Oracle problems as communication tasks and optimization of quantum algorithms

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2409.15549
• Title: Oracle problems as communication tasks and optimization of quantum algorithms
• Authors: Amit Te'eni, Zohar Schwartzman-Nowik, Marcin Nowakowski, Paweł Horodecki, Eliahu Cohen
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: September 2024 (arXiv preprint, last updated October 15, 2025)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15549

Abstract

This paper investigates quantum query complexity problems, with particular focus on algorithm performance under a fixed number of queries. The authors propose using mutual information between output and ground truth to measure algorithm performance, and discover that optimizing mutual information for a single query task is analogous to the fundamental task in quantum communication of maximizing mutual information between sender and receiver. By decomposing algorithms into communication protocols between two agents (Alice and Bob), the authors establish a precise analogy between oracle problems and quantum communication tasks. Within this framework, the oracle's target property plays the role of a message that Alice encodes into a quantum state and sends to Bob, who performs optimal measurements to minimize quantum correlations between the two subsystems.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

Quantum query complexity studies the number of queries required to learn certain properties of a black box. The core question addressed in this paper is: given a fixed number of queries, how well can an algorithm succeed in a learning task?

Research Significance

1. Theoretical Importance: Many important quantum algorithms solve oracle problems, including early examples demonstrating quantum advantage (such as Deutsch-Jozsa, Bernstein-Vazirani, and Simon algorithms)
2. Technical Advantages: Query complexity is easier to study than time complexity, and lower bounds on query complexity can sometimes be proven
3. Practical Applications: Results on query complexity may provide insights for understanding time complexity

Limitations of Existing Approaches

Traditional query complexity research primarily focuses on the number of queries required, with less attention to optimizing algorithm performance under a fixed number of queries.

Research Motivation

The authors aim to bridge quantum computation and quantum communication through an information-theoretic perspective to understand the optimization principles of quantum algorithms, particularly the role of quantum information resources such as quantum discord and quantum coherence in computation.

Core Contributions

1. Establishing an analogy between oracle problems and quantum communication: Proposing a framework that decomposes single-query quantum algorithms into Alice-Bob communication protocols
2. Proposing mutual information-based performance metrics: Using mutual information between output and ground truth as an algorithm performance indicator
3. Deriving characterization theorems for optimal algorithms: Providing theorems describing optimal non-adaptive algorithms for arbitrary oracle classification problems
4. Discovering connections between quantum discord and algorithm optimization: Proving that Bob's optimal measurement basis minimizes quantum correlations
5. Establishing bounds on mutual information: Upper bounds relate to Holevo information, lower bounds relate to quantum coherence
6. Extending to multi-query algorithms: Results extend to non-adaptive algorithms with multiple queries

Methodology Details

Task Definition

An oracle classification problem consists of:

• A set of allowed oracle identities $F$
• A partition: $F = \bigsqcup_{j \in J} A_j$ (disjoint union)
• Query protocol: A set of unitary gates $\{U_f | f \in F\}$
• Probability distribution: $p_f := \Pr(F = f)$

The goal is to use a single oracle query to find the category of an unknown oracle with maximum probability.

Model Architecture

Single-query quantum algorithm structure:

1. Initialization: $n$-qubit state $|\psi_0\rangle$
2. Apply unitary gate $V$
3. Execute single oracle query $U_f \otimes I$
4. Apply additional unitary gate $W$
5. Measure in computational basis, obtaining bit string $y$
6. Output $\hat{j} = g(y)$ based on $y$

Communication protocol analogy:

• Alice: Executes steps 1-3, prepares state and sends to Bob
• Bob: Executes steps 4-5, selects optimal measurement basis to extract information

Technical Innovations

1. Oracle as Independent Subsystem

Construct Hilbert space $H = H_J \otimes H_F \otimes H_Y$, where:

• $H_J$: Oracle category space, dimension $|J|$
• $H_F$: Oracle identity space, dimension $|F|$
• $H_Y$: Quantum computer space, dimension $2^n$

Define classical-classical-classical state: $\rho^0_{JFY} := \sum_{j \in J} \sum_{f \in A_j} p_f |j\rangle\langle j| \otimes |f\rangle\langle f| \otimes |\psi_0\rangle\langle\psi_0|$

2. Quantum Discord and Algorithm Optimization Connection

Non-optimized quantum discord defined as: $D_Y(\rho_{JY}; Z^{\otimes n}) = S(\rho_Y) - S(\rho_{JY}) + S(\rho_J|Z^{\otimes n})$

Key finding: $D_Y(\rho_{JY}; Z^{\otimes n}) = \chi - I(J;Y)$

where $\chi$ is Holevo information and $I(J;Y)$ is mutual information.

3. Optimal Algorithm Characterization Theorem

Theorem: For any oracle problem and fixed $n \geq m$, a single-query quantum algorithm achieves maximum $I(J;Y)$ if and only if:

1. Pre-query unitary condition: $V$ satisfies $I_{\max}(V|\psi_0\rangle) = \max_{|\psi_1\rangle} I_{\max}(|\psi_1\rangle)$
2. Post-query unitary condition: $W$ such that $W^\dagger$ maps the computational basis to the measurement basis with minimum discord

where $I_{\max}(|\psi_1\rangle) = \chi(\{p_j, \sigma^2_j\}_{j \in J}) - D_Y(\rho^2_{JY})$

Experimental Setup

Algorithm Instance Analysis

The authors verify the theoretical framework by analyzing several famous quantum algorithms:

1. Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm: $k \leq 4$
2. Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm: arbitrary $n$
3. Shor-Kitaev algorithm (hidden subgroup problem)
4. Simon algorithm
5. Phase estimation algorithm

Evaluation Metrics

• Mutual information $I(J;Y)$: Primary performance indicator
• Shannon entropy $H(Y)$: Entropy of measurement results
• von Neumann entropy $S(\rho_Y)$: Entropy of quantum state
• Quantum coherence $C(\rho_Y) = H(Y) - S(\rho_Y)$
• Quantum discord $D_Y(\rho_{JY}; Z^{\otimes n})$
• Holevo information $\chi$

Implementation Details

• MATLAB used for numerical simulations
• Complete enumeration for small-scale problems
• Combined analytical and numerical methods for computing information-theoretic quantities

Experimental Results

Deutsch-Jozsa Algorithm Results

Key Findings:

• Discord $D_Y = 0$, indicating algorithm achieves optimality
• $I(J;Y) = 1 = H(J)$, perfect classification
• Coherence completely disappears in final step

Bernstein-Vazirani Algorithm Results

Simon Algorithm Results

For single query, mutual information is approximately 1 bit; multiple queries are needed for complete problem solution.

Phase Estimation Algorithm Results

As the number of auxiliary qubits $t$ increases, mutual information gradually approaches target precision $n$.

Related Work

Quantum Query Complexity

• Classical works on Deutsch-Jozsa, Bernstein-Vazirani, Simon algorithms
• Query complexity lower bound research
• Quantum query complexity of partial Boolean functions

Quantum Computational Resources

• Role of quantum entanglement, quantum coherence, and quantum discord in computation
• Mixed-state quantum computation research
• Origins of quantum advantage

Connections Between Quantum Communication and Computation

• Pioneering work by Buhrman, Cleve, Wigderson
• Query-communication complexity conversions
• Quantum non-locality as communication resource

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Establishing precise correspondence between oracle problems and quantum communication: Single-query algorithms are equivalent to specific quantum communication tasks
2. Discord minimization equivalent to algorithm optimization: Optimal post-query unitary corresponds to minimum discord measurement basis
3. Physical meaning of information-theoretic quantities: Natural appearance of Holevo information, mutual information, and quantum coherence in algorithm analysis
4. Scalability: Results apply to non-adaptive multi-query algorithms

Limitations

1. Applicable only to non-adaptive algorithms: Cannot directly apply to adaptive quantum algorithms
2. Practical optimization difficulty: Finding optimal pre-query states remains difficult in general cases
3. Mutual information vs. success probability: Optimization based on mutual information is not equivalent to success probability optimization

Future Directions

1. Extension to adaptive algorithms: Seeking more general frameworks
2. Practical algorithm design: Applying theoretical results to concrete algorithm optimization
3. Other quantum computation models: Similar analysis for adiabatic, one-way, or topological quantum computation

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong theoretical innovation: Establishes novel connections between quantum computation and quantum communication
2. Mathematical rigor: Provides complete mathematical framework with rigorous proofs
3. Sufficient instance verification: Validates theoretical predictions through multiple classical algorithms
4. Deep physical insights: Reveals fundamental role of quantum information resources in computation

Weaknesses

1. Limited practical applicability: While theoretically elegant, provides limited guidance for practical algorithm design
2. Computational complexity: The optimization problem itself may be computationally complex
3. Restricted scope: Limited to non-adaptive algorithms, restricting application range

Impact

1. Theoretical contribution: Provides new information-theoretic perspective for quantum algorithm analysis
2. Cross-disciplinary value: Connects quantum computation, quantum information, and communication complexity
3. Subsequent research: Follow-up work has applied results to Hamiltonian learning algorithm optimization

Applicable Scenarios

1. Algorithm analysis: Provides information-theoretic analysis tools for existing quantum algorithms
2. Algorithm design: Guides design of new non-adaptive quantum algorithms
3. Theoretical research: Provides new theoretical framework for understanding quantum advantage
4. Practical applications: Optimization of hybrid quantum-classical algorithms such as quantum likelihood estimation

References

This paper cites 67 important references, covering:

• Classical works on quantum query complexity (Deutsch-Jozsa, Bernstein-Vazirani, Simon, etc.)
• Quantum information theory (Holevo theorem, quantum discord, quantum coherence)
• Quantum computational resource theory
• Quantum communication complexity
• Hidden subgroup problem and related algorithms

Overall Assessment: This is a theoretically profound quantum computation paper that provides a new perspective for understanding the information-theoretic structure of quantum algorithms by establishing an analogy between oracle problems and quantum communication. While practical applicability is limited, it possesses significant theoretical value and provides a solid foundation for subsequent research.