In this paper, we calculate the periods of Deligne-Lusztig characters $R_{T,Ï}^G$ associated to $X^F$, where $X=G/H$ for a connected spherical subgroup $H$ of $G$. As an application, we deduce a formula that partially generalizes Lusztig's work on symmetric spaces and extends Reeder's formula in the complexity $0$ case.
- Paper ID: 2409.16853
- Title: Periods of Deligne-Lusztig Characters associated to Spherical Varieties
- Author: Fang Shi
- Classification: math.RT (Representation Theory)
- Publication Date: September 2024
- Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16853
This paper computes the periods of Deligne-Lusztig characters associated to spherical varieties. Specifically, for a connected spherical subgroup H ⊂ G, the paper studies the periods ⟨RT,χG,1HF⟩HF of Deligne-Lusztig characters RT,χG on XF=(G/H)F. As an application, a formula is derived that partially generalizes Lusztig's work on symmetric spaces and extends Reeder's formula for the complexity zero case.
- Research Problem: This paper addresses the computation of periods of Deligne-Lusztig characters on spherical varieties, a fundamental problem in the representation theory of algebraic groups.
- Significance:
- Deligne-Lusztig characters are central objects in the representation theory of finite groups; computing their periods is crucial for understanding the representation structure of finite groups
- Spherical varieties are important objects in algebraic geometry with deep connections to many branches of mathematics
- Such computations have important applications in number theory, the theory of automorphic forms, and related fields
- Limitations of Existing Work:
- Lusztig's work primarily focuses on the symmetric space case
- Reeder's formula applies only to the complexity zero case
- A unified approach for handling general spherical subgroups is lacking
- Research Motivation: To seek a finite field analogue of the work of Wang-Zhang and establish more general period computation formulas.
- Main Theorem: Under Assumption ☆, an explicit formula for period computation is established (Theorem 4.33):
⟨RT,χG,1HF⟩HF=∑ω∈ΩTF(−1)σω+σ(T)tω,χ
- Unified Framework: Incorporates Lusztig's symmetric space results and Reeder's complexity zero results into a unified framework
- Technical Innovations:
- Introduces the concept of geometric-type functions to handle infinite series
- Establishes bijections between multiple index sets
- Develops new techniques for handling spherical varieties
- Broad Applicability: Proves that Assumption ☆ holds in many important cases, including parabolic subgroups, symmetric spaces, and complexity zero subgroups
Compute the period ⟨RT,χG,1HF⟩HF=∣HF∣1∑h∈HFRT,χG(h), where:
- G is a connected reductive group
- H is a connected spherical subgroup of G
- T is an F-stable maximal torus
- χ:TF→Qˉℓ∗ is a character
Introduces the concept of geometric-type functions:
M(ν)=∑j=1lbjβjν∑i=1kaiαiν
Key Lemma 3.2: If a geometric-type function M is integer-valued and has a finite limit, then M is constant.
Establishes bijections between three sets:
- ΦT: the set of quadruples (j,ι,C,X)
- ΓT,BT: the set of irreducible locally closed subschemes
- ΩT: the set of pairs (c,X)
Connections are established via mappings VT,BT:ΦT→ΓT,BT and MT:ΦT→ΩT.
Assumption ☆: For any Borel subgroup B, the set B(k)∩H(k) has an open dense subset consisting of semisimple elements in the Zariski topology.
This condition ensures:
- Only the nilpotent orbit of the identity element contributes to the formula
- The limit coefficients of Green functions are ±1
- Express the period as a geometric-type function P(ν,T,χ)
- Use Lemma 3.2 to prove the function is constant
- Determine the main contributing terms through dimension estimates
- Simplify the multiple indices under Assumption ☆
- Establish the final explicit formula
The paper verifies the correctness of the theory through the following concrete examples:
- Parabolic Subgroup Case (Section 5.2)
- Symmetric Spaces (Section 5.4)
- Unitary Group Pair (U4×U2,U2×U2) (Section 5.3)
- Complexity Zero Case for Reductive Subgroups (Section 5.5)
- Direct computation of periods in specific cases
- Comparison with known results (formulas of Lusztig and Reeder)
- Verification of Assumption ☆ in various cases
Theorem 5.20: For a symmetric space H=Gθ (where θ is an involution):
⟨RT,χG,1HF⟩HF=∑O∑c∈COF(−1)σO,c+σ(T)tO,c,χ
where the sum ranges over F-stable T-orbits in VT.
This is in complete agreement with Lusztig's Theorem 3.3.
Proposition 5.2: When H is a parabolic subgroup:
⟨RT,χG,1HF⟩HF={0∣(XT)F∣if χ is nontrivialif χ is trivial
Specific period computation results are provided for (U4×U2,U2×U2) (Corollaries 5.5 and 5.6).
- Successfully incorporates known results into a unified framework
- Provides explicit computation formulas in new cases
- Demonstrates the broad applicability of the method
- Deligne-Lusztig Theory: Establishes parametrization of irreducible representations of finite reductive groups
- Lusztig's Work on Symmetric Spaces: Addresses the case of fixed point subgroups
- Reeder's Work on Reductive Subgroups: Studies embeddings of complexity zero
- Wang-Zhang's Periods in Automorphic Forms: This paper seeks its finite field analogue
- First systematic treatment of the period problem for general spherical subgroups
- Develops new technical tools (geometric-type functions, essential multiplicative-type condition)
- Establishes unified connections between different cases
- Under Assumption ☆, an explicit formula for periods of Deligne-Lusztig characters on spherical varieties is established
- Unifies various previously known special cases
- Proves that Assumption ☆ holds in a broad range of important cases
- Necessity of Assumption ☆: Although it holds in many important cases, it remains a restrictive condition
- Computational Complexity: The geometric objects involved in actual computations may be quite complex
- Generality: Some technical details depend on specific geometric properties
- Seek methods to remove or weaken Assumption ☆
- Develop more efficient computational techniques
- Explore connections with other branches of mathematics
- Investigate applications in number theory
- Theoretical Depth: Combines deep techniques from algebraic geometry, representation theory, and number theory
- Unification: Successfully incorporates multiple known results into a unified framework
- Technical Innovation: The introduced geometric-type function method has general value
- Completeness: Both theoretical establishment and concrete verification are thorough
- Restrictive Assumptions: Although Assumption ☆ holds in important cases, it limits the generality of the results
- Computational Complexity: Actual applications may involve difficult computations
- Relatively Few Examples: More concrete computational examples could be included
- Theoretical Contribution: Establishes foundations for period theory on spherical varieties
- Methodological Value: The developed techniques may apply to other problems
- Bridging Role: Establishes new connections between different mathematical fields
- Representation theory research on finite reductive groups
- Arithmetic geometry research on spherical varieties
- Period problems in the theory of automorphic forms
- Related computational problems in number theory
The paper cites important literature in the field, including:
- Original work of Deligne-Lusztig DL
- Lusztig's theory on symmetric spaces Lu1, Lu2
- Reeder's work on reductive subgroups R
- Wang-Zhang's period theory WZ
This paper demonstrates considerable technical depth and innovation, successfully generalizing existing theory and establishing a new unified framework. Although it involves some restrictive assumptions, these are verified in important concrete cases, providing a solid foundation for further development in this field.