On the Effects of Elementary and Bound State Fields on Vacuum Stability in $t\bar{t}$ Production at the LHC

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2410.04672
• Title: On the Effects of Elementary and Bound State Fields on Vacuum Stability in $t\bar{t}$ Production at the LHC
• Author: Yoshiki Matsuoka (The Open University of Japan)
• Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology)
• Publication Date: November 13, 2025 (arXiv v6)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04672

Abstract

This paper investigates the excess events in top quark pair $(t\bar{t})$ production recently reported by the CMS collaboration from the perspective of improved vacuum stability, examining two simple scenarios: one involving the existence of toponium ($\eta_t$), and another introducing additional elementary fields ($\Psi$). In both cases, coupling constants are constrained by the Multicritical Point Principle (MPP). The first scenario is based on the Bardeen-Hill-Lindner (BHL) framework for treating toponium effects, while the second scenario embeds $\Psi$ as an inert-like doublet model within the Standard Model. The study finds that toponium cannot satisfy the MPP conditions, whereas the additional elementary field can.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Issues

1. Experimental Observation: The CMS collaboration observed excess events in the $t\bar{t}$ invariant mass distribution near the 345 GeV threshold in proton-proton collision data at center-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$
2. Vacuum Stability Problem: In the Standard Model (SM), the Higgs quartic coupling $\lambda(\mu)$ becomes negative at high energy scales (approximately -0.025 at one-loop, -0.015 at three-loop), threatening vacuum stability

Research Significance

• Theoretical Importance: The CMS observation may point to new physics beyond the Standard Model, requiring theoretical explanation
• Vacuum Stability: Relates to fundamental questions about cosmic evolution—whether the electroweak vacuum is sufficiently long-lived to explain the current age of the universe
• Predictive Power: The Multicritical Point Principle (MPP) has successfully predicted the top quark and Higgs masses and can serve as a powerful tool for constraining new physics

Limitations of Existing Approaches

• Toponium Explanation: As a $t\bar{t}$ bound state ($J^{PC}=0^{-+}$) can explain excess events, but its effects on vacuum stability have not been systematically studied
• Elementary Particle Explanation: Introducing additional scalar/pseudoscalar fields can explain observations, but the parameter space needs to be determined
• Non-perturbative Effects: The composite nature of bound states is difficult to handle with standard field theory methods

Motivation for This Work

To systematically study the effects of both scenarios on vacuum stability through MPP constraints, determining which explanation is theoretically more self-consistent.

Core Contributions

1. First Systematic Study: Combines the CMS $t\bar{t}$ excess events with the vacuum stability problem, providing quantitative analysis through MPP
2. BHL Framework Application: Applies the Bardeen-Hill-Lindner method to toponium, handling composite particle effects through the wave function renormalization condition $Z_2(\Lambda)=0$
3. Exclusion of Toponium Scenario: Demonstrates that introducing toponium alone worsens vacuum stability (minimum value of $\lambda(\mu)$ approximately -0.04), failing to satisfy MPP
4. Determination of Viable Parameter Space: For the additional elementary field scenario, provides specific parameter constraints satisfying MPP: $\kappa_2(M_t) \geq 0.244$, $\mu_c \leq 10^{13.5}$ GeV
5. Theoretical Insight: Proposes that toponium requires combination with other new physics to maintain vacuum stability

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Inputs:

• CMS experimental constraints: $|y_\Psi(M_t)| \geq 0.4$ (Yukawa coupling lower bound)
• Standard Model parameters: top quark mass $M_t = 172.69 \pm 0.30$ GeV, strong coupling constant $\alpha_s(M_Z) = 0.1179 \pm 0.0010$

Outputs:

• Determination of whether each scenario satisfies MPP conditions
• Identification of parameter space satisfying MPP

Constraints:

• One-loop effective potential at MPP scale $\mu_c$ satisfies: $V_{\text{eff}}(\mu_c) \simeq 0$, $\frac{dV_{\text{eff}}}{d\mu}|_{\mu_c} \simeq 0$
• Electroweak scale renormalization conditions

Multicritical Point Principle (MPP)

MPP requires the effective potential to have the same minimum value at two different scales: $V_{\text{eff}}(h=v_{EW}, \mu_{EW}) = V_{\text{eff}}(h=v_c, \mu_c) \simeq 0$$\frac{dV_{\text{eff}}(h=v_{EW}, \mu_{EW})}{d\mu} = \frac{dV_{\text{eff}}(h=v_c, \mu_c)}{d\mu} \simeq 0$

where $v_{EW}=246$ GeV and $\mu_c \gg \mu_{EW}$ is the high-energy MPP scale.

Physical Meaning: The effective potential exhibits multiple criticality at different scales, reflecting fine-tuning of high-energy dynamics.

Renormalization Conditions: $\frac{dV_{\text{eff}}}{dh}\bigg|_{h=v_{EW}} = 0, \quad \frac{d^2V_{\text{eff}}}{dh^2}\bigg|_{h=v_{EW}} = M_h^2, \quad \frac{d^4V_{\text{eff}}}{dh^4}\bigg|_{h=M_t} = 6\lambda(M_t)$

Scenario One: Toponium Model

BHL Framework

Key aspects for handling composite particle $\eta_t$:

• Treat bound state as effective degree of freedom
• Boundary conditions: $Z_2(\Lambda)=0$ ($\Lambda$ is the cutoff scale), $y_{\eta_t}(\Lambda)=\sqrt{4\pi}$ (strong coupling), $\kappa_1(\Lambda)=\lambda_{\eta_t}(\Lambda)=0$
• Cutoff scale selection: $\Lambda = 370-400$ GeV (tens of GeV above the toponium mass of 345 GeV)

Lagrangian

Yukawa interaction: $-\mathcal{L}_{\text{Yukawa}} = y_{\eta_t}\bar{Q}_{3L}\tilde{\eta}_t t_R + \text{h.c.}$

Scalar potential: $V(H, \eta_t) = M_{\eta_t}^2(\eta_t^\dagger\eta_t) + \lambda_{\eta_t}(\eta_t^\dagger\eta_t)^2 + \kappa_1(H^\dagger H)(\eta_t^\dagger\eta_t)$

One-loop Effective Potential

In Landau gauge and $\overline{MS}$ scheme: $V_{\text{eff}}(h(\mu), \mu) = \frac{\lambda(\mu)}{4}h^4(\mu) + \sum_i \frac{n_i}{64\pi^2}M_i^4(h)\left[\ln\frac{M_i^2(h)}{\mu^2} - c_i\right]$

Including contributions from:

• Higgs self-coupling (two terms)
• Gauge bosons $W^\pm, Z$
• Top quark (negative contribution)
• New coupling $\kappa_1$

Renormalization Group Equations (RGE)

Key equations (Appendix A): $\frac{dy_{\eta_t}}{dt} = \frac{y_{\eta_t}}{16\pi^2}\left(\frac{9}{2}y_{\eta_t}^2 + \frac{3}{2}y_t^2 - \frac{17}{12}g_Y^2 - \frac{9}{4}g_2^2 - 8g_3^2\right)$

$\frac{d\lambda}{dt} = \frac{1}{16\pi^2}\left[\lambda(24\lambda - 3g_Y^2 - 9g_2^2 + 12y_t^2) + 2\kappa_1^2 + \cdots - 6y_t^4\right]$

where $t=\ln\mu$ and $\delta=1$ (when $345 \text{ GeV} \leq \mu \leq \Lambda$).

Scenario Two: Additional Elementary Field Model

Model Structure

Similar to inert Higgs doublet model, but with restrictions:

• Higgs coupling form: $(H^\dagger H)(\Psi^\dagger\Psi)$
• Only Yukawa coupling to top quark

Yukawa interaction: $-\mathcal{L}_{\text{Yukawa}} = y_\Psi\bar{Q}_{3L}\tilde{\Psi}t_R + \text{h.c.}$

Scalar potential: $V(\Psi, H) = M_\Psi^2(\Psi^\dagger\Psi) + \lambda_\Psi(\Psi^\dagger\Psi)^2 + \kappa_2(H^\dagger H)(\Psi^\dagger\Psi)$

Vacuum Stability Conditions

Maintain zero vacuum expectation value for $\Psi$: $\lambda_\Psi(\mu) \geq 0, \quad \kappa_2(\mu) > -2\sqrt{\lambda(\mu)\lambda_\Psi(\mu)}$

Parameter Constraints

Based on CMS results: $|y_\Psi(M_t)| \geq 0.4$

Assuming $\lambda(M_t) \sim \lambda_\Psi(M_t)$, solve numerically through one-loop RGE (Appendix B).

Technical Innovations

1. BHL Framework Application: First application of composite particle handling method to toponium vacuum stability analysis, bridging non-perturbative bound states with perturbative RGE through $Z_2(\Lambda)=0$ boundary condition
2. MPP as Selection Criterion: Utilize the strong constraining power of MPP to filter physical scenarios, more rigorous than traditional stability analysis
3. Systematic Comparative Analysis: Compare bound state and elementary field interpretations within the same theoretical framework (MPP), making conclusions more convincing
4. Numerical Methods:
   • Toponium: evolve $\eta_t$-related terms only in $345 \text{ GeV} \leq \mu \leq \Lambda$
   • Simplify to $h=\mu$ (wave function renormalization effects negligible)
   • Systematically scan cutoff scale $\Lambda = 370-400$ GeV

Experimental Setup

Input Parameters

• Top Quark Mass: $M_t = 172.69 \pm 0.30$ GeV
• Strong Coupling Constant: $\alpha_s(M_Z) = 0.1179 \pm 0.0010$
• Higgs Mass: $M_h$ (PDG value)
• CMS Constraint: $|y_\Psi(M_t)| \geq 0.4$ (2$\sigma$ lower bound)

Numerical Methods

1. RGE Evolution: Evolve from electroweak scale $\mu_{EW}$ upward to high energy scale $\mu_c$
2. Boundary Conditions:
   • Toponium: $y_{\eta_t}(\Lambda)=\sqrt{4\pi}$, $\kappa_1(\Lambda)=\lambda_{\eta_t}(\Lambda)=0$
   • Additional elementary field: scan $\kappa_2(M_t)$ and $y_\Psi(M_t)$
3. MPP Verification: For each parameter set, check $V_{\text{eff}}(\mu_c) \simeq 0$ and $\frac{dV_{\text{eff}}}{d\mu}|_{\mu_c} \simeq 0$

Cutoff Scale Selection

• Physical Basis: Toponium threshold approximately 345 GeV, effects extend tens of GeV
• Range: $\Lambda = 370-400$ GeV
• Sensitivity Check: Results insensitive to $\Lambda$ variation

Experimental Results

Scenario One: Toponium

Main Findings

Worsened Vacuum Stability:

• Higgs quartic coupling $\lambda(\mu)$ minimum value approximately -0.04 (Figure 1)
• More negative than Standard Model: SM one-loop approximately -0.025, three-loop approximately -0.015
• Cannot satisfy MPP conditions: At all tested $\Lambda$ values, effective potential cannot vanish at high energy scale

Physical Interpretation

1. Yukawa Coupling Effect: Initial strong coupling of $y_{\eta_t}$ causes rapid decrease of $\lambda$
2. Insufficient $\kappa_1$ Contribution: Although $\kappa_1^2$ term provides positive contribution to $d\lambda/dt$, cannot offset negative effect of $y_{\eta_t}$
3. Cosmological Problem: More negative $\lambda$ means increased probability of electroweak vacuum tunneling to true vacuum, inconsistent with cosmic lifetime

Numerical Results (Figure 1)

• Horizontal axis: $\log_{10}(\mu/\text{GeV})$
• Vertical axis: $4V_{\text{eff}}/\mu^4$
• Parameters: $M_t=172.69$ GeV, $\alpha_s(M_Z)=0.1189$, $\Lambda=400$ GeV
• Blue line shows effective potential reaching minimum value approximately -0.04 around $\mu \sim 10^{10}$ GeV, far from zero

Scenario Two: Additional Elementary Field

Main Findings

Satisfies MPP Conditions:

• Parameter constraint: $\kappa_2(M_t) \geq 0.244$
• MPP scale: $\mu_c \leq 10^{13.5}$ GeV
• Vacuum stability: $\lambda(\mu)$ remains positive or near zero at all scales

Parameter Space

Based on $|y_\Psi(M_t)| \geq 0.4$ (CMS 2$\sigma$ lower bound):

• Critical Coupling: When $\kappa_2(M_t) = 0.244$, effective potential satisfies MPP at $\mu_c = 10^{13.5}$ GeV
• Stronger Coupling: When $\kappa_2(M_t) > 0.244$, MPP scale decreases
• Self-Consistency: Satisfies $\kappa_2 > -2\sqrt{\lambda\lambda_\Psi}$, $\Psi$ vacuum expectation value is zero

Numerical Results (Figure 2)

• Parameters: $M_t=172.69$ GeV, $\alpha_s(M_Z)=0.1189$, $y_\Psi(M_t)=0.4$, $\kappa_2(M_t)=0.244$
• Blue line intersects red line (zero line) at $\mu_c \simeq 10^{13.5}$ GeV
• Effective potential behavior: initially decreases then rises back to zero, satisfying MPP double-criticality condition

Physical Mechanism

1. Positive $\kappa_2$ Contribution: Stabilizes $\lambda$ through $2\kappa_2^2$ term
2. Yukawa Balance: Cross term $-6y_t^2y_\Psi^2$ between $y_\Psi$ and $y_t$ provides moderate negative contribution
3. High-Energy Behavior: Near $\mu_c$, quantum corrections precisely cancel tree-level potential, achieving multi-criticality

Comparative Analysis

Sensitivity Analysis

• Top Quark Mass: Variation within error range does not change conclusions
• Strong Coupling Constant: $\alpha_s$ variation has limited impact on high-energy behavior
• Cutoff Scale (toponium): Results robust under $\Lambda$ variation in 370-400 GeV range

Related Work

Vacuum Stability Research

1. Degrassi et al. (2012): NNLO calculations show SM vacuum becomes metastable at $\mu \sim 10^{11}$ GeV
2. Buttazzo et al. (2013): Systematic study of relationship between Higgs mass and vacuum stability
3. Isidori et al. (2001), Andreassen et al. (2018): Quantum tunneling calculations show SM vacuum lifetime exceeds cosmic age, but near boundary

MPP Applications

1. Froggatt & Nielsen (1996, 2001): Proposed MPP and predicted $M_t \sim 173$ GeV, $M_h \sim 135$ GeV
2. Kawana (2015), Haba et al. (2017): MPP applications in dark matter, neutrino mass extensions
3. Hamada et al. (2021): Unified framework of MPP and inflation
4. Cho et al. (2023), Matsuoka (2024): Complex singlet extensions, dark fermion mass predictions

Toponium

1. Fuks et al. (2021): Analysis of toponium formation signals in LHC Run 2 data
2. Sumino & Yokoya (2010): Effects of top quark bound states on kinematic distributions
3. Bardeen, Hill, Lindner (1990): Composite particle handling in dynamical symmetry breaking

Inert Doublet Model

1. Wang et al. (2022): Review of double Higgs doublet models
2. Arcadi et al. (2025): Current status of WIMP dark matter in 2HDM
3. Misiak & Steinhauser (2017), Arbey et al. (2018): Charged Higgs constraints

Relationship to Related Work

• Innovation: First application of MPP to theoretical explanation of CMS $t\bar{t}$ excess events
• Distinction: Systematic comparison of bound state and elementary field, explicitly excluding former
• Advantage: Provides quantitative parameter constraints, not merely qualitative discussion

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Toponium Scenario Not Viable:
   • Under BHL framework, introducing toponium worsens vacuum stability
   • $\lambda(\mu)$ minimum value reaches -0.04, far below SM's -0.015
   • Cannot satisfy MPP conditions, contradicting cosmological observations
2. Additional Elementary Field Scenario Viable:
   • Inert-like doublet model can satisfy MPP
   • Parameter space: $\kappa_2(M_t) \geq 0.244$, $\mu_c \leq 10^{13.5}$ GeV
   • Vacuum stability improved
3. Theoretical Insights:
   • Toponium requires combination with other new physics to maintain vacuum stability
   • MPP is powerful tool for screening new physics scenarios
   • CMS observation favors elementary particle interpretation

Limitations

1. One-Loop Approximation:
   • Only considers one-loop effective potential and RGE
   • Higher-loop corrections may change quantitative results (but qualitative conclusions expected robust)
   • SM three-loop calculation shows $\lambda$ minimum rises from -0.025 to -0.015, similar effects may exist
2. BHL Framework Assumptions:
   • Validity of treating bound state as effective field depends on $\Lambda$ choice
   • $y_{\eta_t}(\Lambda)=\sqrt{4\pi}$ is approximation (true value may be larger)
   • Wave function renormalization $Z_2$ evolution not fully tracked
3. Model Simplifications:
   • Additional elementary field model only considers top quark Yukawa coupling
   • Neglecting couplings to other fermions may underestimate effects
   • Does not consider $\Psi$ as dark matter candidate
4. Experimental Uncertainties:
   • Statistical significance of CMS excess events requires further confirmation
   • $y_\Psi \geq 0.4$ constraint from pseudoscalar-dominated assumption
   • Scalar-pseudoscalar mixing case not fully explored
5. Parameter Space Exploration:
   • Only provides boundary satisfying MPP, not systematic full parameter space scan
   • Relationship between $\lambda_\Psi$ and $\lambda$ assumed as $\sim$, lacking precise analysis

Future Directions

1. Higher-Order Corrections:
   • Calculate two-loop, three-loop effective potential and RGE
   • Assess impact of higher-order corrections on MPP scale
   • Improve precision of top quark mass and strong coupling constant
2. More Complete Models:
   • Repeat analysis within Two-Higgs-Doublet Model (2HDM) framework
   • Consider scalar-pseudoscalar mixing
   • Include Yukawa couplings of more fermion generations
3. Toponium + New Physics:
   • Explore scenarios with coexisting toponium and additional fields
   • Find minimal models simultaneously explaining CMS observation and maintaining vacuum stability
4. Experimental Verification:
   • Await CMS/ATLAS confirmation with more data
   • Search for other signals of additional fields (single production, decay channels)
   • Precisely measure differential cross-section near $t\bar{t}$ threshold
5. Cosmological Connections:
   • Study relationship between MPP scale and inflation scale
   • Explore additional field as dark matter candidate
   • Analyze first-order nature of electroweak phase transition
6. Non-Perturbative Methods:
   • Go beyond BHL framework using lattice QCD or Dyson-Schwinger equations
   • More precisely calculate bound state effects
   • Evaluate complete contribution of four-fermion interactions

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Problem Relevance:
   • Timely response to latest CMS experimental results
   • Connects phenomenological observations with fundamental theoretical problem (vacuum stability)
   • Choice of MPP as criterion has theoretical depth
2. Methodological Innovation:
   • Novel attempt applying BHL framework to toponium
   • Handling composite particles through $Z_2(\Lambda)=0$ boundary condition is technically sound
   • Systematic comparison of two physical pictures with clear logic
3. Clear Conclusions:
   • Provides quantitative evidence that toponium cannot satisfy MPP ($\lambda_{\min} \sim -0.04$)
   • Gives specific parameter constraints for additional elementary field ($\kappa_2 \geq 0.244$)
   • Figures 1 and 2 intuitively show effective potential behavior
4. Theoretical Self-Consistency:
   • Renormalization conditions properly set
   • RGE equations complete (Appendices A, B)
   • Conditions for zero vacuum expectation value clearly stated
5. Clear Writing:
   • Well-structured, progressing logically from background to methods to results
   • Detailed mathematical derivations with complete appendices
   • Sufficient physical interpretation

Weaknesses

1. Limitations of One-Loop Approximation:
   • In SM, higher-order corrections change $\lambda_{\min}$ from -0.025 to -0.015 (40% change)
   • Paper conclusions based on one-loop, quantitative results may have similar magnitude errors
   • Expected impact of higher-order corrections not discussed
2. Uncertainties in BHL Framework:
   • Arbitrariness in choosing $y_{\eta_t}(\Lambda)=\sqrt{4\pi}$
   • Paper claims "low-energy trajectory insensitive to UV values" but provides no numerical verification
   • Physical motivation for $\Lambda = 370-400$ GeV range not sufficiently justified (only qualitative "tens of GeV")
3. Incomplete Parameter Space Exploration:
   • Additional elementary field scenario only provides boundary $\kappa_2 \geq 0.244$
   • No systematic scan of $y_\Psi$-$\kappa_2$ plane
   • Assumption $\lambda_\Psi \sim \lambda$ lacks justification
4. Simplified Experimental Constraints:
   • CMS result applies to pseudoscalar, but model includes both scalar and pseudoscalar
   • $|y_\Psi| \geq 0.4$ from 2$\sigma$ lower bound, limited statistical significance
   • Other LHC constraints not considered (Higgs signal strength, precision electroweak)
5. Insufficient Physical Picture Discussion:
   • Physical mechanism why toponium worsens vacuum stability explained only briefly
   • Microscopic origin of positive $\kappa_2$ contribution not deeply discussed
   • Physical meaning of MPP scale $10^{13.5}$ GeV (near GUT scale) not commented
6. Missing Dark Matter/Cosmology Connections:
   • Additional field $\Psi$ may be dark matter candidate, but not explored
   • Relationship between MPP scale and inflation scale not mentioned
   • Changes to electroweak phase transition properties not considered

Impact

1. Contribution to Field:
   • Theoretical Methods: Demonstrates potential of MPP in screening new physics
   • Phenomenology: Provides theoretical explanation reference for CMS observation
   • Exclusion Effect: Clearly indicates problem with single toponium scenario
2. Practical Value:
   • Experimental Guidance: Recommends focusing on elementary field signals rather than only bound states
   • Parameter Prediction: $\kappa_2 \geq 0.244$ testable in future experiments
   • Model Building: Provides constraints for 2HDM or inert doublet model
3. Limitations:
   • One-loop approximation limits quantitative reliability
   • CMS excess events need confirmation, experimental foundation of conclusions not solid
   • Connection to mainstream vacuum stability research (multi-loop, non-perturbative tunneling) insufficient
4. Reproducibility:
   • Strengths: Complete RGE equations, clear boundary conditions
   • Weaknesses: No code or numerical details provided (integration method, convergence criteria)
   • Data: Uses public PDG data, reproducible

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research:
   • Study relationship between vacuum stability and new physics
   • Explore MPP applications in different models
   • Develop effective field theory methods for composite particles
2. Phenomenological Analysis:
   • Explain LHC $t\bar{t}$ threshold excess events
   • Constrain inert doublet or 2HDM parameter space
   • Design experimental strategies for finding new scalars/pseudoscalars
3. Not Applicable:
   • Situations requiring high precision (one-loop approximation insufficient)
   • Deep study of non-perturbative bound state dynamics (BHL framework too simplified)
   • Dark matter phenomenology (cosmological constraints not considered)

Overall Assessment

This is a timely, innovative but needs improvement theoretical physics work:

Highlights:

• Connects cutting-edge experimental observations with fundamental theoretical problems
• Novel methodology (BHL+MPP)
• Clear conclusions (exclude toponium, support elementary field)

Main Issues:

• Reliability of one-loop approximation
• Uncertainties in BHL framework not fully quantified
• Parameter space exploration not systematic enough

Recommendations:

• Calculate two-loop corrections to verify conclusion robustness
• Systematically scan parameter space, provide complete phase diagram
• Discuss connections with dark matter and cosmology
• Await CMS confirmation with more data

Expected Impact: Moderate. May attract attention in vacuum stability and new physics phenomenology fields, but needs follow-up work to solidify conclusions.

References

Key Citations

1. CMS Experimental Results:
   • 3 CMS Collaboration, "Search for heavy pseudoscalar and scalar bosons decaying to top quark pairs...", CMS PAS HIG-22-013 (2024), arXiv:2507.05119
2. Original MPP Work:
   • 5 Froggatt & Nielsen, "Standard model criticality prediction...", Phys. Lett. B 368, 96 (1996)
   • 6 Froggatt, Nielsen, Takanishi, "...borderline metastability...", Phys. Rev. D 64, 113014 (2001)
3. Vacuum Stability Calculations:
   • 16 Degrassi et al., "Higgs mass and vacuum stability...at NNLO", JHEP 08, 098 (2012), arXiv:1205.6497
   • 17 Buttazzo et al., "Investigating the near-criticality...", JHEP 12, 089 (2013), arXiv:1307.3536
4. BHL Framework:
   • 14 Bardeen, Hill, Lindner, "Minimal dynamical symmetry breaking...", Phys. Rev. D 41, 1647 (1990)
5. Toponium:
   • 4 Fuks et al., "Signatures of toponium formation in LHC run 2 data", Phys. Rev. D 104, 034023 (2021), arXiv:2102.11281

Paper Summary: This paper systematically investigates two theoretical interpretations of CMS $t\bar{t}$ excess events regarding their effects on vacuum stability through MPP, explicitly excluding the single toponium scenario while supporting the additional elementary field interpretation, with specific parameter constraints provided. Despite limitations such as one-loop approximation, this work provides valuable theoretical perspective for understanding the connection between LHC new physics signals and Standard Model vacuum stability.