2025-11-13T04:07:09.837900

Optimal Quantization for Matrix Multiplication

Ordentlich, Polyanskiy
Recent work in machine learning community proposed multiple methods for performing lossy compression (quantization) of large matrices. This quantization is important for accelerating matrix multiplication (main component of large language models), which is often bottlenecked by the speed of loading these matrices from memory. Unlike classical vector quantization and rate-distortion theory, the goal of these new compression algorithms is to be able to approximate not the matrices themselves, but their matrix product. Specifically, given a pair of real matrices $A,B$ an encoder (compressor) is applied to each of them independently producing descriptions with $R$ bits per entry. These representations subsequently are used by the decoder to estimate matrix product $A^\top B$. In this work, we provide a non-asymptotic lower bound on the mean squared error of this approximation (as a function of rate $R$) for the case of matrices $A,B$ with iid Gaussian entries. Algorithmically, we construct a universal quantizer based on nested lattices with an explicit guarantee of approximation error for any (non-random) pair of matrices $A$, $B$ in terms of only Frobenius norms $\|\bar{A}\|_F, \|\bar{B}\|_F$ and $\|\bar{A}^\top \bar{B}\|_F$, where $\bar{A},\bar{B}$ are versions of $A,B$ with zero-centered columns, respectively. For iid Gaussian matrices our quantizer achieves the lower bound and is, thus, asymptotically optimal. A practical low-complexity version of our quantizer achieves performance quite close to optimal. In addition, we derive rate-distortion function for matrix multiplication of iid Gaussian matrices, which exhibits an interesting phase-transition at $R\approx 0.906$ bit/entry, showing necessity of Johnson-Lindestrauss dimensionality reduction (sketching) in the low-rate regime.
academic

Optimal Quantization for Matrix Multiplication

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2410.13780
  • Title: Optimal Quantization for Matrix Multiplication
  • Authors: Or Ordentlich (Hebrew University of Jerusalem), Yury Polyanskiy (MIT)
  • Classification: cs.IT cs.AI cs.CL cs.LG math.IT
  • Publication Date: October 2024 (arXiv preprint)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13780

Abstract

This paper presents an in-depth investigation of quantization for large-scale matrix multiplication. Unlike traditional vector quantization, the objective is not to approximate the matrices themselves, but rather to approximate their matrix product. Given two real matrices A and B, encoders independently compress each matrix using R bits per entry, and a decoder uses these compressed representations to estimate the matrix product A⊤B. The paper provides non-asymptotic lower bounds on the approximate mean squared error for matrices with independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) Gaussian entries, constructs a universal quantizer based on nested lattices, and discovers an interesting phase transition phenomenon at R ≈ 0.906 bits/entry, indicating the necessity of Johnson-Lindenstrauss dimensionality reduction at low bitrates.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

With the rise of deep neural networks and large language models, matrix multiplication has become a computational bottleneck. Modern computing hardware is often limited by memory bandwidth rather than computational capacity. Therefore, lossy compression of matrices to reduce memory transfer becomes an important problem.

Practical Requirements

For large language models, the authors estimate required quantization rates:

  • During the generation phase, CPUs require 1-3 bits/entry quantization rate to fully utilize computational resources
  • During the prefilling phase, for small LLMs running on fast GPUs, approximately 11.7 bits/entry quantization rate is needed

Limitations of Existing Methods

  1. Classical Vector Quantization: Direct independent quantization of matrices A and B followed by multiplication of quantized matrices results in O(n²) error
  2. Sketching Methods: While providing unbiased estimates, variance remains O(n²)
  3. Deterministic Quantizers: Vectors on spheres have Ω(n²) lower bounds

Core Contributions

  1. Theoretical Lower Bounds: Provides non-asymptotic lower bounds for matrix multiplication quantization with i.i.d. Gaussian entries
  2. Universal Quantizer: Constructs a universal quantizer based on nested lattices with explicit error guarantees for arbitrary matrices
  3. Asymptotic Optimality: Proves that the proposed quantizer achieves the lower bound for i.i.d. Gaussian matrices, thus being asymptotically optimal
  4. Phase Transition Phenomenon: Discovers a phase transition at R ≈ 0.906 bits/entry, revealing the necessity of dimensionality reduction at low bitrates
  5. Practical Algorithm: Provides low-complexity implementations with near-optimal performance

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Given matrices A ∈ R^(n×a) and B ∈ R^(n×b), the goal is to design encoders f₁: R^(n×a) → 2^(naR) and f₂: R^(n×b) → 2^(nbR) and a decoder g such that:

E∥A⊤B−g(f1(A),f2(B))∥F2E\|A^⊤B - g(f_1(A), f_2(B))\|_F^2

is minimized, where each matrix entry is described using R bits.

Core Function Γ(R)

The paper defines the critical rate-distortion function:

1 - \left(1 - (2 \cdot 2^{-2R^*} - 2^{-4R^*})\right) \frac{R}{R^*} & R < R^* \\ 2 \cdot 2^{-2R} - 2^{-4R} & R \geq R^* \end{cases}$$ where R* ≈ 0.906 is the solution to the fixed-point equation R = ½log₂(1 + 4R ln 2). ### Nested Lattice Quantization Scheme #### 1. Inner Product Quantization (Basic Building Block) For ρ-correlated vectors U and V on the sphere, nested lattices Λc ⊂ Λf are used: **Encoding Process**: - Add independent dither vectors Z₁, Z₂ to U and V respectively - Quantize to the fine lattice Λf - Output the coset representation in the coarse lattice Λc **Decoding Process**: - Recover the quantized point from the coset - Remove dither - Compute inner product estimate #### 2. Matrix Multiplication Quantization **Preprocessing Steps**: 1. **Zero-Centering**: Compute Ā = A - (1/n)1·1^⊤A, B̄ = B - (1/n)1·1^⊤B 2. **Norm Quantization**: High-precision description of column means and norms 3. **Random Rotation**: Apply the same orthogonal matrix S to Ā and B̄ **Quantization Steps**: - Apply inner product quantizer to each column of rotated matrices - Use time-sharing parameters κ and MMSE scaling parameters α ### Technical Innovations 1. **Dithering Technique**: Makes quantization error independent of input, avoiding O(n²) error of deterministic quantizers 2. **Nested Lattice Structure**: Provides finite-rate performance while maintaining good quantization quality 3. **Time-Sharing**: Achieves optimal performance at low bitrates through dimensionality reduction 4. **Random Rotation**: Converts arbitrary vectors to uniform distribution on sphere, facilitating analysis ## Experimental Setup ### Theoretical Verification Experiments **Data Generation**: - Matrices A, B ∈ R^(n×n) with i.i.d. N(0,1) entries - n = 3 × 2¹¹ **Implementation Details**: - Base lattice: D₃ lattice (3-dimensional) - Nesting ratio: q = 6 - Lookup table size: < 64KB (fits in L1 cache) - Effective bitrate: ≈ 3.015 bits/symbol ### Comparison Methods - 3-bit scalar quantizer (ℓ∞ normalization) - Theoretical lower bound Γ(R) ## Experimental Results ### Main Results **Performance Comparison**: - Proposed method: 1/n³ ∥Â⊤B - A⊤B∥²F ≈ 0.0593 - 3-bit scalar quantization: ≈ 0.1668 (approximately 3× gap) - Theoretical lower bound: Γ(3.015) = 0.0304 **Key Findings**: 1. D₃ lattice-based scheme significantly outperforms scalar quantization 2. Performance approaches theoretical optimum (approximately 2× gap) 3. Performance gap further narrows with increasing n ### Complexity Analysis **Encoding Complexity**: O(n log n) (using fast Hadamard transform) **Decoding Complexity**: O(1) (using lookup table) **Storage Overhead**: Each quantizer requires O(log n) additional bits for scaling factors ## Related Work ### Randomized Linear Algebra - **Monte Carlo Matrix Multiplication (MCMM)**: Approximate by random row sampling - **Locality-Sensitive Hashing (LSH)**: Low-dimensional sketches for cosine similarity - **Limitations**: Relative error grows with ∥A∥²F∥B∥²F/∥A⊤B∥²F ### Neural Network Quantization - **Post-Training Quantization**: OPTQ, GPTQ and other methods - **Rotation Techniques**: QuIP, QuaRot use Hadamard transforms - **Lattice Quantization**: QUIP# uses E₈ lattice for weight quantization ### Information Theory - **Distributed Compression**: Compression for linear function computation - **Codebook Design**: Voronoi codes and nested lattice codes ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. **Optimality**: For i.i.d. Gaussian matrices, the proposed scheme achieves information-theoretic lower bounds 2. **Universality**: Provides explicit performance guarantees for arbitrary matrices 3. **Phase Transition**: R* ≈ 0.906 bits/entry is the critical threshold 4. **Practicality**: Low-complexity implementation achieves near-theoretical performance ### Limitations 1. **Shared Randomness**: Requires encoders and decoders to share random seeds 2. **Matrix Conditions**: Requires bounded matrix entries (M = n^(10^22000)) 3. **High-Dimensional Lattices**: Theoretical optimality requires high-dimensional "good" lattices; practice uses products of low-dimensional lattices 4. **Deterministic Schemes**: Unclear whether optimal deterministic schemes exist without randomness ### Future Directions 1. **Multiple Matrix Products**: Extension to products of k>2 matrices 2. **Alternative Distance Metrics**: Non-MSE metrics such as KL divergence 3. **Deterministic Quantizers**: Exploration of schemes without shared randomness 4. **Deep Network Applications**: Deployment and optimization in practical LLMs ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Theoretical Rigor**: Provides complete information-theoretic analysis including both upper and lower bounds 2. **Practical Value**: Addresses actual bottlenecks in LLM inference 3. **Technical Innovation**: Cleverly combines lattice quantization, random rotation, and time-sharing 4. **Generality**: Does not depend on specific matrix distribution assumptions ### Weaknesses 1. **Complexity**: Theoretical analysis is intricate; practical implementation requires multiple technical components 2. **Constant Factors**: While asymptotically optimal, finite-sample constants may be large 3. **Hardware Adaptation**: Requires optimization for different hardware platforms 4. **Scalability**: Extension from 2 matrices to multiple matrix products is non-trivial ### Impact **Theoretical Contributions**: - Establishes information-theoretic foundations for matrix multiplication quantization - Reveals phase transition phenomena and necessity of dimensionality reduction - Provides important theoretical benchmarks for the field **Practical Applications**: - Provides new theoretical guidance for LLM quantization - Subsequent work NestQuant achieves SOTA performance on practical LLMs - Informs hardware accelerator design ### Applicable Scenarios 1. **Large Language Model Inference**: Joint quantization of weights and activations 2. **Edge Computing**: Matrix operations in memory-constrained environments 3. **Distributed Computing**: Matrix multiplication under communication constraints 4. **Scientific Computing**: Large-scale numerical linear algebra problems ## References The paper cites 44 relevant references spanning information theory, lattice theory, randomized linear algebra, and neural network quantization. Particularly noteworthy works include: - Zamir's lattice coding monograph providing theoretical foundations - Pioneering work by Erez and Zamir on nested lattices - Recent LLM quantization methods such as OPTQ and QuIP - Results from random matrix theory and spherical geometry --- **Overall Assessment**: This is an excellent paper with significant theoretical and practical contributions, providing solid information-theoretic foundations for matrix multiplication quantization and demonstrating near-optimal practical algorithms. This work is of considerable importance for understanding and improving quantization techniques in large-scale machine learning systems.