Reconstruction of the scalar field potential in nonmetricity gravity through Gaussian processes

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2411.00051
• Title: Reconstruction of the scalar field potential in nonmetricity gravity through Gaussian processes
• Authors: Gaurav N. Gadbail, Sanjay Mandal, P.K. Sahoo, Kazuharu Bamba
• Classification: gr-qc astro-ph.CO hep-th
• Publication Date: December 23, 2024 (arXiv v3)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00051

Abstract

The accelerated expansion of the universe has been extensively confirmed, posing significant challenges to the standard ΛCDM model, particularly regarding the cosmological coincidence problem. This has motivated exploration of modified gravity theories, including nonmetricity gravity, which can explain cosmic acceleration without invoking dark energy. This study incorporates a quintessence scalar field into the nonmetricity framework to model both inflation and late-time acceleration. Employing Gaussian processes with a squared exponential kernel, the scalar field potential V(φ) is reconstructed in a model-independent manner from observational Hubble parameter datasets derived from cosmic chronometers (CC) and radial baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO). This approach enables us to obtain suitable quintessence scalar field models consistent with observational Hubble data within the power-law nonmetricity gravity framework.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problem: The discovery of cosmic acceleration poses major challenges to the standard ΛCDM model, particularly the cosmological coincidence problem—why the dark energy density and matter density are comparable at the present epoch.
2. Problem Significance:
   • Cosmic acceleration has been confirmed by multiple independent observations (supernovae, CMB, BAO, etc.)
   • Although the standard ΛCDM model is simple, it faces theoretical difficulties
   • Alternative theoretical frameworks are needed to explain cosmic dynamics
3. Limitations of Existing Approaches:
   • Traditional modified gravity theories typically rely on curvature or torsion
   • Most studies assume specific forms of scalar field potentials
   • Lack of model-independent methods for direct potential reconstruction from observational data
4. Research Motivation:
   • Explore modified gravity theories based on nonmetricity
   • Develop a unified framework combining early inflation and late-time acceleration
   • Develop data-driven potential reconstruction methods

Core Contributions

1. Proposed a Gaussian process reconstruction method for scalar field potentials in nonmetricity gravity, enabling direct mapping from observational data to theoretical models
2. Constructed a unified framework for early and late-time cosmic acceleration, simultaneously addressing inflation and current accelerated expansion within nonmetricity gravity
3. Achieved good agreement with observational data in the power-law nonmetricity gravity model, validating the method's effectiveness
4. Provided new insights into the role of scalar fields in cosmic evolution, revealing that early dark energy has negligible impact on current accelerated expansion

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: 58 observational Hubble parameter data points H(z) with uncertainties, comprising 32 CC data points and 26 BAO data points Output: Reconstructed scalar field potential V(φ) as a function of scalar field φ Constraints: Power-law nonmetricity gravity framework with parameter n ∈ -0.15, 0.15 to ensure physical consistency

Model Architecture

1. Nonmetricity Gravity Theoretical Framework

The action is defined as:

S = ∫{-1/(2κ²)[Q + f(Q)] + Lφ + Lm}√(-g) d⁴x

where:

• Q is the nonmetricity scalar: Q = -Q_σμν P^σμν
• f(Q) is an arbitrary function of Q
• Lφ = -½g^μν∂_μφ∂_νφ - V(φ) is the scalar field Lagrangian

2. FLRW Cosmology

Under flat FLRW metric:

• Nonmetricity scalar: Q = 6H²
• Friedmann equation: 3H² = ρ_m + ρ_f + ρ_φ
• Acceleration equation: 2Ḣ + 3H² = -(p_m + p_f + p_φ)

3. Power-Law Model

Employing power-law nonmetricity model:

f(Q) = α(Q/Q₀)ⁿ

where α = (Ω_m0-1)6H₀²/(2ⁿ-1), and n is a free parameter

4. Gaussian Process Reconstruction

Using squared exponential kernel function:

k(x,x̃) = σ_f² exp(-(x-x̃)²/(2l²))

Reconstruct H(z) and its derivative H'(z), then calculate:

• Kinetic energy: T(z) = -3/2 H₀²Ω_m0(1+z)³ + (1+z)H'H + nH₀(Ω_m0-1)(H/H₀)^(2n-1)
• Potential energy: V(z) = 3H² + 3H₀²(Ω_m0-1)(H/H₀)^(2n) - 3/2 H₀²Ω_m0(1+z)³ - (1+z)H'/HH² + n(Ω_m0-1)H₀²(H/H₀)^(2n)

Technical Innovations

1. Model-Independent Reconstruction: No pre-assumption of potential form; direct reconstruction from observational data
2. Unified Framework: Simultaneously addresses early inflation and late-time acceleration
3. Physical Constraints: Parameter range restrictions prevent ghost fields and imaginary potentials
4. Data-Driven Approach: Combines CC and BAO data to enhance statistical power

Experimental Setup

Dataset

• CC Data: 32 data points measuring H(z) from passive galaxy age differences
• BAO Data: 26 data points based on baryon acoustic oscillation peak positions
• Redshift Range: 0.07 < z < 2.42
• Priors: Ω_m0 = 0.308 ± 0.012 (from Planck 2015)

Evaluation Metrics

• Reconstructed H₀ = 68.71 ± 4.3 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹
• Consistency with WMAP and Planck observations
• 1σ and 3σ confidence intervals

Comparison Methods

Comparison with multiple scalar field potential forms:

• Massive free scalar field potential: V(φ) = V₁φ²
• Massless self-interacting potential: V(φ) = V₂φ⁴
• φ² potential with vacuum energy: V(φ) = V₀ + V₁φ²
• Massive self-interacting potential: V(φ) = V₁φ² + V₂φ⁴

Implementation Details

• Using GAPP (Gaussian Processes in Python) package
• Recursive relation for scalar field calculation: φ(z_{i+1}) = φ(z_i) + (z_{i+1} - z_i)...^(1/2)
• Fourth-order polynomial fitting: V(φ) = V₀ + V₁φ² + V₂φ⁴

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Hubble Constant: H₀ = 68.71 ± 4.3 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹, consistent with Planck 2015 within error margins
2. Parameter Constraints:
   • n ∈ -0.15, 0.15 ensures physical consistency
   • n > 0.15 leads to negative kinetic energy (ghost field)
   • n < -0.15 leads to imaginary potential
3. Polynomial Coefficients (3σ errors):
   • n = 0.15: V₀ = -0.0069 ± 0.0071, V₁ = -1.5533 ± 0.0984, V₂ = 10.2105 ± 0.2545
   • n = 0 (ΛCDM): V₀ = -0.0307 ± 0.0064, V₁ = -0.8494 ± 0.1300, V₂ = 17.8900 ± 0.4820
   • n = -0.15: V₀ = -0.0463 ± 0.0055, V₁ = 1.9601 ± 0.1951, V₂ = 31.1459 ± 1.1872

Key Findings

1. Early vs. Late-Time Effects: At z < 0.15, both kinetic and potential energy of the scalar field approach zero, indicating negligible impact on current cosmic evolution
2. Geometry-Dominated: Current accelerated expansion is primarily driven by geometric modifications in nonmetricity gravity rather than the scalar field
3. Equation of State: The equation of state parameter for the modified geometric component is w_f ∈ -1.0484, -0.9516
4. Potential Form Compatibility: The reconstructed potential is most compatible with Higgs-type potential V(φ) = V₀ + V₁φ² + V₂φ⁴

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Modified Gravity Theories: Development of f(R), f(T), f(Q) and other theories
2. Scalar Field Dark Energy: Research on quintessence, phantom fields, and other models
3. Gaussian Process Applications: Applications in cosmological parameter reconstruction

Relationship to Related Work

• Extends reconstruction work by Gadbail et al. on f(Q) gravity
• Differs from Niu et al.'s reconstruction within general relativity framework
• Fills the gap in unified treatment of early and late-time dark energy

Comparative Advantages

• First potential reconstruction in nonmetricity gravity
• Provides model-independent data-driven methodology
• Unified treatment of different cosmic evolution stages

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully reconstructed scalar field potential in nonmetricity gravity framework from observational data
2. Early dark energy contributes negligibly to current cosmic acceleration
3. Current acceleration is primarily driven by geometric effects of modified gravity
4. Reconstructed potential is compatible with Higgs-type quartic polynomial form

Limitations

1. Parameter Range Restrictions: Narrow range for n to avoid non-physical behavior
2. Data Dependence: Reconstruction quality depends on observational data precision and coverage
3. Model Assumptions: Still requires assuming specific f(Q) functional form
4. Prior Dependence: Requires Ω_m0 prior from Planck data

Future Directions

1. More rigorous inflation scenario studies
2. Inclusion of additional observational data (SNIa, gamma-ray bursts, etc.)
3. Exploration of alternative f(Q) functional forms
4. Investigation of gravitational waves in modified gravity

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological Innovation: First application of Gaussian process reconstruction for scalar field potential in nonmetricity gravity; novel approach
2. Theoretical Completeness: Provides complete theoretical framework from action to observations
3. Data Sufficiency: Combines 58 high-quality observational data points with solid statistical foundation
4. Physical Consistency: Parameter constraints ensure avoidance of ghost fields and other non-physical behaviors
5. Result Reliability: Reconstructed Hubble constant consistent with independent observations

Weaknesses

1. Model Dependence: Despite claims of model-independence, still requires assuming power-law f(Q) form
2. Constrained Parameter Space: Narrow allowable range for n limits model flexibility
3. Insufficient Early Universe Verification: Analysis of inflation stage is relatively simple
4. Error Propagation Analysis: Could provide more detailed error propagation analysis from H(z) to V(φ)
5. Limited Comparison Baseline: Lacks systematic comparison with other modified gravity theories

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides new data analysis tools for nonmetricity gravity research
2. Methodological Value: Gaussian process method generalizable to other modified gravity theories
3. Observational Guidance: Provides theoretical predictions for future observational projects
4. Cross-Disciplinary Application: Method applicable to other cosmological problems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theory Verification: Testing observational predictions of modified gravity theories
2. Model Selection: Comparing data-fitting capabilities of different gravity theories
3. Parameter Estimation: Constraining free parameters of modified gravity models
4. Future Observations: Guiding design of next-generation cosmological surveys

References

The paper cites 94 relevant references spanning multiple fields including observational cosmology, modified gravity theories, and Gaussian process methods, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is an innovative research work in modified gravity theory that successfully applies machine learning methods to theoretical cosmology, providing important observational testing tools for nonmetricity gravity theory. Despite some technical limitations, its methodological contributions and physical insights hold significant value.