Quantum state preparation with optimal T-count

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2411.04790
• Title: Quantum state preparation with optimal T-count
• Authors: David Gosset, Robin Kothari, Kewen Wu
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: November 2024 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04790

Abstract

This paper investigates a fundamental quantum computing problem: how many T gates are required to approximate an arbitrary n-qubit quantum state to error ε? Building upon improvements to prior work by Low, Kliuchnikov, and Schaeffer, the authors prove that with auxiliary qubits, the optimal asymptotic complexity is $\Theta(\sqrt{2^n\log(1/\varepsilon)}+\log(1/\varepsilon))$. They simultaneously establish that this is also the optimal T-gate count for implementing arbitrary diagonal n-qubit unitary matrices. The paper further describes applications where tensor products of multiple single-qubit unitary matrices can be synthesized in parallel.

Research Background and Motivation

Importance of the Problem

1. Core issue in fault-tolerant quantum computing: In fault-tolerant quantum computing based on 2D stabilizer codes (such as surface codes), T gates are significantly more costly to implement than Clifford gates. T gates require magic state distillation, while Clifford gates can be implemented transversally.
2. Quantification of quantum magic: Quantum magic is a crucial metric for measuring quantum computing's advantage over classical computation. Understanding the non-Clifford resources required to implement quantum states and operations is essential for analyzing quantum advantage.
3. Complexity of classical simulation: Extensions of the Gottesman-Knill theorem show that the cost of classically simulating quantum computation is polynomial in all parameters except the number of T gates.

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. Single-qubit case: The Ross-Selinger algorithm provides optimal T-gate count $O(\log(1/\varepsilon))$ for single-qubit unitary matrices, matching the information-theoretic lower bound.
2. Challenges for multi-qubit systems: Direct application of single-qubit methods to n-qubit cases yields T-gate count $O(2^n(n+\log(1/\varepsilon)))$.
3. Room for improvement in LKS method: Low-Kliuchnikov-Schaeffer (2024) improved T-gate count to $O(\sqrt{2^n}n\log(n/\varepsilon)+\log^2(n/\varepsilon))$, but further optimization is possible.

Core Contributions

1. Optimal quantum state preparation: Proves that the T-gate count for arbitrary n-qubit quantum states has both upper and lower bounds of $\Theta(\sqrt{2^n\log(1/\varepsilon)}+\log(1/\varepsilon))$
2. Optimal diagonal unitary synthesis: Establishes the same optimal T-gate count for implementing diagonal unitary matrices
3. Batch single-qubit unitary synthesis: For $m = O(\log\log(1/\varepsilon))$ distinct single-qubit unitary matrices, T-gate count is $O(\log(1/\varepsilon))$
4. Batch production of single-qubit unitaries: For m copies of a single-qubit unitary matrix $U$, T-gate count is $O(m+\log(1/\varepsilon))$
5. Strengthened lower bound proof: The lower bound holds in the adaptive Clifford+T circuit model, which is stronger than the model used for the upper bound

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Quantum state preparation task: Given an n-qubit target state $|\psi\rangle$ and error parameter $\varepsilon$, design a Clifford+T circuit $U$ such that $U|0^n\rangle|0^a\rangle = |\tilde{\psi}\rangle|0^a\rangle$, where $\||\psi\rangle - |\tilde{\psi}\rangle\| \leq \varepsilon$.

Diagonal unitary synthesis task: Given an n-qubit diagonal unitary matrix $D$ and error $\varepsilon$, design a Clifford+T circuit that approximately implements $D$.

Core Technical Framework

1. Optimal Synthesis of Diagonal Unitary Matrices (Theorem 1.2)

Key idea: View an n-qubit diagonal unitary matrix $D$ as a single-qubit unitary matrix acting on the n-th qubit, controlled by the first n-1 qubits.

Algorithm steps:

1. For each control state $|y\rangle$, the single-qubit unitary $G_y$ can be approximated using $O(\log(1/\varepsilon))$ H and T gates
2. Use a Boolean oracle $B: |y\rangle|z\rangle|0\rangle \to |y\rangle|z\rangle|s_y\rangle$, where $s_y$ is a binary string describing the gate sequence for $G_y$
3. Boolean oracle T-gate count is $O(\sqrt{2^n\log(1/\varepsilon)})$
4. Apply controlled H and controlled T gates with T-gate count $O(\log(1/\varepsilon))$
5. Uncompute the Boolean oracle

2. Optimal Method for Quantum State Preparation (Theorem 1.1)

Two-stage strategy:

Stage one: Coarse approximation (Lemma 3.2)

• Using Khintchine's inequality, prove the existence of Boolean phase oracles $B_1, B_2$ such that $|\phi\rangle = B_2H^{\otimes n}B_1H^{\otimes n}|0^n\rangle$ has constant overlap $\geq 1/\sqrt{2}$ with target state $|\psi\rangle$

Stage two: Error reduction (Lemma 3.4)

• Iteratively apply coarse approximation to the difference state $|\psi\rangle - |\phi\rangle$
• Construct series expansion: $|\psi\rangle \approx \zeta \cdot \sum_{k=0}^{O(\log(1/\varepsilon))} 2^{-k/2}|\psi_k\rangle$
• Implement using linear combination of unitaries (LCU) and exact amplitude amplification

Technical Innovations

1. Avoiding Grover-Rudolph overhead: Traditional methods require n multi-controlled single-qubit unitaries; this work requires only O(1) diagonal unitaries
2. Optimal diagonal unitary synthesis: Innovatively decomposes multi-qubit diagonal unitaries into single-qubit problems and Boolean oracle problems
3. Exact amplitude amplification: Cleverly selects amplitude $\sin(\pi/10)$ so that two rounds of amplitude amplification exactly yield the target state

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Analysis Framework

This paper primarily conducts theoretical analysis using the following tools:

1. Khintchine's inequality: Used to prove the effect of amplitude flattening
2. Sphere packing bounds: Used for counting arguments in establishing lower bounds
3. Normal form theory: Converts Clifford+T circuits into standard forms for analysis

Comparison Benchmarks

1. Ross-Selinger algorithm: Optimal synthesis for single-qubit unitary matrices
2. LKS algorithm: Current best method for multi-qubit state preparation
3. Information-theoretic lower bound: $\Omega(\log(1/\varepsilon))$ lower bound established by Beverland et al.

Model Setup

• Adaptive Clifford+T circuits: Strongest model allowing intermediate measurements and adaptive control
• Unitary Clifford+T circuits: Traditional unitary circuit model
• Error metrics: $\ell_2$ norm for state preparation, operator norm for unitary matrices

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

Theorem 1.1 (Optimal State Preparation)

Any n-qubit quantum state can be prepared using $O(\sqrt{2^n\log(1/\varepsilon)}+\log(1/\varepsilon))$ T gates, and this bound is tight.

Theorem 1.2 (Optimal Diagonal Unitary)

Any n-qubit diagonal unitary matrix can be implemented using $O(\sqrt{2^n\log(1/\varepsilon)}+\log(1/\varepsilon))$ T gates, and this bound is tight.

Application Results

Theorem 1.3 (Batch Synthesis)

For tensor products of $m = O(\log\log(1/\varepsilon))$ distinct single-qubit unitary matrices, T-gate count is $O(\log(1/\varepsilon))$.

Theorem 1.4 (Batch Production)

For m copies of a single-qubit unitary matrix $U$, the T-gate count for $U^{\otimes m}$ is $O(m+\log(1/\varepsilon))$.

Analysis of Improvements

Compared to the LKS method $O(\sqrt{2^n}n\log(n/\varepsilon)+\log^2(n/\varepsilon))$:

1. Eliminates the n factor in the $\sqrt{2^n}$ term
2. Improves the $\log^2(n/\varepsilon)$ term to $\log(1/\varepsilon)$
3. Achieves optimality in the asymptotic sense

Related Work

Quantum Circuit Synthesis

1. Single-qubit synthesis: Kliuchnikov-Maslov-Mosca (2013) established group-theoretic foundations; Ross-Selinger (2016) provided optimal algorithms
2. Multi-qubit synthesis: Grover-Rudolph (2002) proposed hierarchical methods; LKS (2024) achieved significant improvements
3. Unitary synthesis: Still has a large gap between $\tilde{\Omega}(2^n)$ and $\tilde{O}(2^{1.5n})$

Quantum Magic Theory

1. Stabilizer rank: Bravyi et al. (2019) established stabilizer decomposition theory
2. Magic state distillation: Bravyi-Kitaev (2005) laid foundations for fault-tolerant quantum computing
3. Classical simulation: Multiple works study the relationship between T-gate count and classical simulation complexity

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Completely resolves the quantum state preparation problem: Provides tight bounds $\Theta(\sqrt{2^n\log(1/\varepsilon)}+\log(1/\varepsilon))$
2. Establishes optimal synthesis for diagonal unitaries: Same complexity bounds
3. Provides practical batch synthesis methods: Achieves significant resource savings in specific parameter ranges

Limitations

1. Gap for general unitaries: For general n-qubit unitary matrices, a gap remains between $\tilde{\Omega}(2^n)$ and $\tilde{O}(2^{1.5n})$
2. Clifford gate count: While T-gate count is optimal, Clifford gate count is $O(2^n\log(1/\varepsilon))$, approaching but not achieving optimality
3. Practical implementation: Theoretical results require translation into practically feasible quantum algorithms

Future Directions

1. General unitary synthesis: Close the gap between lower and upper bounds
2. Total gate count optimization: Simultaneously optimize T-gate and Clifford gate usage
3. Practical algorithm design: Translate theoretical results into implementable quantum algorithms

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical completeness: Completely resolves the T-gate complexity problem for quantum state preparation with tight bounds
2. Technical innovation: Cleverly combines multiple techniques (Khintchine's inequality, LCU, amplitude amplification, etc.)
3. Practical value: Batch synthesis results have important applications in practical quantum algorithms
4. Rigorous lower bound proof: Establishes lower bounds in the strongest adaptive model, strengthening result credibility

Weaknesses

1. Limited generality: Main results are restricted to quantum states and diagonal unitaries; significant gaps remain for general unitaries
2. Constant factors: Theoretical analysis focuses on asymptotic behavior; actual constant factors may be large
3. Auxiliary resources: Requires substantial auxiliary qubits, potentially challenging for practical implementation

Impact

1. Theoretical significance: Provides important complexity bounds for quantum computing complexity theory
2. Practical value: Provides precise theoretical foundations for resource estimation in fault-tolerant quantum computing
3. Methodological contribution: Techniques developed may apply to other quantum algorithm problems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Fault-tolerant quantum computing: Provides theoretical basis for magic state distillation cost estimation
2. Quantum algorithm design: Provides optimal implementation for algorithms requiring arbitrary quantum state preparation
3. Quantum advantage analysis: Provides tools for analyzing classical simulation difficulty of quantum algorithms

References

This paper cites important works in quantum computing, including:

• Gottesman (1998): Heisenberg representation theory
• Ross & Selinger (2016): Optimal single-qubit synthesis
• Low, Kliuchnikov & Schaeffer (2024): Multi-qubit state preparation improvements
• Beverland et al. (2020): T-gate count lower bound theory