Impact of Correlated Magnetic Noise on Directional Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background Searches

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2411.11746
• Title: Impact of correlated magnetic noise on directional stochastic gravitational-wave background searches
• Authors: Stavros Venikoudis, Federico De Lillo, Kamiel Janssens, Jishnu Suresh, Giacomo Bruno
• Classification: gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology)
• Publication Date: November 2024
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11746v2

Abstract

A potential obstacle to stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB) searches is correlated magnetic noise at Earth-scale distances, such as Schumann resonances. As ground-based detectors' sensitivity to SGWB improves, these effects are expected to become increasingly significant. This study explores for the first time the impact of such noise on anisotropic SGWB searches. The research focuses on the low-frequency range of 20-200 Hz with a resolution of 1/32 Hz, utilizing data from LEMI-120 and Metronix MFS-06e magnetometers located at Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo interferometer sites during the third observing run (O3). Results indicate that during the O3 observing run, magnetic noise correlations remain below the interferometers' sensitivity levels.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Importance of SGWB: The SGWB is formed by the incoherent superposition of numerous weak and unresolvable gravitational-wave signals throughout the universe. Its detection would be an important milestone in ground-based gravitational-wave astronomy, providing unique insights into cosmic evolution.
2. Noise Challenges: Since SGWB signals are extremely weak and inherently stochastic, they are difficult to distinguish from instrumental noise in a single detector. Therefore, cross-correlation methods using multiple detectors are necessary.
3. Correlated Magnetic Noise Threat: Global magnetic disturbances such as Schumann resonances can couple into gravitational-wave interferometers, producing correlated noise across the detector network, potentially contaminating SGWB search results.

Research Motivation

• Existing research primarily focuses on magnetic noise effects in isotropic SGWB searches
• First study of correlated magnetic noise effects in anisotropic SGWB searches
• As detector sensitivity improves (e.g., A+ design), magnetic noise effects may become non-negligible

Core Contributions

1. First assessment of correlated magnetic noise impact on directional SGWB searches
2. Establishment of a complete analytical framework comparing magnetometer data with gravitational-wave data
3. Provision of magnetic budgets for multiple search methods:
   • All-sky all-frequency (ASAF) directional searches
   • Broadband radiometer (BBR) searches
   • Isotropic SGWB searches
4. Future sensitivity predictions: Assessment of potential impacts at A+ design sensitivity levels

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Assessment of correlated magnetic noise contamination on directional SGWB searches by comparing the effective gravitational-wave strain produced by magnetic noise with the sensitivity limits of actual SGWB searches.

Theoretical Framework

Cross-Correlation Statistics

In the presence of correlated magnetic noise, the outputs of two detectors I and J are:

s̃I(f) = h̃I(f) + ñindep_I(f) + ñmag_I(f)
s̃J(f) = h̃J(f) + ñindep_J(f) + ñmag_J(f)

The expected value of cross-correlation is:

⟨s̃*I(f)s̃J(f')⟩ = ⟨h̃*I(f)h̃J(f')⟩ + ⟨ñ*mag_I(f)ñmag_J(f')⟩

Magnetic Noise Measurement

Cross-spectral density is calculated using magnetometer data:

m̃mag_IJ(f) = (2/τ)[|⟨m̃*Ii m̃Ji⟩(f)|² + |⟨m̃*Ii m̃Jj⟩(f)|² + |⟨m̃*Ij m̃Ji⟩(f)|² + |⟨m̃*Ij m̃Jj⟩(f)|²]^(1/2)

Magnetic Coupling Mechanism

The coupling between magnetic field and gravitational-wave strain is described through the coupling function κI(f):

κI(f) = κI,OTI(f) · κI,ITC(f)

where κI,ITC(f) is the internal-to-gravitational-wave channel coupling function, and κI,OTI(f) is the external-to-internal coupling function.

Directional Search Methods

ASAF Search

Using radiometer principles, power searches are performed at each frequency bin and sky direction:

P̂gw(f) = Γ^(-1)_gw(f) · X_gw(f)

The effective magnetic power spectrum estimate is:

P̂mag(f) = Γ^(-1)_gw(f) · X_mag(f)

where the dirty map X_mag(f) contains the magnetic coupling function:

X^IJ_magp(f) = 2Δf Re∑_t [γ^IJ*_ft,p|κI(f)||κJ(f)|m̃mag_IJ(f)] / [PI(t;f)PJ(t;f)]

Experimental Setup

Dataset

• Observational Data: LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA third observing run (O3) data
• Magnetometer Data:
  • LIGO sites: LEMI-120 magnetometers (along X and Y arm directions)
  • Virgo site: Metronix MFS-06e magnetometer (along north-south and east-west directions)
• Frequency Range: 20-200 Hz with 1/32 Hz resolution
• Sky Pixelization: HEALPix scheme, Nside=8, comprising 768 pixels

Data Preprocessing

1. Magnetometer time series downsampled to 512 Hz
2. High-pass filtering at 11 Hz using Butterworth filter
3. Data segmented into 1000-second intervals with Hann windowing and 50% overlap
4. Short-time Fourier transform and spectral coarse-graining

Evaluation Metrics

• Effective Gravitational-Wave Strain: hmag(f,n̂) = √Pmag(f,n̂)Δf
• Energy Density Parameter: Ωgw(f,n̂)
• Gravitational-Wave Flux: F(fref,n̂)

Experimental Results

ASAF Search Results

1. Magnetic Noise Intensity: Strongest in the 20-30 Hz Schumann resonance band, hmag(f,n̂) ~ O(10^-26 - 10^-25)
2. Sensitivity Comparison: Magnetic noise is several orders of magnitude below the 95% Bayesian upper limits of O3 ASAF searches
3. Frequency Characteristics:
   • Strong lines at 50 Hz and 60 Hz (European and American power lines)
   • Arch-like structure in high-frequency bands (oscillatory characteristics of overlap reduction functions)

BBR Search Results

• Effective Flux: Fmag(fref,n̂) ~ O(10^-12 - 10^-11)
• Sensitivity Comparison: At least one order of magnitude below O3 BBR upper limits F^95%,UL_gw(fref,n̂) ~ O(10^-10 - 10^-9)
• Conclusion: Magnetic correlations do not significantly affect O3 BBR searches

Isotropic Search Verification

• Isotropic magnetic budgets extracted from anisotropic estimators are highly consistent with results from Janssens et al. 41
• Schumann resonance peaks in the 20-60 Hz range are well recovered
• Confirmation that Schumann resonances had no significant impact on isotropic SGWB searches during O3

A+ Sensitivity Predictions

• Over most frequency ranges, magnetic noise remains below A+ design sensitivity
• Magnetic contamination risk exists only in a few frequency bins near 60 Hz and 180 Hz

Related Work

History of Magnetic Noise Research

1. Thrane et al. 40: First reported coupling of global magnetic disturbances to gravitational-wave interferometers
2. Janssens et al. 41: Detailed study of magnetic field fluctuations from 1-1000 Hz and their impact on gravitational-wave searches
3. Wiener Filtering Methods 48-50: Development of techniques for removing correlated noise

SGWB Search Methods

1. Radiometer Techniques 36,37: Utilizing Earth's rotation for sky mapping
2. ASAF Method 39: All-sky all-frequency directional searches
3. BBR Method 38: Broadband radiometer searches

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. No Significant Impact During O3: Correlated magnetic noise does not significantly affect isotropic and anisotropic SGWB searches during the O3 observing run
2. Future Possible Challenges: At A+ design sensitivity levels, magnetic contamination remains manageable except for a few frequency bins
3. Method Validation: The established analytical framework is consistent with existing isotropic analysis results

Limitations

1. Phase Information Neglect: The analysis neglects phase information interactions between coupling functions, magnetic fields, and overlap reduction functions
2. Coupling Function Uncertainty: Does not include uncertainties in magnetic coupling functions
3. Conservative Estimates: Uses quadratic sums of four magnetometer pairs, potentially overestimating magnetic noise effects

Future Directions

1. Phase Effect Studies: In-depth investigation of non-trivial effects from phase interactions
2. More Precise Coupling Measurements: Improved measurement precision of magnetic coupling functions
3. Next-Generation Detectors: Assessment of magnetic noise impacts on future detectors such as the Einstein Telescope

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Pioneering Research: First systematic assessment of correlated magnetic noise effects on directional SGWB searches
2. Complete Methodological Framework: Establishment of a complete analytical chain from magnetometer data to gravitational-wave strain estimation
3. Multiple Validations: Method correctness verified through comparison with existing isotropic analyses
4. Practical Value: Provides important reference for noise budgets of future high-sensitivity detectors

Weaknesses

1. Phase Approximation: Neglecting phase information may underestimate magnetic noise effects in certain scenarios
2. Limited Frequency Range: Consideration of only 20-200 Hz may miss important effects in other frequency bands
3. Static Coupling Assumption: Assumption of time-invariant coupling functions may not be entirely accurate

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Opens new directions in environmental noise research for SGWB searches
2. Practical Value: Provides important guidance for data analysis in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA collaborations
3. Future Significance: Provides reference for design and noise control of next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

Applicable Scenarios

• SGWB searches in ground-based gravitational-wave detector networks
• Environmental noise assessment and mitigation strategy development
• Sensitivity prediction and design optimization for future gravitational-wave detectors

References

The paper contains 82 references covering important works in multiple related fields including gravitational-wave detection, SGWB search methods, and magnetic noise research, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.