Thermodynamic limitations on fault-tolerant quantum computing

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2411.12805
• Title: Thermodynamic limitations on fault-tolerant quantum computing
• Authors: Mykhailo Bilokur (Princeton University), Sarang Gopalakrishnan (Princeton University), Shayan Majidy (Harvard University)
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: January 3, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12805

Abstract

This paper investigates the thermodynamic limitations on the scalability of fault-tolerant quantum computing imposed by the thermal effects generated by quantum error correction (QEC). Quantum computers require error correction mechanisms that account for 99.9% of qubit requirements and generate heat through information erasure processes. This heating increases error rates, necessitating more frequent error correction rounds. The authors introduce a dynamical model describing heat generation and dissipation characteristics in qubit arrays weakly coupled to a refrigerator, identifying a dynamical phase transition between two operational regimes: a bounded-error phase where temperature stabilizes and error rates remain below the fault-tolerance threshold, and an unbounded-error phase where rising temperature drives error rates beyond sustainable levels, rendering fault tolerance infeasible.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

Quantum error correction (QEC) is a necessary condition for achieving large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computing, yet QEC itself is a dissipative process that inevitably generates heat according to Landauer's principle. In scalable quantum computing architectures, QEC must be executed "on-chip," meaning the generated heat directly affects the operating environment of the qubits.

Problem Significance

1. Scalability Challenge: As quantum computers scale to thousands of logical qubits, heat generated by QEC may become a limiting factor
2. Feedback Loop: QEC generates heat → increases error rate → requires more frequent QEC → generates more heat, creating a vicious cycle
3. Physical Limitation: This is an unavoidable constraint based on fundamental physical principles, distinct from engineering challenges

Limitations of Previous Research

Previous studies primarily treated QEC as a quantum channel or Lindblad master equation, overlooking the requirement in physical implementations that energy must be extracted from the system sufficiently rapidly to counteract Landauer heating.

Core Contributions

1. Established QEC thermodynamic model: First systematic modeling of heat generation, transport, and dissipation in quantum error correction processes
2. Discovered dynamical phase transition: Identified critical phase transition between bounded-error and unbounded-error phases
3. Provided quantitative analysis: Assessed thermodynamic feasibility of implementing Shor's algorithm for factoring 2048-bit RSA integers based on superconducting qubit parameters
4. Established fault-tolerance conditions: Proved that fault-tolerant quantum computing is only achievable when cooling rates exceed a threshold

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Model the thermal effects generated by QEC in large-scale quantum computing systems and determine the thermodynamic conditions necessary to maintain fault-tolerant quantum computation.

Physical Model Architecture

Geometric Setup

Employs a slab geometry:

• Top: Two-dimensional qubit array
• Bottom: Coupled to refrigerator
• Heat transport: Diffusion from qubits to refrigerator

Core Equations

Temperature evolution in the system is governed by three processes:

$T_{\vec{r}}(t+\Delta t) = T_{\vec{r}}(t) + \frac{\alpha}{T_{\vec{r}}^2}\delta_{\vec{r},\vec{r}_1}Q[f(T_{\vec{r}_1})] + \delta\left(\sum_{|\vec{r}-\vec{r}'|=1}T_{\vec{r}'} - T_{\vec{r}}\right) + \frac{\gamma}{T_{\vec{r}}^3}n_{\vec{r}}(T_0^2 - T_{\vec{r}_L}^2)$

Where:

• $\alpha = \frac{n_a k_B \ln(2)}{2dA}$: QEC heating coefficient
• $\delta = \frac{\Lambda \bar{c}\Delta t}{3a^2}$: thermal diffusion coefficient
• $\gamma = \frac{84\dot{n}_3\Delta t}{An_c}$: cooling coefficient

Heat Capacity Model

Based on low-temperature Debye approximation: $C_{HC}(T_{\vec{r}}) \approx \frac{12\pi^4}{5}\frac{Nk_B}{\Theta_D^3}T_{\vec{r}}^3 = AT_{\vec{r}}^3$

QEC Frequency Model

Defines relationship between QEC frequency and error probability: $f(T_{\vec{r}_1}) = \left(\frac{p_f}{1-p_f}\right)^{c_f}$

Where logical failure probability $p_f = (p_{err}/p_{th})^{d_c/2}$, with $d_c$ being the code distance.

Technical Innovations

1. Multi-scale Modeling: Combines microscopic Landauer heating with macroscopic heat transport
2. Dynamical Feedback: Captures feedback loops between temperature, error rate, and QEC frequency
3. Phase Transition Theory: Applies phase transition framework to analyze system behavior
4. Quasi-linear Approximation: Develops computationally efficient approximation for long-time evolution

Experimental Setup

Physical Parameters

Based on superconducting qubit (transmon) systems:

• Number of Qubits: $n_a = 2 \times 10^7$ (for Shor's algorithm factoring 2048-bit RSA)
• Substrate Material: Silicon, Debye temperature $\Theta_D \approx 636$ K
• Refrigerator: BlueFors LD dilution refrigerator, base temperature $T_0 = 10$ mK
• Encoding: Surface code, code distance $d_c = 27$, threshold $p_{th} = 1\%$

Key Parameter Values

• Heating coefficient: $\alpha \approx 8.79 \times 10^{-15}$ K³
• Diffusion coefficient: $\delta \approx 0.5$
• Cooling coefficient: $\gamma \approx 6.7 \times 10^{-13}$ K²
• Phonon average velocity: $\bar{c} = 5718$ m/s
• Phonon mean free path: $\Lambda = 0.5$ mm

Numerical Implementation

• Lattice: One-dimensional lattice with 50 grid points
• Time Step: $\Delta t = 0.526$ ps (satisfies CFL stability condition)
• Lattice Spacing: $a = 1$ μm

Experimental Results

Phase Transition Behavior

By varying cooling coefficient γ, clear dynamical phase transition is observed:

1. Bounded-Error Phase ($\gamma > \gamma_c$):
   • Temperature stabilizes below threshold
   • Error rates remain within tolerable range
   • Supports long-term fault-tolerant computation
2. Unbounded-Error Phase ($\gamma < \gamma_c$):
   • Temperature rises without bound
   • Error rates exceed fault-tolerance threshold
   • Computation fails in finite time

Critical Exponents

Relationship between failure time τ and cooling capacity shows critical exponent $\zeta \approx 1/2$: $\tau^{-1} \propto (\gamma_c - \gamma)^{1/2}$

Practical System Assessment

Without Active Cooling

Without active cooling, the system enters the unbounded-error phase on second timescales, with temperature rapidly rising above the fault-tolerance threshold.

With Active Cooling

Using realistic refrigeration parameters, the system stabilizes in the bounded-error phase, with temperature converging to an acceptable operating point, supporting long-term fault-tolerant quantum computation.

Scalability Analysis

For Shor's algorithm implementation at $10^7$ qubit scale, given current hardware capabilities, the system remains in the bounded-error phase, indicating that thermodynamic constraints will not limit scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing.

Related Work

QEC Theoretical Foundations

• Threshold Theorem: Classical work by Aharonov & Ben-Or, Knill et al. establishing theoretical foundations of fault-tolerant quantum computing
• Surface Code: Topological quantum error correction code proposed by Dennis et al., featuring high error thresholds

Applications of Landauer's Principle

• Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics: Work by Reeb & Wolf et al. providing theoretical framework for understanding thermodynamic costs of information erasure
• Quantum Measurement Thermodynamics: Recent research on energy costs of quantum measurements

Superconducting Qubits

• Noise Models: Research by Martinis et al., Paladino et al. on noise mechanisms in superconducting qubits
• Temperature Dependence: Experimental studies on effects of quasiparticle excitations and two-level systems on qubit performance

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Phase Transition Existence: QEC systems exhibit clear thermodynamic phase transitions separating feasible and infeasible fault-tolerant computation regimes
2. Current Parameter Feasibility: Based on existing superconducting qubit technology parameters, large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computing is thermodynamically feasible
3. Cooling Threshold: Fault-tolerant quantum computing requires cooling rates exceeding a critical threshold
4. Scalability Prospects: If current hardware capabilities are maintained, thermodynamic constraints should not limit quantum computing expansion

Limitations

1. Platform Specificity: Model primarily targets superconducting qubits; applicability to other platforms (cold atoms, ion traps) requires modification
2. Simplifying Assumptions:
   • One-dimensional heat transport model
   • Uniform qubit parameters
   • Simplified error model
3. Parameter Uncertainty: Certain physical parameters (e.g., temperature-dependent error rates) lack precise experimental data

Future Directions

1. Multi-platform Extension: Adapt thermal management mechanisms for different quantum computing platforms
2. Advanced Error Correction Codes: Study effects of different QEC codes on thermodynamic requirements
3. Non-equilibrium Effects: Consider effects of non-equilibrium states of auxiliary qubits
4. Quantum Optimization: Explore possibilities of using quantum effects to reduce heat dissipation

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Pioneering Research: First systematic study of thermodynamic limitations of QEC, filling an important theoretical gap
2. Rigorous Modeling: Constructs model based on solid physical principles (Landauer's principle, Debye model, etc.)
3. Realistic Parameters: Uses actual experimental parameters for quantitative analysis, enhancing result credibility
4. Clear Physical Picture: Provides intuitive understanding framework through phase transition theory
5. Computational Method Innovation: Quasi-linear approximation effectively addresses numerical challenges at long timescales

Weaknesses

1. Model Simplification: One-dimensional heat transport and uniform parameter assumptions may be oversimplified
2. Error Rate Model: Temperature-dependent error rate model based on limited experimental data, containing uncertainties
3. Platform Limitations: Primarily focuses on superconducting systems; generalizability to other quantum computing platforms is limited
4. Dynamic Effects: Insufficiently considers effects of rapid temperature changes on qubit coherence

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new theoretical perspective on physical limitations of quantum computing
2. Engineering Guidance: Offers quantitative guidance for thermal management system design in large-scale quantum computers
3. Policy Impact: May influence quantum computing development roadmaps and investment decisions
4. Interdisciplinary Value: Connects quantum information, thermodynamics, and condensed matter physics

Application Scenarios

1. Hardware Design: Thermal management system design for large-scale quantum computers
2. Algorithm Optimization: Quantum algorithm design and optimization considering thermal constraints
3. Performance Prediction: Predicting thermodynamic performance of quantum computers at different scales
4. Technology Roadmap Assessment: Evaluating scalability of different quantum computing technology pathways

References

Main references include:

1. Landauer, R. "Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process" (1961) - Foundational work on Landauer's principle
2. Aharonov & Ben-Or "Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant error rate" (1997) - Threshold theorem for fault-tolerant quantum computing
3. Dennis et al. "Topological quantum memory" (2002) - Theoretical foundations of surface codes
4. Gidney & Ekerå "How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits" (2021) - Resource estimation for Shor's algorithm

This paper makes important theoretical contributions to the quantum computing field, providing the first systematic analysis of thermodynamic limitations of QEC. Despite some simplifying assumptions, its rigorous physical modeling and practical parameter analysis provide valuable insights into the feasibility of large-scale quantum computing. This work possesses significant theoretical value and provides practical guidance for future quantum computer engineering design.