An Event-Triggered Framework for Trust-Mediated Human-Autonomy Interaction

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2412.08983
• Title: An Event-Triggered Framework for Trust-Mediated Human-Autonomy Interaction
• Authors: Daniel A. Williams, Airlie Chapman, Chris Manzie
• Classification: cs.RO cs.SY eess.SY
• Publication Date: December 12, 2024 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08983

Abstract

Motivated by increasingly sophisticated collaboration between humans and autonomous systems, this paper proposes a novel hybrid systems framework to capture the interdependent dynamics in these interactions. The framework integrates models from autonomous systems and cognitive psychology literature to represent key elements such as human trust in autonomous systems. By employing asynchronous event-triggered sampling at the human-machine interface, the framework incorporates the intermittent nature of human interaction. Through a practical application in autonomous robot swarm search-and-rescue scenarios, the paper elucidates important considerations for framework parameter tuning and demonstrates how the proposed framework facilitates the design of more efficient and effective human-machine interaction.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

With the increasing prevalence of autonomous systems in commercial and humanitarian applications, there is an urgent need to establish a comprehensive modeling paradigm for human-autonomy interaction (HAI). Existing research lacks a standard closed-loop model with sufficient generality to accommodate most HAI dynamics models.

Importance Analysis

1. Criticality of Trust Dynamics: In HAI, the concept of trust is paramount, as autonomous systems act on behalf of supervisory personnel and provide information. Adequate trust enables commanders to have greater confidence in personal safety and system capabilities, thereby better delegating task responsibility to autonomous systems.
2. Practical Application Requirements: Taking the example of a commander supervising an autonomous robot team searching for survivors in disaster areas, the commander must adjust team formations based on team performance and terrain, which requires effective trust modeling and interaction mechanisms.

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. Sampling Strategy Issues: Periodic sampling relies on fixed sampling rates, producing redundant samples during periods of output stability, increasing transmission costs.
2. Lack of Unified Framework: Currently, there is no approach that integrates representative trust and intervention models with autonomous system dynamics into a formal systems-theoretic framework.
3. Synchronization Requirements: Existing event-triggered sampling schemes typically require simultaneous updates, making them unsuitable for asynchronous communication scenarios.

Core Contributions

1. General HAI Framework: Proposes a general systems-theoretic framework that extends existing work by introducing two interfaces for autonomous system measurement and control.
2. Asynchronous Event-Triggered Sampling: Establishes uniform global asymptotic stability of solution sets under asynchronous event-triggered sampling in a more general form than existing methods.
3. Practical Application Validation: Implements the proposed approach in a swarm search-and-rescue practical application and investigates the effects of framework parameter tuning.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Establish a hybrid systems framework for modeling interactions between human commanders and autonomous systems that must:

• Accommodate existing models from control theory, human-automation interaction, and social psychology
• Support systematic reasoning about closed-loop trust dynamics in HAI scenarios
• Handle intermittent communication through event-triggered sampling

Model Architecture

The framework comprises five interconnected dynamic subsystems:

1. Commander Intervention Interface

Defines commander intervention signal $Y_c \in C_c \subset \mathbb{R}^c$, from which reference signal $R \in C_r(Y_c) \cup D_r(Y_c) \subset \mathbb{R}^{\varrho}$ is extracted:

$\dot{R} = f_r(Y_c, R), \quad R \in C_r(Y_c)$$R^+ = g_r(Y_c, R), \quad R \in D_r(Y_c)$

where $C_r(Y_c)$ is the flow set and $D_r(Y_c)$ is the jump set.

2. System Controller and Dynamics

The autonomous system controller receives reference signal $R$ and environmental input $E_a$, updating internal state $X$ and output $Y_a$:

$\dot{X} = f_a(R, E_a, X)$$Y_a = h_a(X)$

3. System Status Interface

Measures and filters autonomous system output $Y_a$, outputting $Y_s$ transmitted to the commander:

$\dot{S} = f_s(Y_a, S), \quad S \in C_s(Y_a)$$S^+ = g_s(Y_a, S), \quad S \in D_s(Y_a)$$Y_s = h_s(S)$

4. Performance Estimation

The commander's estimate $P$ of system task performance, influenced by $Y_s$ and trust parameter $\kappa$:

$\dot{P} = f_p(\kappa, Y_s, P)$

5. Commander Trust and Intervention Dynamics

Trust dynamics $T$ and intervention output:

$\dot{T} = f_c(\kappa, P, E_c, T)$$Y_c = h_c(\kappa, Y_s, T)$

Technical Innovations

1. Asynchronous Event-Triggered Sampling

Unlike existing synchronous schemes, this paper employs asynchronous event-triggered sampling, allowing plant and controller subsystems to communicate intermittently and independently.

2. Dual Interface Design

• System Status Interface: Acts as a sampler for the autonomous system
• Commander Intervention Interface: Acts as a sampler for commander-related subsystems

3. Stability Guarantees

Through the hybrid small-gain theorem, uniform global asymptotic stability of solution sets is guaranteed under specific conditions.

Experimental Setup

Application Scenario

Autonomous robot swarm search-and-rescue task:

• System Composition: Swarm of 10 autonomous agents
• Task Objective: Search for 10 survivors at unknown locations
• Formation Control: Agents maintain circular formation with radius determined by commander
• Performance Trade-off: Smaller formation radius increases survivor detection rate but reduces search area coverage

Implementation Details

Agent Dynamics Model

Single-integrator system: $\dot{X}_i = 4(X_i^{ref} - X_i)$

where reference position is: $X_i^{ref} = \begin{bmatrix} 6\sin(\frac{t}{2\pi}) + R\cos(\theta_i) \\ 6\sin(0.1t^{2\pi}) + R\sin(\theta_i) \end{bmatrix}$

System Output

Tuple containing survivor proximity and swarm cohesion: $Y_a = \begin{bmatrix} [1-\tanh(\sum_{i=1}^{n_a} \sigma(||X_j^s - X_i||_2))]_{j=1}^{n_s} \\ \frac{\sum_{j=1}^{n_a}(-1+\sum_{i=1}^{n_a} \sigma(||X_j-X_i||_2))}{n_a(n_a-1)} \end{bmatrix}$

Performance and Trust Dynamics

Performance estimation: $\dot{P} = [0.9 \quad 0.1] Y_s - P$

Trust dynamics: $\dot{T} = 0.5(P - T)$

Formation radius reference: $Y_c = 1.5T$

Evaluation Metrics

• State Convergence: Observe convergence of $q_c = [x_c, e_u, \eta_c]^T$ toward global equilibrium
• Sampling Frequency: Analyze frequency characteristics of event-triggered sampling
• System Residual: $\Delta(t) = ||\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n_a} X_i(t) - X_i^{ref}(t)}{n_a}||_2$

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Convergence Verification

Figures 3 and 4 show state trajectories for three tasks $\{M_\tau^A, M_\tau^B, M_\tau^C\}$ under different minimum sampling intervals $\tau = \tau_p = \tau_c$. Results demonstrate:

• All tasks' $q_c$ asymptotically converge to the same global equilibrium point $A_c$
• Convergence speed depends on the magnitude of $\tau_p$ and $\tau_c$
• Smaller $\tau$ values validate Theorem 1 results

2. Controller Gain Effects

Figure 5 shows system residuals under different agent controller gains $k_p \in \{4, 40\}$:

• At $k_p = 4$, residuals oscillate between 0 and 1.47
• At $k_p = 40$, residual oscillations decrease by a factor of 10
• Indicates that higher controller gains significantly improve system performance

3. Sampling Frequency Analysis

Figure 7 shows sampling trigger events in task $M_1^C$:

• As $x_c$ converges to steady state, controller sampler trigger frequency decreases
• Plant sampler triggers periodically due to continuous tracking of Lissajous curve reference
• The two samplers do not always trigger simultaneously, verifying asynchronous characteristics

Parameter Tuning Effects

Experiments reveal:

• Small $(\tau_p, \tau_c)$ values ensure stability guarantees
• Large $(\tau_p, \tau_c)$ values may cause system instability (as shown in Figure 6)
• Event-triggered sampling conserves communication resources compared to fixed-period sampling

Related Work

Event-Triggered Control

• Periodic Sampling: Relies on fixed sampling rates but produces redundancy during output stability periods
• Event-Triggered Sampling: Triggers only when sampling error exceeds threshold, balancing sampling error and transmission frequency
• Asynchronous Schemes: Applicable to scenarios with intermittent communication between plant and controller subsystems

Human-Machine Interaction Trust Modeling

• Trust Dynamics: Existing research proposes linear and nonlinear trust models
• Intervention Strategies: Intervention mechanisms in human-machine systems based on trust
• System Transparency: Key factor affecting trust establishment in human-machine systems

Hybrid Systems Theory

• Stability Analysis: Hybrid system stability based on Lyapunov methods
• Small-Gain Theorem: Used to analyze stability of interconnected systems
• Zeno Behavior: Mechanisms to prevent infinitely frequent jumps

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Framework Effectiveness: The proposed hybrid systems framework successfully captures key dynamics of human-autonomy interaction.
2. Stability Guarantees: Asynchronous event-triggered sampling ensures system stability under specific conditions.
3. Practical Value: The framework releases cognitive and computational resources for commanders to allocate to concurrent tasks.

Limitations

1. Assumption Conditions: Conditions in Assumption 7 are relatively conservative, making it difficult to analytically determine required functions for complex systems.
2. Parameter Tuning: Requires careful adjustment of controller and plant gains as well as minimum sampling periods.
3. Model Complexity: Analytically satisfying stability conditions for non-trivial systems presents challenges.

Future Directions

1. Multi-Commander Systems: Extension to human-machine systems with multiple commanders
2. Adaptive Parameter Tuning: Development of automatic parameter optimization methods
3. Real-World Deployment: Validation of framework effectiveness in actual robotic systems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Contribution: First to unify trust dynamics with event-triggered control in a hybrid systems framework
2. Mathematical Rigor: Provides complete stability analysis and proofs
3. Practicality: Demonstrates framework's practical application potential through search-and-rescue scenarios
4. Interdisciplinary Integration: Successfully integrates concepts from control theory, cognitive psychology, and robotics

Weaknesses

1. Limited Experimental Validation: Verification only in simulation environments, lacking real system experiments
2. Parameter Sensitivity: Framework performance highly depends on parameter selection, but lacks systematic parameter design guidance
3. Scalability: Applicability to large-scale systems remains insufficiently verified
4. Human Factor Modeling: Trust model is relatively simplified, not accounting for individual differences and complex psychological factors

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides a new theoretical framework for human-machine collaborative systems
2. Application Prospects: Potential applications in search-and-rescue, surveillance, autonomous driving, and other domains
3. Method Innovation: Asynchronous event-triggered sampling method can be generalized to other distributed control systems

Applicable Scenarios

• Autonomous systems requiring human supervision
• Distributed control systems with limited communication resources
• Human-machine collaborative tasks requiring trust dynamics consideration
• Applications with intermittent human-machine interaction

References

The paper cites 29 relevant references covering multiple domains including event-triggered control, human-machine interaction, trust modeling, and hybrid systems theory, providing a solid theoretical foundation for this research.