Photon region boundary for stationary axisymmetric black holes

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2412.12665
• Title: Photon region boundary for stationary axisymmetric black holes
• Authors: Prasad Padhye (IISER Mohali), Kajol Paithankar (Indian Institute of Astrophysics & Pondicherry University), Sanved Kolekar (Indian Institute of Astrophysics)
• Classification: gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology)
• Publication Date: November 21, 2025 (arXiv v3)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12665

Abstract

Black hole shadows are fundamentally connected to the structure of light rings and photon regions in the background geometry. This paper investigates the photon region boundary in general asymptotically flat, stationary, axisymmetric black hole spacetimes that admit spherical photon orbits (SPOs). The authors provide explicit expressions for the photon region boundary that depend only on the background metric functions, independent of photon energy or angular momentum parameters, and applicable to both separable and non-separable spacetimes. The paper further analyzes common features of the photon region, including overlap with the ergoregion and the rotation direction of spherical photon orbits. Additionally, light rings are identified as extremal points of the photon region boundary curves in the (r,θ) plane. The method is verified on several exact black hole solutions.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Problem

This paper addresses how to analytically determine the photon region boundary in general stationary axisymmetric black hole spacetimes.

Problem Significance

1. Astrophysical Observational Significance: The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has successfully captured shadow images of the supermassive black holes M87* and Sgr A*, opening new avenues for probing strong-field gravity and testing modified gravitational theories.
2. Theoretical Foundation: The photon region and its structure are crucial for understanding how black hole shadows appear to distant observers. The boundary of a black hole shadow is essentially related to unstable null geodesics spiraling outward from perturbed spherical photon orbits.
3. Universality Requirement: The photon region is entirely determined by the black hole's geometric properties, depending only on the background spacetime metric, independent of the observer's position and motion.

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Separability Dependence: Traditional analytical methods require identifying four constants of motion, typically through separation of radial (r) and polar (θ) components of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. This requires the existence of a Carter-like constant, limiting the method's applicability.
2. Exact Solution Restriction: Existing understanding of photon regions is primarily limited to known exact black hole solutions (such as Kerr, Kerr-Newman, etc.), which have explicit metric functions and separable geodesic equations.
3. Incompleteness of Numerical Methods: For non-separable cases, conventional approaches involve numerically solving coupled radial and polar geodesic equations with chosen initial conditions. However, this method heavily depends on initial condition selection and may fail to recover the entire photon region and its true boundary.
4. Lack of Universal Framework: The literature lacks an analytical technique independent of separation constants and based solely on metric functions to determine the photon region boundary.

Research Motivation

The core motivation of this paper is to establish a universal analytical method for studying photon regions that:

• Does not depend on the Carter constant or any photon motion constants
• Uses only fundamental features of the background metric functions
• Applies to both separable and non-separable spacetimes
• Can provide precise initial conditions for numerical analysis

Core Contributions

1. Proposes a universal photon region boundary construction method: Provides explicit expressions depending only on background metric functions gtt, gtϕ, gϕϕ (Equations 3.11 and 3.12), independent of photon energy E and angular momentum L.
2. Proves the existence of boundary solutions: Through analyzing asymptotic behavior of metric functions near the Killing horizon and at spatial infinity, rigorously proves the existence of at least one inner boundary ri(θ) and one outer boundary ro(θ) between the horizon and spatial infinity.
3. Reveals universal features of the photon region:
   • The outer boundary always lies outside the ergoregion, composed of counter-rotating photon orbits
   • The inner boundary consists of co-rotating photon orbits, potentially partially inside the ergoregion
   • Light rings are located at extremal points of boundary curves ri(θ) and ro(θ)
4. Establishes the concept of critical spin parameter: For a given black hole mass, there exists a critical spin value ac, beyond which the inner boundary lies entirely outside the ergoregion.
5. Verifies the method on multiple exact solutions: Validates the method's correctness and consistency on Kerr, Kerr-Newman, and Kerr-Sen black hole solutions.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Metric of an asymptotically flat, stationary, axisymmetric black hole spacetime of the form: $ds^2 = g_{tt} dt^2 + 2g_{t\phi} dt d\phi + g_{\phi\phi} d\phi^2 + g_{rr} dr^2 + g_{\theta\theta} d\theta^2$

Output: Analytical expressions for the inner boundary ri(θ) and outer boundary ro(θ) of the photon region

Constraints:

• The spacetime admits spherical photon orbits (SPOs)
• The horizon is a Killing horizon
• The metric satisfies: grr, gθθ, gϕϕ > 0 (outside the horizon), ∂rgϕϕ > 0, ∂rgtt < 0

Core Theoretical Framework

1. Effective Potential Method

The Hamiltonian for null geodesics is expressed as: $H = \frac{1}{2}[K(r,\theta) + V(r,\theta)] = 0$

where:

• Kinetic term: $K(r,\theta) = g_{rr}(p_r)^2 + g_{\theta\theta}(p_\theta)^2$
• Potential term: $V(r,\theta) = -\frac{1}{D}(g_{\phi\phi}E^2 + 2g_{t\phi}EL + g_{tt}L^2)$
• $D = g_{t\phi}^2 - g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}$ (D > 0 outside the horizon)

2. Constraints for Spherical Photon Orbits (SPOs)

SPOs require $\dot{r} = 0$ and $\ddot{r} = 0$, equivalent to: $\partial_r(g_{\theta\theta}V) = 0 \quad \text{and} \quad \dot{r} = 0$

3. Photon Region Boundary Definition

The photon region boundary is defined as the curve rb(θ) satisfying two constraints: V(r,\theta) = 0 \tag{3.3}\partial_r V(r,\theta) = 0 \tag{3.4}

This corresponds to points on the boundary being turning points (in the θ direction) of some SPO at θ = 0.

Model Architecture

Step 1: Introduce parameter σ = E/L

Rewrite the potential as: $V(r,\theta) = -\frac{L^2}{D}(g_{\phi\phi}\sigma^2 + 2g_{t\phi}\sigma + g_{tt})$

Step 2: Solve the first constraint V = 0

As a quadratic equation in σ, obtaining two roots: \sigma_{\pm} = \frac{-g_{t\phi} \pm \sqrt{(g_{t\phi})^2 - g_{\phi\phi}g_{tt}}}{g_{\phi\phi}} \tag{3.7}

Step 3: Solve the second constraint ∂rV = 0

Using the condition V = 0 to simplify, obtaining: $\partial_r g_{\phi\phi}\sigma^2 + 2\partial_r g_{t\phi}\sigma + \partial_r g_{tt} = 0$

Solving yields two additional roots: \bar{\sigma}_{\pm} = \frac{-\partial_r g_{t\phi} \pm \sqrt{(\partial_r g_{t\phi})^2 - \partial_r g_{\phi\phi}\partial_r g_{tt}}}{\partial_r g_{\phi\phi}} \tag{3.10}

Step 4: Match roots to determine boundaries

By analyzing the sign properties of roots (Table 1), determine the correct pairing:

• Inner boundary: $\bar{\sigma}_+ = \sigma_+$, yielding: \frac{-g_{t\phi} + \sqrt{(g_{t\phi})^2 - g_{\phi\phi}g_{tt}}}{g_{\phi\phi}}\bigg|_{r=r_i(\theta)} = \frac{-\partial_r g_{t\phi} + \sqrt{(\partial_r g_{t\phi})^2 - \partial_r g_{\phi\phi}\partial_r g_{tt}}}{\partial_r g_{\phi\phi}}\bigg|_{r=r_i(\theta)} \tag{3.11}
• Outer boundary: $\bar{\sigma}_- = \sigma_-$, yielding: \frac{-g_{t\phi} - \sqrt{(g_{t\phi})^2 - g_{\phi\phi}g_{tt}}}{g_{\phi\phi}}\bigg|_{r=r_o(\theta)} = \frac{-\partial_r g_{t\phi} - \sqrt{(\partial_r g_{t\phi})^2 - \partial_r g_{\phi\phi}\partial_r g_{tt}}}{\partial_r g_{\phi\phi}}\bigg|_{r=r_o(\theta)} \tag{3.12}

Technical Innovations

1. Elimination of Photon Parameter Dependence: By simultaneously solving two constraints, cleverly eliminates energy E and angular momentum L, making the boundary entirely determined by metric functions.
2. Root Pairing Strategy: Based on the sign properties of roots inside and outside the ergoregion (Table 1), establishes physical correspondence between σ± and $\bar{\sigma}_{\pm}$.
3. Existence Proof Method:
   • Near the horizon (n→0): Using expansions of surface gravity κH and frame-dragging velocity ωH, proves $\bar{\sigma}_+ > \sigma_+$ and $\bar{\sigma}_- < \sigma_-$
   • At spatial infinity (r→∞): Using asymptotic flatness, proves $\bar{\sigma}_+ < \sigma_+$ and $\bar{\sigma}_- > \sigma_-$
   • By the intermediate value theorem, at least one intersection exists
4. Universal Design: The method does not assume special forms of the metric ratio gθθ/grr (separability condition), thus applicable to non-separable spacetimes.

Experimental Setup

Verification Black Hole Solutions

The paper verifies the method on three classical black hole solutions:

1. Kerr Black Hole
   • Parameters: mass m, spin a (a ≤ m)
   • Horizon: $r_H = m + \sqrt{m^2 - a^2}$
   • Traditional method: Carter constant, inequality $(ρ^2(r-m) - 2r\Delta)^2 \leq 4r^2\Delta a^2\sin^2\theta$
2. Kerr-Newman Black Hole
   • Parameters: mass M, spin a, charge Q (M² ≥ Q² + a²)
   • Horizon: $r_H = M + \sqrt{M^2 - Q^2 - a^2}$
3. Kerr-Sen Black Hole
   • Heterotic string theory solution
   • Parameters: mass M, spin a, charge Q
   • Condition: $a < \sqrt{(M - Q^2/2M)^2}$

Test Parameter Settings

• Kerr black hole: {m, a} = {4, 2} and {4, 3.5}
• Kerr-Newman black hole: {M, a, Q} = {4, 2, 2} and {4, 3, 2}
• Kerr-Sen black hole: {M, a, Q} = {4, 2, 2} and {4, 3, 2}

Evaluation Methods

1. Boundary Consistency Check: Compare ri(θ) and ro(θ) obtained by the new method with rc(θ) from traditional methods (based on Carter constant)
2. 3D Visualization: Plot three-dimensional structures of photon region, ergoregion, and horizon
3. Critical Spin Analysis: Study how the intersection of inner boundary with static limit surface varies with spin parameter

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Method Consistency Verification

For all three black hole solutions, the boundary curves ri(θ) and ro(θ) obtained by the new method perfectly coincide with rc(θ) from traditional methods (Figures 2, 5, 8):

• Kerr Black Hole (Figure 2): Red dashed line (inner boundary) and blue dashed line (outer boundary) perfectly overlap with yellow solid line (traditional method)
• Kerr-Newman Black Hole (Figure 5): Same perfect overlap
• Kerr-Sen Black Hole (Figure 8): Verifies the method's universality

This demonstrates the correctness and validity of the new method.

2. Photon Region Structure Features

From 3D visualizations (Figures 1, 4, 7), one can observe:

• The photon region (orange) forms an annular region
• Partial overlap with the ergoregion (cyan)
• Outer boundary completely outside the ergoregion
• Inner boundary may cross the static limit surface

3. Critical Spin Parameter

Kerr Black Hole (Figure 3): a_c = \frac{m}{\sqrt{2}} \tag{5.6}

For m = 1, 1.5, 2:

• a < ac: Inner boundary has two intersection points with static limit surface
• a = ac: Only one intersection point at equatorial plane θ = π/2
• a > ac: Inner boundary completely outside ergoregion

Kerr-Newman Black Hole (Figure 6): Critical spin is a complex function of M and Q (Equation 5.12), involving polynomial expressions.

Kerr-Sen Black Hole (Figure 9): a_c = \frac{2M^2 - Q^2}{\sqrt{8M^2 - 2Q^2}} \tag{5.20}

Relatively concise form.

Key Findings

1. Light Ring Location:
   • Light rings are located at extremal points of boundary curves ($dr_i/d\theta = 0$ or $dr_o/d\theta = 0$)
   • For Kerr-family black holes, extremal points are at the equatorial plane, corresponding to known equatorial light rings
2. Rotation Direction:
   • Inner boundary: co-rotating, Ω = σ+ > 0
   • Outer boundary: counter-rotating, Ω = σ- < 0
   • Confirmed from energy condition E > 0
3. Ergoregion Relationship:
   • Outer boundary necessarily lies outside ergoregion (rigorously proven)
   • Inner boundary's relationship with ergoregion depends on spin parameter
   • Intersection points satisfy $\bar{\sigma}_+|_{r=r_g} = \sigma_+|_{r=r_g} = 2|g_{t\phi}|/g_{\phi\phi}$

Related Work

Light Ring Research

1. Kerr Black Hole Light Rings: References 15-17 detail the light ring structure of Kerr black holes, with two light rings (one co-rotating, one counter-rotating) located at intersections of photon region boundary with equatorial plane 18.
2. Kerr-Newman-NUT and Plebański-Demiański-class Black Holes: References 19, 20 provide analytical estimates of photon regions and shadows including cosmological constant.
3. Light Ring Asymmetry in Kerr-like Black Holes: Reference 21 uses light ring asymmetry analysis of Kerr and Kerr-like black holes as a measure of no-hair theorem violation.

Light Rings of Compact Objects

4. Rotating Boson Stars and Scalar-haired Kerr Black Holes: Reference 22 finds stable light ring existence leads to trapped or quasi-bound orbits.
5. Ultracompact Objects:
   • References 23, 24: Light rings appear in pairs, one at saddle point, another at local extremum
   • Reference 25: If object has ergoregion, at least one light ring lies outside ergoregion
   • Reference 26: Stationary black holes have at least one standard light ring (at saddle point)

Current Status of Photon Region Research

6. Separable Spacetimes: Most photon region research concentrates on exact black hole solutions with explicit metric functions 18-20, 34-40.
7. Non-separable Spacetimes:
   • Reference 31: Fundamental photon orbits (FPOs) rather than SPOs exist in Kerr-proca hairy black holes
   • Reference 33: Discusses relationship between SPO existence and separability

Advantages of This Work Compared to Related Work

1. Universality: Independent of Carter constant, applicable to separable and non-separable spacetimes
2. Analyticity: Provides explicit expressions rather than numerical methods
3. Completeness: Systematically studies universal features of photon regions
4. Rigor: Provides mathematical proof of boundary existence

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Methodological Contribution: Establishes a universal framework based solely on metric functions to determine photon region boundaries, without requiring Carter constants or variable separation.
2. Existence Theorem: Rigorously proves the existence of at least one inner boundary and one outer boundary between the horizon and spatial infinity.
3. Universal Features:
   • Outer boundary always lies outside ergoregion, composed of counter-rotating photons
   • Inner boundary consists of co-rotating photons, potentially partially inside ergoregion
   • Light rings are located at extremal points of boundary curves
   • Critical spin parameter ac exists
4. Verification Results: Method is completely verified on Kerr, Kerr-Newman, and Kerr-Sen black holes.

Limitations

1. SPO Existence Assumption: The method assumes spacetime admits SPOs but does not prove SPO existence. For spacetimes without SPOs (such as certain Kerr-proca hairy black holes), more general fundamental photon orbits (FPOs) must be considered.
2. Metric Condition Restrictions: Assumes ∂rgϕϕ > 0 and ∂rgtt < 0. While these can be relaxed via H± potential method (Equations 3.32-3.33), additional analysis is needed.
3. Coordinate Dependence: SPO existence may depend on coordinate choice. Some "spherical" orbits may appear as spheroidal orbits in different coordinate systems.
4. Missing Numerical Verification: For known non-separable black hole metrics, numerical implementation and verification remain incomplete.
5. Incomplete Internal Verification: Only verifies that boundary points satisfy constraints, not that all interior points satisfy SPO conditions.

Future Directions

1. Extension to FPOs: Extend photon region concept to spacetimes not admitting SPOs but possessing fundamental photon orbits.
2. Numerical Implementation: Numerically implement the method for complex non-separable black hole metrics, verifying its validity as initial conditions.
3. Ultracompact Objects: Study whether horizonless ultracompact objects admit multiple photon region boundaries (Reference 46 in progress).
4. Coordinate Transformation Study: Systematically study coordinate transformation effects on SPOs and photon regions, particularly cases involving grθ ≠ 0 terms.
5. Observational Applications: Apply the method to black hole solutions in modified gravity theories, providing theoretical predictions for EHT observations.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Theoretical Innovation:
   • First to provide analytical photon region boundary method independent of motion constants
   • Clever root pairing strategy (σ± with $\bar{\sigma}_{\pm}$) offers deep physical insight
   • Rigorous existence proof utilizing asymptotic analysis at horizon and infinity
2. High Method Universality:
   • Applicable to separable and non-separable spacetimes, breaking traditional method limitations
   • Applicable to any metric gravity theory, as field equations are not used
   • Provides precise initial conditions for numerical analysis
3. Clear Physical Picture:
   • Systematically reveals relationship between photon region and ergoregion
   • Clarifies rotation direction of photons on different boundaries
   • Establishes connection between light rings and boundary extremal points
4. Sufficient Verification:
   • Verified on three different black hole solutions
   • Results perfectly consistent with traditional methods
   • Includes detailed 3D visualizations and parameter analysis
5. High Writing Quality:
   • Clear logic, progressing from problem definition through proof to verification
   • Rigorous mathematical derivations with thorough physical explanations
   • Rich figures aiding understanding

Weaknesses

1. Relatively Strong Assumptions:
   • SPO existence assumption limits method applicability
   • Metric monotonicity conditions (∂rgϕϕ > 0, etc.) while relaxable via H± potential method increase complexity
2. Limited Verification Scope:
   • Verified only on separable classical black hole solutions
   • Lacks numerical verification cases for non-separable spacetimes
   • Does not consider more exotic black hole solutions (e.g., with NUT parameter)
3. SPO Completeness Issues:
   • Only proves boundary satisfies constraints, not that interior completely satisfies SPO conditions
   • Lacks discussion on verifying whether SPO passes through given (r, θ) point
4. Limited Physical Interpretation of Critical Spin:
   • Physical origin and universality of critical spin ac not deeply discussed
   • Significantly different ac expressions for different black holes lack unified understanding
5. Insufficient Practical Considerations:
   • Limited specific guidance for observational applications (e.g., EHT data analysis)
   • Does not discuss inferring photon region from observed shadows

Impact

1. Contribution to Field:
   • Important Theoretical Tool: Provides new analytical framework for black hole shadow and photon orbit research
   • Methodological Breakthrough: Opens new path for studying photon regions independent of separability
   • Bridge Role: Connects analytical and numerical methods
2. Practical Value:
   • Applicable to black hole solution analysis in modified gravity theories
   • Provides reliable initial conditions and verification benchmarks for numerical simulations
   • Helps understand observable differences between different gravity theories
3. Reproducibility:
   • Method clearly described, easy to implement
   • Provides concrete verification cases and parameters
   • Formulas explicit, requiring no additional assumptions
4. Citation Potential:
   • Expected to become standard reference for black hole photon region research
   • Important reference value for modified gravity theories, numerical relativity, etc.
   • May inspire similar methods for other problems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research:
   • Photon region analysis of new black hole solutions in modified gravity theories
   • Photon orbit research in non-separable spacetimes
   • Theoretical prediction of black hole shadows
2. Numerical Simulation:
   • Providing initial conditions for numerical calculations of complex black hole metrics
   • Verifying numerical result correctness
   • Exploring criteria for SPO existence
3. Observational Applications:
   • Assisting EHT data analysis and theoretical modeling
   • Distinguishing observational features of different gravity theories
   • Parameter estimation and model selection
4. Educational Use:
   • Advanced textbook content for black hole physics and general relativity
   • Demonstrating geometric method applications in gravity theory

Key References

15 B. Carter, Phys. Rev. 174, 1559 (1968) - Carter constant for Kerr black holes

18 V. Perlick, Black Holes, SS 2022 - Standard description of photon regions

23 P. V. P. Cunha, E. Berti, and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251102 (2017) - Light rings of ultracompact objects

26 Pedro V. P. Cunha and Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 181101 (2020) - Standard light rings of stationary black holes

31 P. V. P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro, and E. Radu, Phys. Rev. D 96, 024039 (2017) - Fundamental photon orbits

33 K. Glampedakis and G. Pappas, Phys. Rev. D 99, 124041 (2019) - SPOs and separability

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical physics paper proposing an innovative and practical method for studying black hole photon regions. The method's universality and rigorous mathematical proof are its greatest strengths. While there remains room for improvement in verification scope and practical applications, this work provides important theoretical tools for black hole physics and gravity theory research, with anticipated broad impact.