Revisiting Endo-reversible Carnot engine: Extending the Yvon engine

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2412.13925
• Title: Revisiting Endo-reversible Carnot engine: Extending the Yvon engine
• Authors: Xiu-Hua Zhao, Yu-Han Ma (School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University; Graduate School, China Academy of Engineering Physics)
• Classification: cond-mat.stat-mech physics.class-ph
• Publication Date: January 3, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13925

Abstract

This paper revisits the efficiency optimization problem of endo-reversible Carnot heat engines. The seminal 1975 paper by Curzon and Ahlborn revealed the maximum power efficiency (EMP) of endo-reversible Carnot heat engines, pioneering the field of finite-time thermodynamics. However, as early as 1955, J. Yvon proposed the Yvon engine with the same EMP, but its limited applicability restricted broader impact. This paper extends the Yvon engine model to a level of generality comparable to the CA engine. Rigorous comparison demonstrates that the extended Yvon engine and CA engine represent steady-state and cyclic forms of endo-reversible Carnot heat engines, respectively, and are equivalent.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Historical Issue: Although the Curzon-Ahlborn (CA) engine is widely known due to its 1975 publication, Yvon actually derived the same maximum power efficiency formula $\eta_{CA} = 1-\sqrt{T_c/T_h}$ in 1955
2. Theoretical Limitations: The original Yvon engine model has specific constraints—considering finite temperature difference only at the hot end with no temperature difference at the cold end, limiting its generality
3. Pedagogical Need: A more concise and intuitive derivation method is needed to help students understand non-equilibrium thermodynamics

Research Motivation

1. Historical Justice: Acknowledge Yvon's pioneering contributions and perfect the development history of finite-time thermodynamics
2. Theoretical Refinement: Establish rigorous correspondence between the Yvon engine and CA engine
3. Pedagogical Value: Provide a more concise optimization method suitable for teaching applications

Core Contributions

1. Extended the Yvon engine model: Generalized the original single-sided heat transfer Yvon engine to a universal dual-sided heat transfer model
2. Established rigorous equivalence: Proved mathematical equivalence between the extended Yvon engine (steady-state) and CA engine (cyclic)
3. Provided simplified optimization method: Achieved more intuitive power maximization derivation through temperature ratio optimization
4. Naturally derived power-efficiency trade-off relationship: Directly obtained the Chen-Yan relationship from the extended model
5. Provided pedagogical value: Offered clearer physical insights for thermodynamics teaching

Methodology Details

Problem Definition

Investigate power optimization of endo-reversible Carnot heat engines under finite heat transfer conditions, establishing equivalent descriptions of steady-state and cyclic heat engines.

Review of Original Yvon Engine

Key characteristics of the original Yvon engine:

• Heat Transfer Law: $\dot{Q} = \Gamma(T_h - T_m)$ (temperature difference only at hot end)
• Endo-reversible Assumption: Working fluid undergoes reversible transformation between $T_m$ and $T_c$
• Efficiency Expression: $\eta^{(Y)} = 1 - T_c/T_m$
• Power Expression: $P^{(Y)} = \Gamma\left(T_h + T_c - T_m - \frac{T_hT_c}{T_m}\right)$

Optimization via AM-GM inequality yields:

• Optimal Temperature: $T_m^* = \sqrt{T_hT_c}$
• Maximum Power Efficiency: $\eta^{(Y)}|_{T_m=T_m^*} = \eta_{CA}$

Extended Yvon Engine Model

Model Architecture

The extended model considers dual-sided heat transfer:

• Hot-end heat transfer: $\dot{Q}_h = \Gamma_h(T_h - \theta_h)$
• Cold-end heat transfer: $\dot{Q}_c = \Gamma_c(\theta_c - T_c)$
• Power Output: $P = \dot{Q}_h - \dot{Q}_c$

Endo-reversible Condition

$\frac{\dot{Q}_h}{\theta_h} = \frac{\dot{Q}_c}{\theta_c}$

This yields efficiency: $\eta = 1 - \theta_c/\theta_h$

Key Mathematical Derivation

From energy conservation and endo-reversible conditions: $\theta_h = \frac{\Gamma_hT_h}{\Gamma_h + \Gamma_c} + \frac{\Gamma_cT_c}{\Gamma_h + \Gamma_c}\frac{\theta_h}{\theta_c}$

Substituting into the power expression: $P = \frac{\Gamma_h\Gamma_cT_h}{\Gamma_h + \Gamma_c}\left(1 + \frac{T_c}{T_h} - \frac{\theta_c}{\theta_h} - \frac{T_c}{T_h}\frac{\theta_h}{\theta_c}\right)$

Technical Innovations

1. Unified Optimization Variable

The key innovation is using $\theta_c/\theta_h$ as a unified optimization variable, rather than optimizing $\theta_c$ and $\theta_h$ separately.

2. Clever Application of AM-GM Inequality

Via the AM-GM inequality: $P \leq \frac{\Gamma_h\Gamma_cT_h}{\Gamma_h + \Gamma_c}\left(1-\sqrt{\frac{T_c}{T_h}}\right)^2$

Equality holds when $\frac{\theta_c^*}{\theta_h^*} = \sqrt{\frac{T_c}{T_h}}$.

3. Power-Efficiency Trade-off Relationship

Naturally derived as: $P = \frac{T_h}{\Gamma_h^{-1} + \Gamma_c^{-1}} \frac{\eta(\eta_C - \eta)}{1-\eta}$

where $\eta_C = 1 - T_c/T_h$ is the Carnot efficiency.

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Methods

This paper primarily conducts theoretical analysis and mathematical derivation verification, including:

1. Equivalence Proof: Proving equivalence between extended Yvon engine and CA engine through parameter correspondence
2. Limiting Case Verification: Verifying that the extended model reduces to the original Yvon engine when $\Gamma_h/\Gamma_c \to 0$
3. Numerical Verification: Graphical demonstration of power-efficiency trade-off relationships

Parameter Correspondence

Establishing relationships between steady-state engine parameters $\Gamma_{h,c}$ and cyclic engine parameters $\gamma_{h,c}$: $\Gamma_{h(c)} = \frac{t_{h(c)}}{\xi(t_h + t_c)}\gamma_{h(c)}$

where $t_{h,c}$ are isothermal process durations and $\xi$ is a cycle time-ratio factor.

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Equivalence Verification

Demonstrated that the maximum power of the extended Yvon engine is identical to the CA engine: $P_{max}^{(CA)} = \frac{\gamma_h\gamma_cT_h}{\xi(\sqrt{\gamma_h} + \sqrt{\gamma_c})^2}\left(1-\sqrt{\frac{T_c}{T_h}}\right)^2$

2. Simplified Optimization Process

Compared to the CA engine requiring separate partial derivatives with respect to $\theta_c$ and $\theta_h$, the extended Yvon engine requires only optimizing the temperature ratio $\theta_c/\theta_h$, substantially simplifying calculations.

3. Generality Verification

• EMP Independence: Maximum power efficiency $\eta_{CA} = 1-\sqrt{T_c/T_h}$ is independent of heat transfer coefficients
• Parameter Dependence: Specific values of $\theta_c^*$ and $\theta_h^*$ depend on heat transfer coefficients
• Time Allocation Effects: In cyclic engines, time ratio $t_c/t_h$ serves as an additional optimization parameter

Power-Efficiency Trade-off Relationship

Figure 2 displays power-efficiency trade-off curves for different Carnot efficiencies $\eta_C = 0.1, 0.7, 0.9$, verifying the correctness of the Chen-Yan relationship.

Theoretical Findings

1. Central Role of Temperature Ratio

The temperature ratio $\theta_c/\theta_h$ (or efficiency $\eta$) is the sole degree of freedom for steady-state endo-reversible engines, independent of heat transfer coefficients.

2. Decoupling of Cyclic and Steady-State

In cyclic engines, efficiency optimization and time allocation optimization are decoupled and can be performed independently.

3. Universality of Optimization

The application of the AM-GM inequality reveals the mathematical essence of endo-reversible engine optimization, emphasizing the importance of geometric means.

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Yvon (1955): First proposed finite-time heat engine optimization, deriving CA efficiency
2. Chambadal (1957), Novikov (1957): Similar analytical approaches
3. Curzon & Ahlborn (1975): Systematic cyclic analysis, pioneering finite-time thermodynamics
4. Chen & Yan (1989): Power-efficiency trade-off relationships

Relationship to Related Work

• Relative to Original Yvon Engine: Extended generality, considering dual-sided heat transfer
• Relative to CA Engine: Provides more concise derivation method
• Relative to Modern Research: Offers new derivation pathway for power-efficiency trade-offs

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Historical Clarification: Yvon's contributions deserve greater recognition; his ideas hold important value
2. Theoretical Unification: Extended Yvon engine and CA engine are essentially different representations of the same problem
3. Method Advantages: Optimization based on temperature ratio is more intuitive and concise
4. Pedagogical Value: Provides effective tools for non-equilibrium thermodynamics teaching

Limitations

1. Scope of Application: Limited to endo-reversible engines under Newton's heat transfer law
2. Idealized Assumptions: Neglects other irreversible factors in actual engines
3. Parameter Selection: Determination of heat transfer coefficients may be difficult in practical applications

Future Directions

1. Non-Newtonian Heat Transfer: Extend to engine optimization under other heat transfer laws
2. Experimental Verification: Conduct experimental studies to verify theoretical predictions
3. Multi-objective Optimization: Consider performance indicators beyond power and efficiency
4. Teaching Applications: Develop teaching cases and curriculum content based on this model

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Historical Value

• Acknowledges overlooked important historical contributions
• Perfects the development history of finite-time thermodynamics
• Demonstrates continuity and inheritance in scientific research

2. Theoretical Contributions

• Establishes rigorous mathematical equivalence relationships
• Provides more concise and intuitive derivation methods
• Reveals the mathematical essence of the problem

3. Pedagogical Value

• Clear and easy-to-follow derivation process
• Intuitive and explicit physical imagery
• Facilitates student understanding of non-equilibrium thermodynamics concepts

4. Methodological Innovation

• Novel approach using temperature ratio as unified optimization variable
• Clever application of AM-GM inequality
• Natural derivation of important trade-off relationships

Weaknesses

1. Practical Limitations

• Primarily theoretical analysis lacking practical application verification
• Limited guidance for practical engineering applications
• Numerous idealized assumptions

2. Degree of Innovation

• Core results (CA efficiency) are not new discoveries
• Mainly reorganization and restatement of existing theory
• Relatively simple mathematical techniques

3. Experimental Verification

• Lacks experimental data support
• No comparison with actual heat engine performance
• Accuracy of theoretical predictions awaits verification

Impact

1. Academic Impact

• Helps perfect the theoretical framework of finite-time thermodynamics
• Provides new analytical perspectives for related research
• May stimulate renewed attention to historical literature

2. Teaching Impact

• Provides valuable cases for thermodynamics teaching
• Helps students establish clear physical concepts
• Applicable to engineering thermodynamics curriculum design

3. Practical Value

• Provides theoretical guidance for heat engine design
• Helps understand performance limits of actual heat engines
• Applicable to heat engine parameter optimization

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research: Finite-time thermodynamics, irreversible thermodynamics research
2. Teaching Applications: Undergraduate and graduate thermodynamics courses
3. Engineering Design: Heat engine performance analysis and optimization design
4. Historical Research: Science history and thermodynamics development history research

References

Key Historical Literature

1. Curzon & Ahlborn (1975) - Original CA engine paper
2. Yvon (1955) - Yvon engine technical report
3. Chambadal (1957), Novikov (1957) - Early related work

Important Theoretical Developments

4. Chen & Yan (1989) - Power-efficiency trade-off relationships
5. Bejan (1996) - Entropy generation minimization theory
6. Andresen (2011) - Finite-time thermodynamics review

Overall Assessment: This is a theoretical paper with significant historical value and pedagogical importance. Although the core results are not entirely novel discoveries, through clever mathematical treatment and clear physical analysis, it provides new perspectives for understanding classical problems. The paper's primary value lies in theoretical integration, historical clarification, and teaching applications, providing beneficial supplements to the field of finite-time thermodynamics.