Weak Hopf non-invertible symmetry-protected topological spin liquid and lattice realization of (1+1)D symmetry topological field theory

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2412.15336
• Title: Weak Hopf non-invertible symmetry-protected topological spin liquid and lattice realization of (1+1)D symmetry topological field theory
• Author: Zhian Jia (National University of Singapore)
• Classification: hep-th, cond-mat.str-el, math-ph, math.MP, math.QA
• Publication Date: December 2024 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15336

Abstract

This paper introduces weak Hopf symmetry as a tool for exploring (1+1)-dimensional topological phases with non-invertible symmetries. Inspired by symmetric topological field theory (SymTFT), the authors construct a lattice model with two types of boundary conditions: one encoding topological symmetry information and another containing non-topological dynamics. The cluster ladder model generalizes the celebrated cluster state model. The paper demonstrates that this model exhibits weak Hopf symmetry, encompassing weak Hopf algebras and their duals. On closed manifolds, the symmetry reduces to the commutant subalgebra of the weak Hopf algebra. Furthermore, weak Hopf tensor network states are introduced to provide exact solutions for the model. Since each fusion category corresponds to the representation category of some weak Hopf algebra, fusion category symmetries naturally correspond to subalgebras of the dual weak Hopf algebra. Therefore, the cluster ladder model provides a lattice realization of arbitrary fusion category symmetries.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Research needs for symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases: The traditional group symmetry framework cannot describe all known topological phases, particularly systems with non-invertible symmetries.
2. Rise of non-invertible symmetries: Recent years have witnessed rapid development of generalized symmetry concepts including higher-form symmetries, non-invertible symmetries, and fusion category symmetries.
3. Challenges in lattice model construction: Despite numerous theoretical examples of fusion category symmetric phases, systematic methods for constructing such lattice models remain lacking.

Research Motivation

1. Bridging theory and implementation: Establishing systematic construction methods from abstract fusion categories to concrete lattice models.
2. Unified symmetry framework: Unifying group symmetries, Hopf symmetries, and weak Hopf symmetries within a single framework.
3. Lattice realization of SymTFT: Providing a computable lattice model platform for symmetric topological field theory.

Core Contributions

1. Proposing weak Hopf symmetry framework: Employing weak Hopf algebras as a unified tool for describing (1+1)D non-invertible symmetries.
2. Constructing weak Hopf cluster ladder model: Generalizing the classical cluster state model to realize lattice representations of arbitrary fusion category symmetries.
3. Establishing duality relations: Proving that fusion category symmetries are equivalent to subalgebras of dual weak Hopf symmetries.
4. Introducing weak Hopf tensor networks: Providing exact solution methods and tensor network representations for model states.
5. Implementing lattice construction of SymTFT: Realizing lattice versions of symmetric topological field theory through boundary condition selection.

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Construct a (1+1)D lattice model realizing arbitrary fusion category symmetry S with exact solution methods. Input: fusion category S; Output: corresponding Hamiltonian and ground state.

Model Architecture

1. Weak Hopf Algebra Foundations

• Weak Hopf algebra H: Vector space with multiplication μ, unit η, comultiplication Δ, counit ε, and antipode S
• Key difference: Unlike Hopf algebras, Δ(1_H) ≠ 1_H ⊗ 1_H, allowing description of broader symmetries

2. Cluster Ladder Lattice Construction

The lattice structure contains three types of edges:

• Symmetry boundary (blue): assigned left H-comodule algebra K
• Physical boundary (red): assigned right H-comodule algebra J
• Bulk edges (black): assigned weak Hopf algebra H

3. Hamiltonian Construction

The total Hamiltonian is:

H[H,K,J] = H_bk + H_sym + H_phys

Where:

• Bulk term: H_bk = -∑_f B^H_f (face operators)
• Symmetry boundary term: H_sym = -∑ A^K (vertex operators)
• Physical boundary term: H_phys = -∑ A^J (vertex operators)

4. Local Operator Definitions

Symmetry boundary vertex operator:

A^K_{v_s} = ∑_{⟨ζ_K⟩} A^{ζ_K^⟨1⟩⊗ζ_K^⟨2⟩}}_{v_s}

Face operator:

B^ψ_f|g,y,h,x⟩ = ∑ ψ(g^{(2)}S(y^{[-1]})S(h^{(1)})x^{[1]})|g^{(1)}, y^{[0]}, h^{(2)}, x^{[0]}⟩

Technical Innovations

1. Weak Hopf Tensor Networks

• Innovative pairing representation: Constructing tensor networks using pairings ⟨•,•⟩ between H and Ĥ
• Graphical notation: Introducing graphical representations with upward and downward reading directions, simplifying calculations
• Structure tensors: Generating entanglement structures through comultiplication

2. Symmetry Analysis

• Closed manifolds: Sym = Cocom(H) × Cocom(Ĥ)
• Open manifolds: Sym = H × Ĥ
• Key insight: Rep(H) ⊆ Cocom(Ĥ), establishing connection between fusion categories and weak Hopf symmetries

3. Boundary Management

Controlling boundary conditions through symmetric separable idempotents ζ_K:

ζ_K = ∑_{(λ_K)} λ_K^{(1)} ⊗ S(λ_K^{(2)})

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Cases

1. Finite Group Examples

• Z_p cluster ladder model: Verifying symmetry structure in the abelian case
• S_3 cluster ladder model: Demonstrating multiple boundary pairings for non-abelian groups

2. Weak Hopf Algebra Examples

• H_8 model: 8-dimensional weak Hopf algebra of the Kac-Paljutkin algebra
• Fibonacci model: Fusion category symmetry constructed through boundary tube algebras

Computational Methods

• Tensor network solution: Using weak Hopf tensor networks to exactly construct ground states
• Symmetry verification: Proving commutation relations S_h, H = 0 through operator methods

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Symmetry Verification

Theorem 3: Weak Hopf cluster state model on closed manifolds possesses symmetry

Sym_{closed cluster} = Cocom(H) × Cocom(Ĥ)

Theorem 4: Weak Hopf cluster state model on open manifolds possesses symmetry

Sym_{open cluster} = H × Ĥ

2. Ground State Construction

Theorem 5: The cluster ladder state |Ψ⟩_ is a ground state of Hamiltonian HH,K,J, satisfying:

A^K_{v_s}|Ψ⟩_{cluster} = A^J_{v_p}|Ψ⟩_{cluster} = B^H_f|Ψ⟩_{cluster} = |Ψ⟩_{cluster}

3. Ground State Degeneracy

According to the Moore-Seiberg formula, the ground state degeneracy on g-genus surface with n holes is:

GSD[M_{g,n}, A_{K_1}, ..., A_{K_k}] = ∑_{Y∈Irr(Rep(D(H)))} ∏_{j=1}^k S_{A_{K_j},Y} S_{1,Y}^{2-2g-n}

Specific Example Analysis

H_8 Model Results

• Dimension: 8-dimensional Kac-Paljutkin algebra
• Representations: 4 one-dimensional + 1 two-dimensional representation
• Fusion rules: Tambara-Yamagami type TY(Z_2×Z_2, χ_, ε=+1)

Fibonacci Model Results

• Objects: {1, τ}, fusion rule τ⊗τ = 1⊕τ
• Boundary tube algebra: 13-dimensional T_
• Quantum dimensions: d_1 = 1, d_τ = φ (golden ratio)

Related Work

Theoretical Background

1. SPT phase classification: Development from group cohomology to cobordism theory
2. Generalized symmetries: Rise of higher-form and non-invertible symmetries
3. SymTFT framework: Topological holography and symmetric topological field theory

Lattice Implementations

1. Cluster state models: Generalizations from Z_2 to finite groups
2. String net models: Kitaev-Kong construction and Levin-Wen framework
3. Anyon chains: Constructions based on fusion trees

Technical Tools

1. Hopf algebras: Quantum groups and quantum double models
2. Tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states
3. Category theory: Fusion categories and module categories

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Unified framework: Weak Hopf symmetry provides a unified framework for describing (1+1)D non-invertible symmetries.
2. Universal construction: The cluster ladder model realizes lattice representations of arbitrary fusion category symmetries.
3. Exact solvability: Weak Hopf tensor networks provide complete solution schemes for the model.

Limitations

1. Dimensional constraints: Current framework primarily applies to (1+1)D systems.
2. Anomalous cases: Certain weak Hopf symmetries exhibit anomalies where rough boundaries do not exist.
3. Computational complexity: Calculations for high-dimensional weak Hopf algebras may face exponential complexity.

Future Directions

1. Higher-dimensional generalizations: Extension to (2+1)D and higher-dimensional systems.
2. Classification problems: Complete classification of weak Hopf symmetric SPT phases.
3. Application exploration: Applications in quantum computing and quantum information processing.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical depth: Establishes complete bridge from abstract category theory to concrete lattice models.
2. Methodological innovation: Weak Hopf tensor networks provide new computational tools.
3. Universality: Framework encompasses all cases from group symmetries to fusion category symmetries.
4. Exactness: Provides complete mathematical description and exact solutions for the model.

Weaknesses

1. Complexity: Mathematical framework is highly abstract, requiring deep background in algebra and category theory.
2. Experimental verification: Lacks direct connection to actual physical systems.
3. Computational efficiency: Tensor network calculations may face challenges for large systems.

Impact

1. Theoretical contribution: Provides important tools for research on non-invertible symmetries.
2. Interdisciplinary value: Connects mathematical physics, condensed matter physics, and quantum information.
3. Future potential: Lays theoretical foundation for quantum simulation and topological quantum computing.

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical research: Theoretical analysis of topological phases and symmetries.
2. Quantum simulation: Implementation in cold atom and superconducting qubit systems.
3. Topological quantum computing: Quantum computing schemes based on non-abelian anyons.

References

This paper cites extensive relevant literature, primarily including:

• SPT phase theory: Pioneering work by Wen, Chen, Gu and others
• Generalized symmetries: Systematic research by Gaiotto, Bhardwaj, Schäfer-Nameki and others
• Hopf algebras: Kitaev quantum double model and related generalizations
• Tensor networks: Hopf tensor network theory by Buerschaper, Mombelli and others

Overall Assessment: This is a theoretically significant paper that provides a systematic framework for lattice realization of non-invertible symmetries. Although the mathematical content is highly abstract, it makes substantial contributions to the field and is expected to advance the theoretical development of topological quantum matter and quantum computing.