Two Egyptian Kings, Shepseskaf and Userkaf, and a solar eclipse (2471 BC)

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2412.20407
• Title: Two Egyptian Kings, Shepseskaf and Userkaf, and a solar eclipse (2471 BC)
• Author: Amelia Carolina Sparavigna (Politecnico di Torino)
• Classification: physics.hist-ph astro-ph.SR physics.pop-ph
• Publication Date: December 2024
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20407

Abstract

This paper is a response to G. Magli's research on the solar eclipse of April 1, 2471 BC and its impact on the termination of Egypt's Fourth Dynasty and the beginning of the Fifth Dynasty. Magli designates this eclipse as the "Shepseskaf eclipse," arguing that it occurred during the reign of Shepseskaf, the last ruler of the Fourth Dynasty. However, through extensive literature review, Sparavigna discovers that the same eclipse is actually associated in the literature with Userkaf, a king of the Fifth Dynasty. Furthermore, the paper corrects misconceptions regarding the name of Khufu's pyramid, "Akhet Khufu," emphasizing that according to evidence from the Wadi el-Jarf papyri, this name should be written with the ibis hieroglyph rather than the later "horizon" symbol.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Controversy: Magli claims in his paper that the 2471 BC eclipse occurred during Shepseskaf's reign and influenced the dynastic transition, but this view lacks sufficient documentary support.
2. Chronological Issues: The absolute chronology of Egypt's Old Kingdom remains controversial, with different scholars' chronologies differing by up to 130 years.
3. Hieroglyphic Misreading: Long-standing misunderstandings exist regarding the translation and hieroglyphic usage of "Akhet Khufu," requiring correction based on the latest archaeological discoveries.
4. Relationship Between Eclipse and Dynastic Change: The hypothesis that eclipses serve as catalysts for political change requires re-examination for sufficient evidentiary support.

Core Contributions

1. Literature Review: Provides comprehensive literature research on the transition between Egypt's Fourth and Fifth Dynasties, revealing that Shepseskaf was not the last ruler of the Fourth Dynasty.
2. Chronological Analysis: Detailed comparison of multiple Egyptian chronological systems, identifying chronological problems in Magli's arguments.
3. Hieroglyphic Correction: Based on primary sources such as the Wadi el-Jarf papyri, corrects the proper spelling and meaning of "Akhet Khufu."
4. Eclipse Record Reassignment: Demonstrates that the 2471 BC eclipse in the literature is associated with Userkaf rather than Shepseskaf.

Methodology

Research Methods

This paper employs historical literature analysis through the following steps:

1. Literature Collection: Systematic collection of academic literature on Egypt's Fourth and Fifth Dynasties, including archaeological reports, inscriptional studies, and chronological analyses.
2. Chronological Comparison: Comparative analysis of different chronological systems proposed by scholars such as Gautschy et al. (2017), von Beckerath, Shaw, and Hornung.
3. Primary Source Analysis: Focuses on analyzing primary materials including the Wadi el-Jarf papyri, inscriptions from the tombs of Qar and Idu, and the letter from Pepi II to Herkhuf.
4. Astronomical Verification: Combines modern astronomical calculations to verify the accuracy of ancient eclipse records.

Technical Innovations

1. Interdisciplinary Integration: Combines Egyptology, astronomy, chronology, and linguistics to provide multidimensional analysis.
2. Primary Source Priority: Emphasizes the use of contemporary primary materials rather than later literature for analysis.
3. Critical Evaluation: Systematically questions and reassesses existing theories.

Experimental Setup

Data Sources

1. Archaeological Materials: Wadi el-Jarf papyri, tombs of Qar and Idu, letter from Pepi II, etc.
2. Chronological Data: Egyptian chronological systems proposed by multiple scholars
3. Astronomical Data: Modern astronomical calculation results for ancient eclipses
4. Literature Materials: Research by scholars such as Sellers (1992) and Kelley & Milone (2011)

Analytical Framework

1. Chronological Consistency Verification: Examines the correspondence between eclipses and rulers under different chronological systems
2. Literature Evidence Weighting: Prioritizes contemporary evidence while cautiously treating later legends
3. Linguistic Analysis: Analyzes the historical evolution and proper usage of hieroglyphic writing

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. Dynastic Sequence Correction:
   • Shepseskaf was not the last ruler of the Fourth Dynasty
   • According to Gautschy et al.'s research, Thamphitis ruled after Shepseskaf
   • Other rulers such as Hordjedef and Baufra may have also reigned
2. Chronological Discrepancies:
   • In Gautschy's low chronology system, Shepseskaf's reign dates to 2418-2412 BC
   • In high chronology systems, it dates to 2551-2546 BC
   • The 2471 BC eclipse more likely occurred during Userkaf's reign
3. Hieroglyphic Evidence:
   • The Wadi el-Jarf papyri clearly show "Akhet Khufu" written with the ibis hieroglyph
   • Gardiner's N27 symbol (horizon symbol) was not yet in use during Khufu's time
   • Pepi II's letter (approximately three centuries later) still uses the ibis symbol to represent "inhabitants of the horizon"

Literature Evidence Analysis

1. Sellers' (1992) Research:
   • Associates the April 1, 2471 BC eclipse with Userkaf
   • Provides detailed eclipse-dynastic change correspondence tables
   • Total eclipse observed in Pe (Buto) region
2. Kelley & Milone (2011):
   • Confirms Sellers' association of the eclipse with Userkaf
   • Provides independent chronological support

Case Analysis

Wadi el-Jarf Papyri Analysis:

• These papyri are contemporary documents from Khufu's time
• Clearly show the correct spelling of "Akhet Khufu"
• Use the ibis symbol (G25) plus the "bread" symbol (t), not the later horizon symbol

Qar Tomb Inscriptions:

• Display the title "Supervisor of the Pyramid City Akhet"
• Similarly use the ibis symbol to write Akhet
• Provide additional evidence of pyramid name usage

Related Work

Research on Eclipses and Dynastic Change

1. Sellers (1992): First proposed a systematic theory of the relationship between eclipses and Egyptian dynastic change
2. Belmonte & Lull (2023): Consider Sellers' theory "highly controversial" but provide no detailed refutation
3. Van Gent (2001): Criticizes the "eclipse game" of forcing associations between eclipses and historical events

Egyptian Chronological Research

1. Gautschy et al. (2017): Proposes a new chronological system based on astronomical observations
2. Puchkov (2024): Analyzes controversies in Gautschy's research
3. Multiple Traditional Chronologies: Systems by scholars such as von Beckerath, Shaw, and Hornung

Pyramid Astronomical Orientation Research

1. Spence (2000): Theory of pyramid orientation based on stellar observations
2. Belmonte (2001): Astronomical orientation analysis of Khufu's pyramid
3. Tupikova (2022): Systematic evaluation of pyramid orientation theories

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Eclipse Attribution Correction: The 2471 BC eclipse should be associated with Userkaf rather than Shepseskaf, supported by multiple independent documentary sources.
2. Dynastic Sequence Clarification: Shepseskaf was not the last ruler of the Fourth Dynasty, a view lacking archaeological and documentary support.
3. Hieroglyphic Correction: "Akhet Khufu" was written with the ibis hieroglyph during Khufu's time; Magli's use of the "horizon" symbol is incorrect.
4. Chronological Issues: Uncertainties in existing chronological systems make precise eclipse-ruler correspondence difficult to establish.

Limitations

1. Chronological Uncertainty: Absolute chronology of Egypt's Old Kingdom remains highly controversial, affecting precise historical reconstruction.
2. Missing Documentation: Many contemporary documents from critical periods are missing, and reliance on later materials may introduce errors.
3. Causality: Even if eclipses and dynastic changes coincide temporally, direct causal relationships are difficult to prove.

Future Directions

1. Additional Archaeological Discoveries: Anticipates new papyri and inscriptional findings to provide more contemporary evidence.
2. Chronological Refinement: Improves chronological systems through additional astronomical observation data and radiocarbon dating.
3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Strengthens collaborative research among Egyptology, astronomy, and chronology.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Academic Rigor: The paper is based on extensive primary materials and academic literature, avoiding speculative discourse.
2. Critical Thinking: Systematically questions and reassesses existing theories, demonstrating good scholarly practice.
3. Interdisciplinary Perspective: Integrates research outcomes from multiple disciplines including Egyptology, astronomy, and linguistics.
4. Evidence-Oriented: Prioritizes contemporary archaeological evidence over later literature or theoretical speculation.

Weaknesses

1. Primarily Descriptive: The paper mainly conducts literature review and evidence organization, lacking new theoretical construction.
2. Controversial Issues: Some conclusions still rely on disputed chronological systems and may require further verification.
3. Causal Mechanisms: Insufficient in-depth analysis of how eclipses influenced political change.

Impact

1. Error Correction Value: Corrects important errors regarding Egyptian dynastic sequences and hieroglyphic usage.
2. Methodological Contribution: Emphasizes the importance of using contemporary evidence, providing methodological guidance for related research.
3. Academic Dialogue: Promotes further discussion and research on related issues within the Egyptological community.

Applicable Scenarios

1. Egyptological Research: Provides important reference for historical reconstruction of the Old Kingdom period.
2. Archaeoastronomy: Provides case analysis for research on the relationship between eclipses and ancient history.
3. Chronological Research: Provides critical perspective for establishing Egyptian absolute chronology.

References

The paper cites 83 important references, primarily including:

1. Gautschy, R. et al. (2017): New chronology of Egypt's Old Kingdom based on astronomical observations
2. Tallet, P. (2017): Research on Wadi el-Jarf papyri
3. Sellers, J. (1992): Death of the Gods in Ancient Egypt (eclipse theory)
4. Lehner, M. (1997, 2001): Complete history of pyramids
5. Belmonte, J.A. (2001): Orientation studies of Old Kingdom pyramids

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality academic correction paper that effectively rectifies several important misconceptions about ancient Egyptian history through rigorous literature analysis and evidence compilation. Although primarily a review in nature, its scholarly value lies in providing reliable foundational materials and methodological guidance for research in related fields.