Injective norm of random tensors with independent entries

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2412.21193
• Title: Injective norm of random tensors with independent entries
• Author: March T. Boedihardjo (Michigan State University)
• Classification: math.PR (Probability Theory)
• Publication Date: January 2, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.21193

Abstract

This paper establishes non-asymptotic bounds on the expected injective norm of random tensors with independent entries. These bounds are analogous to those of Bandeira and van Handel (2016) for the expected spectral norm of random matrices with independent entries.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Core Problem: Establishing non-asymptotic probabilistic bounds for the injective norm of high-order random tensors, which is a natural extension of spectral norm bounds for random matrices to tensors.
2. Significance: The injective norm is a fundamental concept in tensor analysis. When the tensor order r=2, it reduces to the spectral norm of matrices, and is crucial for understanding high-dimensional random structures.
3. Existing Limitations:
   • The classical result of Bandeira-van Handel (2016) applies only to matrices (r=2)
   • Existing tensor bounds either have imprecise constant factors or contain unnecessary logarithmic factors
   • Proof techniques from the matrix case (method of moments, spectral decomposition) do not directly generalize to tensors

Research Motivation

The author aims to extend the precise bounds from the matrix case to general tensors. While compromising on constant factors and logarithmic terms, the main term structure remains optimal.

Core Contributions

1. Main Theorem: Establishes non-asymptotic upper bounds for the injective norm of r-order random tensors, in the form of a main term plus logarithmic correction terms.
2. Technical Innovation: Develops a proof framework based on geometric functional analysis, circumventing the difficult spectral decomposition in the tensor case.
3. Extended Results: Generalizes the bounds to bounded independent random variables and Bernoulli random variables.
4. Concentration Inequalities: Provides corresponding probabilistic concentration bounds.

Methodology Details

Problem Setup

Consider a random tensor on the r-order tensor space $(R^d)^{\otimes r}$: $Z = \sum_{i_1,\ldots,i_r \in [d]} b_{i_1,\ldots,i_r} g_{i_1,\ldots,i_r} e_{i_1} \otimes \cdots \otimes e_{i_r}$

where $g_{i_1,\ldots,i_r}$ are independent standard Gaussian random variables and $b_{i_1,\ldots,i_r} \in \mathbb{R}$ are fixed coefficients.

The injective norm is defined as: $\|Z\|_{inj} := \sup_{x_1,\ldots,x_r \in B_2^d} \langle Z, x_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes x_r \rangle$

Core Technical Framework

1. Construction of Three Technical Objects

The author constructs three key technical objects:

Multilinear map τ: $\tau(x_1,\ldots,x_r) := (b_{i_1,\ldots,i_r}\langle x_1, e_{i_1}\rangle \cdots \langle x_r, e_{i_r}\rangle)_{i_1,\ldots,i_r \in [d]}$

Diagonal matrices $D^{(k)}$: $(D^{(k)}_{x_1,\ldots,x_{k-1},x_{k+1},\ldots,x_r})_{i_k,i_k} := \left(\sum_{i_1,\ldots,i_{k-1},i_{k+1},\ldots,i_r} b_{i_1,\ldots,i_r}^2 \prod_{j \neq k} \langle x_j, e_{i_j}\rangle^2\right)^{1/2}$

Metric $\eta^{(k)}$: $\eta^{(k)}(x,y) := \|\psi_k(x) - \psi_k(y)\|_\infty$

2. System of Key Lemmas

• Lemma 2.1: Establishes the relationship between τ and metric η
• Lemma 2.2: Establishes the relationship between diagonal matrix D and metric η
• Lemma 2.6: Controls the covering number and Dudley integral of metric η

3. Generalized Slepian-Fernique Inequality

The author develops a version of the Slepian-Fernique inequality that allows for a second metric term:

Lemma 3.4: If Gaussian processes $(Z_t)$ and $(W_t)$ satisfy $E(Z_t - Z_s)^2 \leq E(W_t - W_s)^2 + \rho(t,s)^2$ then $E\sup_t Z_t \leq E\sup_t W_t + C\int_0^\infty \sqrt{\ln N(T,\rho,\varepsilon)} d\varepsilon$

Technical Innovations

1. Avoiding Spectral Decomposition: Circumvents the difficult spectral decomposition in the tensor case through geometric functional analysis methods.
2. Metric Decomposition: Decomposes the induced metric into controllable Gaussian process components and geometric metric components.
3. Covering Number Control: Controls the covering numbers of complex metrics through Maurey's empirical method.

Main Results

Theorem 1.1 (Main Result)

For the random tensor Z described above, $E\|Z\|_{inj} \leq \sqrt{2r}\sum_{k \in [r]} \max_{i_1,\ldots,i_{k-1},i_{k+1},\ldots,i_r} \left(\sum_{i_k} b_{i_1,\ldots,i_r}^2\right)^{1/2} + Cr^3(\ln d)^2 \max |b_{i_1,\ldots,i_r}|$

Lower Bound (Remark 1.2)

$(E\|Z\|_{inj}^2)^{1/2} \geq \max_{k \in [r]} \max_{i_1,\ldots,i_{k-1},i_{k+1},\ldots,i_r} \left(\sum_{i_k} b_{i_1,\ldots,i_r}^2\right)^{1/2}$

Extended Results

Corollary 1.4: For independent random variables taking values in $[-K,K]$, similar bounds hold with the main term coefficient becoming $4\sqrt{r}$.

Corollary 1.5: For Bernoulli random variables, the $(\ln d)^{r-2}$ factor from reference 16 is removed.

Technical Analysis

Proof Strategy

1. Step 1: Transform the problem into the supremum of a Gaussian process
2. Step 2: Decompose the induced metric using three technical objects
3. Step 3: Apply the generalized Slepian-Fernique inequality
4. Step 4: Estimate the Gaussian and geometric terms separately

Key Estimates

• Gaussian terms are controlled through concentration inequalities
• Geometric terms are controlled through the Dudley integral of covering numbers
• Covering number estimates utilize Maurey's empirical method

Comparison with Related Work

1. Comparison with Bandeira-van Handel (2016):
   • Main term structure is identical
   • Logarithmic term changes from $\sqrt{\ln d}$ to $(\ln d)^2$
   • Some loss in constant factors
2. Comparison with Latała (2005):
   • Avoids the $\ell^4$ norm term
   • Provides more precise main terms
3. Comparison with Zhou-Zhu (2021):
   • Removes the $(\ln d)^{r-2}$ factor
   • Introduces a controllable logarithmic term

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

This paper successfully extends the precise bounds for random matrix spectral norms to the tensor case. While compromising on technical details, the main term structure remains optimal.

Limitations

1. Logarithmic term deteriorates from $\sqrt{\ln d}$ to $(\ln d)^2$
2. Constant factors are not sufficiently precise
3. Proof techniques are relatively complex

Future Directions

1. Improve the dependence on logarithmic terms
2. Optimize constant factors
3. Develop more direct tensor spectral decomposition techniques

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Significance: Fills an important gap in tensor random analysis
2. Technical Innovation: Develops a new proof framework applicable to tensors
3. Result Precision: Main terms are optimal with matching lower bounds
4. Broad Applicability: Generalizes to multiple types of random variables

Weaknesses

1. Technical Complexity: The proof process is relatively intricate
2. Constant Loss: There is loss in constants and logarithmic terms compared to the matrix case
3. Practical Tightness: Bounds may not be sufficiently tight in high-dimensional cases

Impact

This paper provides fundamental tools for tensor random analysis and offers important theoretical support for tensor methods in machine learning, statistical physics, and related fields.

Applicable Scenarios

• High-dimensional tensor data analysis
• Random tensor network research
• Quantum entanglement geometric analysis
• Tensor decomposition in machine learning

References

1. Bandeira, A. S. and van Handel, R. (2016). Sharp nonasymptotic bounds on the norm of random matrices with independent entries.
2. Latała, R. (2005). Some estimates of norms of random matrices.
3. Zhou, Z. and Zhu, Y. (2021). Sparse random tensors: Concentration, regularization and applications.