2025-11-16T06:43:12.379271

A Yang-Mills-Dirac Quantum Field Theory Emerging From a Dirac Operator on a Configuration Space

Aastrup, Grimstrup
Starting with a Dirac operator on a configuration space of $SU(2)$ gauge connections we consider its fluctuations with inner automorphisms. We show that a certain type of twisted inner fluctuations leads to a Dirac operator whose square gives the Hamiltonian of Yang-Mills quantum field theory coupled to a fermionic sector that consist of one-form fermions. We then show that if a metric exists on the underlying three-dimensional manifold then there exists a change of basis of the configuration space for which the transformed fermionic sector consists of fermions that are no-longer one-forms.
academic

A Yang-Mills-Dirac Quantum Field Theory Emerging From a Dirac Operator on a Configuration Space

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2501.00005
  • Title: A Yang-Mills-Dirac Quantum Field Theory Emerging From a Dirac Operator on a Configuration Space
  • Authors: Johannes Aastrup, Jesper Møller Grimstrup
  • Classification: hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory), math-ph (Mathematical Physics), math.MP (Mathematical Physics)
  • Submission Date: November 22, 2024
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00005

Abstract

This paper investigates fluctuations of a Dirac operator on the configuration space of SU(2) gauge connections under inner automorphisms. The authors demonstrate that certain twisted inner fluctuations yield a Dirac operator whose square produces the Hamiltonian of Yang-Mills quantum field theory coupled to a fermionic sector composed of one-form fermions. Furthermore, they prove that if a metric exists on the underlying three-dimensional manifold, there exists a basis transformation of the configuration space such that the transformed fermionic sector consists of fermions that are no longer one-forms.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Pursuit of Unified Theory: The authors argue that the ultimate physical theory should be based on a small number of conceptually simple principles capable of unifying seemingly opposing frameworks, such as bosonic and fermionic quantum field theories, gravity and the standard model of particle physics.
  2. Inspiration from Noncommutative Geometry: The work of Chamseddine and Connes based on noncommutative geometry demonstrates that the bosonic sector of the standard model can emerge from inner fluctuations of the Dirac operator in spectral triple constructions. However, this mechanism is essentially classical and does not involve quantized fields.
  3. Configuration Space Geometry: The authors attempt to generalize the Chamseddine-Connes unification mechanism to a configuration space geometry framework based on noncommutative geometry, thereby obtaining a unification mechanism involving quantized fields.

Research Motivation

  1. Unification at the Quantum Level: Achieve unification of bosons and fermions at the quantum field theory level, rather than merely at the classical level
  2. Geometric Origin Explanation: Provide a possible geometric origin for the almost-commutative algebras in the Chamseddine-Connes work
  3. Deeper Unification Framework: Establish a unification mechanism that is more fundamental and broader in scope than supersymmetric models

Core Contributions

  1. Twisted Inner Fluctuation Mechanism: Proposes a novel "twisted" inner fluctuation method implemented through commutation of the complex number i with Clifford algebra basis elements
  2. Yang-Mills-Dirac Coupled Theory: Proves that the square of the Dirac operator with twisted fluctuations yields the complete Yang-Mills quantum field theory Hamiltonian coupled to a fermionic sector
  3. Basis Transformation Theory: Establishes a method for transforming one-form fermions to standard fermions through basis transformation of the configuration space when a metric exists on the underlying manifold
  4. Geometric Unification Framework: Achieves unification of bosonic and fermionic theories at a level deeper than quantum field theory

Detailed Methodology

Geometric Construction of Configuration Space

Basic Setup

  • Manifold: Consider a three-dimensional manifold M with bundle V
  • Configuration Space: A is the configuration space of G-connections acting on V (subsequently choosing G = SU(2))
  • Tangent Space: For A₀ ∈ A, the tangent space is TA0A=Ω1(M,g)T_{A_0}A = Ω^1(M,g), where g is the Lie algebra

Metric Construction

The authors assume the existence of a fiberwise metric: FA,AF ∋ A → ⟨⋅,⋅⟩_A where ⟨⋅|⋅⟩_A is an inner product on Ω¹(M,g).

Embedding Map

Through the spin bundle S, construct the embedding: χ(ψ1,ψ2):Ω1(M,g)Ω1(M,SS)χ_{(ψ₁,ψ₂)} : Ω^1(M,g) → Ω^1(M,S⊕S) This requires choosing G = SU(2) and lifting the metric to Ω¹(M,S⊕S).

Clifford Algebra Construction

Basic Operators

Define exterior and interior multiplication operators ext(ψ) and int(ψ) satisfying:

  • {ext(ψ1),ext(ψ2)}=0\{ext(ψ₁), ext(ψ₂)\} = 0
  • {int(ψ1),int(ψ2)}=0\{int(ψ₁), int(ψ₂)\} = 0
  • {ext(ψ1),int(ψ2)}=ψ1,ψ2A\{ext(ψ₁), int(ψ₂)\} = ⟨ψ₁,ψ₂⟩_A

Clifford Multiplication Operators

c(ψ)=ext(ψ)+int(ψ)c(ψ) = ext(ψ) + int(ψ)cˉ(ψ)=ext(ψ)int(ψ)\bar{c}(ψ) = ext(ψ) - int(ψ)

Key Properties

Crucially, the properties of complex multiplication are: c(iψ)=icˉ(ψ),cˉ(iψ)=ic(ψ)c(iψ) = i\bar{c}(ψ), \quad \bar{c}(iψ) = ic(ψ) These properties play a key role in the subsequent "twisting."

Dirac Operator Construction

Hilbert Space

H=(L2(F)L2(F))Ω1(M,SS)H = (L^2(F) ⊕ L^2(F)) ⊗ ∧^*Ω^1(M,S⊕S) where F is the gauge-fixed configuration space.

Dirac Operator

D=(D100D2)D = \begin{pmatrix} D₁ & 0 \\ 0 & D₂ \end{pmatrix} where:

  • D1=icˉ(ψi)ξiD₁ = \sum_i \bar{c}(ψᵢ)∇_{ξᵢ}
  • D2=icˉ(iψi)ξiD₂ = \sum_i \bar{c}(iψᵢ)∇_{ξᵢ}

Here {ξᵢ} is an orthonormal basis of Ω¹(M,g), and {ψᵢ} are corresponding orthonormal vectors in Ω¹(M,S⊕S).

Twisted Inner Fluctuations

Review of Standard Inner Fluctuations

The standard inner fluctuation form is: D~=D+u[D,u1]\tilde{D} = D + u[D,u^{-1}], where u is a unitary element.

Twisted Inner Fluctuations

The twisted form considered in this paper is: D~=D+γu[D,u1]γ1\tilde{D} = D + γu[D,u^{-1}]γ^{-1} where: u=(exp(iCS(A))00exp(iCS(A)))u = \begin{pmatrix} \exp(iCS(A)) & 0 \\ 0 & \exp(-iCS(A)) \end{pmatrix}γ=(0110)γ = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}

CS(A) is the Chern-Simons term: CS(A)=MTr(AdA+23AAA)CS(A) = \int_M \text{Tr}(A ∧ dA + \frac{2}{3}A ∧ A ∧ A)

Technical Innovations

Mathematical Significance of the Twisting Mechanism

The twisting realizes an exchange of the D₁ and D₂ components through the γ matrix, which combined with the properties of the complex number i, causes terms that would otherwise vanish to now produce the fermionic Hamiltonian.

Generation of Yang-Mills-Fermion Coupling

The twisted fluctuation yields: D~2=(HYM+Hfermionic00HYM+Hfermionic)\tilde{D}^2 = \begin{pmatrix} H_{YM} + H_{fermionic} & 0 \\ 0 & H_{YM} + H_{fermionic} \end{pmatrix}

where:

  • HYM=i((ξi)2+([ξi,CS(A)])2)H_{YM} = \sum_i(-(\nabla_{ξᵢ})^2 + ([\nabla_{ξᵢ}, CS(A)])^2) is the Yang-Mills Hamiltonian
  • Hfermionic=i{D1,[D2,CS(A)]}+ΞH_{fermionic} = i\{D₁, [D₂, CS(A)]\} + Ξ is the fermionic Hamiltonian

Experimental Results and Analysis

Structure of the Fermionic Sector

One-Form Fermions

The fermionic Hamiltonian can be written as: Hfermionic=2MTr(ΦAΦΦAΦ)+ΞH_{fermionic} = 2\int_M \text{Tr}(Φ∇_A Φ† - Φ†∇_A Φ) + Ξ

where the fermionic fields are:

  • Φ(x)=iξi(x)int(ψi)Φ(x) = \sum_i ξᵢ(x)\text{int}(ψᵢ)
  • Φ(x)=iξi(x)ext(ψi)Φ†(x) = \sum_i ξᵢ(x)\text{ext}(ψᵢ)

These fermionic fields satisfy anticommutation relations but are one-forms.

Basis Transformation to Standard Fermions

When a metric g and triad field e exist, through basis transformation: Hfermionic=13!MdVolTrg1g2(ΨDAΨΨDAΨ)+ΞH_{fermionic} = \frac{1}{3!}\int_M d\text{Vol} \text{Tr}_{g₁⊗g₂}(ΨD_A Ψ† - Ψ†D_A Ψ) + Ξ

where DA=iσaeaμ(Aμ+ωμ)D_A = -iσᵃe^μₐ(∇_{Aμ} + ωμ) is the spatial Dirac operator, and the new fermionic fields (Ψ†,Ψ) are no longer one-forms but possess the form of standard Dirac fermions.

Physical Significance

Depth of the Unification Mechanism

This unification occurs at a level deeper than where quantum field theory emerges, representing a truly fundamental unification. What is unified is not only bosonic and fermionic quantum field theories; since the metric of the configuration space also encodes geometric information of the underlying three-dimensional manifold, gravity is also involved.

Comparison with Supersymmetry

This unification mechanism is more fundamental and broader in scope than supersymmetric models.

Noncommutative Geometry Approaches

  • Chamseddine-Connes Work: Standard model construction based on spectral triples and almost-commutative algebras
  • Inner Fluctuation Mechanism: Inner fluctuations of the Dirac operator producing classical theories of gauge fields

Configuration Space Geometry

  • Historical Development: Early consideration by Feynman and Singer of the geometry of gauge connection configuration spaces
  • HD-Algebras: Authors' previous work establishing algebraic structures based on parallel transport

Quantum Field Theory Unification

  • Supersymmetric Theories: Unification of bosons and fermions at the quantum field theory level
  • String Theory: Higher-dimensional unification framework

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Geometric Unification: Establishes a bosonic-fermionic unification framework based on the Dirac operator on configuration space
  2. Twisting Mechanism: Discovers the "twisted" inner fluctuation mechanism that generates the fermionic sector
  3. Emergence of Dirac Theory: Proves that standard Dirac fermionic theory naturally emerges from geometric construction

Limitations

  1. Hilbert Space Representation: The authors acknowledge overlooking important Hilbert space representation issues
  2. Gribov Ambiguity: Gribov ambiguity in gauge fixing is an important obstacle
  3. Mathematical Rigor: Rigorous construction of the fluctuated Dirac operator remains incompletely resolved

Future Directions

  1. Representation Theory: Need to establish rigorous Hilbert space representations of the fluctuated Dirac operator
  2. Ground State Structure: Investigate the real versus complex phase issues in the kernel of the fluctuated Dirac operator
  3. Physical Applications: Explore applications of this framework to concrete physical problems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Conceptual Innovation: The twisted inner fluctuation mechanism is entirely novel, providing new insights for unified theory
  2. Mathematical Depth: Deeply integrates noncommutative geometry, differential geometry, and quantum field theory
  3. Unification: Achieves unification at a deeper level than existing theories
  4. Geometric Intuition: Provides geometric interpretation for abstract quantum field theory

Weaknesses

  1. Technical Details: Certain critical technical issues (such as Hilbert space representation) are deferred
  2. Physical Interpretation: The physical meaning of the "twisting" operation remains incompletely clear
  3. Practical Applicability: Considerable distance remains to actual physical applications

Impact

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new research directions for quantum gravity and unified field theory
  2. Mathematical Value: Advances the development of configuration space geometry and noncommutative geometry
  3. Long-term Significance: May provide important clues for constructing the ultimate unified theory

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Theoretical Physics Research: Theoretical exploration of quantum gravity and unified field theory
  2. Mathematical Physics: Applied research in noncommutative geometry and differential geometry
  3. Fundamental Research: In-depth investigation of quantum field theory foundations and geometrization

References

This paper cites 24 important references, primarily including:

  • Classical works on noncommutative geometry by Connes et al. 1-6
  • Authors' previous series of works on HD-algebras and configuration space geometry 7-16
  • Foundational literature on quantum field theory and gauge theory 17-23

Overall Assessment: This is a highly original theoretical physics paper proposing an entirely novel geometric unification mechanism. Although certain technical details require refinement, its core ideas possess significant theoretical value and development potential. This work represents important progress in the direction of quantum gravity and unified field theory.