A Novel Framework for Learning Stochastic Representations for Sequence Generation and Recognition

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.00076
• Title: A Novel Framework for Learning Stochastic Representations for Sequence Generation and Recognition
• Authors: Jungsik Hwang, Ahmadreza Ahmadi
• Classification: cs.LG cs.AI cs.RO
• Publication Date: January 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00076
• Code: https://github.com/mulkkyul/stochasticRNNPB

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel stochastic recurrent neural network parameter bias (stochastic RNNPB) framework for sequence generation and recognition. Inspired by predictive coding and the Bayesian brain hypothesis, the model introduces stochasticity into the latent space through the reparameterization trick of variational autoencoders. Experimental results demonstrate that the stochastic RNNPB model significantly outperforms deterministic models on robot motion sequence generation and recognition tasks, enabling quantification and adjustment of uncertainty during learning and inference, forming continuous latent space representations that promote stable motion generation and enhanced generalization capabilities.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

Sequence data generation and recognition are fundamental capabilities for autonomous systems operating in dynamic environments. Existing deterministic models have limitations in handling uncertainty and generalization ability.

Problem Significance

1. Biological Inspiration: The brain processes perceptual information through predictive coding and Bayesian inference, continuously generating predictions and updating beliefs by minimizing prediction errors
2. Practical Requirements: Robotic systems require robust sequence modeling in noisy and incomplete data environments
3. Technical Challenges: Traditional deterministic models are prone to overfitting and struggle to capture the inherent uncertainty in data

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. RNNPB Model: While capable of sequence generation and recognition, it operates on point estimates and cannot model uncertainty in data distributions
2. VAE Model: Primarily used for generative tasks with posterior estimation through feedforward computation, lacking iterative inference mechanisms
3. Deterministic Models: More susceptible to overfitting and unable to effectively handle complete data variability

Core Contributions

1. Proposes a Novel Stochastic RNNPB Model: Integrates RNNPB and VAE, introducing stochasticity in parameter biases through the reparameterization trick
2. Implements Approximate Bayesian Inference: The model handles uncertainty similar to core brain functions
3. Validates Performance Improvements: Demonstrates superior performance of the stochastic model over deterministic models on robot motion datasets for both generation and recognition tasks
4. Establishes Biological Connections: Aligns machine learning models with predictive coding and Bayesian brain theoretical frameworks

Methodology Details

Task Definition

• Input: Multi-dimensional sequence data (e.g., robot joint angles)
• Output: Sequence generation (reconstruction) and sequence recognition (posterior estimation)
• Objective: Learn probabilistic representations of sequences, capturing uncertainty and enhancing generalization

Model Architecture

Overall Design

The model comprises four main components:

1. Stochastic Parameter Bias Layer: Introduces stochasticity through Gaussian distribution parameterization
2. Input Layer: Receives input data at each time step
3. LSTM Layer: Processes sequence data and maintains internal states
4. Output Layer: Generates model predictions

Key Technical Implementation

1. Stochastic Parameter Bias

PB^(i) = μ^(i) + σ^(i) ⊙ ε, where ε ~ N(0,I)

where μ^(i) and σ^(i) are the mean and standard deviation for sequence i, and ε is a standard normal random vector.

2. Training Objective Function

L(θ,μ,σ) = L_rec + β × L_KLD

• L_rec: Reconstruction loss (MSE)
• L_KLD: KL divergence regularization term
• β: Hyperparameter balancing reconstruction accuracy and latent space regularization

3. Sequence Generation The model generates sequences in an autoregressive manner, sampling PB at t=0 and maintaining PB constant for subsequent time steps to ensure sequence-level consistency.

4. Sequence Recognition Recognition is performed through prediction error minimization (PEM) with iterative optimization of μ and σ parameters:

μ,σ ≈ argmin L_rec = argmin ||x_obs - x_pred||²

Technical Innovations

1. Sequence-Level Uncertainty Modeling: Introducing stochasticity at the parameter bias layer is computationally more efficient than modeling uncertainty at weights, hidden units, or output layers
2. Iterative Posterior Estimation: Unlike VAE's feedforward posterior estimation, employs iterative optimization through prediction error minimization
3. Early Update Mechanism: Directly updates μ values when reconstruction loss falls below a threshold, accelerating convergence
4. Mirror Neuron System Characteristics: Shares internal neural representations during both generation and recognition processes

Experimental Setup

Dataset

• REBL-Pepper Dataset: Contains 36 manually designed emotional animations for the Pepper robot
• Data Augmentation: Generates 72 motion sequences through mirroring
• Feature Dimensionality: 17 joint angles (in radians)
• Joint Types: Head, hip, knee, elbow, shoulder, wrist, and other joints

Model Configuration

• PB Dimensionality: 4 neurons
• LSTM Hidden Units: 256
• Training Epochs: 50,000
• Optimizer: Adam (learning rate 0.001)
• β Parameter Settings:
  • Strong Prior: β = 1e-3
  • Weak Prior: β = 1e-6
  • Zero Prior: β = 0
  • Deterministic model baseline

Evaluation Metrics

• Reconstruction Loss: MSE between training sequences and reconstructed sequences
• Prediction Error: Reconstruction accuracy between observed and unobserved portions
• Correlation Coefficient: Pearson correlation coefficient between generated and target sequences

Experimental Tasks

1. Reconstruction Task: Generate motion sequences from the learned PB distribution
2. Recognition Task: Recognize 10 novel patterns (generated through noise, scaling, and translation)

Experimental Results

Main Results

Reconstruction Task Performance

The stochastic model's reconstruction loss decreases with smaller β values across different settings, indicating that stronger priors lead to reduced reconstruction accuracy. The deterministic model exhibits overfitting trends as PB dimensionality increases, while the stochastic model avoids this issue.

Recognition Task Performance

• Baseline Condition: Stochastic model significantly outperforms deterministic model
  • Stochastic Model (Weak Prior): Reconstruction Loss 0.00206±0.00057
  • Deterministic Model: Reconstruction Loss 0.13475±0.05937
• Warm Start: Improves performance for all models, with deterministic models benefiting most
• Robustness: Stochastic model demonstrates stable performance across different initialization conditions

Latent Space Analysis

Probability Density Distribution

As β decreases, the probability density function of PB becomes sharper, indicating that the model learns lower variance for each sequence. Different sequences exhibit different variance levels, reflecting the model's ability to capture sequence-specific uncertainty.

PCA Visualization

• Strong Prior: PB values are more dispersed, exploring latent space more broadly
• Weak/Zero Prior: PB values cluster more tightly, indicating more deterministic representations
• Deterministic Model: Contains only point estimates for 72 training sequences

Latent Space Continuity

Correlation analysis reveals that the stochastic model develops smoother latent space, while the deterministic model is sensitive to minor perturbations, exhibiting a rugged latent space landscape.

Recognition Process Dynamics Analysis

The stochastic model explores a broader range of latent space during recognition, with different trials exhibiting different optimization paths. The deterministic model shows identical narrow trajectories, indicating strong dependence on initialization.

Related Work

Neural Network Models

1. RNNPB Series: Widely applied in cognitive robotics but lacking uncertainty modeling
2. VAE Series: Provides probabilistic generative frameworks but lacks iterative inference mechanisms
3. β-VAE: Promotes disentangled representation learning through weighting factors

Theoretical Frameworks

1. Predictive Coding: Development of PredNet, PCN, PC-RNN and other models
2. Bayesian Brain: Uncertainty quantification methods including Bayes by Backprop and Dropout
3. Multimodal Learning: Applications of P-VMDNN, PV-RNN and other models

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Stochasticity Advantages: Introducing stochasticity significantly improves sequence generation and recognition performance
2. Smooth Latent Space: Stochastic models learn more continuous and stable representation spaces
3. Uncertainty Quantification: The model effectively quantifies and adjusts uncertainty in internal beliefs
4. Biological Plausibility: Highly consistent with predictive coding and Bayesian brain theories

Limitations

1. Computational Complexity: Iterative optimization during recognition is computationally intensive
2. Unimodal Restriction: Current model handles only single perceptual modality
3. Dataset Scale: Experiments validated only on relatively small-scale robot motion datasets
4. Real-Time Performance: Iterative inference may limit real-time applications

Future Directions

1. Multimodal Extension: Integrate multiple perceptual modalities including vision and audition
2. Computational Optimization: Investigate more efficient inference algorithms
3. Large-Scale Validation: Test on larger and more complex datasets
4. Cognitive Modeling: Apply to simulating differences in cognitive processing

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Solid Theoretical Foundation: Effectively combines neuroscience theory with machine learning techniques
2. Clear Technical Innovation: The design of introducing stochasticity at the parameter bias layer is simple and effective
3. Comprehensive Experimental Design: Includes multiple β settings, initialization conditions, and evaluation metrics
4. In-Depth Analysis: Analyzes model characteristics from multiple perspectives including probability distributions and latent space structure
5. Biological Significance: Provides computational models for understanding brain cognitive processes

Weaknesses

1. Dataset Limitations: Validated only on a single robot motion dataset; generalization remains to be verified
2. Computational Efficiency: Iterative optimization during recognition may limit practical applications
3. Theoretical Analysis: Lacks theoretical guarantees on model convergence and stability
4. Limited Comparisons: Comparisons with other advanced sequence modeling methods (e.g., Transformers) are limited

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides new research directions for sequence modeling and cognitive robotics
2. Practical Value: Shows potential in robotic applications requiring uncertainty quantification
3. Cross-Disciplinary Impact: Connects neuroscience, machine learning, and robotics
4. Reproducibility: Provides complete code implementation, facilitating subsequent research

Applicable Scenarios

1. Robotics Learning: Motion imitation, action recognition, human-robot collaboration
2. Time Series Prediction: Sequence prediction tasks requiring uncertainty quantification
3. Cognitive Modeling: Investigating computational mechanisms of brain cognition
4. Adaptive Systems: Dynamic systems requiring online learning and adaptation

References

The paper cites 44 relevant references covering important works in predictive coding, Bayesian brain, variational inference, sequence modeling, and other research domains, providing solid theoretical foundation and technical support for this research.