Recognising Perfect Fits

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.00232
• Title: Recognising Perfect Fits
• Author: Layne Hall
• Classification: math.GT (Geometric Topology)
• Publication Date: December 31, 2024
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00232

Abstract

A pseudo-Anosov flow is said to have perfect fits if asymptotic stable and unstable foliations exist in its universal cover. This paper presents an algorithm that determines whether a pseudo-Anosov flow has perfect fits based on its box decomposition. As a corollary, we obtain an algorithm to determine whether two flows without perfect fits are orbitally equivalent.

Research Background and Motivation

Significance of the Problem

1. Theoretical Significance: There exist rich interactions between pseudo-Anosov flows and three-dimensional manifold topology; the existence of perfect fits is key to understanding this relationship
2. Practical Applications: The determination of perfect fits directly affects the existence of veering triangulations, which are important tools for studying three-dimensional manifolds
3. Algorithmic Needs: Inspired by the rich computational theory of three-dimensional manifolds, studying pseudo-Anosov flows from an algorithmic perspective is a natural and important problem

Limitations of Existing Methods

• Although box decompositions can describe all flows, they are too flexible and can be arbitrarily refined
• Veering triangulations, while canonical invariants of flows, do not always exist
• Lack of effective algorithms to determine whether a given flow has perfect fits

Research Motivation

The core motivation of this paper is to establish an algorithmic bridge between box decompositions and veering triangulations, addressing when conversion between these two representations is possible.

Core Contributions

1. Main Algorithm: Proposes the HasPerfectFits algorithm, which determines whether a pseudo-Anosov flow given by a box decomposition has perfect fits
2. Theoretical Characterization: Establishes algorithmic connections between perfect fits and the existence of veering triangulations
3. Orbital Equivalence Problem: Solves the orbital equivalence problem for pseudo-Anosov flows without perfect fits
4. Suspension Flow Recognition: Provides an algorithm to determine whether a pseudo-Anosov flow is a suspension flow
5. Generalized Results: Extends results to (pseudo)Anosov flows with marked orbits

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Box decomposition B of pseudo-Anosov flow φ Output: Determine whether φ has perfect fits Constraints: The flow must be pseudo-Anosov and a valid box decomposition must be given

Model Architecture

1. Main Algorithm HasPerfectFits

Algorithm 5.1 HasPerfectFits(B)
1: n := 0
2: while True
3:   if FindFit(n,B) = True then
4:     return True
5:   else if FindVeering(B(n)) = True then
6:     return False
7:   n := n + 1

2. Core Subroutines

FindFit Algorithm (Algorithm 3.5):

• Enumerates periodic orbits of length at most n
• Encodes homotopy classes of periodic orbits using symbolic dynamics
• Applies solutions to the conjugacy problem to detect Fenley's criterion

FindVeering Algorithm (Algorithm 4.30):

• Directly constructs the veering triangulation corresponding to the flow
• Implemented through iterative construction of the universal cover of M°
• Applies the Agol-Guéritaud construction

Technical Innovations

1. Bidirectional Verification Strategy

• Forward Verification: Verifies the existence of perfect fits by finding freely homotopic periodic orbits
• Backward Verification: Verifies the non-existence of perfect fits by constructing veering triangulations

2. Symbolic Dynamics Method

• Uses transition graph M(B) to encode periodic orbits
• Handles equivalence relations of repeated passages
• Eliminates duplicates using persistent walls and pushout equivalences

3. Geometric Construction Techniques

• Constructs skeleton rectangles in the universal cover
• Uses cornerstones to identify translation equivalences
• Applies a finite version of the Agol-Guéritaud construction

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

This paper is primarily theoretical work, verifying the correctness of the method through:

1. Fenley's Characterization Theorem: Utilizes Fenley's equivalence between perfect fits and freely homotopic periodic orbits
2. Agol-Guéritaud Theory: Based on the correspondence between veering triangulations and flows without perfect fits
3. Conjugacy Problem Solutions: Relies on Sela and Préaux's solutions to the conjugacy problem for three-dimensional manifold groups

Algorithmic Complexity Considerations

• The complexity of FindFit depends on the length of the shortest freely homotopic orbit pair
• The complexity of FindVeering relates to the cornerstone size of edge rectangles
• The termination of the overall algorithm is guaranteed by theory

Experimental Results

Main Theorems

Theorem 5.2: There exists an algorithm that determines whether a box decomposition of a given pseudo-Anosov flow has perfect fits.

Corollary 5.3: There exists an algorithm that determines whether a (pseudo)Anosov flow with marked orbits has genuine perfect fits.

Corollary 5.4: The orbital equivalence problem for pseudo-Anosov flows without perfect fits is decidable.

Corollary 5.5: There exists an algorithm to determine whether a given pseudo-Anosov flow is a suspension flow.

Algorithm Correctness

The correctness of the algorithm is guaranteed by two key propositions:

• Proposition 3.6: FindFit returns True if and only if φ has perfect fits
• Proposition 4.31: FindVeering returns True if and only if φ lacks perfect fits

Concrete Application Examples

The paper provides examples of constructing pseudo-Anosov flows with perfect fits (Example 2.14), demonstrating the applicability of the algorithm.

Related Work

Core Theoretical Foundations

1. Fenley's Work: Establishes characterization of perfect fits and freely homotopic periodic orbits
2. Agol-Guéritaud Construction: Provides correspondence from flows without perfect fits to veering triangulations
3. Schleimer-Segerman Program: Gives construction from veering triangulations to flows

Related Algorithmic Work

• Algorithmic theory of three-dimensional manifolds (Haken, Matveev, Kuperberg)
• Computational research on veering triangulations
• Applications of symbolic dynamics in flow research

Unique Contributions of This Paper

Compared to existing work, this paper provides the first complete algorithmic solution to the perfect fits determination problem and establishes an algorithmic bridge between box decompositions and veering triangulations.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. The perfect fits determination problem is algorithmically decidable
2. The orbital equivalence problem for flows without perfect fits can be solved via veering triangulations
3. Suspension flow recognition can be achieved through computation of fiber slopes

Limitations

1. Anosov Flow Case: The main theorem does not directly apply to Anosov flows; a generalized version is needed
2. Non-transitive Flows: Non-transitive pseudo-Anosov flows always have perfect fits, making the problem trivial
3. Computational Complexity: The actual runtime of the algorithm may be long, lacking tight complexity bounds

Future Directions

The paper proposes six open problems:

1. Uniform bounds on the length of freely homotopic orbit pairs
2. Bounds on the cornerstone size of edge rectangles
3. Relationship between veering triangulation size and number of boxes
4. Bounds on quasi-geodesic constants
5. Decidability of the orbital equivalence problem for transitive pseudo-Anosov flows
6. Generalization to higher-dimensional settings

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Completeness: Provides a complete algorithmic solution to perfect fits determination
2. Methodological Innovation: Cleverly combines symbolic dynamics, geometric topology, and algorithmic theory
3. Practical Value: Solves key algorithmic problems in veering triangulation theory
4. Generalizability: Methods can be extended to more general settings

Weaknesses

1. Computational Complexity: Lacks precise analysis of algorithmic complexity
2. Implementation Details: Some technical details (such as cornerstone construction) are quite complex
3. Experimental Verification: Primarily theoretical work lacking large-scale experimental validation

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important algorithmic tools for geometric topology
2. Application Prospects: Opens new directions for computational research on three-dimensional manifolds
3. Methodological Value: Demonstrates how to translate abstract geometric concepts into concrete algorithms

Applicable Scenarios

• Computational topology research on three-dimensional manifolds
• Classification problems in dynamical systems
• Construction and recognition of veering triangulations
• Orbital equivalence determination for pseudo-Anosov flows

References

The paper cites extensive relevant literature, primarily including:

• Fenley's series of works on pseudo-Anosov flows
• Agol and Guéritaud's theory on veering triangulations
• Sela and Préaux's solutions to algorithmic problems for three-dimensional manifold groups
• Mosher's classical work on box decompositions
• Recent research on computational aspects of veering triangulations

This paper makes important contributions to algorithmic theory in geometric topology, providing effective computational tools for understanding the structure of pseudo-Anosov flows, with significant theoretical value and application prospects.