2025-11-21T00:07:15.631681

Empirical forms of the Petty projection inequality

Paouris, Pivovarov, Tatarko
The Petty projection inequality is a fundamental affine isoperimetric principle for convex sets. It has shaped several directions of research in convex geometry which forged new connections between projection bodies, centroid bodies, and mixed volume inequalities. We establish several different empirical forms of the Petty projection inequality by re-examining these key relationships from a stochastic perspective. In particular, we derive sharp extremal inequalities for several multiple-entry functionals of random convex sets, including mixed projection bodies and mixed volumes.
academic

Empirical forms of the Petty projection inequality

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2501.00253
  • Title: Empirical forms of the Petty projection inequality
  • Authors: Grigoris Paouris, Peter Pivovarov, Kateryna Tatarko
  • Classification: math.MG (Metric Geometry)
  • Publication Date: January 3, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00253

Abstract

The Petty projection inequality is a fundamental affine isoperimetric principle for convex sets. It has shaped multiple research directions in convex geometry, establishing new connections between projection bodies, centroid bodies, and mixed volume inequalities. By revisiting these key relationships from a probabilistic perspective, this paper establishes several distinct empirical forms of the Petty projection inequality. In particular, the authors derive sharp extremal inequalities for multiple multivariate functionals of random convex sets, including mixed projection bodies and mixed volumes.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Description

  1. Core Problem: The Petty projection inequality is a fundamental inequality in convex geometry, but its empirical forms have not been sufficiently studied. The authors aim to establish generalizations of this inequality for random convex sets.
  2. Significance:
    • The Petty projection inequality is a canonical example of affine isoperimetric inequalities, in which ellipsoids play an extremal role
    • It connects projection bodies, centroid bodies, and mixed volume inequalities, forming an important component of Brunn-Minkowski theory
    • This inequality has influenced multiple research directions in convex geometry
  3. Existing Limitations:
    • While empirical versions of affine isoperimetric inequalities for centroid bodies and LpL_p-analogues have been studied, empirical forms of the Petty projection inequality have remained elusive
    • There is a lack of a unified framework for understanding these geometric inequalities from a probabilistic perspective
  4. Research Motivation:
    • Inspired by recent results of E. Milman and Yehudayoff, as well as methods of Campi and Gronchi
    • To fill the gap in research on empirical forms of the Petty projection inequality
    • To establish a bridge between random convex set theory and classical convex geometry

Core Contributions

  1. Established empirical inequalities for mixed projection bodies: Proved sharp extremal inequalities for randomly generated mixed projection bodies (Theorem 1.1)
  2. Generalized the classical Petty projection inequality: Provided empirical forms of the Petty projection inequality for random convex sets (Theorem 1.2)
  3. Proved empirical mixed volume inequalities: Established empirical versions of Minkowski's first inequality (Theorem 1.5) and its applications in Petty's inequality (Theorem 1.4)
  4. Provided a unified random framework: Through random linear operators and symmetrization techniques, unified the treatment of empirical forms of various geometric inequalities
  5. Connected random approximation theory: Demonstrated how to recover classical deterministic inequalities from random inequalities via the law of large numbers

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Study the volume properties of projection bodies and mixed projection bodies of randomly generated convex sets, and establish corresponding extremal inequalities. Specifically, consider random convex sets of the form XC={c1X1++cNXN:(cj)C}XC = \{c_1X_1 + \cdots + c_NX_N : (c_j) \in C\}, where X1,,XmX_1, \ldots, X_m are independent random vectors.

Core Technical Framework

1. Random Matrix Notation System

Introduce block random matrix notation:

  • X=[X1X]X = [X_1 \ldots X_\ell], where each XiX_i is an n×min \times m_i block
  • X#=[X1#X#]X^{\#} = [X^{\#}_1 \ldots X^{\#}_\ell], where the columns of Xi#X^{\#}_i follow a symmetric decreasing rearrangement distribution

2. Shadow System Theory

Utilize Shephard's shadow system theory:

  • For a unit vector uu and convex body CC, construct shadow systems Kt=PtCK_t = P_tC
  • Key theorem: Mixed volumes of shadow systems along a common direction are convex functions of the parameter

3. Rearrangement Inequality Techniques

Apply the Rogers-Brascamp-Lieb-Lutinger inequality in Christ's form:

  • For functions FF satisfying quasi-concavity conditions, rearrangement inequalities hold
  • Transition from general distributions to symmetric decreasing rearrangements through iterated Steiner symmetrization

Main Theorem Statements

Theorem 1.1 (Mixed Projection Body Inequality): Let C1,,Cn1C_1, \ldots, C_{n-1} be compact convex sets, and let XX and X#X^{\#} be corresponding random matrices. For any radial measure ν\nu with decreasing density: Eν(Π(XC1,,XCn1))Eν(Π(X#C1,,X#Cn1))\mathbb{E}_\nu(\Pi^\circ(XC_1, \ldots, XC_{n-1})) \leq \mathbb{E}_\nu(\Pi^\circ(X^{\#}C_1, \ldots, X^{\#}C_{n-1}))

Theorem 1.2 (Classical Projection Body Case): As a special case, for a compact convex set CC and random matrix XX: Eν(Π(XC))Eν(Π(X#C))\mathbb{E}_\nu(\Pi^\circ(XC)) \leq \mathbb{E}_\nu(\Pi^\circ(X^{\#}C))

Technical Innovations

  1. Combination of shadow systems and random operators: First combines Shephard's shadow system theory with random linear operators, providing geometric intuition for the proofs
  2. Block matrix treatment: Through clever block matrix notation, unifies the treatment of mixed projection bodies of convex sets of different dimensions
  3. Measure-theoretic methods: Extends beyond Lebesgue measure to general radial measures with decreasing density
  4. Random approximation perspective: Interprets classical geometric inequalities as limits of random approximations

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Methods

As a pure mathematical theory paper, this work verifies results through:

  1. Special case verification: Verifies that when random parameters approach deterministic limits, the classical Petty inequality is recovered
  2. Consistency checks: Ensures that new inequalities are consistent with known systems of affine isoperimetric inequalities
  3. Extremal case analysis: Analyzes the extremal properties of ellipsoids in the new inequalities

Application Examples

The paper provides several concrete applications:

  1. Random simplices: When CC is a simplex, [K]m=conv{X1,,Xm}[K]_m = \text{conv}\{X_1, \ldots, X_m\}
  2. LpL_p-addition: Generalizes to addition operations in LpL_p-Brunn-Minkowski theory
  3. Centroid bodies: Connects to mixed projection bodies of empirical centroid bodies

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

  1. Convergence verification: Proves that as mm \to \infty, random inequalities converge to the classical Petty inequality: EΠ([K]m)EΠ([K]m)Π(K)Π(K)\mathbb{E}|\Pi^\circ([K]_m)| \leq \mathbb{E}|\Pi^\circ([K^*]_m)| \to |\Pi^\circ(K)| \leq |\Pi^\circ(K^*)|
  2. Generalized forms: Establishes more general inequalities, such as for LpL_p-addition: Eν(Π([K]m1p1+p[L]m2p2))Eν(Π([K]m1p1+p[L]m2p2))\mathbb{E}_\nu(\Pi^\circ([K]^{p_1}_{m_1} +_p [L]^{p_2}_{m_2})) \leq \mathbb{E}_\nu(\Pi^\circ([K^*]^{p_1}_{m_1} +_p [L^*]^{p_2}_{m_2}))
  3. Mixed volume inequalities: Proves the empirical Minkowski first inequality: EV(XC1,,XCn)EV(X#C1,,X#Cn)\mathbb{E}V(XC_1, \ldots, XC_n) \geq \mathbb{E}V(X^{\#}C_1, \ldots, X^{\#}C_n)

Theoretical Findings

  1. Universality: Multiple seemingly different geometric inequalities can be unified under a random framework
  2. Extremality: Symmetric decreasing rearrangement maintains extremal properties in the random setting
  3. Connectivity: Establishes deep connections between random approximation theory and classical convex geometry

Historical Development

  1. Petty's original work (1972): Based on Busemann's work on expected volumes of random simplices in convex bodies
  2. Lutwak's development: Introduced the concept of mixed projection bodies and established corresponding inequalities
  3. LpL_p-theory: LpL_p and Orlicz projection body theory by Lutwak, Yang, and Zhang

Research on Empirical Inequalities

  1. Paouris-Pivovarov (2012): Pioneered the study of empirical forms of affine isoperimetric inequalities
  2. Centroid body empirical forms: Established empirical inequalities for centroid bodies and LpL_p-analogues
  3. Milman-Yehudayoff (2023): Recent breakthrough in affine quermassintegral inequalities

Technical Methods

  1. Shadow system theory: Systematic symmetrization methods by Rogers-Shephard and Shephard
  2. Rearrangement inequalities: Rogers-Brascamp-Lieb-Lutinger inequality in Christ's form
  3. Random convex geometry: Modern developments in the theory of random convex sets

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Successfully established empirical forms of the Petty projection inequality and its generalizations
  2. Provided a unified random framework for treating various geometric inequalities
  3. Demonstrated the powerful potential of random methods in convex geometry

Limitations

  1. Technical constraints: Requires assumptions that random vectors have continuous distributions
  2. Computational complexity: Computing expected values of random projection bodies may be difficult
  3. Scope of generalization: Some results are restricted to the radial measure setting

Future Directions

  1. Discrete case: Extend to discrete random vectors
  2. High-dimensional asymptotics: Study asymptotic behavior in high dimensions
  3. Algorithmic applications: Develop numerical algorithms based on these inequalities

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Strong theoretical innovation: First establishes empirical forms of the Petty projection inequality, filling an important theoretical gap
  2. Methodological unity: Provides a unified framework for handling various geometric inequalities through shadow systems and rearrangement inequalities
  3. Technical depth: Cleverly combines deep techniques from convex geometry, probability theory, and measure theory
  4. Result completeness: Not only provides main theorems but also convergence analysis and application examples

Weaknesses

  1. Limited practical applicability: As a pure theoretical result, direct application value may be limited
  2. Highly technical proofs: Highly technical proofs may limit accessibility of the results
  3. Computational challenges: Computing these random expectations faces practical difficulties

Impact

  1. Academic value: Opens new directions for cross-disciplinary research between convex geometry and random geometry
  2. Theoretical completeness: Perfects the theoretical system of affine isoperimetric inequalities
  3. Methodological contribution: The techniques provided can be applied to other geometric inequalities

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Theoretical research: Research in convex geometry and random geometry theory
  2. High-dimensional probability: Geometric analysis of high-dimensional random phenomena
  3. Optimization theory: Potential applications in convex optimization theory

References

The paper cites 36 important references, primarily including:

  • Classical literature: Petty (1961, 1971), Lutwak's series of works
  • Modern developments: Milman-Yehudayoff (2023), Gardner-Hug-Weil (2013)
  • Technical foundations: Schneider's convex body theory textbook, Christ's rearrangement inequality
  • Related work: Paouris-Pivovarov's series of empirical inequality research

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical mathematics paper that makes important contributions to convex geometry. While technically demanding, it provides new perspectives for understanding the probabilistic nature of geometric inequalities and possesses significant theoretical value and methodological significance.