Exploring the bridge between historical and future motion behaviors remains a central challenge in human motion prediction. While most existing methods incorporate a reconstruction task as an auxiliary task into the decoder, thereby improving the modeling of spatio-temporal dependencies, they overlook the potential conflicts between reconstruction and prediction tasks. In this paper, we propose a novel approach: Temporal Decoupling Decoding with Inverse Processing (\textbf{$TD^2IP$}). Our method strategically separates reconstruction and prediction decoding processes, employing distinct decoders to decode the shared motion features into historical or future sequences. Additionally, inverse processing reverses motion information in the temporal dimension and reintroduces it into the model, leveraging the bidirectional temporal correlation of human motion behaviors. By alleviating the conflicts between reconstruction and prediction tasks and enhancing the association of historical and future information, \textbf{$TD^2IP$} fosters a deeper understanding of motion patterns. Extensive experiments demonstrate the adaptability of our method within existing methods.
- Paper ID: 2501.00315
- Title: Temporal Dynamics Decoupling with Inverse Processing for Enhancing Human Motion Prediction
- Authors: Jiexin Wang, Yiju Guo, Bing Su (Gaoling School of Artificial Intelligence, Renmin University of China)
- Classification: cs.CV (Computer Vision)
- Publication Date: December 31, 2024 (arXiv preprint)
- Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00315
Exploring the bridge between historical and future motion behaviors remains a core challenge in human motion prediction. While most existing methods incorporate reconstruction tasks as auxiliary tasks in the decoder to improve spatiotemporal dependency modeling, they overlook potential conflicts between reconstruction and prediction tasks. This paper proposes a novel approach: Temporal Dynamics Decoupling with Inverse Processing (TD²IP). The method strategically separates reconstruction and prediction decoding processes, employing distinct decoders to decode shared motion features into historical or future sequences. Furthermore, inverse processing reverses motion information along the temporal dimension and reintroduces it to the model, leveraging bidirectional temporal correlations in human motion behavior. By mitigating conflicts between reconstruction and prediction tasks and enhancing associations between historical and future information, TD²IP promotes deeper understanding of motion patterns. Extensive experiments demonstrate the method's adaptability among existing approaches.
Human Motion Prediction (HMP) is an important task in computer vision that aims to predict future skeletal motion sequences based on given historical motion sequences. This technology has broad application value in robot collaboration, autonomous driving, pedestrian intent estimation, and other domains.
- Task Conflict Problem: Existing methods commonly employ shared decoders to simultaneously execute two tasks—reconstructing historical motion and predicting future motion—but these tasks present inherent conflicts:
- Reconstruction tasks require projecting motion features back to the manifold of original historical behavior
- Prediction tasks require projecting features to the manifold of future behavior
- The decoder must balance between two manifolds, potentially resulting in insufficient feature representation
- Task Difficulty Imbalance: As shown in Figure 2, there exists inherent imbalance in difficulty between reconstruction and prediction tasks, making equal attention allocation to both tasks inefficient
- Insufficient Global Temporal Correlation: Traditional methods lack sufficient exploitation of bidirectional temporal correlations between historical and future information
Based on the aforementioned problems, the authors pose a natural question: Can prediction performance be further improved by comprehensively considering task conflicts, difficulty imbalance, and other factors? This motivates the proposal of the TD²IP method.
- Proposes Temporal Dynamics Decoupling (TDD) Framework: Decomposes the shared decoder in traditional encoder-decoder frameworks into specialized reconstruction and prediction decoders, effectively mitigating interference and conflicts between different tasks
- Introduces Inverse Processing (IP) Auxiliary Task: Through temporal dimension reversal of motion information, the model can leverage future motion information to predict historical information, significantly enhancing correlations between historical and future information
- Universal Framework Design: The proposed method can be seamlessly integrated into various existing prediction methods as a complementary enhancement technique
- Experimental Validation: Conducts extensive experiments on standard HMP benchmark datasets, demonstrating the method's effectiveness and superiority
Given a historical pose sequence X=[X1,⋯,XTp]∈RTp×J×3, where Xt∈RJ×3 represents the 3D coordinates of J body joints at time t, the objective is to predict future pose sequence Y=[XTp+1,⋯,XTp+Tf]∈RTf×J×3.
The HMP problem is formally expressed as designing an effective predictor Fpred(⋅) such that predicted future motion Y^=Fpred(X) approximates true future motion Y as closely as possible.
The TD²IP framework contains the following core components:
- Embedding Layer: Projects input sequences to feature space
X^=W2(σ(W1X+b1))+b2
- Encoder ϕ: Models spatiotemporal dependencies in motion data
M=ϕ(X^)
- Decoupled Decoders: Comprises historical decoder gh and future decoder gf
Traditional methods use a single decoder to simultaneously reconstruct historical motion and predict future motion. TDD decomposes this process into two specialized decoders:
Pk=gk(M)∈RTk×J×D
where k∈{h,f} denotes historical and future respectively, and Tk represents the corresponding temporal dimension.
Final prediction is obtained through temporal dimension concatenation:
Y^f=[Ph,Pf]∈RT×J×D
To enhance bidirectional temporal correlations, IP introduces reverse prediction during training:
- Temporal Reversal: Performs temporal reversal operation on motion data P=[X,Y] to obtain Pr=[XT,XT−1,⋯,X1]
- Reverse Input: Re-partitions to obtain Xr=[XT,⋯,XT−Tp+1]
- Reverse Prediction:
Y^r=[Ph,r,Pf,r]∈RT×J×D
where Ph,r=gh(Mr), Pf,r=gf(Mr)
- Task Decoupling Strategy: Employs specialized decoders to separately handle reconstruction and prediction tasks, avoiding the manifold balancing problem of traditional shared decoders
- Bidirectional Temporal Modeling: IP leverages bidirectional temporal correlations in motion, enabling each decoder to access complete motion information
- Plug-and-Play Design: Framework design maintains simplicity and effectiveness, allowing easy integration into various existing prediction methods
- Human3.6M (H3.6M): Large-scale 3D human pose dataset containing diverse daily activities
- CMU Motion Capture (CMU-Mocap): Classical human motion capture dataset
Uses Mean Per Joint Position Error (MPJPE) to evaluate performance, with lower values indicating better performance.
Selects multiple state-of-the-art open-source baseline methods:
- Traj-GCN: Graph convolutional network-based trajectory prediction method
- SPGSN: Skeleton partitioned graph scattering network
- EqMotion: Equivariant multi-agent motion prediction
- STBMP: Spatiotemporal branch motion prediction
Baselines integrated with TD²IP method are denoted with suffix "-T".
- Each method undergoes 5 experiments on all datasets with average scores reported
- Uses standard training and testing protocols
- Loss function combines forward and reverse prediction losses: L=Lf+Lr
| Method | 80ms | 160ms | 320ms | 400ms | 560ms | 1000ms | Average |
|---|
| Traj-GCN | 12.19 | 24.87 | 50.76 | 61.44 | 80.19 | 113.87 | 57.22 |
| Traj-GCN-T | 11.31 | 24.10 | 49.95 | 60.72 | 78.44 | 113.00 | 56.25 |
| SPGSN | 10.74 | 22.68 | 47.46 | 58.64 | 79.88 | 112.42 | 55.30 |
| SPGSN-T | 10.32 | 22.13 | 46.65 | 57.87 | 79.17 | 112.08 | 54.71 |
| EqMotion | 9.45 | 21.01 | 46.06 | 57.60 | 75.98 | 109.75 | 53.31 |
| EqMotion-T | 8.96 | 20.50 | 45.93 | 57.99 | 75.91 | 109.76 | 53.01 |
On the CMU-Mocap dataset, TD²IP similarly demonstrates consistent improvement effects, achieving a significant 6.75% improvement particularly on SPGSN.
Ablation experiments validate the effectiveness of each component:
| Lf | Lr | TDD | Traj-GCN | SPGSN | EqMotion | Average |
|---|
| ✓ | | | 37.31 | 34.88 | 33.53 | 35.24 |
| ✓ | ✓ | | 36.93 | 34.67 | 33.52 | 35.04 |
| ✓ | | ✓ | 36.29 | 34.49 | 33.29 | 34.69 |
| ✓ | ✓ | 41.23 | 37.91 | 37.13 | 38.76 |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 36.52 | 34.24 | 33.34 | 34.70 |
- Feature Visualization: T-SNE visualization shows that TD²IP brings predicted action features closer to true features
- FID Evaluation: Reduced Frechet Inception Distance values reflect improved prediction performance
- Qualitative Evaluation: On actions such as "Purchases" and "Walkingdog", TD²IP reduces prediction errors in arms and legs, avoiding the "average pose" problem
- Consistent Improvement: TD²IP achieves consistent performance improvements across most time intervals and different baseline methods
- Component Synergy: The combination of TDD and IP produces synergistic effects, further enhancing model performance
- Universality: The method demonstrates effectiveness across different network architectures (GCN, LSTM, Transformer)
- Early Methods: Focus on extracting motion representations from historical sequences for direct prediction generation
- Auxiliary Task Methods: Incorporate reconstruction tasks as auxiliary tasks in decoders to enhance spatiotemporal dependency modeling
- Network Architecture Innovation: Methods based on different architectures such as GCN and Transformer
Compared to existing work, this paper is the first to systematically analyze the conflict problem between reconstruction and prediction tasks and proposes a decoupling solution, while introducing bidirectional temporal modeling to enhance global correlations.
- TD²IP effectively mitigates conflicts between reconstruction and prediction tasks through temporal dynamics decoupling
- Inverse processing enhances bidirectional associations between historical and future information
- The method exhibits good universality and can be integrated into multiple existing methods
- Experiments validate the method's effectiveness on multiple benchmark datasets
- Computational Overhead: Introducing additional decoders and inverse processing may increase computational complexity
- Hyperparameter Sensitivity: The paper lacks detailed sensitivity analysis of hyperparameters such as inverse loss weights
- Long-term Prediction: Effectiveness for longer time range predictions requires further verification
- Explore more efficient decoupling architecture designs
- Investigate adaptive weight allocation strategies
- Extend to more complex multi-person interaction scenarios
- Profound Problem Insight: First systematic analysis of reconstruction and prediction task conflicts with important theoretical value
- Reasonable Method Design: The combination of TDD and IP both resolves task conflicts and enhances temporal modeling
- Comprehensive Experiments: Full validation across multiple datasets and baseline methods
- Strong Universality: Plug-and-play design facilitates easy integration into existing methods
- Rich Visualization: Validates method effectiveness through multiple approaches including T-SNE and FID
- Insufficient Theoretical Analysis: Lacks theoretical convergence analysis of the decoupling architecture
- Computational Efficiency: Lacks detailed computational complexity analysis and runtime comparisons
- Parameter Sensitivity: Lacks sensitivity analysis of key hyperparameters
- Limited Improvement Magnitude: While consistent, improvement magnitude is relatively modest (0.08%-6.75%)
- Academic Contribution: Provides new task decoupling perspective for HMP field, potentially inspiring subsequent research
- Practical Value: As a universal enhancement framework, can be directly applied to existing systems
- Reproducibility: Clear method description facilitates reproduction and extension
- Robot Collaboration: Human-robot collaboration scenarios requiring accurate human motion prediction
- Autonomous Driving: Pedestrian trajectory prediction and intent estimation
- Motion Gaming: Real-time action recognition and prediction
- Medical Rehabilitation: Motion analysis and rehabilitation assessment
The paper cites 29 relevant references covering major research directions in HMP, including early statistical methods, deep learning methods, and latest graph neural network and Transformer methods, providing sufficient theoretical foundation for the research.
Overall Assessment: This is an innovative work in the human motion prediction field that, through in-depth analysis of existing method limitations, proposes a simple yet effective solution. While improvement magnitude is limited, its universality and theoretical insights provide valuable contributions to the field's development.