2025-11-16T12:07:12.311543

Chunk-Distilled Language Modeling

Li, Livescu, Zhou

We introduce Chunk-Distilled Language Modeling (CD-LM), an approach to text generation that addresses two challenges in current large language models (LLMs): the inefficiency of token-level generation, and the difficulty of adapting to new data and knowledge. Our method combines deep network-based LLMs with a straightforward retrieval module, which allows the generation of multi-token text chunks at a single decoding step. Our retrieval framework enables flexible construction of model- or domain-specific datastores, either leveraging the internal knowledge of existing models, or incorporating expert insights from human-annotated corpora. This adaptability allows for enhanced control over the language model's distribution without necessitating additional training. We present the CD-LM formulation along with performance metrics demonstrating its ability to improve language model performance and efficiency across a diverse set of downstream tasks. Code and data will be made publicly available.

academic

Chunk-Distilled Language Modeling

Basic Information

Paper ID: 2501.00343
Title: Chunk-Distilled Language Modeling
Authors: Yanhong Li (University of Chicago & TTIC), Karen Livescu (Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago), Jiawei Zhou (TTIC & Stony Brook University)
Classification: cs.CL cs.AI
Publication Date: December 31, 2024 (arXiv preprint)
Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00343

Abstract

This paper proposes Chunk-Distilled Language Modeling (CD-LM), a text generation approach that addresses two core challenges of current large language models: the inefficiency of token-level generation and the difficulty of adapting to new data and knowledge. The method combines deep network-based LLMs with a simple retrieval module, enabling the generation of multi-token text chunks in a single decoding step. Its retrieval framework supports flexible construction of model-specific or domain-specific data stores, leveraging both the internal knowledge of existing models and expert insights from manually annotated corpora. This adaptability allows enhanced control over the language model distribution without requiring additional training.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problems

Generation Efficiency Issue: Current LLMs based on autoregressive Transformer architecture generate text serially, one token at a time, limiting inference efficiency
Knowledge Adaptation Difficulty: Updating model parameters after pretraining requires expensive data and computational resources, making it challenging to dynamically incorporate new knowledge

Problem Significance

Existing solutions have limitations: speculative decoding improves speed but maintains fixed model distribution; retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves adaptability but typically offers no efficiency gains
A unified solution addressing both efficiency and performance is needed

Key Insights

The paper observes that LLMs frequently generate repeated text chunks in similar contexts. These chunks exhibit high-probability plateaus in token sequences, indicating strong model memorization of certain multi-token combinations.

Core Contributions

Proposes CD-LM Framework: The first retrieval-augmented language modeling method that simultaneously improves generation efficiency and modeling performance
Designs Flexible Chunk Extraction Mechanism: Supports three application scenarios (knowledge distillation, self-distillation, expert distillation)
Constructs Efficient Retrieval Architecture: Trie-based data storage and context matching mechanism
Derives Probability Calculation Algorithm: Provides complete dynamic programming algorithm for sequence probability computation
Comprehensive Experimental Validation: Demonstrates dual improvements in efficiency and performance across multiple tasks

Method Details

Task Definition

Given a prefix sequence $x_{<n}$ , CD-LM selects at each generation step:

Accept a retrieved text chunk $c_n$ (skipping multiple token generation steps)
Reject the chunk and use the base LM to generate a single token

Model Architecture

1. Probabilistic Generation Model

CD-LM introduces a binary random variable $z_n$ controlling whether to use a retrieved chunk at position $n$ :

$p(z_n = 1) = q_n$

The generation process is:

If $z_n = 1$ : Accept chunk $c_n$ with length $\tau_n$
If $z_n = 0$ : Use base LM to generate a single token

2. Chunk Data Store Construction

Data store $D = \{(r_i, s_i)\}_{i=1}^{|D|}$ , where:

$r_i = (u_i, v_i)$ : $u_i$ is the preceding context, $v_i$ is the entry token
$s_i$ : text chunk
Stored using trie structure $\{T_{w_1}, T_{w_2}, ..., T_{w_{|V|}}\}$ , where each $T_w$ stores all chunks starting with token $w$

3. Adaptive Chunk Retrieval

Chunk proposal model $G(x_{<n}) \rightarrow (c_n, q_n)$ :

(u^*, c_n) &= \arg\max_{(u,s) \in T_{x_{n-1}}} \{\text{sim}(f_\theta(x_{<n-1}), f_\theta(u))\} \\ q_n &= g_\phi(\text{sim}(f_\theta(x_{<n-1}), f_\theta(u^*))) \end{align}$$ where $\text{sim}(\cdot, \cdot)$ is cosine similarity and $g_\phi(\cdot)$ is a mapping function from similarity to acceptance probability. ### Technical Innovations 1. **Hard Decision Mechanism**: Unlike kNN-LM's soft mixing, CD-LM makes hard decisions for multi-token chunks 2. **Entry Token Constraint**: Uses the previous token as an entry point to limit search space and improve retrieval efficiency 3. **Training-Free Design**: The entire framework requires no additional training and can work with any off-the-shelf LM 4. **Three Distillation Modes**: - **KCD-LM**: Distills knowledge from stronger models - **SCD-LM**: Self-memory for efficiency improvement - **ECD-LM**: Incorporates expert-annotated knowledge ## Experimental Setup ### Datasets 1. **Language Modeling**: WikiText-103, GitHub Code (Dockerfile) 2. **Domain Adaptation**: Medical Instruction Dataset, Pile-of-Law (Federal Register) 3. **Efficiency Testing**: MT-Bench-80, MT-Bench-10 4. **Knowledge Injection**: Alan Turing Wikipedia page, synthetic PII data ### Evaluation Metrics - **Performance**: Perplexity (PPL), MAUVE score, ROUGE-L, BLEURT - **Efficiency**: Token Time Savings (TTS), Forward Pass Savings (FPS) - **Quality**: LLM-as-a-judge evaluation, human fluency assessment ### Baseline Methods - kNN-LM, RETOMATON (non-parametric methods) - REST (speculative decoding method) - Base models with direct fine-tuning ### Implementation Details - Chunk extraction threshold $\gamma \in [0.3, 0.9]$ - Similarity threshold $\eta$ optimized on validation set - Context length: 64 tokens - Piecewise linear function used as $g_\phi$ ## Experimental Results ### Main Results #### 1. Knowledge Distillation (KCD-LM) In GPT-2 small (137M) → GPT-2 XL (1.5B) distillation experiments: | Dataset | Base LM | KCD-LM | Improvement | |---------|---------|---------|-------------| | WikiText | 34.83 | 22.90 | 34.2% | | Medical | 51.68 | 24.95 | 51.7% | | Law | 11.41 | 8.24 | 27.8% | | Code | 106.44 | 50.77 | 52.3% | #### 2. Self-Distillation Efficiency (SCD-LM) Efficiency improvements on MT-Bench-80: | Model | TTS Improvement | FPS Improvement | |-------|-----------------|-----------------| | GPT-2-XL | 19.59% | 43.33% | | LLaMA-2 | 14.89% | 32.32% | | Mistral | 11.75% | 24.52% | #### 3. Expert Distillation (ECD-LM) Entity coverage improvement in Alan Turing QA: | Model | Avg Entity Increase | Unique Entity Increase | |-------|---------------------|------------------------| | GPT2-XL | 46.8% | 42.2% | | LLaMA-2 | 13.5% | 17.7% | | Mistral | 18.5% | 11.9% | ### Ablation Studies 1. **Chunk Extraction Threshold Impact**: Lower thresholds (0.3-0.4) perform best on most tasks 2. **Data Store Size**: CD-LM requires only 30-40% of kNN-LM's storage space 3. **Retrieval Frequency**: Each retrieval searches only 0.0003-0.01% of the data store ### Case Analysis Generation examples demonstrate that CD-LM can: - Naturally integrate retrieved text chunks - Control chunk usage frequency through similarity thresholds - Maintain coherence and fluency in generated text ## Related Work ### Non-parametric Language Modeling - kNN-LM: Performs retrieval at each token position with high computational overhead - NPM: Fully non-parametric, lacking parametric knowledge ### Speculative Decoding - REST: Retrieves draft token sequences but requires LLM verification - Traditional speculative decoding: Improves speed only, cannot improve performance ### Retrieval-Augmented Generation - Classification by granularity: document-level, phrase-level, token-level - CD-LM operates at phrase-level with hard decisions and efficiency advantages ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. CD-LM successfully achieves dual improvements in efficiency and performance 2. Training-free design enables easy deployment to existing LMs 3. Three distillation modes support diverse application scenarios 4. Significantly outperforms existing methods across multiple tasks ### Limitations 1. **Retrieval Overhead**: While more efficient than kNN-LM, retrieval latency still exists 2. **Chunk Quality Dependency**: Performance largely depends on chunk extraction quality 3. **Domain Adaptability**: Requires specialized data stores for specific domains 4. **Memory Requirements**: Large-scale data stores still require substantial memory ### Future Directions 1. **Retrieval Optimization**: Quantization, data store pruning, alternative search strategies 2. **Dynamic Chunk Extraction**: Real-time adaptive chunk identification mechanisms 3. **Multimodal Extension**: Extension to images, audio, and other modalities 4. **Trainable Components**: Introduction of learnable parameters for further optimization ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Strong Innovation**: First retrieval-augmented method addressing both efficiency and performance 2. **Theoretical Completeness**: Provides complete probabilistic modeling and computational framework 3. **Comprehensive Experiments**: Covers multiple tasks, models, and evaluation dimensions 4. **High Practicality**: Training-free design facilitates real-world deployment 5. **Clear Writing**: Accurate technical descriptions and detailed experimental setup ### Weaknesses 1. **Retrieval Efficiency**: Still has additional overhead compared to pure parametric methods 2. **Hyperparameter Sensitivity**: Multiple threshold parameters require careful tuning 3. **Long Sequence Handling**: Insufficient evaluation on long sequence generation 4. **Theoretical Analysis**: Lacks convergence and complexity guarantees ### Impact 1. **Academic Value**: Provides new paradigm for retrieval-augmented language modeling 2. **Practical Value**: Important application potential in resource-constrained scenarios 3. **Reproducibility**: Commits to open-sourcing code and data for easy reproduction 4. **Inspirational Value**: Provides important insights for future related research ### Applicable Scenarios 1. **Resource-Constrained Environments**: When small models need performance close to large models 2. **Domain Adaptation**: When rapid adaptation to domain-specific knowledge is needed 3. **Real-Time Systems**: Applications with high inference speed requirements 4. **Knowledge Updates**: Scenarios requiring dynamic incorporation of new knowledge ## References The paper cites important works in retrieval-augmented generation, speculative decoding, and non-parametric language modeling, providing solid theoretical foundations and comparison baselines for CD-LM design. --- **Overall Assessment**: This is a high-quality research paper proposing the innovative CD-LM framework, demonstrating excellence in theoretical modeling, technical implementation, and experimental validation. The method has significant value in addressing LLM efficiency and adaptability issues and is expected to have substantial impact in practical applications.