Decoherence dynamics in a polaron system with collective dephasing

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.00355
• Title: Decoherence dynamics in a polaron system with collective dephasing
• Authors: Saima Bashir, Muzaffar Qadir Lone, Prince A Ganaie
• Classification: quant-ph cond-mat.other
• Publication Date: December 31, 2024
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00355

Abstract

Within the framework of quantum information, managing decoherence is a critical task. This study provides an in-depth investigation of the decoherence dynamics of a dressed qubit, represented by a spinless fermion hopping between two lattice sites that are strongly coupled to a collective bosonic bath. To simplify calculations under strong coupling, the Lang-Firsov transformation is employed, effectively minimizing the system-bath interaction. From the polaron perspective using an Ohmic bath spectral density with Gaussian cutoff, a fundamental time scale s (equivalent to length scale l) is identified that determines coherence decay. Utilizing a quantum master equation in the energy eigenstate basis while maintaining fixed particle number, it is demonstrated that coherence persists at small s values but weakens at larger s values. Furthermore, methods for manipulating decoherence within the system using π pulses are explored.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem to be Addressed: The decoherence problem arising from interactions between quantum systems and their environment, which represents a major obstacle in quantum information processing and quantum computing. Particular attention is paid to decoherence dynamics in strong coupling regimes for two-site systems composed of spinless fermions.
2. Problem Significance:
   • The fragility of quantum superposition states makes quantum systems susceptible to entanglement with environmental degrees of freedom, leading to decoherence and entanglement degradation
   • Decoherence represents a major barrier to the development of quantum information processing systems such as quantum computers
   • Understanding decoherence dynamics is crucial for technological development utilizing quantum mechanics
3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
   • Traditional perturbative methods fail under strong coupling conditions
   • Lack of detailed studies on decoherence dynamics in the dressed basis (polaron framework)
   • Limited approaches for handling collective dephasing baths
4. Research Motivation:
   • Systematic investigation of decoherence dynamics within the polaron framework
   • Identification of key parameters controlling coherence decay
   • Exploration of decoherence control schemes based on π pulses

Core Contributions

1. Established decoherence theory within the polaron framework: The Lang-Firsov transformation converts the strong coupling problem into a weak coupling problem, enabling perturbative treatment
2. Identified key control parameters: Discovered that the fundamental time scale s = l/v (length scale l) determines coherence decay behavior
3. Revealed localization-delocalization transition: Demonstrated that small s values maintain coherence while large s values lead to complete decoherence, corresponding to a localization-delocalization transition
4. Proposed π pulse control scheme: Developed a decoherence protection protocol based on bang-bang control, achieving effective protection of quantum information
5. Provided complete dynamical description: Delivered complete time evolution of density matrix diagonal and off-diagonal elements in the single-particle subspace

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Investigation of decoherence dynamics in a two-site quantum bit system composed of spinless fermions, where:

• Input: Initial quantum state, system-bath coupling parameters
• Output: Coherence decay time evolution, localization-delocalization transition behavior
• Constraints: Fixed particle number, strong system-bath coupling, Markovian approximation

Model Architecture

1. System Hamiltonian

Total Hamiltonian: $H = H_S + H_B + H_I$

System Hamiltonian: $H_S = \epsilon(a_1^\dagger a_1 + a_2^\dagger a_2) + J(a_1^\dagger a_2 + a_2^\dagger a_1)$

where $\epsilon$ is the site energy and $J$ is the hopping strength.

2. Lang-Firsov Transformation

Define the transformation operator: $S = -\sum_{p,k} n_p\left(\frac{g_{pk}}{\omega_k}b_k - \frac{g_{pk}^*}{\omega_k}b_k^\dagger\right)$

Transformed system Hamiltonian: $H'_S = \tilde{J}[a_1^\dagger a_2 + a_2^\dagger a_1] + \epsilon(n_1 + n_2) + V_{12}n_1n_2$

Effective hopping energy: $\tilde{J} = J\exp\left[-\frac{1}{2}\sum_k |\alpha_k|^2\right]$

3. Quantum Master Equation

In the interaction picture: $\frac{d\rho_s(t)}{dt} = -\int_0^t d\tau \text{Tr}_B[H'_I(t), [H'_I(\tau), \rho_s(t)\rho_B]]$

Derived master equation: $\dot{\rho}_S(t) = \gamma_+(t)[L_{12}^\dagger\rho_S L_{12} - \frac{1}{2}\{L_{12}L_{12}^\dagger, \rho_S\}] + \gamma_+(t)[L_{12}\rho_S L_{12}^\dagger - \frac{1}{2}\{L_{12}^\dagger L_{12}, \rho_S\}] + \gamma_-(t)[L_{12}\rho_S L_{12}L_{12}^\dagger\rho_S L_{12}^\dagger]$

Technical Innovations

1. Application of polaron transformation: Cleverly converts strong coupling problems into effective weak coupling problems, such that $\tilde{J} \ll J$
2. Counter-adiabatic approximation: Under the condition $\tilde{J}/\Delta E_B \ll 1$, neglects time dependence of system operators, simplifying calculations
3. Identification of geometric factors: Discovers that the $1-\cos(\vec{k}\cdot\vec{l})$ factor suppresses coupling to certain bath modes, explaining coherence protection mechanisms
4. Single-particle subspace analysis: Completely solves density matrix evolution in the $\{|S\rangle, |T\rangle\}$ basis

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Model Parameters

• Bath spectral density: Ohmic bath with Gaussian cutoff $|g(\omega)|^2 = \alpha\omega e^{-\omega^2/\Omega^2}$
• Key parameters: $s = l/v$ (time scale), $\alpha$ (coupling strength), $\Omega$ (cutoff frequency)
• Experimentally relevant parameters: Lattice spacing $l = 100\times 10^{-9}$ m to $10\times 10^{-6}$ m, phonon velocity $v = 350$ m/s

Evaluation Metrics

1. Normalized coherence: $C(t) = \frac{|\langle T|\rho(t)|S\rangle|}{|\langle T|\rho(0)|S\rangle|}$
2. Population difference: $PD(t) = \frac{|\langle T|\rho(t)|T\rangle - \langle S|\rho(t)|S\rangle|}{|\langle T|\rho(0)|T\rangle + \langle S|\rho(0)|S\rangle|}$

Comparative Analysis

• Coherence evolution under different s values
• Comparison of small s ($s=1$) vs. large s ($s=10,100$) behavior
• Comparison of effects with and without π pulse control

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Coherence-Parameter Relationship:
   • $s \ll 1$: Coherence is maintained over long times
   • $s \gg 1$: System rapidly loses coherence
   • Clear localization-delocalization transition exists
2. Population Dynamics:
   • Small s values: System primarily remains in energy eigenstates $|S\rangle$ and $|T\rangle$
   • Large s values: Evolution toward equal probability mixture of $|S\rangle$ and $|T\rangle$
3. Effective Hopping Suppression:
   • $\tilde{J}/J$ decays exponentially with s and $\alpha$
   • Validates the effectiveness of Lang-Firsov transformation

π Pulse Control Results

Through bang-bang control protocol: $U_{\text{cycle}}(t, \delta t) = U_I(t+2\delta t, t+\delta t)\Pi U_I(t+\delta t, t)\Pi$

Achieves:

• Complete decoherence suppression at $O(\delta t^3)$ precision
• Arbitrary small errors obtainable by choosing sufficiently large N

Physical Mechanism Analysis

Coherence Protection Mechanism:

• Geometric factor $\sin^2(\vec{k}\cdot\vec{l}/2)$ suppresses forward scattering processes
• Certain bath modes cannot distinguish lattice separation, reducing coherence loss
• Available phase space volume increases with s

Related Work

1. Polaron Theory: Application of Lang-Firsov transformation in strong electron-phonon coupling systems
2. Open Quantum Systems: Quantum master equation methods and Markovian approximation
3. Decoherence Control: Dynamic decoupling and bang-bang control techniques
4. Cold Atom Systems: Bose-Einstein condensate realization in double-well potentials
5. Quantum Dot Systems: Impurity trapping and double quantum dot implementations

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Identified key parameters controlling decoherence: Time scale $s = l/v$ determines coherence decay behavior
2. Revealed localization-delocalization transition: Quantum state localization control achievable through s adjustment
3. Established effective control scheme: π pulse technique effectively suppresses decoherence
4. Provided complete theoretical framework: Complete description of decoherence dynamics from polaron perspective

Limitations

1. Markovian approximation: Requires $\tau_R \gg \tau_B$, limiting applicability range
2. Counter-adiabatic condition: Requires $\tilde{J}/\Delta E_B \ll 1$, potentially restricting parameter choices
3. Zero-temperature approximation: Neglects finite temperature effects
4. Idealized assumptions: π pulses assumed to be instantaneous and perfect

Future Directions

1. Extension to finite temperature cases
2. Consideration of non-Markovian effects
3. Investigation of multi-particle system decoherence
4. Exploration of alternative bath environments
5. Experimental verification of theoretical predictions

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong methodological innovation: Cleverly combines Lang-Firsov transformation and quantum master equation to handle strong coupling problems
2. Clear physical picture: Provides intuitive physical understanding through geometric factor and phase space analysis
3. Good theoretical completeness: Complete theoretical framework from Hamiltonian construction to dynamical solution
4. High practical value: Proposed control scheme has practical significance for quantum information processing

Weaknesses

1. Lack of experimental verification: Purely theoretical work without experimental validation
2. Limited parameter range: Multiple approximation conditions restrict method universality
3. Limited numerical results: Primarily demonstrates qualitative behavior, lacking detailed numerical analysis
4. Insufficient comparative analysis: Insufficient comparison with other decoherence control methods

Impact

1. Academic contribution: Provides new theoretical tools for strongly coupled open quantum systems
2. Practical value: Offers guidance for decoherence control in quantum computing
3. Reproducibility: Detailed theoretical derivations facilitate subsequent research
4. Cross-disciplinary application: Methods generalizable to other strongly coupled quantum systems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Cold atom systems: Quantum bit implementation in double-well BEC
2. Quantum dot systems: Charge/spin quantum bit in double quantum dots
3. Molecular systems: Quantum bits with strong vibronic coupling
4. Solid-state systems: Quantum impurity problems with strong electron-phonon coupling

References

The paper cites multiple important related works, including:

• Original Lang-Firsov transformation literature I. G. Lang and Y. A. Firsov, 1963
• Open quantum system theory H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, 2002
• Dynamic decoupling techniques L. Viola and S. Lloyd, 1998
• Cold atom implementations M. Bruderer et al., 2007

Summary: This is an important paper making significant contributions to the theory of strongly coupled open quantum systems. Through clever theoretical methods and clear physical analysis, it provides new perspectives and tools for understanding and controlling quantum decoherence. Despite limitations from certain theoretical assumptions, its innovation and practical value make it an important work in the field.