2025-11-22T18:28:15.174123

Federated Dropout: Convergence Analysis and Resource Allocation

Xie, Wen, Liu et al.
Federated Dropout is an efficient technique to overcome both communication and computation bottlenecks for deploying federated learning at the network edge. In each training round, an edge device only needs to update and transmit a sub-model, which is generated by the typical method of dropout in deep learning, and thus effectively reduces the per-round latency. \textcolor{blue}{However, the theoretical convergence analysis for Federated Dropout is still lacking in the literature, particularly regarding the quantitative influence of dropout rate on convergence}. To address this issue, by using the Taylor expansion method, we mathematically show that the gradient variance increases with a scaling factor of $γ/(1-γ)$, with $γ\in [0, θ)$ denoting the dropout rate and $θ$ being the maximum dropout rate ensuring the loss function reduction. Based on the above approximation, we provide the convergence analysis for Federated Dropout. Specifically, it is shown that a larger dropout rate of each device leads to a slower convergence rate. This provides a theoretical foundation for reducing the convergence latency by making a tradeoff between the per-round latency and the overall rounds till convergence. Moreover, a low-complexity algorithm is proposed to jointly optimize the dropout rate and the bandwidth allocation for minimizing the loss function in all rounds under a given per-round latency and limited network resources. Finally, numerical results are provided to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
academic

Federated Dropout: Convergence Analysis and Resource Allocation

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2501.00379
  • Title: Federated Dropout: Convergence Analysis and Resource Allocation
  • Authors: Sijing Xie, Dingzhu Wen, Xiaonan Liu, Changsheng You, Tharmalingam Ratnarajah, Kaibin Huang
  • Classification: cs.LG cs.IT math.IT
  • Publication Date: December 31, 2024
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00379

Abstract

Federated Dropout is an effective technique to overcome communication and computation bottlenecks in deploying federated learning at the network edge. In each training round, edge devices only need to update and transmit a sub-model generated through the typical dropout method in deep learning, thereby effectively reducing per-round latency. However, the literature still lacks theoretical convergence analysis of Federated Dropout, particularly regarding the quantitative impact of dropout rate on convergence. To address this gap, this paper employs Taylor expansion methods to mathematically prove that gradient variance grows with a scaling factor of γ/(1-γ), where γ∈[0,θ) denotes the dropout rate and θ is the maximum dropout rate ensuring loss function reduction. Based on this approximation, the paper provides convergence analysis of Federated Dropout, demonstrating that higher dropout rates per device lead to slower convergence. This provides a theoretical foundation for reducing convergence latency through trade-offs between per-round delay and total convergence rounds.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Surging Demand for Edge AI: Mobile data explosion drives AI deployment at network edges, making Federated Edge Learning (FEEL) a promising technology for realizing edge AI
  2. Computational Resource Constraints: Edge devices face severe computational resource limitations, while modern deep neural networks (DNNs) and large language models (LLMs) require substantial computational capacity
  3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
    • Communication-efficient methods (gradient compression, device scheduling, etc.) primarily address communication bottlenecks
    • Model pruning methods still incur significant communication overhead in early training stages and typically reduce model representational capacity
    • Lack of fundamental reduction in computational overhead

Research Motivation

  1. Theoretical Gap: Although the FedDrop framework is practical, it lacks rigorous theoretical convergence analysis
  2. Optimization Requirements: Theory-guided optimization of joint design of dropout rates and resource allocation is needed
  3. Practical Applications: Providing theoretical foundation and practical algorithms for federated learning in resource-constrained environments

Core Contributions

  1. Convergence Theoretical Analysis:
    • Using Taylor expansion to prove that sub-network gradient vectors are variance-bounded estimates of original DNN gradient vectors
    • Mathematical proof that gradient variance is proportional to γ/(1-γ)
    • Establishing quantitative relationship between dropout rate and convergence speed
  2. Per-Round Loss Function Minimization:
    • Based on theoretical analysis, characterizing learning loss reduction in arbitrary rounds
    • Maximizing learning loss reduction under constraints of system bandwidth, task completion latency, and device energy budget
  3. Joint Optimization Algorithm:
    • Proposing joint design of adaptive dropout rates and bandwidth allocation
    • Obtaining closed-form solutions through KKT conditions
    • Algorithm complexity of only O(K²)
  4. Performance Evaluation:
    • Conducting numerical experiments under both underfitting and overfitting scenarios
    • Validating correctness of theoretical analysis

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: K edge devices, each device k holding local dataset Dk Objective: Minimize global loss function: F(w)=∑k=1K∣Dk∣∣D∣fk(w^k;Dk)F(w) = \sum_{k=1}^K \frac{|D_k|}{|D|} f_k(\hat{w}_k; D_k) where w^k\hat{w}_k is the dropout-generated sub-network corresponding to device k, and fkf_k is the local loss function of device k.

Model Architecture

1. Federated Dropout Framework

The FedDrop framework comprises five steps:

  1. Generation Phase: Server generates sub-networks for each device
  2. Push Phase: Devices download corresponding sub-networks
  3. Computation Phase: Devices update sub-networks based on local data
  4. Pull Phase: Devices upload updated sub-networks
  5. Aggregation Phase: Server aggregates all sub-network updates to update the global model

2. Dropout Mechanism

For device k with dropout rate γk, the sub-network is defined as: w^k=w∘mk\hat{w}_k = w \circ m_k where the j-th element of dropout mask mk is:

\frac{1}{1-\gamma_k}, & \text{with probability } (1-\gamma_k) \\ 0, & \text{with probability } \gamma_k \end{cases}$$ #### 3. Latency and Energy Consumption Model Total latency per round: $$T_{k,t} = T^{com,dl}_{k,t} + T^{cmp}_{k,t} + T^{com,ul}_{k,t}$$ Total energy consumption: $$E_{k,t} = E^{com,ul}_{k,t} + E^{cmp}_{k,t} + \xi_k$$ ### Technical Innovations #### 1. Gradient Variance Bounding Theorem **Lemma 1**: Under the stated assumptions, sub-network gradient vectors are variance-bounded estimates: $$E_{m_k^{(t)}}[\hat{g}_k(\hat{w}_k^{(t)})] = \tilde{g}_k(w^{(t)})$$ $$D_{m_k^{(t)}}[\hat{g}_k(\hat{w}_k^{(t)})] \leq (AG)^2 \cdot \frac{\gamma_{k,t}}{1-\gamma_{k,t}}$$ #### 2. Convergence Analysis **Theorem 1**: Given learning rate η = 1/(3√TL), the ground-truth gradient vector converges to: $$\lim_{T→+∞} \frac{1}{T} \sum_{t=0}^{T-1} \|g(w^{(t)})\|^2 ≤ G_T = 0$$ Key Finding: Convergence speed decreases with increasing dropout rate. #### 3. Joint Optimization Problem $$\min_{\{\gamma_{k,t}, \rho_{k,t}\}} \sum_{k=1}^K \frac{|D_k|}{|D|} \frac{1}{1-\gamma_{k,t}}$$ Subject to: - C1: Per-round latency constraint - C2: Energy consumption constraint - C3: Bandwidth allocation constraint - C4: Dropout rate constraint ## Experimental Setup ### Datasets - **CIFAR-100**: Used for training LeNet and AlexNet - **Data Distribution**: - IID distribution - Non-IID distribution (using Dirichlet(0.1) distribution) ### Model Configuration 1. **LeNet** (Underfitting Scenario): - 2 convolutional layers + 2 fully connected layers - Kernel size: 5×5 - Activation function: Tanh 2. **AlexNet** (Overfitting Scenario): - 5 convolutional layers + 2 fully connected layers - Kernel size: 3×3 - Activation function: ReLU ### Evaluation Metrics - Convergence rounds - Test accuracy - Computational and communication overhead ### Baseline Methods 1. **Proposed Scheme**: Optimal scheme of Algorithm 1 2. **Bandwidth-Aware Scheme**: Random bandwidth allocation with optimized dropout rates 3. **No-Dropout Scheme**: Ideal baseline without considering dropout ## Experimental Results ### Main Results #### 1. Impact of Dropout Rate on Performance - **Underfitting Scenario**: Test accuracy decreases with increasing dropout rate - **Overfitting Scenario**: Moderate dropout rate (0.15) achieves best performance; excessively high dropout rates degrade performance #### 2. Impact of Network Resources on Learning Performance **Impact of Per-Round Latency**: - Proposed scheme consistently outperforms bandwidth-aware scheme - Convergence rounds decrease with increasing per-round latency - Performance gap with no-dropout scheme narrows as latency increases **Impact of System Bandwidth**: - Convergence rounds decrease with increasing system bandwidth - Proposed scheme outperforms baseline methods under various bandwidth conditions #### 3. Quantitative Results According to Table II, under identical sparsity: - FedDrop on LeNet shows accuracy declining from 25.19% (γ=0) to 19.09% (γ=0.4) on Non-IID data - FedDrop on AlexNet shows accuracy first increasing then decreasing on Non-IID data, peaking at 32.77% when γ=0.15 ### Ablation Studies By comparing uniform settings with different dropout rates, the paper validates: 1. Smaller dropout rates lead to faster convergence 2. Correctness of theoretical analysis 3. Regularization effect of dropout in overfitting scenarios ### Experimental Findings 1. **Theory Validation**: Experimental results align with theoretical analysis, proving negative correlation between dropout rate and convergence speed 2. **Resource Trade-offs**: More network resources allow lower dropout rates, improving performance 3. **Scenario Adaptability**: Proposed scheme outperforms no-dropout scheme in overfitting scenarios ## Related Work ### Communication-Efficient Federated Learning - Partial gradient averaging, gradient compression, resource management, device scheduling, over-the-air computation, knowledge distillation, etc. ### Computation-Efficient Methods - Pruned federated learning (PruneFL) - Adaptive model pruning - Sub-network training frameworks: static, rolling, and importance-guided schemes ### Advantages of This Work 1. **Low Design Complexity**: Requires only dropout operation 2. **Multi-Functional Adaptability**: Dropout rate can adapt to device capabilities and network conditions 3. **High Model Diversity**: Randomness-induced training diversity 4. **Strong Model Robustness**: Enhances model robustness and eliminates simple dependencies between neurons ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. First to provide rigorous theoretical convergence analysis of FedDrop 2. Establishing quantitative relationship between dropout rate and convergence speed 3. Proposing low-complexity joint optimization algorithm 4. Experimental validation of theoretical analysis and algorithm effectiveness ### Limitations 1. **Assumption Constraints**: Analysis based on small dropout rate assumption 2. **Model Scope**: Primarily considers DNNs; LLMs left for future research 3. **Channel Model**: Assumes frequency non-selective channels 4. **Optimization Objective**: Uses loss function upper bound rather than exact values ### Future Directions 1. Extension to large language models (LLMs) 2. Integration with compression and over-the-air computation techniques 3. Consideration of more complex channel models 4. Adaptive strategies in dynamic network environments ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Significant Theoretical Contribution**: First to provide rigorous convergence analysis for FedDrop, filling an important theoretical gap 2. **Rigorous Mathematical Derivation**: Using Taylor expansion and KKT conditions with complete and reliable mathematical proofs 3. **High Practical Value**: O(K²) complexity algorithm suitable for practical deployment 4. **Comprehensive Experiments**: Covering both underfitting and overfitting scenarios with sufficient validation 5. **Clear Writing**: Well-structured with accurate technical exposition ### Weaknesses 1. **Assumption Limitations**: Small dropout rate assumption may restrict practical application scope 2. **Model Limitations**: Validation only on relatively simple networks; lacks large-scale model experiments 3. **Environment Simplification**: Single-cell network model; actual deployment environments are more complex 4. **Limited Comparisons**: Insufficient comparison with other sub-network training methods ### Impact 1. **Academic Value**: Provides theoretical foundation for dropout techniques in federated learning 2. **Practical Significance**: Offers feasible solutions for federated learning in edge computing environments 3. **Reproducibility**: Detailed algorithm description and clear parameter settings facilitate reproduction ### Applicable Scenarios 1. **Resource-Constrained Edge Devices**: IoT devices with limited computational and communication capabilities 2. **Bandwidth-Limited Networks**: Wireless network environments requiring reduced communication overhead 3. **Latency-Sensitive Applications**: Edge AI applications sensitive to delays 4. **Large-Scale Deployment**: Federated learning systems supporting large numbers of participating devices ## References The paper cites 50 relevant references covering important works in federated learning, edge computing, resource allocation, model compression, and other related domains, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research. --- **Overall Assessment**: This is an important paper with significant theoretical contributions to federated learning analysis. The authors provide the first rigorous convergence analysis for FedDrop, establishing quantitative relationships between dropout rate and convergence performance, and proposing a practical joint optimization algorithm. The theoretical derivations are rigorous, experimental validation is comprehensive, and the work has important implications for advancing federated learning applications in edge computing environments.