Design To Convert a Wired PLC into Wireless PLC

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.00476
• Title: Design To Convert a Wired PLC into Wireless PLC
• Authors: Sushil Ghildiyal, Kishankumar Bhimani, Prof. Manimozhi M (VIT University)
• Classification: cs.HC cs.SY eess.SY physics.ins-det
• Published Journal: International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), Volume 6 Issue I, January 2018
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2018.1244

Abstract

This paper proposes converting existing wired Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) into wireless PLCs using Bluetooth technology. The system employs two Bluetooth devices as transceivers to transmit and receive input signals, thereby constructing a wireless PLC architecture. The primary advantage of PLCs is controlling outputs based on input states. In the Bluetooth implementation, handshake communication occurs between two Bluetooth modules, interfacing with the PLC through a microcontroller board (Arduino), enabling field devices to be controlled wirelessly.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

In traditional industrial automation systems, extensive wired connections (fieldbus) are required between field devices and PLCs, presenting the following challenges:

1. High wiring costs: Requiring substantial cables and connectors
2. Difficult maintenance: Complex troubleshooting and maintenance procedures
3. High labor costs: Extensive manual labor for wiring and maintenance
4. Connector failures: Physical connections are prone to malfunction

Research Motivation

With the advancement of wireless technologies, converting field device-to-PLC communication to wireless methods offers the following advantages:

• Reduced wiring work and associated costs
• Decreased connector failure risks
• Provision of backup communication links during network failures
• Particularly useful in locations where wiring and troubleshooting are difficult

Technical Selection Rationale

Compared to other WPAN technologies such as ZigBee, Bluetooth was selected for the following reasons:

• ZigBee exhibits low data transmission rates, increasing overall scanning time
• Bluetooth technology offers low cost, ease of use, and high transmission rates
• Suitable for short-range industrial communication applications

Core Contributions

1. Proposed a Bluetooth-based wireless PLC solution: Utilizing HC05 Bluetooth modules to retrofit wired PLCs for wireless operation
2. Designed a complete system architecture: Including hardware interface design for both field-side and PLC-side components
3. Implemented master-slave Bluetooth communication protocol: Achieving stable wireless communication through AT command configuration
4. Constructed a functional prototype system: Validating the feasibility of the approach using Arduino Uno, HC05 Bluetooth modules, and Delta PLC

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Converting traditional wired PLC systems into wireless systems while maintaining original control logic and functionality, enabling wireless communication between field devices and PLCs.

Input: Digital/analog signals from field devices Output: Actuator actions controlled by PLC Constraints: Maintaining real-time requirements and ensuring communication reliability

System Architecture

Overall Architecture

The system employs a star topology structure, comprising two main components:

1. Field-side:
   • Input devices (sensors, switches, etc.)
   • Arduino Uno microcontroller
   • HC05 Bluetooth module (configured as slave device)
2. PLC-side:
   • HC05 Bluetooth module (configured as master device)
   • Arduino Uno microcontroller
   • Relay interface circuit
   • Delta PLC (14SS model, 8 inputs, 6 outputs)

Communication Flow

Input Devices → Arduino(Field-side) → HC05(Slave) ~~Wireless~~ HC05(Master) → Arduino(PLC-side) → Relay → PLC Input Module

Technical Implementation Details

Bluetooth Module Configuration

• Master device configuration: AT+ROLE=1
• Slave device configuration: AT+ROLE=0
• Address binding: AT+BIND='slave device address'
• Unified baud rate: Ensuring consistent baud rates between master and slave devices

Hardware Interface

• Operating voltage: PLC uses 24VDC, Arduino uses 5VDC
• Signal conversion: Voltage level conversion achieved through 5VDC relays
• Connection method: HC05 module connects to Arduino via 6 pins (EN, TXD, RXD, Vcc, GND, STATE)

Software Implementation

• PLC programming: Using WPL Software 2.39 with ladder logic language
• Arduino programming: Using Arduino IDE for serial communication and I/O control

Experimental Setup

Hardware Components

1. PLC: Delta 14SS model PLC (8 input, 6 output channels)
2. Microcontroller: Arduino Uno development board
3. Wireless module: HC05 Bluetooth modules (2 units)
4. Interface circuit: 5VDC relay
5. Power supply: 24VDC industrial power source

Software Tools

• PLC programming software: WPL Software 2.39
• Microcontroller programming: Arduino IDE
• Programming languages: Ladder logic (LBD) for PLC, C++ for Arduino

Test Scenarios

Simple switch-controlled LED output scenario to verify system functionality:

• Input: Mechanical switch
• Output: LED controlled by PLC output channel Y1
• Logic: LED illuminates when switch closes, extinguishes when switch opens

Experimental Results

System Functionality Verification

Experiments successfully verified the following functionalities:

1. Bluetooth pairing: Master and slave Bluetooth modules successfully establish connections
2. Signal transmission: Field switch states are wirelessly transmitted to the PLC
3. Real-time control: PLC controls outputs in real-time based on received wireless signals
4. Stable communication: Communication remains stable and reliable within a 10-meter range

Performance Parameters

Based on technical comparison tables provided in the paper:

• Communication distance: 10 meters
• Data transmission rate: 1000 kbps
• Maximum node count: 10 nodes
• Operating frequency band: 2.4-2.485 GHz ISM band

Practical Test Results

As shown in Figure 11, when the field switch closes, PLC output Y1 successfully illuminates, validating the effectiveness of wireless communication and control.

Related Work

Industrial Wireless Communication Technologies

1. ZigBee technology: Although power-efficient, data transmission rate is only 250kbps, unsuitable for high real-time requirements
2. WiFi technology: Transmission rates up to 5500kbps, but high power consumption and cost
3. Fieldbus: Wired solutions such as Profibus and DeviceNet with complex wiring requirements

Wireless PLC Research

Related research primarily focuses on ZigBee and WiFi applications. This paper systematically proposes a Bluetooth-based solution for the first time, achieving good balance between cost, power consumption, and performance.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Technical feasibility: Bluetooth technology successfully enables wireless retrofitting of wired PLCs
2. Cost-effectiveness: Retrofitting approach is more cost-effective than redesigning wireless PLCs
3. Practicality: Suitable for short-range industrial automation application scenarios

Limitations

1. Communication distance constraints: Bluetooth communication limited to 10 meters, restricting application scope
2. Node count limitations: Supporting maximum 10 nodes, unsuitable for large-scale systems
3. Insufficient real-time analysis: Lacking detailed latency and reliability analysis
4. Electromagnetic interference: Industrial environment interference effects insufficiently considered

Future Directions

1. Extended communication distance: Investigating newer technologies such as Bluetooth 5.0 to increase communication range
2. Multi-node networking: Designing network topologies supporting more nodes
3. Enhanced reliability: Adding error detection and retransmission mechanisms
4. Industrial-grade validation: Conducting long-term testing in actual industrial environments

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong practicality: Addresses actual wiring problems in industrial applications
2. Controllable costs: Using existing hardware platforms with low retrofitting costs
3. Mature technology: Based on established Bluetooth technology with assured reliability
4. Complete implementation: Providing comprehensive solutions from hardware to software

Weaknesses

1. Insufficient theoretical analysis: Lacking systematic performance analysis and theoretical modeling
2. Limited test scale: Only simple switch control testing performed
3. Industrial adaptability: Insufficient consideration of special industrial environment requirements
4. Scalability limitations: Difficult to extend to large-scale complex systems

Impact

1. Technical contribution: Provides new perspectives for wireless industrial automation
2. Practical value: Offers reference value for wireless retrofitting of small and medium-sized industrial systems
3. Limitations: Impact scope primarily restricted to small-scale, short-distance application scenarios

Applicable Scenarios

• Small production line equipment control
• Industrial environments with difficult wiring conditions
• Temporary or mobile industrial equipment control
• Wireless retrofitting of existing systems

References

The paper cites 8 related references, primarily covering:

1. Wireless Programmable Logic Controller system design
2. Fieldbus communication standards (EN 50170 PROFIBUS)
3. Wireless applications in industrial automation
4. ZigBee and wireless sensor network technologies
5. Real-time wireless sensor/actuator communication systems

Overall Assessment: This paper presents a practical industrial automation wireless solution. While lacking theoretical depth and comprehensive testing, it provides valuable reference for wireless retrofitting of existing industrial systems. The approach is particularly suitable for small to medium-scale, short-distance industrial application scenarios.