Many-Valued Modal Logic

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.00489
• Title: Many-Valued Modal Logic
• Authors: Amir Karniel (Technion), Michael Kaminski (Technion)
• Classification: cs.LO (Logic in Computer Science)
• Published Conference: Non-Classical Logics Theory and Applications (NCL'24), EPTCS 415, 2024
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00489

Abstract

This paper combines the concepts of modal logic and many-valued logic in a general and comprehensive manner. Given an arbitrary finite linearly ordered set of truth values and an arbitrary set of propositional connectives defined by truth tables, the authors define the many-valued minimal normal modal logic, presented in the form of a Gentzen-style sequent calculus, and prove its soundness and strong completeness with respect to many-valued Kripke models. The logic treats necessity and possibility operators independently, meaning they are not defined in terms of each other, and thus the duality between them is reflected in the proof system itself. The authors also prove the finite model property of this logic (implying strong decidability) and consider some of its extensions. Furthermore, they demonstrate the unique way of defining negation such that De Morgan duality between necessity and possibility holds, and embed many-valued intuitionistic logic into an extension of many-valued modal logic.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The core problem this research addresses is how to establish a universal modal logic system within the framework of many-valued logic. Traditional modal logic (such as the K system) is based on classical two-valued logic, whereas many real-world reasoning scenarios involve uncertainty or gradations of truth values, requiring many-valued logic for better modeling.

Importance Analysis

1. Theoretical Significance: Extending modal logic to many-valued settings provides a more general framework for logical theory
2. Practical Applications: Possesses important application value in scenarios with inherent uncertainty or truth value gradations, such as fuzzy logic systems and multi-agent systems
3. Unified Framework: Provides a unified framework capable of handling a broader range of logical scenarios

Limitations of Existing Approaches

Existing research on many-valued modal logic exhibits the following limitations:

• Most are based on fixed sets of connectives (such as Łukasiewicz connectives)
• Typically handle only the necessity operator □, defining the possibility operator ◇ as the dual of □
• Lack a unified framework for handling arbitrary truth value sets and connectives
• Limited results regarding strong completeness and strong decidability

Research Motivation

The authors' research motivation lies in:

1. Establishing a completely universal framework for many-valued modal logic
2. Treating □ and ◇ operators independently without assuming their mutual definability
3. Providing theoretical guarantees for strong completeness and strong decidability
4. Exploring the relationships between many-valued modal logic and other logical systems

Core Contributions

1. Proposed universal many-valued modal logic mv-K: Applicable to arbitrary finite linearly ordered truth value sets and arbitrary propositional connective sets
2. Established independent treatment mechanisms for □ and ◇: Without assuming mutual definability between the two, directly reflecting duality in the proof system
3. Proved strong completeness and strong decidability: Through canonical model theorems and finite model property
4. Constructed a complete extension system: Including mv-D, mv-T, mv-K4, mv-S4, mv-B, mv-S5 and other extensions
5. Characterized the unique negation definition: Such that □ and ◇ satisfy De Morgan duality
6. Achieved embedding of many-valued intuitionistic logic: Embedding many-valued intuitionistic logic into mv-S4

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

The task of this paper is to define a many-valued modal logic system mv-K for a given truth value set V = {v₁, v₂, ..., vₙ} (where v₁ < v₂ < ... < vₙ) and arbitrary propositional connective sets, such that it:

• Is semantically based on many-valued Kripke models
• Syntactically employs sequent calculus with labeled formulas
• Possesses soundness and strong completeness
• Satisfies the finite model property

Semantic Framework

Many-valued Kripke models are defined as triples M = ⟨W,R,I⟩, where:

• W is a non-empty set of possible worlds
• R is an accessibility relation on W
• I: W × P → V is a valuation function

Semantics of modal operators:

• I(u,□φ) = inf({I(v,φ) : v ∈ S(u)}), where inf(∅) = vₙ
• I(u,◇φ) = sup({I(v,φ) : v ∈ S(u)}), where sup(∅) = v₁

Syntactic System

Labeled formulas: Pairs of the form (φ,k), indicating that formula φ has truth value vₖ

Sequents: Expressions of the form Γ → Δ, where Γ and Δ are finite sets of labeled formulas

Axiom system includes:

1. Identity axiom: (φ,k) → (φ,k)
2. Connective axioms: Axioms defined according to truth tables
3. Modal rules:
   • □-rule: (φ,k) → Γ× / (□φ,k),Γ → (k ≠ n)
   • ◇-rule: (φ,k) → Γ× / (◇φ,k),Γ → (k ≠ 1)

where the definition of Γ× reflects the semantic constraints of modal operators.

Technical Innovations

1. Labeled formula method: Using labeled formulas (φ,k) to directly express truth value information, avoiding restrictions of designated values
2. Independent modal treatment: □ and ◇ as independent primitive operators, not mutually defined through negation
3. Universal connective handling: Uniformly handling arbitrary propositional connectives through truth tables
4. Strong completeness proof: Achieving strong completeness through canonical model construction

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Methods

This paper primarily conducts theoretical analysis and proof verification, including:

1. Soundness proof: Proving all rules are semantically valid through induction on derivation length
2. Strong completeness proof: Proving semantic entailment completeness through canonical model theorems
3. Finite model property proof: Proving each logic possesses finite model property through filtering techniques

Concrete Example Verification

The paper verifies theoretical results through multiple concrete examples:

Example 2: Proving that the sequent (□φ,k) → (◇φ,k)⁺ is derivable in mv-K (k ≠ n)

Example 5: In the modal extension of three-valued Łukasiewicz logic, proving: (□(p ⊃ q),3),(□p,3) → (□q,3)

These examples demonstrate the system's expressive and reasoning capabilities.

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

Theorem 6 (Soundness and Strong Completeness): For a set of sequents Σ and sequent Γ → Δ, Σ ⊢ Γ → Δ if and only if Σ ⊨ Γ → Δ

Theorem 21 (Completeness of Extensions):

• mv-D is sound and strongly complete with respect to serial Kripke models
• mv-T is sound and strongly complete with respect to reflexive Kripke models
• mv-K4 is sound and strongly complete with respect to transitive Kripke models
• mv-S4 is sound and strongly complete with respect to preorder Kripke models
• mv-B is sound and strongly complete with respect to symmetric Kripke models
• mv-S5 is sound and strongly complete with respect to equivalence relation Kripke models

Theorem 24 (Finite Model Property): All considered logics possess the finite model property

Corollary 25 (Strong Decidability): All considered logics are strongly decidable

Uniqueness Results for Negation

Theorem 28: Let ¬ be a unary connective. Then the sequents (◇φ,k) → (¬□¬φ,k) and (□φ,k) → (¬◇¬φ,k) are derivable in mv-K if and only if for all k = 1,2,...,n, ¬(vₖ) = vₙ₋ₖ₊₁

This proves the uniqueness of the negation definition for which De Morgan duality holds.

Embedding Results

Theorem 32: Σ ⊨ₘᵥᵢₗ Γ → Δ if and only if Σᵗ ⊨_C Γᵗ → Δᵗ, where C is the class of preorder Kripke models

This establishes a complete embedding of many-valued intuitionistic logic into mv-S4.

Related Work

Main Research Directions

The paper provides a detailed review of related research on many-valued modal logic:

1. Approaches based on specific connectives: Such as Ostermann's n-valued Łukasiewicz modal logic
2. Matrix methods: Such as Morikawa's modal logic based on three-valued logic
3. General approaches: Such as Fitting's approach based on finite lattices, Takano's matrix-labeled formula method

Advantages of This Paper

Compared to existing work, this paper's advantages include:

• Greater universality: Applicable to arbitrary truth value sets and connectives
• Independent modal treatment: Handling both □ and ◇ without assuming mutual definability
• Stronger theoretical guarantees: Strong completeness and strong decidability
• Unified framework: Covering all basic logical extensions

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully established a universal framework for many-valued modal logic mv-K and its extensions
2. Proved strong completeness and strong decidability for all systems
3. Characterized the unique negation definition for which De Morgan duality holds
4. Achieved complete embedding of many-valued intuitionistic logic

Limitations

1. Linear order restriction: The current framework requires truth value sets to be linearly ordered, unable to directly handle partially ordered structures
2. Finiteness requirement: Only considers finite truth value sets
3. Proof complexity: Many proofs are omitted due to space constraints

Future Directions

1. Extension to partially ordered truth value structures
2. Consideration of infinite truth value sets
3. Investigation of computational complexity
4. Exploration of embeddings of more logical systems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Outstanding theoretical contribution: Establishes the most universal framework for many-valued modal logic
2. Innovative technical methods: Independent treatment of modal operators, use of labeled formula techniques
3. Strong result completeness: Covers soundness, strong completeness, decidability and other core properties
4. Strong systematicity: Uniformly handles all major modal logic extensions

Weaknesses

1. Limited practical applications: Primarily theoretical contributions, lacking verification in concrete application scenarios
2. Insufficient proof details: Many important proofs are omitted due to space constraints
3. Missing computational complexity analysis: Does not analyze the specific complexity of decision problems

Impact

1. Theoretical impact: Provides a unified theoretical foundation for many-valued modal logic research
2. Methodological impact: The methods of labeled formulas and independent modal treatment have value for generalization
3. Application potential: Possesses application prospects in fuzzy reasoning, uncertainty modeling and other fields

Applicable Scenarios

1. Fuzzy logic systems: Handling reasoning with uncertainty
2. Multi-agent systems: Modeling agents' beliefs and knowledge
3. Incomplete information reasoning: Handling modal reasoning under partial information
4. Theoretical logic research: Serving as a foundational framework for studying the combination of many-valued and modal logic

References

The paper cites 24 related references, covering important works in multiple fields including many-valued logic, modal logic, and intuitionistic logic, including:

• Kripke's classical work on modal logic semantics
• Fitting's pioneering research on many-valued modal logic
• Takano's work on many-valued intuitionistic logic
• Research on various many-valued logic systems

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical logic paper that makes important theoretical contributions to the field of many-valued modal logic. The universal framework established by the paper possesses strong theoretical value and potential application prospects, representing significant progress in the field.