The Power of Generalized Clemens Semantics

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.00499
• Title: The Power of Generalized Clemens Semantics
• Authors: Hitoshi Omori (Tohoku University), Jonas R. B. Arenhart (Federal University of Santa Catarina)
• Classification: cs.LO (Computer Science - Logic)
• Publication Date/Conference: EPTCS 415, 2024 (Non-Classical Logics Theory and Applications, NCL'24)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00499

Abstract

This paper provides an in-depth investigation of the ordered pair semantics originally proposed by Matthew Clemens for LP (Priest's Logic of Paradox). The authors generalize Clemens semantics to the case of n-tuple semantics, covering arbitrary n values. Specifically, the paper addresses languages containing quantifiers and considers the philosophical implications of this semantics. The latter includes a cognitive interpretation of the semantics (involving multiple subjects) and, following Susan Haack's suggestions, a discussion of the proper understanding of many-valued logics (LP and K3) from the perspective of classical logic. The article also explores applications of this semantics to issues such as informative contradictions and mixed consequence relations.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problem: The understanding and interpretation of additional truth values in many-valued logical systems. Traditional many-valued logics (such as LP and K3) introduce a third truth value, but the philosophical implications and modes of understanding have remained controversial.
2. Significance: Many-valued logics play an important role in addressing philosophical issues such as paradoxes, vagueness, and inconsistency. However, the lack of clear conceptual understanding affects the rationality and effectiveness of their applications.
3. Limitations of Existing Approaches:
   • Traditional many-valued logic semantics often introduce difficult-to-understand "third truth values"
   • Lack of a unified framework for understanding different many-valued logical systems
   • Semantic interpretation of mixed consequence relations presents difficulties
4. Research Motivation: Adopting Susan Haack's strategy, the authors explain apparently additional truth values through classical truth values and additional cognitive or semantic components, thereby improving the intelligibility of many-valued logics.

Core Contributions

1. Generalization of Clemens Semantics: Extends the original ordered pair semantics to the case of arbitrary n-tuples
2. Extension to First-Order Logic: Addresses languages containing quantifiers and establishes a complete first-order Clemens semantics
3. Philosophical Interpretation: Provides philosophical interpretation frameworks including multi-agent cognitive readings and "respects" readings
4. Equivalence Theorems: Proves the equivalence of generalized Clemens semantics with standard LP, K3, and classical logic
5. Application to Mixed Consequence Relations: Provides a unified semantic interpretation framework for mixed consequence relations

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

The core task of this paper is to provide semantic interpretations for many-valued logical systems based on classical truth values, specifically including:

• Input: Many-valued logic formulas and inference rules
• Output: Semantic interpretation based on n-tuple classical truth values
• Constraints: Maintain equivalence with the original logical system

Model Architecture

1. Basic Framework

n-tuple Semantics Definition:

• Define 2^n as the n-fold Cartesian product of 2, equipped with lexicographic order
• Unary operation: −⟨x₁,...,xₙ⟩ := ⟨1−x₁,...,1−xₙ⟩
• n-interpretation: v: Prop → 2^n function

Truth Value Operations:

I(¬A) = −I(A)
I(A∧B) = min(I(A), I(B))  
I(A∨B) = max(I(A), I(B))

2. Designated Value Sets

Three different designated value sets are defined:

• Strict Type (Ds): {⟨1,1,...,1⟩} - corresponds to K3 logic
• Dominant Type (Db): {⟨1,x₂,...,xₙ⟩ : x₂,...,xₙ ∈ 2} - corresponds to classical logic
• Tolerant Type (Dt): 2^n {⟨0,0,...,0⟩} - corresponds to LP logic

3. First-Order Extension

For languages L₁ containing quantifiers:

v(∀xA) = min({v(Aₓ(kd)) : d ∈ D})
v(∃xA) = max({v(Aₓ(kd)) : d ∈ D})

Technical Innovations

1. Unified Framework: Unifies LP, K3, and classical logic through a single n-tuple semantic framework
2. Order Preservation: Utilizes lexicographic order to ensure correspondence with the original logical systems
3. Extensibility: The framework can be extended to arbitrary finite "dimensions"
4. Philosophical Interpretation: Provides multiple philosophical interpretation pathways for the technical framework

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

The paper primarily conducts theoretical analysis, verifying the following equivalences through rigorous mathematical proofs:

Main Theorems:

• Theorem 2: Γ ⊨ₙ,s A ⟺ Γ ⊨k A (K3 equivalence)
• Theorem 2: Γ ⊨ₙ,b A ⟺ Γ ⊨₂ A (Classical logic equivalence)
• Theorem 2: Γ ⊨ₙ,t A ⟺ Γ ⊨l A (LP equivalence)
• Theorem 3: Γ ⊨ₙ,s,t A ⟺ Γ ⊨st A (Mixed consequence equivalence)

Proof Methods

Through constructive bidirectional mappings:

1. Lemma 1: Mapping from Clemens interpretations to three-valued interpretations
2. Lemma 2: Mapping from three-valued interpretations to Clemens interpretations
3. Using induction to prove correspondence of formula valuations

Experimental Results

Main Results

Equivalence Verification: All main theorems have been rigorously proven mathematically, confirming the complete equivalence between generalized Clemens semantics and standard many-valued logical systems.

Expressive Power of the Framework: Demonstrates that n-tuple semantics can express:

• The bivalence of classical logic
• The strictness requirements of K3
• The tolerance characteristics of LP
• The complexity of mixed consequence relations

Philosophical Applications

1. Multi-Agent Interpretation

• ⟨1,1⟩: Both agents consider it true
• ⟨1,0⟩: Only the first agent considers it true
• ⟨0,1⟩: Only the second agent considers it true
• ⟨0,0⟩: Both agents consider it false

2. "Respects" Interpretation

Used for Paul Égré's theory of informative contradictions:

• Different n-tuple positions represent different "respects" of predicate application
• The contradictory sentence "John is a man and John is not a man" can be interpreted as different judgments under different respects

3. Mixed Consequence Relations

Provides a unified semantic interpretation for mixed consequence relations proposed by Cobreros et al., avoiding the "chameleon" nature of the third truth value.

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Susan Haack's Theory: Proposes understanding many-valued logics through classical truth values and additional semantic components
2. Clemens's Original Work: Proposes ordered pair semantics for LP
3. Mixed Consequence Relations: Work by Cobreros et al. requires better semantic interpretation
4. Paul Égré's Contradiction Theory: Research on informative contradictions and "respects" quantification

Advantages of This Paper

Compared to related work, this paper's advantages include:

• Provides a more general framework (n-tuples vs. ordered pairs)
• Extends to first-order logic
• Provides multiple philosophical interpretations
• Offers unified interpretation for mixed consequence relations

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Technical Contribution: Successfully generalizes Clemens semantics to n-tuple cases and extends to first-order logic
2. Philosophical Contribution: Provides a classicalization interpretation of many-valued logics that meets Haack's requirements
3. Application Value: Provides new analytical tools for issues such as informative contradictions and mixed consequence relations

Limitations

1. Complexity: n-tuple semantics becomes more complex as n increases
2. Order Dependence: The choice of lexicographic order may affect the reasonableness of philosophical interpretation
3. Application Scope: Primarily concentrated on theoretical analysis; practical applications require further exploration

Future Directions

1. Explore the impact of other types of order relations on semantics
2. Apply the framework to more non-classical logical systems
3. Study computational complexity issues
4. Develop automated reasoning systems based on this semantics

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: All main results have rigorous mathematical proofs with solid theoretical foundations
2. Unification: Provides a unified framework for understanding multiple different logical systems
3. Philosophical Depth: Not only provides technical results but also deeply explores philosophical implications
4. Innovation: Successfully generalizes Clemens's original ideas to more general cases
5. Application-Oriented: Demonstrates the application value of theory in concrete philosophical problems

Weaknesses

1. Limited Practicality: Primarily theoretical work lacking actual computational implementation and application cases
2. Complexity Considerations: Does not deeply analyze the computational complexity of n-tuple semantics
3. Philosophical Controversy: Some philosophical interpretations may be controversial, particularly regarding the understanding of "respects"
4. Empirical Verification: Lacks empirical or experimental verification of the proposed philosophical interpretations

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Makes important contributions to the semantics theory of non-classical logics
2. Interdisciplinary Value: Connects logic, philosophy, and cognitive science
3. Subsequent Research: Provides new theoretical tools for subsequent research in related fields
4. Teaching Value: Helps better understand and teach many-valued logics

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Logic Research: Applicable to theoretical analysis of non-classical logics
2. Philosophical Applications: Can be used to analyze philosophical problems such as paradoxes, vagueness, and contradictions
3. Artificial Intelligence: Potentially applicable to uncertain reasoning and multi-agent systems
4. Cognitive Science: Can be used to model reasoning processes of multiple cognitive subjects

References

The paper cites 16 important references, including:

• Matthew Clemens (2020): Original paper on ordered pair semantics for LP
• Susan Haack (1978): Philosophy of Logics - classic work on understanding many-valued logics
• Graham Priest (2006, 2008): Authoritative works on LP and non-classical logics
• Pablo Cobreros et al. (2012, 2013): Important work on mixed consequence relations
• Paul Égré (2019): Recent research on informative contradictions

This paper makes important contributions to the semantics theory of non-classical logics, providing a new understanding pathway for many-valued logics through the generalization of Clemens semantics. Its theoretical rigor and philosophical depth make it an important reference in the field, with significant value for understanding the nature and applications of many-valued logics.