Formalization of Biological Circuit Block Diagrams for formally analyzing Biomedical Control Systems in pHRI Applications

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.00541
• Title: Formalization of Biological Circuit Block Diagrams for formally analyzing Biomedical Control Systems in pHRI Applications
• Authors: Adnan Rashid (NUST, Pakistan), Saed Abed (Kuwait University), Osman Hasan (NUST, Pakistan)
• Classification: cs.LO (Logic in Computer Science)
• Publication Date: December 31, 2024 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00541

Abstract

This paper proposes a formal analysis method based on interactive theorem proving for control problems in biomedical systems within physical human-robot interaction (pHRI). Traditional manual proofs and computational analysis tools suffer from human errors and algorithmic unreliability. The paper constructs mathematical models of control components using higher-order logic (HOL) and performs deductive reasoning analysis through the HOL Light theorem prover. The method models control systems as block diagrams using differential equations and transfer functions based on Laplace transform theory, with validity verified through a case study of ultrafiltration dialysis processes.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

1. Core Issue: Biomedical systems in physical human-robot interaction lack reliable formal verification methods for control analysis
2. Limitations of Existing Approaches:
   • Manual proofs are prone to human errors, especially when handling large complex systems
   • Computer-based tools (such as Maple, MATLAB, Mathematica) contain unverified algorithms and numerical approximation errors
   • May overlook critical assumptions required for mathematical analysis

Research Significance

• Biomedical systems directly interact with the human body and are responsible for life-sustaining functions, making reliability and safety paramount
• System failures may lead to misdiagnosis, inappropriate treatment, or even life-threatening consequences
• pHRI systems involve direct or indirect physical contact between humans and machines, presenting higher safety risks
• Rigorous verification techniques are needed to ensure correct operation of control systems

Research Motivation

Given the safety-critical nature of biomedical systems, traditional analysis methods cannot provide sufficient reliability guarantees. There is an urgent need for a formal verification method that ensures the correctness of analysis results.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed a formal analysis framework for biomedical control systems based on interactive theorem proving, using higher-order logic to model control components
2. Established formal representation methods for biological circuit block diagrams, including basic building blocks such as series, parallel, summing junctions, branch points, and feedback
3. Implemented formal transformation from time-domain differential equations to frequency-domain transfer functions, based on Laplace transform theory
4. Provided practical case verification of ultrafiltration dialysis processes, demonstrating the applicability of the method to real biomedical systems
5. Ensured mathematical rigor of analysis results, guaranteeing correctness through the trusted environment of the theorem prover

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Differential equation models and system parameters of biomedical control systems Output: Formally verified transfer functions and stability analysis results Constraints: Systems must satisfy Laplace transform existence conditions and piecewise differentiability requirements

Theoretical Foundation

HOL Light Theorem Prover

• Interactive theorem prover implemented in OCaml
• Features a minimal trusted core (approximately 400 lines of OCaml code)
• Correctness verified through the CakeML project
• Provides rich support for multivariate calculus theory

Laplace Transform Formalization

Definition 3: HOL Light formalization of Laplace transform

⊢def ∀s g. ltfm g s = integ {x| &0 ≤ x} (λx. cexp (--(s ∗ Cx x)) ∗ g x)

Definition 4: Laplace transform existence conditions

⊢def ∀s g. lexst g s ⇔ (∀b. g pcws_diff_on interval [&0,b]) ∧ (∃M a. Re s > a ∧ eord g M a)

Block Diagram Component Formalization

Series Configuration

Definition 6: Transfer function of N components in series

⊢def ∀Ai. ser [A1; A2; ...; AN] = ∏(i=1 to N) Ai

Summing Junction

Definition 7: Summation of multiple components

⊢def ∀Ai. summ [A1; A2; ...; AN] = ∑(i=1 to N) Ai

Branch Point

Definition 8: Formal representation of signal branching

⊢def ∀α Ai. pick_point [A1; A2; ...; AN] = [α ∗ A1; α ∗ A2; ...; α ∗ AN]

Feedback System

Definition 9: Feedback branch

⊢def ∀α β n. branch α β n = ∏(i=0 to n) series_comp [α;β]

Definition 10: Feedback block

⊢def ∀α β. feedback_block α β = series_comp [α; ∑(k=0 to ∞) branch α β k]

Technical Innovations

1. Complete Formal Framework: First application of interactive theorem proving to biomedical control system analysis
2. Rigorous Block Diagram to Transfer Function Mapping: Establishes formal correspondence between block diagram representation and mathematical models
3. Precise Continuous System Modeling: Compared to discrete state model checking methods, accurately captures continuous behavior
4. General-Purpose Design: Supports arbitrary combinations of series and parallel components and complex feedback structures

Experimental Setup

Case System: Ultrafiltration Dialysis Process

• System Description: Ultrafiltration process in renal dialysis for removing excess fluid from patients
• System Components: Three modules (arm, torso, leg) with volumes VA(t), VT(t), VL(t) respectively
• Control Parameters: Transfer constants kTA, kTL, kA, kL, ultrafiltration rate UFR(t)

Mathematical Model

Dynamics equation for fluid transfer between arm and torso:

dVA(t)/dt = -kAVA(t) + kTAVT(t)  (Equation 2)

Formal Implementation

Definition 12: Formal representation of fluid transfer dynamics

⊢def diff_eq_at VT VA t kA kTA ⇔ 
    diff_eq_nord 1 (olst_diff_eq_at kA) VA t = 
    diff_eq_nord 0 (ilst_diff_eq_at kTA) VT t

Experimental Results

Main Theorem Verification

Theorem 1: Transfer function of arm-torso fluid transfer system

⊢thm ∀kA kTA s. s + Cx kA ≠ Cx (&0) ⇒ 
    blk_diag_rep_at kA kTA = (Cx kTA)/(s + Cx kA)

Theorem 2: Correspondence between dynamics model and transfer function

⊢thm ∀kA kTA VT VA s. [Assumptions A1-A8] ⇒ 
    ltfm VA s / ltfm VT s = Cx(&1)/(s + Cx kA)

Verification Conditions

• A1-A2: Positivity constraints on transfer constants (&0 < kA ∧ &0 < kTA)
• A3-A4: Existence of derivatives and Laplace transforms
• A5: Zero initial conditions
• A6: Satisfaction of dynamics equations
• A7-A8: Non-zero denominators of transfer functions

Method Advantages Verification

1. Explicit Condition Specification: All analysis conditions are explicitly specified and verified
2. Universal Quantification: Theorems hold universally for all parameter values
3. Continuous System Handling: Accurately models continuous processes such as fluid transfer
4. Result Reliability: Mathematical rigor guaranteed through theorem prover

Related Work

Formal Methods Applications in Engineering

• Autonomous vehicle platoon control systems 5
• Linear analog filter analysis 6
• Unmanned underwater vehicle control 7
• Image processing filters 8
• Cyber-physical systems 9

Biological System Formalization

• Authors' previous work in synthetic biology 10: protein activation, inhibition, and self-activation analysis
• Multi-input receptor analysis in cancer cell recognition and disease diagnosis

Innovations of This Paper

• First application of interactive theorem proving to biomedical control systems in pHRI
• Specialized block diagram formalization method for biomedical systems
• Completely different application domain from previous work, though both use block diagram representation

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully established a formal analysis framework for biomedical control systems based on higher-order logic and theorem proving
2. Verified the feasibility of the method in practical systems through the ultrafiltration dialysis case study
3. Provided more reliable analysis results than traditional methods, avoiding human errors and algorithmic uncertainty
4. Established rigorous formal mapping from differential equations to transfer functions

Limitations

1. High Human-Machine Interaction Requirements: Theorem proving requires substantial human intervention, potentially time-consuming and tedious
2. Steep Learning Curve: Users require specialized knowledge in formal methods and theorem proving
3. Limited Automation: While automation strategies can be developed, manual guidance is still required
4. Limited Case Coverage: Only one dialysis process case verified; more practical application validation needed

Future Directions

1. Develop More Automation Strategies: Such as the TF_TAC_UF automation strategy mentioned in the paper
2. Expand Case Studies: Verify more types of biomedical control systems
3. Integrate Other Analysis Methods: Combine with stability analysis, robustness analysis, etc.
4. Improve Tool Chain: Develop more user-friendly interfaces and auxiliary tools

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Method Innovation: First introduction of rigorous formal methods to biomedical control system analysis
2. Solid Theoretical Foundation: Based on mature HOL Light theorem prover and Laplace transform theory
3. High Mathematical Rigor: All results verified through rigorous logical reasoning
4. Clear Practical Value: Formal verification is significant for safety-critical biomedical systems
5. Complete Framework: Provides complete workflow from differential equation modeling to transfer function analysis

Weaknesses

1. Limited Experimental Verification: Only one ultrafiltration dialysis case provided; lacks broader experimental validation
2. Insufficient Efficiency Considerations: No detailed discussion of computational complexity and practical application efficiency
3. Insufficient Comparison with Traditional Methods: Lacks quantitative comparison with MATLAB/Simulink and similar tools
4. Low Automation Level: While automation strategies are mentioned, their effectiveness is not demonstrated in detail
5. Insufficient Discussion of Applicability Scope: Lacks systematic analysis of which types of biomedical systems are suitable

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Opens new directions for formal methods application in biomedical engineering
2. Practical Value: Provides more reliable analysis tools for safety-critical biomedical systems
3. Methodological Significance: Demonstrates how to apply abstract mathematical theory to concrete engineering problems
4. Interdisciplinary Integration: Promotes cross-disciplinary fusion of computer science, control theory, and biomedical engineering

Applicable Scenarios

1. Safety-Critical Systems: Particularly suitable for biomedical devices with extremely high reliability requirements
2. Regulatory Approval: Can be used for formal verification and regulatory approval of medical devices
3. System Design: Rigorous mathematical verification during design phase
4. Teaching and Research: Serves as a typical case of formal methods application in engineering

References

1 J Fernández, C Galindo, J Barbacho, and A Luque. Automatic Control Systems in Biomedical Engineering, 2018.

2 O. Hasan and S. Tahar. Formal Verification Methods. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition, pages 7162–7170. IGI Global, 2015.

13 A. Rashid and O. Hasan. Formalization of Lerch's Theorem using HOL Light. Journal of Applied Logics—IFCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 5(8):1623–1652, 2018.

16 C. H. Houpis and S. N. Sheldon. Linear Control System Analysis and Design with MATLAB. CRC Press, 2013.

Overall Assessment

This is a groundbreaking paper in an interdisciplinary field that successfully introduces formal verification methods to biomedical control system analysis. While there is room for improvement in experimental validation and practical applicability, its theoretical contributions and methodological value are noteworthy, establishing an important foundation for subsequent research in this field.