Spectral spaces of normal subgroups

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.00845
• Title: Spectral spaces of normal subgroups
• Author: Amartya Goswami (University of Johannesburg, South Africa)
• Classification: math.GR (Group Theory), math.GN (General Topology)
• Publication Date: January 1, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00845

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to prove that the set of proper normal subgroups of a group, when equipped with the coarse lower topology, constitutes a spectral space.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Context

1. Spectral Space Theory: Spectral spaces are important concepts in algebraic geometry and topology, introduced by Hochster in 1969, possessing key properties such as quasi-compactness and sobriety.
2. Spectral Theory in Group Theory: Recent developments have advanced spectral theory in group theory. Results in reference 2 demonstrate that the spectrum of prime normal subgroups Spec(G) of a group G is a spectral space under the Zariski topology if and only if it is compact, if and only if G has a maximal normal subgroup.
3. Research Motivation:
   • Extend spectral space theory from ring theory to group theory
   • Investigate topological properties of the normal subgroup lattice
   • Establish connections between group structure and topological properties

Research Significance

This research fills a gap in spectral space theory within group theory, providing a new topological perspective for understanding the structure of normal subgroups in groups, and potentially opening new directions for interdisciplinary research between group theory and topology.

Core Contributions

1. Main Theorem: Proves that for a group G with a maximal normal subgroup, the set of proper normal subgroups N⁺(G) constitutes a spectral space under the coarse lower topology.
2. Technical Methods: Establishes the main result by verifying three core conditions of spectral spaces (quasi-compactness, sobriety, and open subspace properties).
3. Theoretical Framework: Bridges the gap between normal subgroups in group theory and spectral spaces in topology.
4. Methodological Contribution: Demonstrates how to apply topological property research of algebraic structures to group theory.

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

For a group G, define:

• N(G): the set of all normal subgroups of G
• N⁺(G): the set of all proper normal subgroups of G (i.e., N(G) \ {G})
• Coarse lower topology: the topology with closed subbasis consisting of sets V(S) = {N ∈ N(G) | S ⊆ N}

The goal is to prove that N⁺(G) is a spectral space when G has a maximal normal subgroup.

Core Concepts

1. Spectral Space Definition: A topological space X is a spectral space if and only if:
   • X is quasi-compact
   • X is sober
   • X has a basis consisting of quasi-compact open sets that is closed under finite intersections
2. Key Lemma 2.1: A quasi-compact sober open subspace of a spectral space is itself a spectral space.

Proof Strategy

Via Lemma 2.1, it suffices to verify:

1. N(G) is a spectral space
2. N⁺(G) is quasi-compact
3. N⁺(G) is sober
4. N⁺(G) is an open subspace of N(G)

Technical Details

Step 1: Spectrality of N(G)

• Utilizes the fact that N(G) is an algebraic lattice
• Directly applies Priestley's Theorem 4.2 to obtain the result

Step 2: Quasi-compactness of N⁺(G)

• Let {Kλ}λ∈Λ be a subfamily of closed sets in the subbasis of N⁺(G) satisfying ∩λ∈ΛKλ = ∅
• Utilize that V(∪λ∈ΛNλ) = ∅ implies ∨λ∈ΛNλ = G
• Apply Alexander's subbasis theorem to derive quasi-compactness

Step 3: Sobriety of N⁺(G)

• Prove that for N ∈ N⁺(G), we have V(N) = C(N)
• Proceed by case analysis distinguishing C(N) = N⁺(G) and C(N) ≠ N⁺(G)
• Establish that N⁺(G) is a T₀ space to ensure uniqueness of generic points

Step 4: Openness of N⁺(G)

• Observe that G ∈ N(G) and G = V(G) = C(G)
• Therefore N(G)\N⁺(G) = {G} is closed
• Hence N⁺(G) is open

Experimental Setup

This is a pure theoretical mathematics paper and does not involve numerical experiments or computational verification. All results are obtained through rigorous mathematical proof.

Main Results

Theorem 1.1 (Main Result)

Let G be a group with a maximal normal subgroup. Then the set of proper normal subgroups N⁺(G) is a spectral space under the coarse lower topology.

Completeness of Proof

The paper provides a complete proof covering all necessary conditions for the spectral space definition:

1. ✓ Quasi-compactness
2. ✓ Sobriety
3. ✓ Appropriate open set basis structure

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Hochster (1969): Introduced the concept of spectral spaces, primarily applied to spectra of prime ideals in commutative rings
2. Priestley (1994): Developed intrinsic spectral topology theory, establishing connections between algebraic lattices and spectral spaces
3. Facchini et al. (2023): Studied the spectrum of prime normal subgroups of groups, establishing equivalence between spectral compactness and the existence of maximal normal subgroups
4. Finocchiaro et al. (2023): Investigated topological properties of ideal classes in rings under the coarse lower topology

Contribution of This Paper

This paper extends spectral space theory from prime ideals to all normal subgroups, providing a more general framework.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully establishes spectral space properties for the set of normal subgroups in group theory
2. Proves that under appropriate conditions (existence of a maximal normal subgroup), N⁺(G) possesses good topological structure
3. Provides new tools for interdisciplinary research between group theory and topology

Limitations

1. Condition Restrictions: Requires that group G must have a maximal normal subgroup, excluding infinite groups such as Prüfer groups
2. Application Scope: Currently primarily theoretical results; practical applications require further development
3. Computational Complexity: For concrete groups, verifying spectral space properties may be computationally complex

Future Directions

The author proposes in Remark 2.2: investigating and identifying various classes of spectral spaces associated with normal subgroups of groups, which points the direction for subsequent research.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: Successfully introduces spectral space theory into group theory, opening new research directions
2. Rigorous Proof: Mathematical proofs are complete and logically clear, with sufficient justification for each step
3. Clever Methods: Skillfully simplifies the proof process through Lemma 2.1
4. Clear Writing: Well-structured paper with clear definitions and easy to understand

Weaknesses

1. Limited Applications: As a pure theoretical result, it lacks concrete applications and examples
2. Stringent Conditions: The existence of maximal normal subgroups restricts the applicability of the theorem
3. Lack of Examples: The paper provides no concrete examples of groups and their corresponding spectral spaces

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides new theoretical tools for interdisciplinary research between group theory and topology
2. Subsequent Research: May inspire further research on topological properties of group structures
3. Methodological Significance: Demonstrates how to combine algebraic structure research with topological methods

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Group Theory: Study of group structural properties
2. Algebraic Topology: Exploration of topological properties of algebraic structures
3. Spectral Theory: Extension of applications of spectral space theory

References

The paper cites the following key literature:

1. Hochster (1969): Original definition of spectral spaces
2. Priestley (1994): Intrinsic spectral topology theory
3. Facchini et al. (2023): Spectrum of prime normal subgroups of groups
4. Finocchiaro et al. (2023): Topological properties of ideal classes in rings

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical mathematics paper that successfully introduces spectral space theory into group theory with rigorous proofs and novel results. While its applicability is limited, it makes important contributions to theoretical development in related fields.