FAPL-DM-BC: A Secure and Scalable FL Framework with Adaptive Privacy and Dynamic Masking, Blockchain, and XAI for the IoVs

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.01063
• Title: FAPL-DM-BC: A Secure and Scalable FL Framework with Adaptive Privacy and Dynamic Masking, Blockchain, and XAI for the IoVs
• Authors: Sathwik Narkedimilli, Amballa Venkata Sriram, Sujith Makam, MSVPJ Sathvik, Sai Prashanth Mallellu
• Classification: cs.CR (Cryptography and Security)
• Publication Date: January 2, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01063

Abstract

FAPL-DM-BC is a novel federated learning framework designed for Internet of Vehicles (IoV), integrating Federated Adaptive Privacy-aware Learning (FAPL) and Dynamic Masking (DM) techniques that enable real-time adaptive adjustment of privacy policies based on data sensitivity and environmental conditions, achieving optimal privacy-utility trade-offs. The framework implements secure logging and decentralized verification through blockchain, employs cloud microservice architecture for secure aggregation, and leverages model-agnostic explainable AI (XAI) to drive a dual-model feedback mechanism, providing a secure, scalable, and interpretable IoV platform for applications including autonomous driving, traffic management, vehicular network security, and smart cities.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

With the rapid development of Internet of Vehicles (IoV), traditional centralized learning systems face significant challenges:

1. Privacy Leakage Risks: Centralized data processing is prone to sensitive vehicle data breaches
2. Security Threats: Model poisoning attacks and data tampering threaten system integrity
3. Scalability Limitations: Centralized architectures struggle to accommodate exponential growth in IoV networks
4. Real-time Processing Requirements: Dynamic vehicular environments demand real-time response and decision-making

Limitations of Existing Approaches

Current distributed federated learning solutions exhibit the following deficiencies:

• Lack of dynamic privacy adjustment mechanisms to adapt to changing environmental conditions
• Absence of reliable data provenance guarantees and decentralized verification
• Lack of interpretability, affecting trustworthiness in safety-critical applications
• Inflexible trade-offs between privacy protection and model performance

Research Motivation

This work aims to construct a comprehensive federated learning framework that simultaneously addresses privacy, security, scalability, and interpretability challenges in IoV environments, providing a complete solution for vehicular network applications.

Core Contributions

1. Proposes the FAPL-DM-BC Comprehensive Framework: First integration of Federated Adaptive Privacy-aware Learning, Dynamic Masking, blockchain, and explainable AI into a unified IoV federated learning framework
2. Designs Adaptive Privacy Mechanisms: Real-time adjustment of privacy protection policies based on data sensitivity and environmental conditions, achieving optimal privacy-utility trade-offs
3. Establishes Blockchain Security Infrastructure: Implements tamper-proof logging, decentralized verification, and smart contract-based automated validation through blockchain
4. Develops Dual-Model Feedback Mechanism: XAI-based dual-model architecture providing local prediction validation and continuous optimization
5. Provides Comprehensive Security Analysis: Formal verification of framework security through BAN logic and analysis of defense capabilities against multiple attack scenarios

Methodology Details

Task Definition

The research task involves implementing secure, scalable, and interpretable federated learning in vehicular networks, where:

• Input: Local data distributed across vehicle nodes
• Output: Global model updates and local prediction results
• Constraints: Ensuring data privacy, model security, system scalability, and decision interpretability

Model Architecture

Overall Architecture Design

The FAPL-DM-BC framework employs a layered architecture comprising the following core components:

1. Edge Device Layer: Vehicle nodes execute local training and privacy protection
2. Blockchain Layer: Provides secure logging and decentralized verification
3. Cloud Microservice Layer: Executes secure aggregation and global model management
4. XAI Feedback Layer: Provides interpretability and model validation

Key Module Functions

1. Federated Adaptive Privacy-aware Learning (FAPL) Module

• Dynamically adjusts differential privacy noise based on data sensitivity
• Optimizes gradient masking intensity based on environmental conditions and threat levels
• Continuously monitors privacy-utility trade-offs and adaptively adjusts policies

2. Dynamic Masking (DM) Module

• Dynamically adjusts obfuscation strength of model updates
• Considers data sensitivity, environmental conditions, and threat models
• Balances privacy protection with model convergence performance

3. Blockchain Security Module

• Validates model updates using Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus algorithm
• Automates verification and authorization through smart contracts
• Provides immutable provenance tracking

4. Dual-Model XAI Feedback Module

• Model 1: Generates predictions and explanations
• Model 2: Validates prediction accuracy and explanation reliability
• Local feedback loop for continuous model performance optimization

Mathematical Formulas and Algorithm Procedures

Weighted Average Fusion Formula:

Final Updates = wL · x + wG · y

Where:

• wL: Local feedback update weight
• wG: Global model update weight
• x: Local feedback update
• y: Global model update

Technical Innovations

1. Real-time Adaptive Privacy Adjustment: Unlike static privacy protection methods, FAPL dynamically adjusts privacy policies based on real-time environmental conditions
2. Deep Integration of Blockchain and Federated Learning: Blockchain is not only used for recording but also participates in verification and consensus processes
3. Dual-Model Feedback Mechanism: Improves prediction accuracy and interpretability through mutual validation between two models
4. Multi-layer Security Safeguards: Combines encrypted communication, blockchain verification, SMPC aggregation, and other security mechanisms

Experimental Setup

Framework Assumptions

The paper is based on the following key assumptions:

1. Blockchain infrastructure possesses scalability to handle high-frequency, high-throughput operations
2. Edge devices and cloud systems have computational capacity to execute cryptographic operations
3. Secure communication channels exist to prevent data eavesdropping or tampering
4. XAI tools can execute local validation and feedback processing on edge devices

BAN Logic Security Verification

The paper employs BAN (Burrows-Abadi-Needham) logic for formal verification of protocol security, defining the following entities and objectives:

Entity Definitions:

• P: IoV edge device
• C: Cloud microservice
• B: Blockchain network
• Various security keys: KP-C, KP-B, KB-C

Security Objectives:

• P |≡ C |∼ MP: P believes C has received MP
• C |≡ B |∼ MC: C believes B has securely recorded and verified MC
• B |≡ P |∼ MP: B believes P has securely sent MP
• P |≡ #MC: P believes the received global model update MC is fresh and unmodified

Experimental Results

Security Analysis Results

The paper verifies the framework's defense capabilities against multiple attacks through detailed security analysis:

Attack Defense Capability Comparison

Privacy Protection Effectiveness

1. Anonymity: Achieves data source anonymization through FAPL and DM techniques
2. Unlinkability: Dynamic masking prevents data transmission patterns from being traced
3. Collision Attack Resistance: Multi-layer security mechanisms provide collision attack protection

BAN Logic Verification Results

BAN logic analysis verifies the following security properties:

• Freshness and integrity of all messages
• Mutual authentication between communicating entities
• Confidentiality and non-repudiation of data transmission

Related Work

Primary Research Directions

1. IoV Security and Privacy: Existing research primarily focuses on single technologies such as encryption and blockchain
2. Federated Learning Privacy Protection: Techniques including differential privacy and secure multi-party computation
3. Explainable AI: Model interpretation methods such as SHAP and LIME
4. Blockchain-based Federated Learning: Utilizing blockchain for decentralized verification in federated learning

Advantages of This Work

Compared to existing work, FAPL-DM-BC's primary advantages include:

• First integration of multiple advanced technologies into a unified framework
• Provides real-time adaptive privacy adjustment mechanisms
• Combines interpretability with security guarantees
• Specialized optimization for IoV scenarios

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. FAPL-DM-BC successfully addresses privacy, security, scalability, and interpretability challenges in IoV federated learning
2. The adaptive privacy mechanism achieves optimal privacy-utility trade-offs
3. Blockchain integration provides robust security guarantees and provenance capabilities
4. The dual-model XAI feedback mechanism significantly enhances model interpretability and trustworthiness

Limitations

1. Computational Overhead: Multi-layer security mechanisms may introduce significant computational and communication overhead
2. Blockchain Scalability: Performance bottlenecks of blockchain in large-scale IoV networks
3. Practical Deployment Complexity: Framework complexity may affect feasibility of real-world deployment
4. Lack of Real-world Data Validation: The paper primarily conducts theoretical analysis without large-scale real-world data verification

Future Directions

1. Quantum-resistant Cryptography: Integration of quantum-safe cryptographic methods
2. Edge Intelligence Optimization: Further optimization of computational efficiency on edge devices
3. Cross-domain Interoperability: Integration with smart city systems
4. Lightweight Consensus Protocols: Development of more efficient blockchain consensus mechanisms

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Technical Innovation: First organic integration of multiple cutting-edge technologies, proposing a comprehensive solution
2. Sufficient Theoretical Analysis: Provides rigorous security proofs through BAN logic
3. Clear Application Scenarios: Specialized design addressing specific IoV requirements
4. Comprehensive Security Analysis: Considers multiple attack scenarios and provides corresponding defense mechanisms

Weaknesses

1. Lack of Experimental Validation: The paper is primarily a theoretical framework design lacking performance verification on real datasets
2. High Complexity: Complex system architecture with potentially high deployment and maintenance costs
3. Questionable Scalability: Although claiming scalability, lacks performance analysis in large-scale scenarios
4. Insufficient Integration Discussion: Limited discussion on integration with existing IoV infrastructure

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides new research directions and technical pathways for IoV federated learning
2. Practical Value: Provides security assurance framework for intelligent transportation and autonomous driving systems
3. Reproducibility: Detailed framework design with certain reproducibility, though requiring substantial engineering implementation

Applicable Scenarios

• Collaborative learning for autonomous vehicles
• Intelligent traffic management systems
• Vehicular network security protection
• Smart city data sharing
• Distributed learning scenarios requiring high privacy protection

References

The paper cites 21 relevant references covering important works in IoV security, federated learning, blockchain, explainable AI, and other domains, providing a solid theoretical foundation for framework design.

Overall Assessment: This is a paper with strong technical innovation that proposes a comprehensive IoV federated learning framework. Although it has limitations in experimental validation, its theoretical contributions and technical integration approach have important reference value for the field. The authors are recommended to supplement real-world data validation and performance analysis in subsequent work to further verify the framework's practical applicability.