Embodied AI-Enhanced Vehicular Networks: An Integrated Large Language Models and Reinforcement Learning Method

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.01141
• Title: Embodied AI-Enhanced Vehicular Networks: An Integrated Large Language Models and Reinforcement Learning Method
• Authors: Ruichen Zhang, Changyuan Zhao, Hongyang Du, Dusit Niyato, Jiacheng Wang, Suttinee Sawadsitang, Xuemin Shen, Dong In Kim
• Classification: cs.NI (Networking and Internet Architecture)
• Publication Date: January 2, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01141

Abstract

This paper investigates adaptive transmission strategies in embodied AI-enhanced vehicular networks through the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) for semantic information extraction and Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) for decision-making. The framework aims to optimize data transmission efficiency and decision-making accuracy by formulating an optimization problem that incorporates the Weber-Fechner law to balance bandwidth utilization and Quality of Experience (QoE). Specifically, the Large Language and Vision Assistant (LLAVA) model is employed to extract critical semantic information from raw image data captured by embodied AI agents (i.e., vehicles), reducing transmission data size by over 90% while preserving essential content required for vehicular network communication and decision-making. In dynamic vehicular network environments, a Proximal Policy Optimization method based on Generalized Advantage Estimation (GAE-PPO) is adopted to stabilize decision-making under uncertainty.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

With the advent of the 6G era, Internet of Vehicles (IoV) is expected to achieve unprecedented advances with traffic density exceeding 0.1-10 Gbps/m² and connection density reaching 10 million devices per square kilometer. These improvements will significantly enhance data rates, connectivity, and network capacity, fundamentally transforming IoV services such as real-time navigation, environmental awareness, and autonomous decision-making.

Research Motivation

1. Data Processing Challenges: As the number of connected vehicles grows, extensive sensors must be deployed to collect and process large volumes of real-time data. Traditional discriminative AI models struggle to maintain high performance under dynamic conditions.
2. Transmission Efficiency Issues: Raw sensor data transmission requires substantial bandwidth. How to reduce data transmission volume while ensuring information quality has become a critical challenge.
3. Decision-Making Complexity: The vehicular network environment is highly dynamic, requiring intelligent decision-making systems that adapt to environmental changes in real-time.

Limitations of Existing Methods

• Traditional approaches primarily focus on conventional performance metrics such as spectral efficiency, latency, and security
• Lack consideration of semantic data transmission and decision-making efficiency
• Insufficient exploration of integrated applications of LLMs and DRL in vehicular network resource optimization

Core Contributions

1. Data Transmission Modeling: Formulates an optimization problem balancing data transmission efficiency and decision-making accuracy, introducing the Weber-Fechner law as a metric for quantifying Quality of Experience (QoE).
2. LLM-Based Semantic Data Processing: Leverages LLAVA to extract semantic information from raw image data, significantly reducing transmission bandwidth while preserving essential contextual details required for vehicular network communication and decision-making.
3. Enhanced DRL-Based Decision-Making: Proposes the GAE-PPO method to improve decision-making in dynamic vehicular network environments by reducing variance in policy gradient updates through generalized advantage estimation, thereby stabilizing the training process.
4. Pioneering Work: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first work exploring the joint application of LLM data processing and DRL decision-making in embodied AI-enhanced vehicular networks.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Consider a cellular network-based vehicular communication network in urban environments where I vehicles equipped with embodied AI systems operate within the coverage of base stations (BS). The network comprises W vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) links and Q vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) links.

Objective: Optimize transmission power, semantic symbol allocation, and channel usage to maximize QoE while ensuring efficient resource utilization.

Model Architecture

1. LLAVA Semantic Information Extraction

Architecture Design:

• Vision Encoder: Uses Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) vision encoder to convert images into feature vectors:

  Zi = g(Ii)
  

• Projection Matrix: Projects features to language model word embedding space through a trainable linear projection matrix W:

  Ei = W · Zi
  

• Semantic Extraction: Generates semantic information through the LLAVA model:

  Mi = LLAVA(Ii; θi)
  

Model Fine-tuning:

• Loss function: L = Σ||Mi - M̂i||²
• Cross-entropy loss: LCE = Σq(vi,l)log p(vi,l)

2. GAE-PPO Transmission Strategy Optimization

MDP Design:

• Action Space: at = [{bq[w]}, {P^V2V_q[w]}, {uq}] (Dimension: 3Q)
• State Space: st = [{H^(w)_i}, {γ^V2V_q(t)}, {γ^V2I_w(t)}] (Dimension: 2W+Q)
• Reward Function: QoE-based reward with constraint violation penalty terms

GAE-PPO Algorithm:

• Agent objective function: J(θA) = Et[ρt(θA)A^π_θold_A_t]
• Clipped objective: Jclip(θA) = Et[min(ρt(θA)A^π_θold_A_t, clip(ρt(θA), 1-ε, 1+ε)A^π_θold_A_t)]
• Generalized Advantage Estimation: A^π_θold_A_t = Σ(γλ)^l δt+l

Technical Innovations

1. Weber-Fechner Law-Based QoE Modeling: First application of psychophysical laws to vehicular network QoE assessment, providing more accurate reflection of user-perceived quality.
2. Cross-Modal Semantic Compression: Achieves image-to-text semantic transformation through LLAVA with compression rates exceeding 90%.
3. Stabilized Reinforcement Learning: GAE mechanism significantly enhances PPO algorithm convergence stability in dynamic environments.

Experimental Setup

Datasets

• Text Dataset: European Parliament dataset containing approximately 2 million sentences and 53 million words
• Image Dataset: 30 driving scenario images for semantic extraction evaluation
• LLAVA Model: LLAVA-v1.5-7B with 7 billion tunable parameters

Evaluation Metrics

• Semantic Similarity: Cosine similarity using BERT embeddings
• QoE: User experience quality based on Weber-Fechner law
• Convergence Performance: Cumulative reward and convergence steps
• Transmission Efficiency: SINR, power allocation, etc.

Baseline Methods

• LLM Model Comparisons: LLAVA-1.5-13b-hf, Qwen-VL-Chat, Deepseek-vl-7b-base, Moondream2
• DRL Algorithm Comparisons: Pure PPO, DDPG, Random Policy

Implementation Details

• Network Architecture: 3-layer Transformer with 8 attention heads, ReLU activation
• Optimizer: Adam optimizer with learning rates ranging from 1×10⁻⁴ to 1×10⁻⁸
• GAE-PPO Parameters: γ=0.99, ε=0.5, λ₁=λ₂=1

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. LLAVA Performance Evaluation

• Parameter Efficiency: LLAVA-1.5-7b-hf reduces parameters by 46.2% compared to LLAVA-1.5-13b-hf
• Inference Time: Average 40% faster than LLAVA-1.5-13b-hf
• Semantic Accuracy: Best performance on parking space identification tasks

2. GAE-PPO Performance Improvement

• Convergence Performance: Approximately 61% improvement in cumulative reward compared to pure PPO
• QoE Improvement: 36% improvement over DDPG, significant improvement over pure PPO in 8-vehicle scenarios
• Convergence Speed: Reduction of 10, 23, and 54 convergence steps for vehicles 1, 2, and 3 respectively

3. Scalability Analysis

• 4→8 Vehicles: QoE improvement of 61.4%
• 8→12 Vehicles: QoE improvement of 31.9%
• 12→16 Vehicles: QoE improvement of 25.2%

Ablation Studies

• SINR and Sentence Length Relationship: In high SINR environments, sentence length has minimal impact on SSIM; in low SINR environments, shorter sentences maintain higher SSIM
• Attention Mechanism Analysis: LLAVA attention maps accurately focus on relevant image regions such as vehicles and parking spaces

Case Study

Semantic Extraction Example:

• Original image: 614KB → Extracted text: 12.1KB (compression rate >98%)
• Accurate identification: "Four parking spaces, three occupied, one vacant"
• Location description: "Vacant parking space located between red and yellow vehicles"

Related Work

Vehicular Network Research

• Spectrum Sharing: Multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for optimizing V2V and V2I communication
• Power Allocation: DRL solutions for URLLC power allocation problems
• Secure Transmission: Secure transmission schemes for joint radar-communication systems

Embodied AI Research

• Data Extraction: LLM for efficient multimodal data processing and transmission
• Decision-Making: DRL for developing adaptive strategies in dynamic environments
• Integrated Methods: Combination of LLM and DRL for embodied environment decision-making

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Effectiveness Validation: The proposed embodied AI framework outperforms traditional methods in transmission efficiency, convergence speed, and system performance
2. Semantic Compression Advantages: LLAVA achieves over 90% data compression rate while maintaining semantic integrity
3. Decision-Making Stability: GAE-PPO significantly enhances decision-making stability and convergence performance in dynamic environments

Limitations

1. Computational Complexity: Overall complexity of O(L²·d + L·d²) + O(T·Σnp-1·np) may face challenges in resource-constrained environments
2. Dataset Scale: Relatively small image dataset (30 images) used in experiments may affect generalization capability
3. Practical Deployment: Lacks validation in real vehicular network environments

Future Directions

1. Algorithm Optimization: Further reduce computational complexity to accommodate edge computing environments
2. Dataset Expansion: Construct larger-scale and more diverse vehicular network scenario datasets
3. Practical Validation: Verify framework performance in real vehicular network testbeds

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Innovation: First integration of LLM and DRL for embodied AI vehicular networks with novel technical approach
2. Theoretical Contributions: Introduction of Weber-Fechner law for QoE modeling provides new perspective for vehicular network performance assessment
3. Comprehensive Experiments: Multi-dimensional comparative experiments including different LLM models, DRL algorithms, and scalability analysis
4. Practical Value: Significant data compression rate and performance improvements demonstrate practical application potential

Weaknesses

1. Insufficient Complexity Analysis: While providing theoretical complexity analysis, lacks actual runtime and energy consumption evaluation
2. Limited Robustness Verification: Lacks performance validation under adversarial and extreme conditions
3. Incomplete Cost-Benefit Analysis: Insufficient discussion of trade-offs between deployment costs and performance gains

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides new research direction for embodied AI applications in vehicular networks
2. Practical Prospects: Broad application potential in 6G vehicular networks, autonomous driving, and related fields
3. Reproducibility: Detailed parameter settings and algorithm descriptions facilitate reproduction

Applicable Scenarios

1. Intelligent Transportation Systems: Real-time traffic information processing and decision-making
2. Autonomous Driving: Environmental perception and path planning optimization
3. Edge Computing: Efficient data processing in resource-constrained environments
4. 6G Networks: Intelligent resource management in next-generation mobile networks

References

The paper cites 51 relevant references, primarily covering:

• Vehicular network communication optimization 15-19
• Embodied AI and LLM application research 20-29
• Deep reinforcement learning methods 39-43
• Semantic communication and QoE modeling 33-36

Overall Assessment: This is a pioneering work in the field of embodied AI-enhanced vehicular networks with novel technical approach, comprehensive experimental validation, and significant academic and practical value. While there remains room for improvement in complexity optimization and practical deployment verification, it provides important theoretical foundations and technical references for the development of this field.