Integrated AHB to APB Bridge Using Raspberry Pi and Artix-7 FPGA

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.01147
• Title: Integrated AHB to APB Bridge Using Raspberry Pi and Artix-7 FPGA
• Authors: Gopi Chand Ananthu, Riadul Islam (Senior Member, IEEE)
• Classification: cs.AR (Computer Architecture)
• Journal: IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems–I
• Institution: University of Maryland, Baltimore County, MD 21250, USA
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01147

Abstract

This project focuses on the design and implementation of an AHB to APB bridge for efficient communication in System-on-Chip (SoC) architectures. The Advanced High-performance Bus (AHB) is utilized for high-speed operations, typically connecting processors and memory, while the Advanced Peripheral Bus (APB) is optimized for low-power, low-speed peripheral devices. The AHB to APB bridge serves as an interface, converting complex high-speed AHB transactions into simpler single-cycle APB transactions, enabling seamless data transfer between fast components and slow peripherals. The bridge manages clock domain synchronization, transaction conversion, and flow control, ensuring compatibility between AHB's burst transfers and APB's non-pipelined protocol.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Context

In modern System-on-Chip (SoC) design, there is a need to integrate high-performance processors with low-power peripheral devices to achieve optimal performance and energy efficiency. AHB and APB operate under different protocols and speed requirements, presenting challenges for direct communication:

1. Protocol Differences: AHB supports high-speed, high-performance burst mode transfers and pipelined operations, while APB is designed for simplicity, providing single-cycle, low-power transactions
2. Clock Domain Mismatch: AHB operates at higher frequencies to handle performance-critical tasks, while APB operates at lower frequencies to conserve power
3. Transaction Complexity: The need to convert AHB's complex burst modes and pipelined operations into APB's non-pipelined, single-cycle transactions

Research Significance

The AHB to APB bridge plays a critical role in SoC architectures with widespread applications in:

• Embedded Systems: Supporting communication between processing cores and peripherals such as sensors and timers
• Consumer Electronics: Connecting fast processors to audio controllers, display drivers, and I/O interfaces
• Automotive Systems: Facilitating CPU interaction with control units, supporting infotainment and engine management
• Industrial Automation: Linking high-speed controllers with sensors and actuators

Limitations of Existing Approaches

Traditional bridge designs often lack:

1. Effective clock domain synchronization mechanisms
2. Flexible reconfigurable design solutions
3. Comprehensive hardware verification platforms
4. Detailed power and timing analysis

Core Contributions

1. Innovative Integrated Architecture: Proposes a complete AHB to APB bridge system based on Raspberry Pi and Artix-7 FPGA, achieving efficient communication through SPI interface
2. Reconfigurable Design Solution: Constructs a reconfigurable bridge design supporting researchers' use in their investigations
3. Comprehensive Verification Platform: Establishes a complete testing platform encompassing hardware implementation, simulation verification, and performance analysis
4. Detailed Performance Evaluation: Provides comprehensive area, power, and timing analysis reports validating design effectiveness

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Design an AHB to APB bridge implementing:

• Input: AHB protocol signals (address, data, control signals, etc.)
• Output: APB protocol-compatible signals
• Constraints: Ensuring data integrity, clock domain synchronization, and low-power design

System Architecture

Overall Architecture Design

The system comprises five key modules:

1. Raspberry Pi (Master Device)
   • Generates 100-bit wide input data
   • Serially transmits data to FPGA via SPI MOSI line
   • Receives processed output data via MISO line for verification
2. SPI Slave (Data Reception Module)
   • Receives serial data from Raspberry Pi via SPI interface (100 bits)
   • Processes data reception, synchronization, and outputs transaction initiation signals
   • Sequentially sends received 1-bit data to Mapper1
3. Mapper1 (Signal Mapping Module)
   • Assembles 1-bit input from SPI Slave into parallel 100-bit data
   • Maps various parts of 100-bit data to specific AHB-compatible signals: prdata, haddr, hwdata, htrans, hreadyin, hwrite
4. Bridge Top (AHB to APB Conversion Module)
   • Processes AHB-compatible signals from Mapper1
   • Converts them to APB-compatible control signals
   • Manages read/write operations
5. Mapper2 (Output Aggregation Module)
   • Collects outputs from Bridge Top module
   • Aggregates signals into 104-bit output data
   • Transmits bit-by-bit back to Raspberry Pi via MISO line

Bridge Top Core Architecture

The Bridge Top module contains three key interconnected submodules:

1. AHB Slave Interface
   • Functions as AHB slave module
   • Receives AHB signals and validates transactions
   • Generates control signals for subsequent modules
   • Pipelines AHB address and data
2. APB FSM Controller
   • Manages APB transactions
   • Uses finite state machine to coordinate read/write operation flows
   • Ensures proper handshaking between AHB and APB domains
3. APB Interface
   • Generates APB-compatible signals required for peripheral communication
   • Manages transaction completion and response signal generation

Technical Innovations

1. SPI Serialization Optimization: Optimizes FPGA pin usage through serialization, providing robust synchronization mechanisms
2. FSM Control Strategy: Employs finite state machines to generate multiplexer and demultiplexer control signals, ensuring correct data routing and synchronization
3. Clock Domain Synchronization: Effectively addresses clock domain matching between high-frequency AHB and low-frequency APB
4. Reconfigurable Design: Supports flexible utilization by researchers in their investigations

Experimental Setup

Hardware Platform

• FPGA: Artix-7 100TCSG324 FPGA
• Master Controller: Raspberry Pi 4 Model B
• Communication Interface: SPI Protocol

Development Toolchain

• Design Tools: Xilinx Vivado Design Suite (RTL coding, behavioral simulation, hardware synthesis)
• Synthesis Tools: Synopsys Design Compiler (DC) (gate-level synthesis, area/power/timing optimization)
• Physical Implementation: Synopsys IC Compiler II (ICC2) (place and route operations)
• Software Development: Python scripts for SPI communication management

Verification Methods

• Verilog hardware description language implementation
• Testbench verification across multiple operational scenarios
• Hardware simulation and FPGA implementation verification

Experimental Results

Functional Verification Results

Signal Transmission Verification

Experiments verified correct mapping between Raspberry Pi input and FPGA output:

Timing Verification

Simulation results demonstrate:

• Clock signals maintain stable periodic waveforms
• AHB to APB protocol conversion executes correctly
• Read/write operations synchronize successfully
• State machine correctly handles various transaction scenarios

Performance Analysis Results

Area Analysis

Power Analysis

Timing Analysis

• Clock Period: 0.72 ns
• Data Arrival Time: 0.30 ns
• Data Required Time: 0.64 ns
• Timing Slack: 0.34 ns (meets timing constraints)

Experimental Findings

1. Register Power Dominance: Register components contribute 97.70% of total power consumption, indicating that optimizing register usage is crucial for power reduction
2. Significant Interconnect Area: The 477.019164 units of interconnect area highlights the importance of efficient routing strategies
3. Adequate Timing Slack: The positive timing slack of 0.34 ns ensures the design meets timing constraints and operates reliably

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. AMBA Protocol Optimization: ARM's AMBA standard continuously evolves to optimize SoC internal communication
2. Bridge Design: Research on bridging technologies between various bus protocols
3. Low-Power Design: Power optimization techniques for mobile and embedded applications
4. FPGA Implementation: System implementation on reconfigurable hardware platforms

Advantages of This Work

Compared to existing work, this paper provides:

1. Comprehensive hardware verification platform
2. Detailed performance analysis data
3. Reconfigurable design solution
4. Innovative SPI interface integration

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully implemented an AHB to APB bridge system based on Raspberry Pi and Artix-7 FPGA
2. Verified the effectiveness of SPI communication in data transmission
3. Demonstrated design optimization in area, power, and timing through comprehensive analysis
4. Established a complete RTL to GDSII implementation flow

Limitations

1. Power Optimization Headroom: Excessive register power consumption requires further optimization
2. Frequency Limitations: Current design's maximum operating frequency is constrained by timing requirements
3. Scalability Considerations: More complex SoC systems may require additional optimizations

Future Directions

1. Explore more efficient power management strategies
2. Investigate design optimizations supporting higher frequency operation
3. Extend support for additional bus protocol types
4. Develop automated bridge generator tools

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Completeness: Provides complete flow from design through implementation verification
2. High Practical Value: Reconfigurable design facilitates researcher utilization
3. Sufficient Verification: Includes functional simulation, hardware implementation, and performance analysis
4. Technical Innovation: SPI interface integration and FSM control strategy demonstrate innovation

Weaknesses

1. Missing Performance Benchmarks: Lacks detailed comparison with other bridge designs
2. Limited Application Scenarios: Primarily targets specific hardware platform combinations
3. Insufficient Power Optimization: Excessive register power consumption requires improvement
4. Missing Scalability Analysis: Insufficient discussion of design scalability

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides complete reference implementation for SoC bridge design
2. Practical Value: Directly applicable to related research and teaching
3. Reproducibility: Detailed implementation details support result reproduction
4. Promotion Potential: Reconfigurable characteristics facilitate technology dissemination

Applicable Scenarios

1. Educational Research: Suitable as practical project for SoC design courses
2. Prototype Development: Can be used for rapid prototype verification
3. Embedded Systems: Applicable to small and medium-scale embedded applications
4. Technology Validation: Serves as verification platform for new algorithms and optimization techniques

References

This paper cites 50 related references, primarily including:

1. ARM AMBA protocol specification documents
2. FPGA design and implementation research
3. SoC architecture and low-power design literature
4. SPI communication and bridge design related work

Overall Evaluation: This is an engineering-practice-oriented paper providing a complete AHB to APB bridge design and implementation solution. While relatively limited in theoretical innovation, its comprehensive verification flow, detailed performance analysis, and reconfigurable characteristics provide good practical value and pedagogical significance.