About the Keplerization of motion in any central force field

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.01247
• Title: About the Keplerization of motion in any central force field
• Author: Christian CARIMALO (Sorbonne Université)
• Classification: physics.class-ph (Classical Physics)
• Publication Date: January 2, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01247

Abstract

This paper reviews and reformulates the Keplerization method for single-body motion in central force fields introduced by Martinusi and Gurfil in 2012, recasting it as a general "homogenization" method applicable to any bounded motion. The article further demonstrates how this extended method provides proof for the existence of dynamical symmetry groups and how to extend such groups to global symmetry groups.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Core Issue: Orbital analysis of a single particle moving in an arbitrary central force field is a fundamental problem in classical mechanics, yet direct solution is often difficult for complex potential functions.
2. Significance:
   • Central force problems form the foundation of celestial mechanics, atomic physics, and other fields
   • Understanding motion laws under different potentials is crucial for theoretical physics development
   • Seeking unified treatment methods helps reveal intrinsic connections between different systems
3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
   • Traditional methods target specific potential functions, lacking universality
   • The original Martinusi-Gurfil Keplerization method primarily addresses bounded motion
   • Lacks systematic theoretical proof for dynamical symmetries
4. Research Motivation:
   • Generalize the Keplerization method to all types of bounded motion
   • Establish a unified theoretical framework for understanding symmetries in different central force fields
   • Provide rigorous proof for the existence of dynamical symmetry groups

Core Contributions

1. Method Extension: Generalizes the original Keplerization method to a general "homogenization" method applicable to all types of bounded motion
2. Theoretical Proof: Provides rigorous mathematical proof for the existence of dynamical symmetry groups in arbitrary central force field systems
3. Symmetry Group Extension: Demonstrates how to extend dynamical symmetry groups to global symmetry groups
4. Unified Framework: Establishes a unified theoretical framework connecting motion under different potential functions
5. Geometric Insight: Emphasizes the crucial role of turning points in orbital symmetry

Detailed Methodology

Problem Definition

Study the motion of a classical non-relativistic point particle P with mass m under a spherically symmetric potential V(r), where r is the distance from the potential source point O. The objective is to establish connections between motion under arbitrary potentials and known solvable systems (such as the Kepler problem).

Core Theoretical Framework

1. Fundamental Equations

For motion in a central force field, the effective potential is: $U(r) = \frac{L^2}{2mr^2} + V(r)$

where L is the angular momentum. The equation of motion is: $\frac{p_r^2}{2m} = E - U(r) \geq 0$

2. Binet-type Formula

Introducing u = 1/r, we obtain: $u'^2 = F(u) = -u^2 + \frac{2m}{L^2}[E - V(1/u)]$

3. Classification of Turning Points

Based on the properties of F(u), motion is classified into three types:

• Bounded Motion: $F(u) = g_3(u)(u_M - u)(u - u_m)$, where $u_m \leq u \leq u_M$
• Lower-bounded Motion: $F(u) = g_2(u)(u_M - u)$, where $u \leq u_M$
• Upper-bounded Motion: $F(u) = g_1(u)(u - u_m)$, where $u \geq u_m$

Homogenization Transformation

1. Keplerization of Bounded Motion

Introducing a new angular variable χ: $\frac{d\chi}{d\psi} = \sqrt{g_3(u(\psi))}$

The original equation is transformed to: $\left(\frac{du}{d\chi}\right)^2 = (u_M - u)(u - u_m)$

This is identical to the elliptical orbit equation of the Kepler problem.

2. Treatment of Lower-bounded Motion

For lower-bounded motion, rewrite g₂(u) as: $g_2(u) = G_2(u)(u + a)$

Through appropriate parameter selection and transformation, it can be mapped to hyperbolic orbits of the Kepler problem.

3. Homogenization of Upper-bounded Motion

Utilizing upper-bounded solutions of potential V(r) = -K/r², similar transformations achieve homogenization.

Technical Innovations

1. Unified Transformation Framework: Establishes unified transformation theory applicable to all motion types
2. Geometric Perspective: Emphasizes geometric properties of orbits rather than specific motions
3. Symmetry Revelation: Uncovers hidden symmetries between different systems through homogenization
4. Turning Point Significance: Proves the crucial role of turning points in defining orbital symmetry axes

Theoretical Analysis

Existence of Dynamical Symmetry Groups

1. Universal Existence of LRL-type Vectors

Through the Keplerization method, it is proven that any central force field possesses conserved quantities analogous to the Laplace-Runge-Lenz (LRL) vector: $\mathbf{S} = L\mathbf{e}_x$

where $\mathbf{e}_x$ is the unit vector along the periapsis axis.

2. Lie Algebra Structure

The symmetry vector S and angular momentum L satisfy Poisson bracket relations: $\{L_i, S_j\} = \epsilon_{ijk}S_k$$\{S_i, S_j\} = -\epsilon_{ijk}L_k$$\{L_i, L_j\} = \epsilon_{ijk}L_k$

These relations define a Lie algebra isomorphic to SO(3,1).

Global Symmetry Groups

For homogeneous potentials $V(r) \propto r^ν$, introduce the mechanical similarity operator: $M = x_k\frac{\partial}{\partial x_k} + \frac{\nu}{2}p_k\frac{\partial}{\partial p_k}$

The Lie algebra of the complete symmetry group is generated by M, L_i, and S_i, satisfying: $[M, L_i] = [M, S_i] = 0$

Classical Potential Examples

1. Newtonian Potential V(r) = -K/r

• E > 0: Hyperbolic orbits, $r = \frac{r_0}{1 + e\cos\psi}$, e > 1
• E = 0: Parabolic orbits, e = 1
• E < 0: Elliptical orbits, e < 1

2. Potential V(r) = -K/r²

Depending on parameters, produces cosine-type, hyperbolic cosine-type, or hyperbolic sine-type orbits.

3. Repulsive Potentials

For repulsive potentials V(r) = +K/r and V(r) = +K/r², only lower-bounded motion occurs.

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Martinusi-Gurfil (2012): First introduced the Keplerization concept, primarily for bounded motion
2. Bertrand's Theorem: Determines potential forms producing closed orbits
3. Classical Symmetry Studies: Research by Fradkin, Mukunda, and others on symmetry groups for specific potentials

Contributions Compared to Existing Work

1. Universality: Extended to all motion types, not limited to bounded motion
2. Theoretical Depth: Provides rigorous proof for symmetry group existence
3. Unified Perspective: Establishes unified connections between different potentials

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Universality Theorem: Any central force field possesses dynamical symmetry groups with universal structure
2. Criticality of Turning Points: The existence of turning points is the fundamental reason for orbital symmetry
3. Feasibility of Homogenization: Any bounded motion can be connected to motion under homogeneous potentials through appropriate transformations
4. Symmetry Group Extension: Dynamical symmetry groups can be extended to global symmetry groups including energy transformations

Limitations

1. Canonical Transformation Issue: The appendix proves that Keplerization transformations are generally not canonical
2. Unbounded Motion: For motion without turning points, Keplerization does not directly apply
3. Computational Complexity: For complex potentials, finding suitable transformation functions may be difficult

Future Directions

1. Integrable Systems Generalization: Explore applications of this method to other integrable systems
2. Quantum Correspondence: Investigate quantum mechanical counterparts of classical symmetries
3. Numerical Methods: Develop numerical computation methods based on homogenization
4. Relativistic Extension: Extend to relativistic cases

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Depth: Provides profound theoretical insights into central force field symmetries
2. Methodological Innovation: Skillfully combines geometric perspective with dynamical analysis
3. Universal Framework: Establishes unified theory applicable to arbitrary potentials
4. Mathematical Rigor: Provides rigorous proof for symmetry group existence
5. Physical Intuition: Reveals the fundamental role of turning points in orbital symmetry

Weaknesses

1. Practical Limitations: Application to complex potentials may be constrained by difficulty in finding transformation functions
2. Canonicality Issues: Non-canonical nature of transformations limits applications within Hamiltonian mechanics framework
3. Computational Complexity: In some cases, calculations may be more complex than direct solution

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new unified perspective for classical mechanics symmetry theory
2. Pedagogical Value: Helps understand intrinsic connections between different central force problems
3. Research Inspiration: May inspire search for similar unified methods in other physics fields

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research: Suitable for theoretical analysis and symmetry studies of central force fields
2. Educational Applications: Can demonstrate deep connections between different physical systems
3. Numerical Computation: May provide new insights for numerical solution of complex potentials
4. Celestial Mechanics: Potentially valuable for orbital analysis in complex gravitational fields

References

The paper cites 22 important references, including:

• Martinusi & Gurfil (2012): Original Keplerization method
• Laplace (1799), Runge (1919), Lenz (1924): Historical development of LRL vector
• Bertrand (1873): Classical theorem on closed orbits
• Modern symmetry theory literature

Summary: This is an important theoretical contribution to classical mechanics. By generalizing and deepening the Keplerization method, it provides a new theoretical framework for understanding universal symmetries in central force fields. While certain practical limitations exist, its theoretical value and contribution to physical intuition are significant.