Groups with a covering condition on commutators

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.01360
• Title: Groups with a covering condition on commutators
• Authors: Eloisa Detomi, Marta Morigi, Pavel Shumyatsky
• Classification: math.GR (Group Theory)
• Publication Date: January 2, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01360

Abstract

Given a group G and positive integers k, n, let B_n = B_n(G) denote the set of all elements x in G such that |x^G| ≤ n. A group G is said to satisfy the (k,n)-covering condition on commutators if there exists a subset S ⊆ G with |S| ≤ k such that all commutators of G are contained in SB_n. The significance of this condition was revealed in recent studies on class-2 probabilistically nilpotent finite groups. The main result of this paper is: if G is a group satisfying the (k,n)-covering condition on commutators, then G' contains a characteristic subgroup B such that both G':B and |B'| are (k,n)-bounded. This generalizes several similar earlier results.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem Origin: This research stems from the study of probabilistically nilpotent finite groups. In reference 4, researchers discovered that class-2 probabilistically nilpotent finite groups contain a subgroup of bounded index satisfying the (k,n)-covering condition on commutators.
2. Problem Significance:
   • The covering condition on commutators connects several important concepts in group theory: BFC groups (bounded finite conjugacy class groups), probabilistically nilpotent groups, and the structure of derived subgroups
   • This condition provides a new perspective for understanding the commutator structure of groups
   • It has important applications in probabilistic group theory and finite group theory
3. Limitations of Existing Results:
   • Reference 3 only handled the special case where all commutators lie in B_n(G)
   • Reference 4 provided results on the existence of a bounded index subgroup T such that γ_4(T) has bounded order, but the characterization of derived subgroup structure was not sufficiently precise
   • There was a lack of in-depth analysis of group structure under general (k,n)-covering conditions
4. Research Motivation: To further clarify the structure of groups satisfying (k,n)-covering conditions, particularly the precise structural characteristics of their derived subgroups.

Core Contributions

1. Main Theorem: Proved that for a group G satisfying the (k,n)-covering condition on commutators, the derived subgroup G' contains a characteristic subgroup B such that both G':B and |B'| are (k,n)-bounded.
2. Technical Innovations:
   • Introduced the concept of C*_G(g) = {x ∈ G | x,g ∈ X} and proved it is a subgroup
   • Developed inductive techniques for handling covering conditions
   • Established the concept of special (i)-subgroups and related theory
3. Result Generalization: Generalized the result from reference 3 where B_n covers all commutators to the more general case where SB_n covers all commutators.
4. Theoretical Insight: Provided deep understanding of the derived subgroup structure of groups satisfying covering conditions.

Methodology Details

Problem Definition

Study groups G satisfying the following condition: there exists a subset S ⊆ G with |S| ≤ k such that all commutators of G are contained in SB_n, where B_n = {x ∈ G | |x^G| ≤ n}. The goal is to determine the structural characteristics of the derived subgroup G' of such groups.

Core Technical Framework

1. Establishment of Preparatory Assumptions

The paper establishes four key additional assumptions through inductive arguments:

• Assumption 1: If x ∈ Comm(G,G) and x ∈ B_n^100, then x ∈ B_n
• Assumption 2: If x ∈ Comm(G,G) and x ∈ sB_n^100 for some s ∈ S, then x ∈ sB_n
• Assumption 3: When s ≠ s', sB_n ∩ s'B_n = ∅
• Assumption 4: Technical assumption for quotient groups

2. Construction of Key Subgroups

Define X = Comm(G,G) ∩ B_n, and let B = ⟨X⟩. For any g ∈ G, define:

C*_G(g) = {x ∈ G | [x,g] ∈ X}

Lemma 3.1 proves that C*_G(g) is indeed a subgroup of G, which is a non-trivial result since such a set defined in general need not be a subgroup.

3. Analysis of Covering Properties

Lemmas 3.2 and 3.3 establish the relationship between covering conditions and subgroup indices:

• The cosets of C*_G(g) correspond precisely to sets of the form {x ∈ G | x,g ∈ sB_n}
• G : C*_G(g) ≤ k

Technical Innovations

1. Special (i)-Subgroup Theory

Introduced the concept of special (i)-subgroups: a normal subgroup L satisfying:

• B ≤ L
• X_L ⊆ Z(B)
• G : L ≤ i

This provides a hierarchical approach for handling complex covering conditions.

2. Inductive Order-Reduction Technique

Through Lemma 3.10, proved that if G has a (j)-subgroup with j ≥ 2, then there exists a bounded order normal subgroup T such that G/T has a (j-1)-subgroup. This provides an effective inductive framework.

3. Commutator Centralization Technique

Using Lemmas 3.6 and 3.8, systematically analyzed the structure of B,x^G, proving it has bounded order, thereby controlling the structure of B'.

Experimental Setup

As a pure theoretical mathematics paper, this work does not involve numerical experiments but rather verifies theoretical results through rigorous mathematical proofs.

Main Results

Proof Structure of Theorem 1.1

The proof consists of several key steps:

1. Base Case: When |S| = 1, directly apply the results from reference 3
2. Inductive Setup: Perform induction on |S|, establishing necessary technical assumptions
3. Subgroup Construction: Construct sequences of special subgroups and corresponding normal subgroups
4. Boundedness Analysis: Through iterative application of Lemmas 3.9 and 3.10, prove that B' has bounded order

Contributions of Key Lemmas

• Lemma 3.5: Proves G' : B is k-bounded
• Lemma 3.6: Proves that for any x ∈ X, B,x^G has n-bounded order
• Lemma 3.9: Establishes existence of special subgroups
• Lemma 3.10: Provides mechanism for inductive order-reduction

Related Work

Historical Development

1. BFC Group Theory: B.H. Neumann proved that the derived subgroup of BFC groups is finite
2. Schur's Theorem: When G : Z(G) ≤ n, the order of G' is n-bounded
3. Reference 3: Handled the case where all commutators lie in B_n
4. Reference 4: First introduced covering conditions in the study of probabilistically nilpotent groups

Position of This Work

This paper generalizes the result from reference 3 from B_n-covering to SB_n-covering and provides more precise structural description than reference 4. Compared with the general covering conditions for multilinear commutator words in reference 2, this paper focuses on the commutator case and provides more precise results.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

Theorem 1.1 completely characterizes the derived subgroup structure of groups satisfying the (k,n)-covering condition on commutators: G' contains a characteristic subgroup B such that both G':B and |B'| are (k,n)-bounded.

Theoretical Significance

1. Structural Clarification: Provides precise quantitative description for understanding the derived subgroup structure of such groups
2. Methodological Innovation: Develops new techniques for handling covering conditions
3. Application Potential: Provides new tools for probabilistic group theory and finite group theory

Limitations

1. Proof techniques are complex, involving multiple technical assumptions
2. Treatment of infinite groups requires additional care
3. Specific bounded constants may be large

Future Directions

1. Improve estimates of bounded constants
2. Generalize to other types of group words
3. Further applications in probabilistic group theory

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Depth: Provides deep structural analysis of groups satisfying covering conditions
2. Technical Innovation: Introduces multiple new technical tools and concepts
3. Rigorous Proof: Clear logic and complete argumentation
4. Generalization Significance: Generalizes existing results to more general cases

Weaknesses

1. Technical Complexity: Proof involves substantial technical details that may affect readability
2. Constant Estimation: Does not provide specific bounded constants
3. Application Examples: Lacks concrete application examples

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides new theoretical tools for group theory research
2. Application Prospects: Has important applications in probabilistic group theory and finite group theory
3. Methodological Contribution: Techniques for handling covering conditions have general value

Applicable Scenarios

This result applies to:

1. Structural analysis of probabilistically nilpotent groups
2. Research on BFC group-related problems
3. Quantitative analysis of derived subgroup structure
4. Covering problems in finite group theory

References

The paper cites 12 related references, mainly including:

• 3 Work by G. Dierings and P. Shumyatsky on commutator groups with bounded conjugacy classes
• 4 Research by S. Eberhard and P. Shumyatsky on probabilistically nilpotent groups
• 6 Classical results by B.H. Neumann on BFC groups
• 8 Group theory textbook by D.J.S. Robinson

These references provide a solid theoretical foundation for this research.