Mixing Times and Privacy Analysis for the Projected Langevin Algorithm under a Modulus of Continuity

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.04134
• Title: Mixing Times and Privacy Analysis for the Projected Langevin Algorithm under a Modulus of Continuity
• Authors: Mario Bravo, Juan Pablo Flores-Mella, Cristóbal Guzmán
• Classification: stat.ML cs.LG math.OC math.ST stat.TH
• Publication Date: January 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04134

Abstract

This paper investigates the mixing times of the Projected Langevin Algorithm and privacy curves for noisy stochastic gradient descent (SGD), extending beyond the scope of non-expansive iterations. Specifically, the authors derive novel mixing time bounds for the Projected Langevin Algorithm, which in certain important cases are dimension-free and polylogarithmic in precision, closely matching existing results for the smooth convex case. Furthermore, the paper establishes new privacy curve upper bounds for subsampled noisy SGD algorithms. These bounds demonstrate critical dependence on gradient regularity and are applicable to a broad class of convex loss functions beyond the smooth case.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Importance of Sampling: Sampling from log-concave distributions π ∝ e^(-f) is a fundamental algorithmic problem and serves as a building block for volume estimation, optimization, Bayesian statistics, machine learning, and differential privacy.
2. Langevin Algorithm: The Langevin algorithm approximates the target distribution by discretizing the Langevin diffusion:

   dL_t = -∇f(L_t)dt + √2dW_t
   

   
   After discretization, this yields a Markov chain:

   X_{t+1} = Π_X[X_t - η∇f(X_t) + √(2η)ξ_t]
   

3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
   • Most research focuses on strongly convex smooth potential function settings
   • Limited research on non-smooth convex potential functions
   • Privacy Amplification by Iteration (PABI) techniques are primarily restricted to non-expansive iterations

Research Motivation

This paper aims to extend PABI techniques beyond non-expansive iterations by quantifying the regularity of underlying mappings through moduli of continuity, thereby handling a broader class of potential functions including non-differentiable functions.

Core Contributions

1. Extended PABI Framework: Extends PABI techniques to general mappings with moduli of continuity, even accommodating discontinuous mappings.
2. Optimization Problem Design: Designs an optimization problem to obtain optimal Rényi divergence bounds for PABI applications, whose tractability is closely related to the modulus of continuity of the relevant gradient mapping.
3. Explicit Solutions: Proves that when the modulus of continuity has the form φ(δ) = √(cδ² + h), the optimization problem admits an exact explicit solution.
4. Mixing Time Bounds: Establishes novel mixing time bounds for convex and (p,M)-weakly smooth cases, which in certain scenarios are dimension-free and polylogarithmic in precision.
5. Privacy Curve Analysis: Establishes new privacy curve upper bounds for noisy SGD, demonstrating critical dependence on gradient regularity.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Studies projected noisy iterations:

X_{t+1} = Π_X[Φ_t(X_t) + ξ_t], ξ_t ~ N(0, σ²_t I_{d×d})

where Φ_t has modulus of continuity φ_t.

Modulus of Continuity Framework

Definition

For a mapping Φ: X ⊆ ℝ^d → ℝ^d, a non-decreasing function φ: ℝ₊ → ℝ₊ is a modulus of continuity for Φ if:

‖Φ(x) - Φ(y)‖ ≤ φ(‖x - y‖) ∀x, y ∈ X

Important Cases

1. Convex Lipschitz: φ(δ) = √(δ² + (2ηL)²)
2. Convex (p,M)-weakly smooth: φ(δ) = √(δ² + (2η^(1/(1-p))√((1-p)/(1+p))(M/2)^(1/(1-p)))²)
3. Strong Dissipation: φ(δ) = √((1-2ηκ+η²β²)δ² + 2ηλ)

PABI Extension

Core Lemma

Lemma 3.2: Let X ⊆ ℝ^d be a closed convex set, and Φ have modulus of continuity φ. For random variables X, X' and Gaussian noise ξ ~ N(0, σ²I), let Y = Π_XΦ(X) + ξ, Y' = Π_XΦ(X') + ξ, then for any 0 < a ≤ φ(δ):

R_α^(φ(δ)-a)(Y‖Y') ≤ R_α^(δ)(X‖X') + αa²/(2σ²)

Shifted Optimization Problem

To obtain the tightest PABI bounds, one must solve the shifted optimization problem:

min_{u∈R} E(u) := Σ_{t=1}^T (φ_{t-1}(u_{t-1}) - u_t)²/σ²_{t-1}

Main Theoretical Results

Theorem 3.4 (Main Result)

Let φ_t(δ) = √(c_tδ² + h_t), then for projected noisy iterations:

R_α(X_T‖X'_T) ≤ α/2 [Π_{k=0}^{T-1}c_k D² / Σ_{j=0}^{T-1}σ²_j Π_{l=j+1}^{T-1}c_l + Σ_{t=0}^{T-1} h_t Π_{k=t+1}^{T-1}c_k / Σ_{j=t}^{T-1}σ²_j Π_{l=j+1}^{T-1}c_l]

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Analysis Framework

This is primarily a theoretical work establishing bounds through rigorous mathematical proofs rather than empirical experiments. The analysis includes:

1. Mixing Time Analysis: Evaluates convergence rates using total variation distance
2. Privacy Analysis: Employs the Rényi differential privacy framework
3. Optimization Analysis: Proves existence and uniqueness of optimal solutions to the shifted optimization problem

Evaluation Metrics

• Mixing Time: T_{mix,TV}(ε) = min{t ∈ ℕ: d(t) ≤ ε}
• Rényi Divergence: R_α(μ‖ν)
• Total Variation Distance: ‖μ - ν‖_

Experimental Results

Mixing Time Bounds

Theorem 4.2 (Weakly Smooth Case)

For convex and (p,M)-weakly smooth functions, if 1/η ≥ Θ, then:

T_{mix,TV}(ε) ≤ ⌈D²/η⌉ · ⌈log₂(1/ε)⌉

where Θ = (M/2)^(2/(1+p))(1-p)/(1+p) max{16ln(D(M/2)^(1/(1-p))e), 27}^((1-p)/(1+p))

Theorem 4.3 (Strong Dissipation Case)

For (λ,κ)-strongly dissipative and β-smooth functions, let c = 1 - 2ηκ + η²β² < 1, then:

T_{mix,TV}(ε) = O(log_{1/c}(1 + D²(1-c)/(4η)) · (e/(1-c))^{λ/2} log₂(1/ε))

Privacy Curve Analysis

Theorem 5.2 (Noisy SGD)

For convex, L-Lipschitz, and (p,M)-weakly smooth losses, noisy SGD satisfies (α,ε)-RDP where:

ε ≤ α/σ² [16L²T/n² + D²/(η²T) + 4η^(2p/(1-p))(1-p)/(1+p)(M/2)^(2/(1-p))ln(T·e)]

Key Findings

1. Dimension-Free Bounds: In certain cases, mixing time bounds are independent of dimension d
2. Regularity Dependence: Privacy bounds significantly depend on gradient regularity parameters p
3. Optimality: For moduli of continuity of the form φ(δ) = √(cδ² + h), the optimization problem has a unique optimal solution
4. Degenerate Cases: When p = 0 (Lipschitz case), non-trivial privacy bounds that vanish as n → ∞ cannot be obtained

Related Work

Langevin Algorithm Research

• Smooth Strongly Convex Case: Extensive research by Dalalyan (2017), Durmus and Moulines (2019), and others
• Non-Smooth Case: Relatively limited research, primarily including Pereyra (2016), Chatterji et al. (2020), and others

PABI Techniques

• Original Framework: Proposed by Feldman et al. (2018)
• Extended Applications: Applied to smooth convex cases by Altschuler and Talwar (2022, 2023)
• Contribution of This Paper: Extension to the modulus of continuity framework

Differential Privacy

• Classical Analysis: Assumes all iterations are published
• Last Iterate: Research by Chourasia et al. (2021), Ye and Shokri (2022), and others on privacy of the last iterate

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully extends PABI techniques beyond non-expansive iterations
2. Establishes tight bounds for multiple important classes of potential functions
3. Demonstrates the critical role of moduli of continuity in privacy and sampling analysis

Limitations

1. Non-Smooth Case: Non-trivial privacy amplification cannot be obtained in the Lipschitz case
2. Step Size Restrictions: Certain results require stricter step size constraints
3. Specific Form: Main results are limited to moduli of continuity of the form φ(δ) = √(cδ² + h)

Future Directions

1. Extension to more general forms of moduli of continuity
2. Improved privacy bounds in non-smooth cases
3. Investigation of more complex settings such as saddle point problems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: Successfully extends PABI techniques to more general settings with significant theoretical value
2. Mathematical Rigor: Complete and rigorous proofs; analytical solutions to the optimization problem demonstrate deep mathematical insights
3. Practical Value: Results apply to a broad class of potential functions including non-differentiable functions
4. Unified Framework: Provides a unified analytical framework through moduli of continuity

Weaknesses

1. Limited Applicability: Main results are restricted to specific forms of moduli of continuity
2. Lack of Empirical Validation: Absence of numerical experiments to verify the tightness of theoretical results
3. Non-Smooth Challenges: Relatively pessimistic privacy results in non-smooth cases

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new theoretical tools for sampling and privacy analysis
2. Methodological Value: The modulus of continuity approach may inspire related research
3. Practical Guidance: Offers theoretical guidance for practical algorithm design

Applicable Scenarios

1. Bayesian Inference: Posterior sampling involving non-smooth priors
2. Differential Privacy: Machine learning applications requiring precise privacy guarantees
3. Optimization: Analysis of stochastic algorithms for non-smooth convex optimization problems

References

• Altschuler, J. and Talwar, K. (2022, 2023). Privacy amplification by iteration
• Feldman, V. et al. (2018). Privacy amplification by iteration
• Dalalyan, A. (2017). Langevin Monte Carlo analysis
• Bubeck, S. et al. (2018). Projected Langevin Monte Carlo

This paper makes important contributions to theoretical machine learning and differential privacy. Through innovative use of moduli of continuity, it successfully extends the applicability of PABI techniques and provides new theoretical tools for analyzing non-smooth optimization and privacy-preserving algorithms.