Classically Bound and Quantum Quasi-Bound States of an Electron on a Plane Adjacent to a Magnetic Monopole

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.04406
• Title: Classically Bound and Quantum Quasi-Bound States of an Electron on a Plane Adjacent to a Magnetic Monopole
• Authors: J. Martin, A. Baskerville, V. L. Campo, J. Minns, J. Pooley, S. T. Carr, C. A. Hooley, G. Möller, J. Quintanilla
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Affiliated Institutions: University of Kent and other UK universities
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04406v2

Abstract

In three-dimensional space, electrons moving in a magnetic monopole field exhibit no bound states. This paper explores the physical phenomena that emerge when an electron is confined to a two-dimensional plane adjacent to a magnetic monopole. The study reveals that the classical problem admits bound states, while the quantum problem exhibits quasi-bound states, along with a continuum of scattering states. The lifetimes of quasi-bound states are calculated using multiple complementary approximation methods, which show good agreement for relatively short lifetimes. The critical magnetic monopole charge required to realize a single quasi-bound state is approximately 18Q_D (where Q_D is the Dirac monopole charge). The paper also examines the feasibility of implementing this magnetic charge in existing monopole analogues (spin ice, artificial spin ice, magnetic needles, etc.).

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Three-Dimensional Constraints: In three-dimensional space, electrons moving in a magnetic monopole field follow geodesics on a cone surface, with no closed orbits and consequently no bound states
2. Inspiration from Two-Dimensional Confinement: Inspired by two-dimensional electron gas systems in the quantum Hall effect, researchers sought to alter this situation by confining electrons to a two-dimensional plane
3. Experimental Feasibility: Although true Dirac monopoles remain undiscovered, multiple monopole analogues exist, such as spin ice, artificial spin ice, and magnetic needles

Research Significance

1. Fundamental Physics: Exploring novel physical phenomena in electron-magnetic monopole interactions
2. Experimental Application Value: Providing theoretical foundations for detecting magnetic monopoles using existing technology
3. Quantum Control: Offering new perspectives for quantum state manipulation in two-dimensional electron systems

Core Contributions

1. Discovery of Novel Physical Phenomena: Under two-dimensional confinement, the electron-magnetic monopole system exhibits both classical bound states and quantum quasi-bound states
2. Establishment of Complete Theoretical Framework: Providing comprehensive theoretical descriptions from classical mechanics to quantum mechanics
3. Development of Multiple Computational Methods: WKB approximation, finite difference method, phase shift method, and other techniques for calculating quasi-bound state lifetimes
4. Determination of Critical Conditions: Identifying the minimum magnetic charge threshold (≈18Q_D) required for quasi-bound state formation
5. Assessment of Experimental Feasibility: Systematic analysis of the possibility of achieving the required magnetic charge with current technology

Detailed Methodology

Physical Model Setup

Consider an electron with effective mass m* and charge q_e = -|q_e|, confined to a two-dimensional plane at distance D from a magnetic monopole with magnetic charge Q_m.

Key Physical Quantities:

• Natural length unit: D
• Natural energy unit: E₀ = ℏ²/(2m*D²)
• Dimensionless magnetic charge parameter: λ, where Q_m = 2λQ_D
• Dirac monopole charge: Q_D = 2πℏ/(μ₀|q_e|)

Classical Mechanics Analysis

Effective Potential:

V_cl(ρ) = (λ²/ρ²)[M/λ + (1 - 1/√(1+ρ²))]²

where ρ = r/D is the dimensionless radial coordinate and M is the angular momentum quantum number.

Orbital Classification:

1. Bound Orbits: Particles oscillate within the potential well
2. Scattering Orbits: Particles incident from infinity undergo scattering
3. Circular Orbits: Orbits with constant radius, classified as stable or unstable

Quantum Mechanical Treatment

Schrödinger Equation: After variable separation and coordinate transformation, the radial Schrödinger equation is obtained:

-d²ψ(ρ)/dρ² + V_q(ρ)ψ(ρ) = ϵψ(ρ)

Quantum Potential:

V_q(ρ) = (λ²/ρ²)(M/λ + [1 - 1/√(1+ρ²)])² - 1/(4ρ²)

Key Difference: The quantum potential contains an additional term -1/(4ρ²) compared to the classical potential, arising from the Laplacian transformation in polar coordinates.

Solution Methods

1. WKB Approximation

Quantization Condition:

∫[ρ₁ to ρ₂] p_n(ρ)dρ = (n + 1/2)π

Wave Function Form: Piecewise definition with oscillatory solutions inside the potential well and exponentially decaying solutions in the barrier region.

2. Finite Difference Method

Discretizing the Schrödinger equation into a matrix eigenvalue problem:

[1/h² T + U]ψ(ρ) = ϵψ(ρ)

3. Phase Shift Method

Identifying quasi-bound states through analysis of the energy dependence of scattering phase shifts δ_ℓ(ϵ):

δ_ℓ(ϵ) = δ_ℓ(ϵ_n) + arctan((ϵ-ϵ_n)/Γ)

Computational Setup

Calculation Parameters

• Numerical Grid: N = 4000 points
• Radial Range: a = 0, b = 20 (dimensionless units)
• Step Size: h = (b-a)/(N-1)
• Typical Magnetic Charge Strength: λ = 100 (for demonstration calculations)

Verification Methods

1. Inter-Method Comparison: Comparing results from WKB, finite difference, and phase shift methods
2. Limiting Case Verification: Comparing with analytical Bessel function solutions when λ = 0
3. Convergence Testing: Stability of results under different grid resolutions

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. Number of Bound States

Total Number of Bound States:

N_bq ≈ 0.03λ²

This is approximately 4 times smaller than the classical semiclassical estimate (N_b ≈ 0.13λ²).

2. Critical Magnetic Charge

• Minimum Charge Threshold: Q_m ≈ 18Q_D (corresponding to λ ≈ 2.77)
• Corresponding Angular Momentum: M = 0
• Quasi-Bound State Lifetime: τ₁/₂ ≈ 4 (dimensionless units)

3. Angular Momentum Dependence

• Negative M Values: Arbitrarily large negative M values can produce bound states
• Positive M Values: Upper limit exists at (M/λ)_max ≈ 0.089
• Maximum Number of Bound States: Achieved at M = 0

Lifetime Calculation Results

The three methods yield highly consistent lifetime results within their applicable ranges:

WKB Method Lifetime Formula:

τ₁/₂ ≈ (ρ₂-ρ₁)ln2/√ϵ_n × exp(2∫[ρ₂ to ρ₃] P_n(ρ)dρ)

Typical Numerical Values: For λ = 100, quasi-bound state lifetimes for different quantum numbers n and angular momenta M range from 10⁻⁶ to 10³ (dimensionless units).

Experimental Feasibility Assessment

1. Magnetic Needles

• Current Implementation: Q_m ≈ 6Q_D
• Required Improvement: Achieving magnetic field strength of 0.6T
• Expected Lifetime: ≈1μs (at distance 5μm)

2. Artificial Spin Ice

• Current Implementation: Tunable magnetic charge at distances of 100-1000nm
• Expected Lifetime: 0.7-70ns

3. Spin Ice Materials

• Current Implementation: Q_m ≈ Q_D/8000
• Required Improvement: Enhancement factor of 144,000 (practically infeasible)

4. Magnetoelectric Materials

• Topological Insulators: Single electron impurities can induce Dirac monopoles
• Expected Lifetime: 7-700ps (at distances of 10-100nm)

Related Work

Historical Background

1. Dirac 1931: Proposed the concept of magnetic monopoles and quantization conditions
2. Poincaré 1896: Analyzed electron motion in magnetic monopole fields
3. Birkeland Experiments: Observed convergence of electron beams near magnetic poles

Modern Developments

1. Spin Ice Theory (2008): Castelnovo et al. discovered magnetic monopole excitations in spin ice
2. Artificial Spin Ice (2006-2010): Experimental implementations by Möller, Ladak, and others
3. Topological Insulators (2009): Magnetoelectric effects predicted by Qi et al.

Related Theoretical Work

Recent work by Diamantini et al. (2021) investigated superconducting pairing mechanisms near magnetic monopoles but neglected the A² term, contrasting with the complete treatment presented in this paper.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Novel Physical Phenomena: Two-dimensional confinement enables bound/quasi-bound states in electron-magnetic monopole systems
2. Critical Conditions: Minimum magnetic charge threshold of 18Q_D, significantly higher than a single Dirac monopole
3. Experimental Feasibility: Magnetic needle and artificial spin ice systems show the most promise for achieving required conditions
4. Quantum Effects: The additional term in the quantum potential (-1/(4ρ²)) significantly affects bound state properties

Limitations

1. Neglected Spin Effects: Zeeman effect and spin-orbit coupling not considered
2. Idealized Assumptions: Assumes perfect two-dimensional confinement and point-like monopoles
3. Static Treatment: Monopole dynamics not included
4. Numerical Constraints: Finite difference method limited by computational resources

Future Directions

1. Inclusion of Spin: Considering complete spin-orbit interactions
2. Many-Body Effects: Investigating multi-electron systems and electron-electron interactions
3. Experimental Implementation: Collaboration with experimental groups to verify theoretical predictions
4. Superconducting Pairing: Applying results to superconducting pairing mechanisms

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Completeness: Comprehensive theoretical framework from classical to quantum mechanics, from analytical to numerical approaches
2. Methodological Diversity: Three independent methods verify result reliability
3. Practical Value: Systematic assessment of experimental feasibility provides guidance for future experiments
4. Mathematical Rigor: Detailed derivations and numerical verification
5. Physical Insight: Reveals profound effects of dimensional confinement on quantum systems

Limitations

1. Experimental Challenges: Required magnetic charge strength remains high, making experimental implementation difficult
2. Idealized Assumptions: Various non-ideal effects in real systems insufficiently considered
3. Application Constraints: Currently primarily fundamental physics research with limited practical applications
4. Computational Complexity: Numerical computation faces technical challenges in handling long-lived states

Impact and Significance

1. Academic Value: Provides new research directions for magnetic monopole physics
2. Interdisciplinary Relevance: Connects condensed matter physics, quantum optics, and other fields
3. Technology Advancement: May promote development of related experimental techniques
4. Theoretical Tools: Developed computational methods applicable to other quasi-bound state problems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Fundamental Physics Research: Magnetic monopole physics and quantum mechanics foundations
2. Condensed Matter Physics: Two-dimensional electron gas systems and topological materials research
3. Quantum Devices: Potential quantum control and quantum information applications
4. Computational Physics: Numerical calculation methods for quasi-bound and resonant states

References

The paper includes 44 references spanning from Dirac's original work to recent experimental advances, primarily covering:

• Theoretical foundations of magnetic monopoles (Dirac 1931)
• Spin ice and artificial spin ice experiments (Castelnovo 2008, Möller 2006, etc.)
• Magnetoelectric effects in topological insulators (Qi 2009, etc.)
• Quantum mechanics and computational physics methods (Landau & Lifshitz, etc.)