On quantifying the spin angular momentum density of light

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2501.05565
• Title: On quantifying the spin angular momentum density of light
• Authors: Xiaoyu Zheng, Peter Palffy-Muhoray (Kent State University)
• Classification: physics.optics
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05565

Abstract

Beyond carrying energy, light carries linear momentum and angular momentum. These are key quantities in rapidly developing optical research and technologies focused on light-induced material forces and torques. The spin angular momentum (SAM) density of light is of particular interest because, unlike orbital angular momentum, it is decoupled from linear momentum. The SAM density of light was first estimated by Poynting in 1909 using mechanical analogies. Subsequently, exact expressions were developed based on quantum mechanics and field theory results, and are widely used today. This paper demonstrates that the SAM density of light can be derived directly from Coulomb's law and Maxwell's equations, without relying on quantum mechanics or field theory; this could have been calculated by Maxwell and his contemporaries. Beyond its historical significance, the straightforward derivation of our results makes them accessible to non-experts in the field.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problem: The quantification of spin angular momentum (SAM) density of light has traditionally relied on complex theoretical frameworks from quantum mechanics and field theory, lacking a direct derivation method based on classical electromagnetic theory.
2. Problem Significance:
   • Optical forces and torques have important applications in modern optomechanics
   • SAM density differs from orbital angular momentum in that it is decoupled from linear momentum, thus possessing unique physical significance
   • Understanding angular momentum transfer in light is crucial for studying light-matter interactions
3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
   • Traditional derivations rely on integration by parts, requiring fields to vanish at infinity
   • Require advanced theoretical background in quantum mechanics or field theory
   • The existence of a "plane wave paradox": whether plane waves carry spin angular momentum remains controversial
4. Research Motivation:
   • Provide a simple derivation method based on classical electromagnetic theory
   • Resolve the controversy over whether plane waves carry SAM
   • Make results more comprehensible to non-experts

Core Contributions

1. Proposed a derivation method for SAM density based on Coulomb's law and Maxwell's equations, without relying on quantum mechanics or field theory
2. Demonstrated that elliptically polarized plane waves indeed carry spin angular momentum, resolving the long-standing "plane wave paradox"
3. Established an identity relationship between force/torque density and momentum flux density, providing a new theoretical framework for understanding light momentum transfer
4. Provided a classical derivation path traceable historically to Maxwell's era, possessing significant educational and historical value

Methodology Details

Task Definition

This paper aims to derive the spin angular momentum density expression of light through purely classical methods, with Maxwell's electromagnetic field as input and explicit SAM density expression as output, constrained to use only Coulomb's law and Maxwell's equations.

Model Architecture

Overall Methodological Framework

The authors employ a microscopic approach, calculating macroscopic forces and torques by computing Lorentz forces on charges in the medium due to electromagnetic fields:

1. Linear Momentum Case: Calculating radiation pressure on an isotropic lossless plate from normally incident linearly polarized plane waves
2. Angular Momentum Case: Calculating torque on a wave plate from normally incident elliptically polarized plane waves

Key Technical Details

Radiation Pressure Calculation: For an isotropic lossless dielectric plate, the force per unit area is: $F_A = \int_0^d \langle \dot{P} \times B \rangle dz$

Through complex field analysis (including internal reflections), the identity is obtained: $F_A = \frac{1}{c}\langle E_i \times H_i \rangle - \frac{1}{c}\langle E_r \times H_r \rangle - \frac{1}{c}\langle E_t \times H_t \rangle$

Torque Density Calculation: For a uniaxial wave plate, the torque per unit area is: $\tau_A = \int_0^d \langle P \times E \rangle dz$

After detailed derivation, the key identity is obtained: $\tau_A = \frac{\varepsilon_0 c}{\omega^2}(\dot{E}_i \times E_i) - \frac{\varepsilon_0 c}{\omega^2}(\dot{E}_r \times E_r) - \frac{\varepsilon_0 c}{\omega^2}(\dot{E}_t \times E_t)$

Technical Innovations

1. Avoided integration by parts: Traditional methods require boundary conditions where fields vanish at infinity; this method proceeds directly from the Lorentz force
2. Incorporated internal reflections: Accounts for complete multiple reflection effects, which are crucial for force and torque balance
3. Purely classical derivation: The entire derivation uses only Coulomb's law and Maxwell's equations, requiring no quantum mechanical concepts

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

This is primarily a theoretical work, with correctness of the method verified through mathematical derivation:

1. Numerical Verification: Provides sufficient information for numerical verification of identities
2. Comparison with Known Results: Compares final results with Darwin's (1932) classical expression
3. Historical Experimental Reference: Cites Beth's (1936) landmark experiment as experimental foundation

Computational Examples

The paper provides specific computational examples:

• Variation of radiation pressure on isotropic plates with thickness (Figure 2)
• Variation of surface torque density on wave plates with thickness and polarization state (Figure 4)

Experimental Results

Main Results

SAM Density Expression: The final derived SAM density is: $\rho_s = \frac{\varepsilon_0}{2\omega}\text{Im}(E^* \times E)$

This is entirely consistent with expressions obtained by Darwin (1932) and subsequent researchers.

Momentum Flux Density:

• Linear momentum flux density: $\phi_L = \frac{1}{c}\langle E \times H \rangle \hat{k}$
• SAM flux density: $\phi_s = \frac{\varepsilon_0 c}{2\omega}\text{Im}(E^* \times E)\hat{k}$

Important Findings

1. Plane waves do carry SAM: Elliptically polarized plane waves possess non-zero spin angular momentum density
2. Critical role of internal reflections: Without internal reflections, a semi-infinite plate would not experience radiation pressure
3. Consistency between classical and quantum results: Results obtained through purely classical methods are in complete agreement with quantum mechanical predictions

Related Work

Historical Development Timeline

1. Kepler (1571-1630): First proposed that light carries linear momentum
2. Maxwell (1831-1879): Calculated radiation pressure on mirrors
3. Poynting (1909): Proposed that light carries angular momentum, estimated photon SAM as ±ℏ
4. Darwin (1932): First quantified SAM density of light
5. Beth (1936): Experimentally confirmed torque effects of circularly polarized light

Modern Developments

• Allen et al. (1992): Discovery of orbital angular momentum
• Berry (2009): Poynting vector decomposition
• Bliokh et al.: Development of kinetic and canonical momentum formalisms

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. The SAM density of light can be obtained through purely classical methods, without requiring quantum mechanics or field theory
2. Elliptically polarized plane waves indeed carry spin angular momentum, resolving the "plane wave paradox"
3. This method could historically have been completed by Maxwell and his contemporaries

Limitations

1. Computational Complexity: Although conceptually simple, the mathematical derivation is lengthy and complex
2. Idealized Models: Uses assumptions of infinite plane waves and ideal media
3. Limited Physical Insights: Main contribution lies in the derivation method rather than new physical discoveries

Future Directions

1. Extend the method to more complex light beam structures
2. Consider lossy and nonlinear media
3. Explore applications of this method in optomechanics

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Methodological Innovation: Provides a novel classical derivation path, avoiding theoretical dependencies of traditional methods
2. Mathematical Rigor: Detailed derivation with complete appendix calculations
3. Historical Value: Demonstrates the completeness and profundity of classical electromagnetic theory
4. Educational Significance: Makes complex concepts more accessible to non-experts

Weaknesses

1. Lengthy Calculations: Mathematical derivation is extremely complex, potentially less convenient than traditional methods in practical applications
2. Limited Physical Insights: Primarily a re-derivation of known results, lacking new physical predictions
3. Insufficient Experimental Verification: Lacks novel experimental designs to verify theoretical predictions

Impact

1. Theoretical Significance: Provides new theoretical foundations for light momentum theory
2. Educational Value: Can serve as important supplementary material for electromagnetic theory teaching
3. Historical Significance: Demonstrates the depth and completeness of classical physical theory

Applicable Scenarios

1. Precise calculation of optical forces and torques
2. Design of optomechanical systems
3. Teaching and popularization of electromagnetic theory
4. Theoretical analysis of complex light-matter interactions

References

The paper cites abundant historical and contemporary literature, including:

• Darwin, C.G. (1932) - First quantification of SAM density
• Beth, R.A. (1936) - Landmark optical torque experiment
• Berry, M.V. (2009) - Poynting vector decomposition
• Bliokh, K.Y. et al. - Development of modern angular momentum theory

Although this paper is relatively limited in physical discoveries, its unique derivation method and profound historical insights grant it significant value in the development of optical theory, particularly in contributing substantially to educational accessibility and theoretical completeness.