Is Dark Matter the origin of the $B\to K \nu\bar\nu$ excess at Belle II?

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2502.04900
• Title: Is Dark Matter the origin of the $B\to K \nu\bar\nu$ excess at Belle II?
• Authors: Lorenzo Calibbi, Tong Li, Lopamudra Mukherjee, Michael A. Schmidt
• Classification: hep-ph (theoretical high energy physics), hep-ex (experimental high energy physics)
• Publication Date: February 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04900

Abstract

This paper proposes two dark matter models that can naturally explain the excess of $B^+\to K^+ +$ invisible events reported by the Belle II collaboration relative to the standard model prediction for $B^+\to K^+ \nu\bar\nu$ decay. In both models, the interaction between the dark sector and visible sector is mediated through an axion-like particle (ALP) and kinetic mixing between the dark photon and the standard model photon, respectively. Both models contain a light fermionic singlet as the dark matter candidate and can explain the observed dark matter relic abundance through freeze-in and freeze-out production mechanisms respectively, while simultaneously explaining the Belle II excess.

Research Background and Motivation

Experimental Anomalies

1. Belle II Measurement Results: The Belle II collaboration first observed evidence for $B^+ \to K^+\nu\bar\nu$ decay with a measured value of: \text{BR}(B^+ \to K^+\nu\bar\nu)_{\text{Belle II}} = (2.3 \pm 0.5_{\text{stat}} {}^{+0.5}_{-0.4}_{\text{syst}}) \times 10^{-5}
2. Standard Model Prediction: The standard model predicts: $\text{BR}(B^+ \to K^+\nu\bar\nu)_{\text{SM}} = (5.58 \pm 0.37) \times 10^{-6}$
3. Statistical Significance: The experimental value shows 2.7σ tension with theoretical predictions, suggesting possible new physics beyond the standard model.

Theoretical Motivation

• Rare B meson decays serve as sensitive probes for new physics beyond the standard model
• Invisible decay channels provide a natural experimental window for dark matter physics
• A unified theoretical framework is needed that can simultaneously explain the Belle II anomaly and dark matter relic abundance

Core Contributions

1. Proposes two complete dark matter models: Axion-like particle (ALP) portal model and dark photon portal model
2. Unified explanation: Simultaneously explains the Belle II $B \to K +$ invisible excess and cosmological dark matter abundance
3. Different production mechanisms: Demonstrates two distinct dark matter production mechanisms—freeze-in and freeze-out
4. Parameter space analysis: Provides detailed analysis of parameter space satisfying experimental constraints
5. Testable predictions: Offers verifiable predictions for future experiments

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Construct dark matter models that simultaneously satisfy the following conditions:

• Explain the $B^+ \to K^+ +$ invisible event excess observed by Belle II
• Produce the correct dark matter relic abundance $\Omega_{\text{DM}}h^2 = 0.12$
• Satisfy all existing experimental constraints

Model Architecture

ALP Portal Model

Basic Lagrangian:

ALP-Dark Matter Interaction:

Key Features:

• ALP decay constant $f_a$ controls interaction strength
• Flavor-changing coupling $C^{\text{V}}_{sb}$ responsible for $B \to K$ transitions
• Long-lived ALP escapes detector or decays to invisible particles

Dark Photon Portal Model

Basic Lagrangian:

Effective Interaction:

Key Features:

• Kinetic mixing parameters $\epsilon$ and $\epsilon_Z$
• Dark photon mass $m_X \approx 2$ GeV
• Majorana dark matter $\psi$ interacting through dark photon

Technical Innovations

1. Dual Explanation Mechanisms:
   • ALP model: Long-lived mediator + freeze-in production
   • Dark photon model: Short-lived mediator + freeze-out production
2. Thermalization Analysis:
   • Detailed calculation of ALP thermalization through b-quark processes
   • Solution of coupled Boltzmann equations
3. Constraint Evasion:
   • Naturally avoids LHCb $B \to K^*$ invisible constraints
   • Evades direct detection experimental limits

Experimental Setup

Experimental Constraints

1. Belle II Data: $B^+ \to K^+ +$ invisible (1σ and 2σ regions)
2. BaBar Constraints: $B \to K^* \nu\bar\nu$ upper limits
3. LHCb Search: $B \to K^{(*)} \mu\mu$
4. Dark Photon Constraints: BaBar $e^+e^- \to \gamma X$ search
5. Cosmological Constraints: Dark matter relic abundance

Parameter Space

• ALP Model: $(f_a/C_q, C^{\text{A}}_{\chi\chi}/f_a, m_\chi)$
• Dark Photon Model: $(\epsilon, \epsilon_Z, \alpha_X, m_{\text{DM}})$

Experimental Results

Main Results

ALP Portal Model

1. Belle II Fit:
   • 1σ range: $1.4 \times 10^8 \text{ GeV} < f_a/|C^{\text{V}}_{sb}| < 1.8 \times 10^8 \text{ GeV}$
   • Optimal parameters: $f_a/C_q \approx 10^8$ GeV
2. Dark Matter Production:
   • Freeze-in mechanism through ALP decay $a \to \chi\bar{\chi}$
   • Correct relic abundance requires $m_\chi \sim$ MeV, $C^{\text{A}}_{\chi\chi}/f_a \sim 6 \times 10^{-9}$ GeV$^{-1}$
3. ALP Lifetime:$c\tau_a \simeq 65\text{m} \times \left(\frac{10^8 \text{ GeV}}{f_a/C_q}\right)^2$

Dark Photon Portal Model

1. Parameter Constraints:
   • Requires $\epsilon_Z \simeq 2.3 \times 10^{-5}$ to explain Belle II data
   • Strongly constrained by $B \to K^* +$ invisible
2. Dark Matter Freeze-out:
   • Through $\psi\psi \to \phi\phi$ annihilation process
   • Correct abundance requires $\alpha_X \approx 10^{-3}$
3. Constraint Status:
   • Excluded at 1σ level
   • Still viable at 2σ level

Ablation Studies

ALP Model Sensitivity Analysis:

• Impact of flavor-universal coupling assumption
• Validity of UV coupling $C^{\text{UV}}_G = 0$
• Effects of different dark matter masses

Dark Photon Model Parameter Dependence:

• Upper limits on kinetic mixing $\epsilon$
• Constraints from dark Higgs mass $m_\phi$
• Importance of BBN constraints

Predictions and Tests

1. Future Belle II Measurements:
   • Predictions for $B \to K^* +$ invisible
   • Discrimination between ALP and dark photon models
2. Direct Detection Prospects:
   • Dark photon model potentially detectable in high mass region
   • ALP model difficult to detect due to extremely weak coupling

Related Work

Theoretical Model Comparison

1. Scalar Dark Matter Models Refs. 38-40:
   • Require heavy resonances or tuning
   • Subject to direct detection constraints
2. Other ALP Studies:
   • Freeze-in dark matter Refs. 66-70
   • But lack consideration of B physics constraints
3. Dark Photon Literature:
   • GeV-scale dark photons Refs. 71-82
   • Lacking connection to B anomalies

Advantages of This Work

• Unified framework explaining two independent observations
• Naturally avoids existing constraints
• Provides clear experimental predictions

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Feasibility Proof: Both models can simultaneously explain Belle II anomaly and dark matter abundance
2. Mechanism Differences: ALP model (long-lived + freeze-in) vs dark photon model (short-lived + freeze-out)
3. Experimental Discrimination: Future $B \to K^*$ measurements can distinguish between the two scenarios

Limitations

1. ALP Model: Requires specific flavor structure
2. Dark Photon Model: Requires extended model to explain $\epsilon_Z$
3. Tuning Degree: Some parameters require specific values

Future Directions

1. Experimental Tests:
   • Belle II measurement of $B \to K^* +$ invisible
   • NA62 measurement of $K^+ \to \pi^+ +$ invisible
2. Theoretical Development:
   • UV completion of ALP
   • Extensions of dark photon model
3. Phenomenological Studies:
   • Predictions for other rare decays
   • Direct detection signals

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. High Innovation: First systematic study of connection between dark matter and Belle II anomaly
2. Theoretical Completeness: Provides two complementary theoretical frameworks
3. Detailed Calculations: Includes complete thermal history analysis
4. Comprehensive Constraints: Considers all relevant experimental limitations
5. Clear Predictions: Provides testable predictions for future experiments

Weaknesses

1. Parameter Tuning: Some parameter values require specific choices
2. Model Complexity: Dark photon model requires additional extensions
3. Detection Difficulty: ALP model signals are difficult to directly detect
4. Theoretical Assumptions: Flavor universality and other assumptions require UV theory support

Impact

1. Academic Value:
   • Connects particle physics anomalies with dark matter physics
   • Provides new perspectives for new physics searches
2. Practical Value:
   • Guides future Belle II analysis strategies
   • Provides target parameters for dark matter detection experiments
3. Reproducibility:
   • Clear calculation methodology
   • Parameter choices have clear physical motivation

Applicable Scenarios

1. Suitable For:
   • Theoretical explanations of B physics anomalies
   • Light dark matter model research
   • New physics analysis of rare decays
2. Limitations:
   • Specific mass range for dark matter
   • Requires specific mediator particle properties
   • Depends on confirmation of Belle II anomaly

References

Primarily references Belle II experimental results, standard model calculations, dark matter theory, and related new physics model research, covering a complete literature system from experimental measurements to theoretical calculations.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical physics paper that successfully connects the latest Belle II experimental anomaly with dark matter physics, providing two complete and complementary theoretical frameworks. The paper demonstrates high technical level, comprehensive analysis, and offers new perspectives for understanding B physics anomalies and dark matter problems. Although there are some theoretical assumptions and parameter tuning involved, it represents an important contribution to the field overall.