The Maximum Theoretical Ground Speed of the Wheeled Vehicle

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2502.15341
• Title: The Maximum Theoretical Ground Speed of the Wheeled Vehicle
• Authors: Altay Zhakatayev (Nazarbayev University), Mukatai Nemerebayev (Sherkhan Murtaza University)
• Classification: physics.class-ph (Classical Physics), math.OC (Optimal Control)
• Submission Date: February 21, 2025 to arXiv
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15341

Abstract

This paper proposes a theoretical limit on the maximum ground speed of wheeled vehicles from the perspectives of material mechanics and rotational dynamics. This limit is based on centrifugal force constraints on wheel materials at high-speed rotation, demonstrating that maximum velocity depends solely on the material's specific strength (strength-to-mass ratio) and is independent of wheel radius.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Problem

This paper addresses a fundamental yet insufficiently studied question: What is the theoretical maximum speed of a wheeled vehicle? This question holds significant practical importance, particularly for racing vehicles and land speed record challenge vehicles pursuing extreme velocities.

Problem Significance

1. Engineering Design Guidance: Provides theoretical basis for wheel material selection in high-speed vehicles (such as land speed record challenge vehicles)
2. Future Applications: Offers guidance for vehicle design in low-gravity environments such as the Moon and Mars
3. Theoretical Completeness: Fills a gap in vehicle dynamics theory regarding speed limits

Limitations of Existing Research

Current research on vehicle speed limitations primarily focuses on:

• Aerodynamic drag
• Engine power limitations
• Tire-ground friction and slippage
• However, lacks systematic analysis of rotational limits of the wheel itself from a material mechanics perspective

Research Motivation

The authors recognize that under ideal conditions (no air resistance, no slippage, unlimited power), the mechanical strength of wheel materials becomes the fundamental limiting factor for speed. This physical principle is analogous to material strength constraints in space elevator concepts.

Core Contributions

1. Derivation of an analytical formula for maximum wheeled vehicle speed: $V_{max} = \sqrt{2\mu} = \sqrt{2T_s/\rho}$, where $\mu$ is material specific strength, $T_s$ is ultimate tensile strength, and $\rho$ is density
2. Revelation of counterintuitive physical laws: Maximum speed is independent of wheel radius and depends solely on material specific strength
3. Provision of speed limit data for different materials: Calculation of theoretical speed limits for 12 materials ranging from rubber (210 m/s) to graphene (10.7 km/s)
4. Establishment of theoretical framework: Provides theoretical foundation for high-speed vehicle design in low-gravity environments (Moon, Mars)

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Physical parameters of wheel material (ultimate tensile strength $T_s$, density $\rho$)
Output: Maximum vehicle speed $V_{max}$ for a wheel made of this material under ideal conditions
Constraints:

• No aerodynamic effects
• Flat, smooth ground surface
• Wheel remains in contact with ground (no bouncing)
• No-slip condition
• Vehicle has sufficient power source

Theoretical Model

1. Physical Model Setup

The wheel is modeled as:

• An ideal disk with radius $R$ and thickness $H$
• Isotropic, homogeneous material
• Rotating at constant angular velocity $\omega$

2. Mechanical Analysis

Examination of an infinitesimal element $E$ at radius $r$ (as shown in Figure 1):

Stress State:

• Radial tensile stress: $T$ (inner boundary) and $T+dT$ (outer boundary)
• Shear stress: $S = 0$ (by symmetry and equilibrium conditions)

Equilibrium Equation: Force balance in the radial direction:

(T + dT) - T = -ω²r·dm

where the negative sign indicates that centripetal force direction is opposite to the radial direction.

3. Mathematical Derivation

Step 1: Mass element expression $dm = \rho \cdot r \, d\theta \, dr \, H$

Step 2: Differential equation $dT = -\omega^2 \rho H r^2 dr \, d\theta$

Step 3: Conversion to stress form Stress is defined as $p = \frac{T}{\rho d\theta H}$, substituting yields: $dp = -\omega^2 \rho r \, dr$

Step 4: Integration solution $\int_{p_i}^{p_f} dp = -\int_0^R \omega^2 \rho r \, dr$

Boundary Conditions:

• Outer boundary ($r=R$): $p_f = 0$ (free surface)
• Center ($r=0$): $p_i = p_{max}$ (maximum stress)

Step 5: Maximum stress derivation $p_{max} = \frac{1}{2}\rho \omega^2 R^2$

Step 6: Failure criterion Material failure condition: $p_{max} = T_s$ (ultimate tensile strength)

Step 7: Final formula Since $V = \omega R$ (no-slip condition), substituting yields: $V_{max} = \sqrt{\frac{2T_s}{\rho}} = \sqrt{2\mu}$

where $\mu = T_s/\rho$ is the material specific strength.

Technical Innovation Points

1. Concise Analytical Solution: Through continuum mechanics methods, a closed-form analytical solution is obtained, avoiding complex numerical simulations
2. Revelation of Radius Independence:
   • Physical interpretation: Increasing radius decreases maximum angular velocity, but the linear velocity $V=\omega R$ effects exactly cancel
   • Mathematical essence: The stress formula $\rho \omega^2 R^2$ can be rewritten as $\rho V^2$, eliminating dependence on $R$
3. Analogy with Aerodynamics: The formula $V_{max} = \sqrt{2T_s/\rho}$ is formally similar to the dynamic pressure formula $V = \sqrt{2p/\rho}$
4. Interdisciplinary Connection: Links wheel speed limits to material strength requirements in space elevators

Experimental Setup

Data Sources

This is a purely theoretical study using published material performance parameters from literature:

• Tensile strength $T_s$ and density $\rho$ data from 5 materials science references 1-5
• Actual vehicle speed data from Guinness World Records and automotive industry reports 6-9

Material Sample

Twelve representative materials were selected, covering:

• Traditional Materials: Rubber, zinc alloy, glass, stainless steel
• Engineering Materials: Aluminum alloy, titanium alloy, carbon fiber composite
• High-Performance Materials: Kevlar fiber, carbon nanotubes, graphene

Calculation Method

For each material:

1. Obtain $T_s$ and $\rho$ values from literature
2. Calculate specific strength $\mu = T_s/\rho$
3. Apply formula $V_{max} = \sqrt{2\mu}$ to calculate theoretical speed limit

Experimental Results

Main Results

Table I: Material Specific Strength and Corresponding Maximum Vehicle Speed

Key Findings

1. Theoretical Limit of Rubber Tires: 210 m/s
   • Current fastest commercial vehicle (Koenigsegg Jesko Absolut): 139 m/s
   • 66% margin remaining to rubber's theoretical limit
   • Note: Actual rubber tires are non-homogeneous with other materials at the center, potentially exceeding this limit
2. Land Speed Record:
   • ThrustSSC (current record holder): 341 m/s (supersonic)
   • Uses aluminum alloy wheels (theoretical limit 479 m/s)
   • Speed is 71% of theoretical limit
3. Future Challengers:
   • Bloodhound LSR uses aluminum-zinc alloy wheels
   • Theoretical limit between 228 m/s (zinc alloy) and 479 m/s (aluminum alloy)
4. Extreme Material Potential:
   • Graphene wheels theoretically reach 10.7 km/s (approximately 31 Mach)
   • Carbon nanotube wheels reach 7.7 km/s

Physical Insights

Verification of Radius Independence:

• For a given material, maximum speed is identical regardless of wheel size
• Large wheels: low rotation speed, high linear velocity
• Small wheels: high rotation speed, low linear velocity
• The product $\omega R = V$ remains constant

Magnitude of Centrifugal Acceleration:

• Typical passenger car (wheel diameter 400 mm, speed 50 m/s):
  • Rim acceleration: 1250 m/s²
  • Approximately 127 times gravitational acceleration
• This validates the reasonableness of neglecting gravitational effects

Related Work

Vehicle Speed Limitation Research

Related research directions mentioned but not extensively discussed:

1. Aerodynamic Limitations: Drag and lift at high speeds
2. Aerodynamic Heating: Friction-induced heating problems
3. Tire Slippage: Friction coefficient limitations
4. Power Source Limitations: Engine power constraints

Material Mechanics Applications

Space Elevators:

• Same physical principles as this paper
• Both limited by material specific strength
• Require extremely high specific strength materials (carbon nanotubes, graphene)

Rotating Machinery

• Flywheel energy storage systems
• Turbomachinery
• Face similar centrifugal stress limitations

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Limit Formula: The maximum speed of wheeled vehicles is $V_{max} = \sqrt{2T_s/\rho}$, depending solely on material specific strength
2. Radius Independence: Maximum speed is independent of wheel size, an inherent characteristic of material mechanics
3. Importance of Material Selection:
   • Traditional materials (rubber, steel, aluminum): 0.2-0.5 km/s
   • High-performance composites: 1-2 km/s
   • Nanomaterials: 7-10 km/s
4. Application Scenarios:
   • On Earth: aerodynamic drag becomes the dominant factor
   • Moon/Mars: this theory may become the practical limitation

Limitations

Explicitly stated assumptions and simplifications by the authors:

1. Neglected Effects:
   • Aerodynamic forces (drag, lift)
   • Wheel-ground slippage
   • Gravitational effects
   • Vehicle weight pressure on wheels
   • Friction forces on wheels
2. Idealized Assumptions:
   • Wheel as homogeneous material
   • Perfectly flat, smooth ground
   • Unlimited power source
   • Perfect no-slip contact
3. Applicable Range:
   • Primarily applicable to vacuum or thin atmosphere environments
   • On Earth, aerodynamic drag becomes dominant before material limits are reached

Future Directions

Subsequent research proposed by the authors:

1. Multi-Factor Coupled Models:
   • Comprehensive effects of gravity, vehicle weight, and friction
   • More accurate theoretical models
2. Other Limiting Factors:
   • Theoretical limits of aerodynamic heating
   • Speed limits under slippage conditions
   • Theoretical limits of power sources
3. Practical Engineering Applications:
   • Optimization design of non-homogeneous wheels
   • Performance prediction of composite wheels

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor:
   • Derivation from first principles with clear logic
   • Complete mathematical derivation with clear physical meaning
   • Explicit statement of boundary conditions and assumptions
2. Counterintuitive Insights:
   • Radius independence is an important discovery
   • Analogy with dynamic pressure formula is enlightening
   • Connects vehicle engineering with space elevator concepts
3. Practical Value:
   • Provides quantitative guidance for material selection
   • Simple calculations, easy to apply
   • Forward-looking for future space exploration
4. Clear Writing:
   • Reasonable structure, clear logic
   • Rich information in figures and tables
   • Adequate discussion of assumptions and limitations

Weaknesses

1. Lack of Experimental Verification:
   • Pure theoretical study without experimental or simulation verification
   • No comparison with actual high-speed vehicle failure cases
   • Lack of quantitative assessment of simplified assumption impacts
2. Excessive Model Simplification:
   • Actual wheels are non-homogeneous (rubber + steel wire + rim)
   • Temperature effects neglected (high-speed rotation causes heating, reducing strength)
   • Dynamic loads (acceleration, turning) not considered
   • Fatigue failure modes not discussed
3. Limited Application Scenarios:
   • Aerodynamic drag dominates in Earth environments
   • Other factors limit speed before material limits are reached
   • Moon/Mars applications still distant
4. Insufficient Literature Review:
   • Inadequate discussion of existing wheel failure research
   • Limited connection with related work in rotating machinery (flywheels, turbines)
   • Lack of historical case analysis of high-speed vehicle failures
5. Technical Details:
   • Stress concentration effects not discussed
   • Spoke and rim effects not considered
   • Material anisotropy (e.g., composites) not deeply analyzed

Impact

Academic Value:

• Fills a gap in vehicle dynamics theory
• Provides concise and elegant analytical solution
• Serves as excellent teaching case (continuum mechanics application)

Engineering Value:

• Provides theoretical upper limit for speed challenges
• Guides high-performance wheel material selection
• Potential value for space exploration vehicle design

Limitations:

• Limited practical application value (Earth environment)
• Requires substantial follow-up work for practical implementation
• High reproducibility (pure theoretical calculation)

Applicable Scenarios

Ideal Application Scenarios:

1. Moon/Mars Racing:
   • Thin atmosphere, small aerodynamic drag
   • Low gravity environment
   • May reach material limits
2. Vacuum Tube Transportation:
   • Hyperloop wheel design
   • Must consider material strength limitations
3. Material Selection Guidance:
   • High-speed racing wheel hubs
   • Land speed record challenge vehicles

Inapplicable Scenarios:

1. Conventional Ground Vehicles: Aerodynamic drag and engine power are primary limitations
2. Low-Speed Applications: Far from reaching material limits
3. Complex Terrain: Other factors dominate

References

Key references cited in the paper:

1. Callister (2007): Classical materials science textbook providing basic material data
2. Lu et al. (2006): Carbon nanotube density determination
3. Anton Paar (2021): Graphene characterization
4. Takakura et al. (2019): Carbon nanotube strength research
5. Shen & Oyadiji (2020): Graphene-reinforced materials review
6. Guinness World Records: ThrustSSC land speed record
7. Bloodhound LSR: Speed challenge project information

Overall Assessment

This is a concise and elegant theoretical physics paper that derives a theoretical upper limit on wheeled vehicle speed from basic principles. Its main value lies in:

✅ Theoretical Completeness: Provides a fundamental physical constraint for vehicle dynamics
✅ Educational Value: Excellent application case of continuum mechanics
✅ Forward-Looking: Provides theoretical foundation for future space exploration

⚠️ Limited Practical Utility: Other factors (aerodynamic drag) are more important in Earth environments
⚠️ Requires Extension: Practical applications need consideration of more complex factors

Overall, this is a novel and rigorously derived short paper suitable for publication in classical physics or engineering mechanics journals. While its practical application value is limited, its theoretical insights—particularly radius independence—hold important educational and inspirational significance.