Detecting Topological Phase Transition in Superconductor-Semiconductor Hybrids by Electronic Raman Spectroscopy

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2502.19841
• Title: Detecting Topological Phase Transition in Superconductor-Semiconductor Hybrids by Electronic Raman Spectroscopy
• Authors: Takeshi Mizushima (Osaka University), Yukio Tanaka (Nagoya University), Jorge Cayao (Uppsala University)
• Classification: cond-mat.supr-con (Condensed Matter Physics - Superconductivity)
• Publication Date: October 13, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.19841

Abstract

In superconductor-semiconductor hybrid systems, the application of a magnetic field closes the trivial bulk energy gap and induces a topological phase transition (TPT), resulting in Majorana zero modes at the line ends. However, trivial Andreev bound states formed at the interface with metallic leads mimic the local properties of Majorana modes, making detection of TPT through local conductance measurements difficult. This study investigates TPT detection by utilizing the static and dynamic density response of the hybrid system. Specifically, the authors demonstrate that the dynamically renormalized response including Coulomb interaction effects can reveal characteristic electronic structure and detect TPT, producing strong Raman scattering intensity. Furthermore, the authors find that gapless plasmons emerge in the normal state, marking a bulk Lifshitz transition. The results predict that bulk response of superconducting nanowires is a powerful spectroscopic method for detecting bulk topological phase transitions.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The core problem addressed by this research is how to unambiguously detect topological phase transitions (TPT) in superconductor-semiconductor hybrid systems, particularly distinguishing genuine Majorana zero modes from trivial Andreev bound states.

Problem Significance

Topological superconductors have attracted considerable attention due to their potential applications in fault-tolerant quantum computing. Majorana zero modes possess non-Abelian braiding statistics and can be used to implement fault-tolerant qubit operations. However, unambiguous identification of Majorana zero modes and topological superconductivity remains a challenging task.

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Issues with local conductance measurements: Inevitable effects in hybrid systems (such as disorder, inhomogeneous potentials, quantum dot formation) lead to the appearance of trivial Andreev bound states that mimic the local properties of Majorana zero modes
2. Controversy over topological gap protocol: Although Microsoft Quantum reported devices via topological gap protocol, trivial Andreev bands can also mimic nearly quantized local conductance and bulk reopening signals in non-local measurements
3. Limitations of interferometric measurements: Recent interferometric methods can neither exclude trivial Andreev bound states nor detect TPT

Research Motivation

The authors propose an alternative approach through bulk measurements to directly measure TPT, utilizing dynamic density-density response functions to capture bulk gap closing and reopening signals, detected through electronic Raman spectroscopy.

Core Contributions

1. Proposes novel detection method: Detects topological phase transitions through dynamic density response functions, avoiding limitations of local measurements
2. Theoretically predicts Raman spectral signals: Demonstrates that dynamic response produces strong spectral intensity detectable by electronic Raman spectroscopy
3. Discovers Lifshitz transition signature: Finds that evolution of gapless plasmons in the normal state can measure bulk Lifshitz transitions
4. Establishes complete theoretical framework: Renormalized response theory including Coulomb interaction effects, accounting for fluctuation effects of the parent superconductor

Detailed Methods

Task Definition

The research objective is to establish a method based on bulk response measurements to detect topological phase transitions in superconductor-semiconductor hybrid systems, with system parameters and applied magnetic field as input, and observable spectral signals as output.

Theoretical Model Architecture

1. Effective Hamiltonian

The system employs a one-dimensional Rashba spin-orbit coupled semiconductor wire with effective Hamiltonian:

H(k) = ξₖτz + αkσzτ₀ + bσxτz - Δσyτy

where:

• ξₖ = k²/2mₑff - μ is the free electron energy
• α is the Rashba spin-orbit coupling strength
• b = ½gμᵦB is the Zeeman energy
• Δ is the proximity-induced superconducting gap

2. Quasiparticle Excitation Spectrum

The quasiparticle excitation energies are:

E²±(k) = Pₖ ± 2√(b²Δ² + ξₖ²(b² + α²k²))

where Pₖ = Δ² + ξₖ² + b² + α²k²

3. Dynamic Density Response Function

The bare dynamic density-density correlation function is defined as:

χρρ(Q) = -1/V ∫₀^(T⁻¹) ⟨ρ̂(q,τ)ρ̂(-q,0)⟩e^(iωₘτ)dτ

Under the random phase approximation, the renormalized dynamic density response function is:

χ̃ρρ(q,ω) = χρρ(q,ω)/[1 - U(q)χρρ(q,ω)]

Technical Innovations

1. Bulk Response vs. Local Measurements

• Traditional methods rely on local conductance measurements, easily affected by interface effects
• This method utilizes bulk density response, directly probing bulk gap closing and reopening

2. Treatment of Coulomb Interactions

• Accounts for screening effects of long-range Coulomb interactions on density response
• Handles electron-electron interactions through random phase approximation

3. Application of Raman Spectroscopy

• Connects theoretical predictions with experimentally observable quantities
• Raman scattering intensity directly relates to renormalized density response function

Experimental Setup

Material Parameters

The study employs typical parameters for InSb semiconductors:

• Effective mass: mₑff = 0.014mₑ
• Rashba coupling: α = 0.5 eVÅ
• g-factor: g = 50
• Chemical potential: μ = 1.0 meV
• Proximity-induced gap: Δ = 0.5 meV

Geometric Parameters

• Wire radius: a = 1-100 nm
• Parent superconductor parameters: Δˢ = 0.2 meV, μˢ = 1 eV

Critical Field Values

• Lifshitz transition field: Bₗ = μ = 0.69 T
• Topological phase transition critical field: Bᶜ = √(μ² + Δ²) = 0.70 T

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Evolution of Static Dielectric Function

• In the normal state, ε(q) exhibits three resonance peaks at q = {2k^N_{F,+}, k^N_{F,+} + k^N_{F,-}, 2k^N_{F,-}}
• At the Lifshitz transition (B = Bₗ), the dielectric function diverges as q → 0
• At the topological phase transition in the superconducting state (B = Bᶜ), ε(q) exhibits singular behavior at q = 0

2. Evolution of Dynamic Density Response

Normal state characteristics:

• Two gapless plasmon modes exist
• With increasing magnetic field, the low-frequency branch softens and disappears at the Lifshitz transition
• The high-frequency branch persists in the helical phase

Superconducting state characteristics:

• Trivial phase (B < Bᶜ): Two excitation continua exist with threshold energies ω±_
• At topological phase transition (B = Bᶜ): Low-frequency continuum threshold energy approaches zero
• Topological phase (B > Bᶜ): Low-frequency continuum disappears, only upper continuum contributes

3. Raman Spectral Signals

• Field evolution clearly tracks the minimum energy 2Δ₁ of pair excitations at the inner Fermi point
• Captures bulk gap closing and reopening signals at TPT
• Signal remains significant even considering Coulomb screening effects

Quantitative Results

• At δB = -0.18 T, the difference between inner and outer Fermi momenta is approximately 0.025 nm⁻¹
• Typical momentum transfer in Raman experiments: q ~ 10⁻⁴ nm⁻¹
• Contribution from parent superconductor is negligible compared to semiconductor wire response

Related Work

Topological Superconductivity Research Field

1. Theoretical foundations: Theoretical frameworks based on Kitaev chain models and Rashba superconductors
2. Experimental progress: Majorana device experiments with InAs and InSb nanowires
3. Detection methods: Tunneling spectroscopy, non-local conductance, topological gap protocol, etc.

Spectroscopy Methods

1. Electronic Raman scattering: Probing charge density waves and Higgs modes in 2H-NbSe₂
2. Semiconductor wire spectroscopy: Studying low-energy excitations and plasmon dispersion
3. Compressibility measurements: Measuring compressibility of low-dimensional semiconductors via capacitive techniques

Advantages Compared to Related Work

1. Bulk measurement method: Avoids interference from interface effects
2. Connection between theory and experiment: Directly correlates theoretical calculations with observable Raman signals
3. Complete theoretical framework: Accounts for fluctuation effects of parent superconductor

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Dynamic density response can detect TPT: Field evolution clearly shows bulk gap closing and reopening
2. Raman spectroscopy is an effective probe: Produces sufficiently strong signals for experimental detection
3. Lifshitz transition observable through plasmon evolution: Provides additional information for understanding the system
4. Method insensitive to parent superconductor fluctuations: Ensures robustness of detection method

Limitations

1. Effects of trivial Andreev bands: If the entire wire forms Andreev bands, true bulk signals may be obscured
2. Theoretical assumptions: Assumes proximity-induced gap is constant; actual situations may be more complex
3. Experimental requirements: Requires high-quality hybrid systems and precise spectroscopic measurements

Future Directions

1. Detailed study of Andreev band effects: Requires in-depth investigation of how bulk measurements distinguish genuine bulk signals from Andreev band signals
2. Experimental verification: Verify theoretical predictions in actual devices
3. Method generalization: Extend to other topological superconductor systems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong methodological innovation: Proposes novel detection method based on bulk response, circumventing difficulties of traditional local measurements
2. Complete theoretical framework: Establishes comprehensive theoretical description starting from microscopic Hamiltonian
3. High experimental feasibility: Raman spectroscopy is a mature experimental technique; predicted signal intensity is sufficient for detection
4. Clear physical picture: Clearly explains various physical processes and mechanisms

Weaknesses

1. Lack of experimental verification: Pure theoretical work without experimental validation
2. Model simplifications: Some assumptions (such as constant gap) may be overly simplified
3. Incomplete resolution of Andreev band problem: Acknowledges this as an important issue but does not investigate deeply

Impact

1. Academic value: Provides new ideas and methods for topological superconductivity detection
2. Practical value: Can guide experimental design and advance experimental research in Majorana physics
3. Reproducibility: Theoretical calculation methods are clear and easy to reproduce and verify

Applicable Scenarios

1. Basic research: Fundamental research in topological superconductivity physics
2. Device characterization: Characterization and optimization of Majorana devices
3. Quantum computing: Development and application of topological qubits

References

The paper cites 93 important references covering topological superconductivity theory, Majorana physics, spectroscopy techniques, and related fields, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Summary: This paper proposes an innovative theoretical framework for detecting topological phase transitions in superconductor-semiconductor hybrid systems through electronic Raman spectroscopy. This method is expected to overcome limitations of traditional local measurement methods, providing new tools for experimental research in Majorana physics. Although experimental verification is still needed, the theoretical framework is complete, the physical picture is clear, and it possesses significant academic value and application prospects.