Entanglement dynamics via Geometric phases in Trapped-ions

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2503.00294
• Title: Entanglement dynamics via Geometric phases in Trapped-ions
• Authors: Dharmaraj Ramachandran, Ganesh Hanchanahal, Radhika Vathsan (BITS-Pilani, K. K. Birla Goa Campus)
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00294v3

Abstract

This paper proposes utilizing geometric phases (GP) as a tool for evaluating the performance of Mølmer-Sørensen (MS) gates and identifying noise characteristics. The research reveals that geometric phases are particularly sensitive to environmental noise near approximately twice the clock pulse time (2T). Since geometric phase measurements do not require complete quantum state tomography, this method provides a practical and experimentally feasible approach for detecting entanglement and classifying the noise properties affecting the system.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problems

• Main Challenge: MS gates in trapped-ion quantum systems undergo non-unitary evolution due to inevitable environmental interactions, leading to significant deviations from ideal dynamics
• Limitations of Existing Methods: Traditional quantum process tomography (QPT) and Bell state tomography (BST) require multiple measurements, with measurement counts growing exponentially with system size

2. Research Significance

• Trapped-ion systems are a primary platform for quantum computing
• MS gates are widely used methods for implementing controlled interactions in many-body systems
• Entanglement is a fundamental resource for quantum information processing tasks (e.g., quantum teleportation, superdense coding)

3. Research Motivation

• Develop more practical methods for gate performance evaluation
• Provide noise identification techniques independent of complete state tomography
• Simplify measurement complexity by leveraging the single-parameter nature of geometric phases

Core Contributions

1. Proposes Geometric Phase-based Performance Analysis (GPA) Method: First systematic exploration of geometric phase behavior during MS gate implementation and its application in gate performance analysis
2. Discovers Noise Sensitivity Characteristics of Geometric Phases: Demonstrates that GP exhibits special sensitivity to environmental noise near the 2T moment
3. Establishes Weak-Field Condition Verification Tool: Shows that GP can serve as a diagnostic tool for assessing the degree of weak-field (WF) condition implementation
4. Provides Noise Classification Mechanism: Identifies specific noise types that destroy the X-state structure of the density operator through non-zero subsystem GP values

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Investigate geometric phase evolution of MS gates under ideal and noisy conditions, establishing correlations between GP and gate performance and noise characteristics.

MS Gate Fundamental Theory

1. Interaction Hamiltonian

For a two-color laser-driven trapped-ion system, the interaction Hamiltonian is:

H_I(t) = (ηℏΩ/2)σ_φ(ae^{iεt}e^{iφ_m} + a†e^{-iεt}e^{-iφ_m})

where η is the Lamb-Dicke parameter, Ω is the Rabi frequency, and σ_φ is the spin operator.

2. Evolution Operator

The unitary evolution operator for a two-ion MS gate is:

U_MS(t) = D(α(t)S)e^{iS²β(t)}

where:

• α(t) = (ηΩ/ε)e^{iεt/2}sin(εt/2)e^{iφ_m}
• β(t) = (ηΩ/2ε)²(εt - sin εt)

Geometric Phase Calculation

Kinematic Method

The Mukunda-Simon kinematic method is employed to calculate geometric phases of pure states:

φ_g(τ) = Arg{⟨Ψ(0)|Ψ(τ)⟩} - Im∫₀^τ dt⟨Ψ(t)|Ψ̇(t)⟩

For mixed states, the generalized formula by Tong et al. is used:

φ_g(τ) = Arg[∑_k √(ε_k(0)ε_k(τ))⟨Ψ_k(0)|Ψ_k(τ)⟩e^{-∫₀^τ dt⟨Ψ_k(t)|Ψ̇_k(t)⟩}]

Two Operating Modes

1. Weak-Field (WF) Mode

• Condition: ηΩ ≪ δ - ν
• Characteristics: α(t) ≈ 0, β(t) ≈ Ω̃t/4
• Ideally GP = 0 (parallel transport)
• Non-zero GP appears as η increases

2. Strong-Field (SF) Mode

• Condition: ε = 2Ωη, T = 2π/ε
• Characteristics: Allows single-photon excitation, intermediate states |10⟩ and |01⟩ are populated
• Produces non-trivial GP trajectories

Experimental Setup

Noise Models

Four common environmental noise sources in trapped-ion systems are considered:

Master Equation

The non-unitary evolution of the system is described by the Lindblad master equation:

iℏ∂ρ/∂t = [H_I, ρ] + ∑_k γ_k(L_kρL_k† - ½L_k†L_kρ - ½ρL_k†L_k)

Evaluation Metrics

• Entanglement Measure: Negativity N(ρ) = ∑_{a_i<0} a_i
• Entanglement Loss: ΔE = 1 - E(T)
• GP Deviation: Δφ_g(t) = φ_g^u(t) - φ_g^n(t)

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. GP Behavior Under Ideal Conditions

• WF Mode: Ideally φ_g(t) = 0, non-zero GP emerges as η increases
• SF Mode: Produces complex non-zero GP trajectories with direction changes at odd pulse times (T, 3T)

2. Noise Sensitivity Analysis

All four noise models exhibit sharp GP changes near the 2T moment:

• Qubit Dephasing: Shows significant GP deviation at different entanglement losses (ΔE = 0.05, 0.12, 0.26)
• Qubit Decay: Similar 2T sensitivity pattern
• Phonon Heating and Dephasing: Sharp features appear near 2T

3. Key Findings

• GP sensitivity at the 2T moment originates from significantly enhanced change rates of quantum state |Ψ(t)⟩ at this moment
• Both real and imaginary parts of ⟨11|Ψ(t)⟩ exhibit sharp changes near 2T
• This sensitivity provides an effective means for noise detection and classification

Subsystem Dynamics Analysis

X-State Structure Preservation

• Density operators produced by MS interactions consistently maintain X-state structure
• Conventional noise sources (the four types in Table I) preserve X-state structure
• Subsystem GP remains zero in these cases

Non-local Noise Detection

• Certain noise sources (e.g., L_nl = σ_x^(1) + σ_z^(2)) destroy X-state structure
• Non-zero subsystem GP is generated in such cases
• Subsystem GP serves as an identification marker for specific noise types

Related Work

History of Geometric Phase Research

• Experimental Discovery: Independently discovered by Pancharatnam (1950s) and Higgins et al.
• Theoretical Development: Berry provided generalized form for adiabatic slow cyclic evolution
• Generalizations: Samuel-Bhandari extended to non-adiabatic cases

Applications in Quantum Systems

• Single-Qubit Systems: Yi et al. studied GP in non-Markovian dephasing environments
• Entangled Systems: Limited studies exploring GP in initially entangled states
• Trapped Ions: Hong-Xia studied GP in unitary dynamics; Müller et al. studied non-unitary dynamics

Experimental Implementations

• Successful observation of GP in superconducting qubits
• Ramsey interferometers and similar devices used for GP measurements
• Hong-Xia et al. proposed experimental measurement schemes for GP in trapped-ion systems

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. GP as Diagnostic Tool: Demonstrates that geometric phases can effectively evaluate MS gate performance and identify noise
2. 2T Sensitivity: Reveals that GP exhibits special sensitivity to environmental noise at the 2T moment
3. Experimental Feasibility: GP measurements do not require complete state tomography, offering practical application value

Limitations

1. Method Completeness: GPA is less comprehensive than QPT or BST but provides effective detection of specific noise
2. System Scale: Research primarily focuses on two-qubit systems
3. Noise Models: Only considers several typical noise sources; actual systems may be more complex

Future Directions

1. Many-Body Extension: Extend research to many-body entangled systems
2. Other Platforms: Conduct similar studies on other qubit platforms
3. Experimental Verification: Verify theoretical predictions in actual trapped-ion systems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Novelty: First systematic application of geometric phases to MS gate performance analysis
2. Practical Value: Provides simplified noise detection method with measurement complexity independent of system size
3. Theoretical Depth: Establishes deep connections between GP and quantum state evolution trajectories
4. Experimental Relevance: Considers typical noise sources in actual trapped-ion systems

Weaknesses

1. System Limitations: Analysis primarily focuses on two-qubit systems; many-body cases require further investigation
2. Noise Model Simplification: Actual system noise may be more complex with stronger correlations
3. Missing Experimental Verification: Lacks actual experimental data validating theoretical predictions
4. Insufficient Comparative Analysis: Quantitative comparison with traditional methods (QPT/BST) is insufficient

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides new theoretical tools for quantum gate performance evaluation
2. Practical Prospects: Holds potential applications in quantum computing experiments
3. Methodological Inspiration: May inspire other applications of geometric phases in quantum information

Applicable Scenarios

1. Rapid Noise Screening: Suitable for quick performance evaluation of MS gate implementations
2. Real-time Monitoring: Can be used for real-time noise monitoring during quantum computation
3. System Optimization: Helps optimize experimental parameters to reduce specific noise types

References

The paper cites 41 important references covering classical works in quantum entanglement theory, trapped-ion technology, geometric phase theory, and open quantum systems, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is an innovative theoretical work in the quantum information field, proposing a new method for MS gate performance analysis using geometric phases. Although experimental verification and extension to many-body systems require further refinement, it provides valuable new tools for quantum gate performance evaluation with good theoretical significance and application prospects.