Local Unitary Equivalence of Tripartite Quantum States In Terms of Trace Identities

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2503.06240
• Title: Local Unitary Equivalence of Tripartite Quantum States In Terms of Trace Identities
• Authors: Isaac Dobes, Naihuan Jing
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: April 23, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06240v2

Abstract

Building upon the work of Jing-Yang-Zhao on local unitary equivalence of bipartite quantum states, this paper presents a corrected version of their proof. The work establishes a correspondence between local unitary (LU) equivalence and simultaneous orthogonal (SO) equivalence. The corrected proof employs a supermatrix algebra framework, enabling the generalization of this correspondence to tripartite quantum states. Finally, applying the generalized Specht criterion of Futorny-Horn-Sergeichuk, the problem of local unitary equivalence for tripartite quantum states is essentially reduced to checking trace identities and a few other LU invariants. The paper also indicates that these results can be generalized to arbitrary multipartite quantum states, though with certain practical limitations.

Research Background and Motivation

Importance of the Problem

Quantum entanglement is a peculiar phenomenon that has puzzled researchers for nearly a century. Driven by applications in quantum computing, interest and effort in understanding entanglement have grown rapidly. Since entanglement involves non-local properties of quantum states, the choice of local basis should not affect the degree of entanglement of a quantum state. Therefore, an important task in entanglement research is to classify quantum states according to local unitary (LU) equivalence.

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Makhlin's Method: Applicable only to the Fano form of 2-qubit density matrices
2. Kraus's Method: Characterizes LU equivalence of pure n-qubit states through "canonical forms," but fails in degenerate cases
3. Li-Qiao Method: Uses higher-order singular value decomposition to represent arbitrary multipartite quantum states, but involves enormous computational complexity in degenerate cases
4. Jing et al. Method: Characterizes LU equivalence through trace identities, but applies only to bipartite quantum states and contains minor errors in the 2-qubit density matrix case

Research Motivation

This paper aims to correct the errors in Jing et al.'s method and generalize it to tripartite quantum states, providing an effective trace identity method for determining LU equivalence in higher-dimensional multipartite states.

Core Contributions

1. Corrected the bipartite case proof: Rectified minor errors in the Jing-Yang-Zhao paper regarding LU equivalence establishment for 2-qubit density matrices
2. Established supermatrix algebra framework: Rewrote the proof using supermatrix algebra language, laying the foundation for generalization
3. Generalized to tripartite quantum states: Established the correspondence between quasi-LU equivalence and SO equivalence for tripartite quantum states
4. Applied generalized Specht criterion: Reduced the LU equivalence problem for tripartite quantum states to checking trace identities
5. Provided generalization pathway for arbitrary multipartite systems: Indicated that the method can be generalized to arbitrary multipartite cases and discussed practical limitations

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Given two density matrices ρ and ρ̂ representing states in the same quantum system $\mathbb{C}^{d_1} \otimes ... \otimes \mathbb{C}^{d_N}$, they are called locally unitarily (LU) equivalent if there exist $U_i \in SU(d_i)$ (1 ≤ i ≤ N) such that: $\hat{\rho} = (U_1 \otimes ... \otimes U_N)\rho(U_1 \otimes ... \otimes U_N)^{\dagger}$

Core Concepts

1. Supermatrix Algebra Framework

• Supermatrix Representation: Represents tensors $T \in V_1 \otimes ... \otimes V_d$ as supermatrices $A \in \mathbb{F}^{n_1 \times ... \times n_d}$
• Multilinear Matrix Multiplication: Defines the operation rules for $(X_1, ..., X_d) * A$
• k-mode Unfolding: Method for converting supermatrices to ordinary matrices

2. Quasi-LU Equivalence

Density matrices ρ and ρ̂ are quasi-LU equivalent if there exist $O_{j_i} \in O(\delta_{j_i})$ such that: $\hat{T}_{j_1...j_m} = (O_{j_1}, ..., O_{j_m}) * T_{j_1...j_m}$ holds for all $1 \leq j_1 < ... < j_m \leq n$ and $1 \leq m \leq n$.

3. Simultaneous Orthogonal (SO) Equivalence

For tripartite states, SO equivalence is defined as the existence of $O_i \in O(\delta_i)$ such that: $\hat{T}_{123} = (O_1, O_2, O_3) * T_{123}$$\hat{T}_1 \circ \hat{T}_{23} = (O_1, O_2, O_3) * (T_1 \circ T_{23})$$\hat{T}_2 \circ \hat{T}_{13} = (O_2, O_1, O_3) * (T_2 \circ T_{13})$$\hat{T}_{12} \circ \hat{T}_3 = (O_1, O_2, O_3) * (T_{12} \circ T_3)$

Main Theorems

Theorem 1 (Bipartite Case)

Quasi-LU equivalence and SO equivalence are equivalent for bipartite states, subject to additional norm conditions. For 2-qubit density matrices, a superdeterminant condition is also required to ensure LU equivalence.

Theorem 3 (Tripartite Case)

Quasi-LU equivalence and SO equivalence are equivalent for tripartite states, provided that:

1. Norm conditions: $\|\hat{T}_i\| = \|T_i\|$ or $\|\hat{T}_{jk}\| = \|T_{jk}\|$
2. Sign conditions: $\hat{T}_i^t\hat{T}_{ij}\hat{T}_j$ and $T_i^tT_{ij}T_j$ have the same sign
3. For 3-qubit cases, a superdeterminant condition is required

Theorem 4 (Trace Identity Characterization)

Quasi-LU equivalence for tripartite states can be characterized through:

1. Norm and sign conditions
2. Trace identities: $\text{Tr}(w\{A_{\alpha}A_{\beta}^t, A_5A_5^t\}) = \text{Tr}(w\{B_{\alpha}B_{\beta}^t, B_5B_5^t\})$
3. Quasi-LU equivalence of partial traces
4. Invertibility conditions

Experimental Setup

This is primarily a theoretical work without conventional numerical experiments. Theoretical verification is conducted through:

Mathematical Verification

• Proof Completeness: Each theorem is provided with complete mathematical proofs
• Logical Consistency: The generalization from bipartite to tripartite cases maintains logical coherence
• Boundary Case Analysis: Discussion of degenerate cases and special conditions

Method Comparison

Theoretical comparison with existing methods:

• Computational Complexity: The trace identity method is relatively simple
• Applicable Scope: Extended to tripartite cases
• Practicality: Avoids computational difficulties of the Li-Qiao method in degenerate cases

Experimental Results

Theoretical Results

1. Successful Correction: Rectified errors in the original method for 2-qubit cases
2. Effective Generalization: Successfully generalized the method to tripartite quantum states
3. Computational Optimization: The verification length of trace identities has an upper bound: $25(1 + \delta_i + \delta_{j_2}\delta_k)^2$

Method Advantages

• LU Invariance: All trace identities are LU invariants
• Computational Efficiency: Simpler computation compared to other methods
• Theoretical Completeness: Provides necessary and sufficient conditions

Limitations Analysis

1. Sign Conditions: Not LU invariants, potentially preventing recognition of certain equivalent states
2. Invertibility Requirements: Requires specific matrices to be invertible, limiting applicability
3. High-Dimensional Extension: While theoretically generalizable, computational complexity grows rapidly

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Makhlin (2002): Fano form characterization of 2-qubit density matrices
2. Kraus (2010): Canonical form method for pure n-qubit states
3. Li-Qiao (2012-2013): Higher-order singular value decomposition method
4. Jing et al. (2016): Trace identity method (bipartite case)

Contributions of This Work

• Corrected errors in Jing et al.'s method
• Generalized to tripartite cases
• Provided a more complete theoretical framework

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Established the connection between LU equivalence and trace identities for tripartite quantum states
2. Provided a practical determination algorithm, avoiding the difficulty of directly finding unitary transformations
3. Laid theoretical foundations for research on higher-dimensional cases

Limitations

1. Non-LU Invariant Conditions: Sign and invertibility conditions may miss certain equivalent cases
2. Computational Complexity: The number of trace identities grows exponentially with the number of particles
3. Practical Application: The method's practicality is limited for systems with four or more particles

Future Directions

1. Algorithm Optimization: Seek methods to reduce the number of trace identities
2. Special State Classes: Develop specialized methods for specific types of quantum states
3. Numerical Implementation: Develop efficient numerical algorithms to verify theoretical results

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Complete mathematical proofs with clear logic
2. Methodological Innovation: The supermatrix algebra framework provides an elegant pathway for generalization
3. Practical Value: The trace identity method is relatively simple and easy to implement
4. Error Correction: Rectified errors in previous work

Weaknesses

1. Condition Restrictions: Requires additional non-LU invariant conditions, potentially affecting completeness
2. Extensibility Issues: While theoretically generalizable, practical applications are limited
3. Lack of Numerical Verification: Pure theoretical work lacking concrete numerical examples

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new tools for quantum state classification theory
2. Methodological Value: The supermatrix algebra method may inspire research on other problems
3. Practical Potential: Has practical application value in tripartite quantum state analysis

Applicable Scenarios

1. Quantum Information Theory: Entanglement classification and analysis of quantum states
2. Quantum Computing: State equivalence determination in quantum algorithms
3. Theoretical Physics: Mathematical description of multipartite quantum systems

References

This paper is primarily based on the following key references:

1. Jing, Yang, Zhao (2016): "Local unitary equivalence of quantum states and simultaneous orthogonal equivalence"
2. Futorny, Horn, Sergeichuk (2017): "Specht's criterion for systems of linear mappings"
3. Kraus (2010): "Local unitary equivalence of multipartite pure states"
4. Li, Qiao (2013): "Classification of arbitrary multipartite entangled states under local unitary equivalence"

Summary: This paper makes important advances in the theory of local unitary equivalence of quantum states. Through the supermatrix algebra framework, it successfully generalizes the bipartite case to tripartite systems and provides a practical determination method based on trace identities. Despite certain theoretical limitations, it establishes a solid foundation for further development in this field.