2025-11-29T02:34:19.569501

Relating elliptic curve point-counting and solutions of quadratic forms with congruence conditions

Mondal
In this paper, we analyze the theta series associated to the quadratic form $Q(\mathbf{x}) := x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_4^2$ with congruence conditions on $x_i$ modulo $2, 3, 4$, and $6$. By employing special operators on modular, non-holomorphic Eisenstein series of weight $2$, we construct a basis for the Eisenstein space for levels $2^k$ (with $k \le 7$), $3^{\ell}$ (with $\ell \le 3$), and $p$, where $p>3$ is an odd prime. Using the relation between the trace of Frobenius on an elliptic curve and the Fourier coefficients of the cusp-form part of the theta series corresponding to $Q$, we establish a relation between the number of integer solutions to the equation $Q(\mathbf{x}) = p$ and the number of $\mathbb{F}_p$-rational points on the associated elliptic curve under certain congruence conditions on $p$.
academic

Relating elliptic curve point-counting and solutions of quadratic forms with congruence conditions

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2503.17944
  • Title: Relating elliptic curve point-counting and solutions of quadratic forms with congruence conditions
  • Author: Koustav Mondal (Louisiana State University)
  • Classification: math.NT (Number Theory)
  • Publication Date: March 2025 (arXiv v3: October 27, 2025)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17944

Abstract

This paper analyzes theta series related to the quadratic form Q(x):=x12+x22+x32+x42Q(\mathbf{x}) := x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_4^2, where xix_i satisfy congruence conditions modulo 2, 3, 4, 6. By applying special operators to non-holomorphic Eisenstein series of weight 2, the author constructs bases for Eisenstein spaces of levels 2k2^k (k ≤ 7), 3ℓ3^{\ell} (ℓ ≤ 3), and odd primes p. Using the relationship between Frobenius traces on elliptic curves and Fourier coefficients of the cusp form part of theta series, the paper establishes a connection between the number of integer solutions to Q(x)=pQ(\mathbf{x}) = p and the number of Fp\mathbb{F}_p-rational points on related elliptic curves.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Problem

This paper studies the classical problem of quadratic form representation: Given the quadratic form Q(x)=x12+x22+x32+x42Q(\mathbf{x}) = x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_4^2, how many ways can a given natural number n be represented when the variables satisfy congruence conditions xi≡s(modM)x_i \equiv s \pmod{M}?

Significance

  1. Historical Significance: The representation problem for quadratic forms has a long history. Lagrange proved the four-square theorem in 1770, and Ramanujan provided a complete list of all universal quadratic forms.
  2. Theoretical Value: Connects multiple core areas of number theory: modular form theory, elliptic curve arithmetic, and quadratic form theory.
  3. Computational Applications: Elliptic curve point counting has important applications in cryptography. The relationships established in this paper provide new computational perspectives.

Limitations of Existing Methods

  1. Classical theta series methods primarily handle cases without congruence conditions.
  2. Research on theta series with congruence conditions (congruent theta series) is limited.
  3. Lack of systematic methods for constructing Eisenstein series bases of specific levels.
  4. Explicit relationships between quadratic form representation numbers and elliptic curve point counting remain underexplored.

Research Motivation

The author's core motivation is to establish profound connections between combinatorial objects (integer solutions to quadratic forms) and geometric objects (points on elliptic curves), using modular form theory as a bridge.

Core Contributions

  1. Construction of Eisenstein Series Bases: Systematically uses Sieving operators (S) and V operators to construct bases for weight 2 Eisenstein spaces E2(Γ0(2k))E_2(\Gamma_0(2^k)) (k ≤ 7), E2(Γ0(3ℓ))E_2(\Gamma_0(3^{\ell})) (ℓ ≤ 3), and E2(Γ0(p))E_2(\Gamma_0(p)) (odd primes p) (Theorem 1.4).
  2. Theta Series Decomposition: Provides complete decompositions of all congruent theta series θk,M\theta_{k,M} for moduli 2, 3, 4, 6 into Eisenstein series and cusp forms.
  3. Main Theorem: Establishes precise relationships between point counting on the elliptic curve E:y2=x3+1E: y^2 = x^3 + 1 and quadratic form representation numbers (Theorem 1.7):
    • For primes p≡1(mod6)p \equiv 1 \pmod{6}: r1,3(p)=13Np(1)r_{1,3}(p) = \frac{1}{3}N_p(1)
    • General three-term recurrence: 3r1,3(pk)=Np(k)+3p⋅r1,3(pk−2)3r_{1,3}(p^k) = N_p(k) + 3p \cdot r_{1,3}(p^{k-2})
  4. Generalized Formulas: Provides complete representation formulas for composite numbers (Theorem 1.9), involving products of Fourier coefficients and divisor sum functions.
  5. Analogous Results: Tables 1 and 2 showcase similar relationships between other quadratic forms and elliptic curves.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input:

  • Quadratic form Q(x)=x12+x22+x32+x42Q(\mathbf{x}) = x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_4^2
  • Congruence conditions: xi≡s(modM)x_i \equiv s \pmod{M}, where M∈{2,3,4,6}M \in \{2, 3, 4, 6\}
  • Natural number n

Output:

  • Representation number rs,M(n)r_{s,M}(n): the count of integer vectors x∈Z4\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{Z}^4 satisfying Q(x)=nQ(\mathbf{x}) = n and xi≡s(modM)x_i \equiv s \pmod{M}

Key Constraint: Utilize modularity properties of modular forms and elliptic curve theory.

Core Methodological Architecture

1. Congruent Theta Series

Define congruent theta series: θs,M(τ)=∑x∈Z4xi≡s(modM)qx12+x22+x32+x42=∑n=1∞rs,M(n)qn\theta_{s,M}(\tau) = \sum_{\substack{\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{Z}^4 \\ x_i \equiv s \pmod{M}}} q^{x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_4^2} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} r_{s,M}(n)q^n

where q=e2πiτq = e^{2\pi i \tau}, τ∈H\tau \in \mathbb{H} (upper half-plane).

2. S and V Operators

Sieving Operator (Definition 1.3): For M∈NM \in \mathbb{N}, m∈Zm \in \mathbb{Z}f∣SM,m(τ):=∑n≥0n≡m(modM)cf(n)qnf|_{S_{M,m}}(\tau) := \sum_{\substack{n \geq 0 \\ n \equiv m \pmod{M}}} c_f(n)q^n

V Operator: For d∈Qd \in \mathbb{Q}f∣Vd(τ):=f(dτ)=∑n≥0cf(n)qdnf|_{V_d}(\tau) := f(d\tau) = \sum_{n \geq 0} c_f(n)q^{dn}

Key Property (Proposition 2.6): Finite sum formula f∣SM,m(τ)=1M∑j=0M−1f(τ+jM)ζM−jmf|_{S_{M,m}}(\tau) = \frac{1}{M} \sum_{j=0}^{M-1} f\left(\frac{\tau + j}{M}\right) \zeta_M^{-jm}

where ζM=e2πi/M\zeta_M = e^{2\pi i/M}.

3. Non-holomorphic Eisenstein Series

Use weight 2 non-holomorphic Eisenstein series: E^2(τ):=1−3πIm(τ)−24∑n≥1σ1(n)qn\hat{E}_2(\tau) := 1 - \frac{3}{\pi \text{Im}(\tau)} - 24\sum_{n \geq 1} \sigma_1(n)q^n

where σ1(n)=∑d∣nd\sigma_1(n) = \sum_{d|n} d is the divisor sum function.

Key Result (Lemma 2.9):

  • E^2∣SM,m(τ)∈M2(Γ1(M2))\hat{E}_2|_{S_{M,m}}(\tau) \in M_2(\Gamma_1(M^2)) for m>0m > 0
  • E^2∣(dVd−Sd,0)(τ)∈M2(Γ0(lcm(4,d))∩Γ1(d2))\hat{E}_2|(dV_d - S_{d,0})(\tau) \in M_2(\Gamma_0(\text{lcm}(4,d)) \cap \Gamma_1(d^2))

Technical Innovation Points

1. Systematic Construction of Eisenstein Bases

Proof Strategy for Theorem 1.4:

  • Odd k case: Use recursive construction via {f∣Vp:f∈basis of E2(Γ0(pk−1))}\{f|_{V_p} : f \in \text{basis of } E_2(\Gamma_0(p^{k-1}))\}
  • p=2, k≤3 case: Use {E^2∣S2k,m:m∈(Z/2kZ)×}∪{f∣V2}\{\hat{E}_2|_{S_{2^k,m}} : m \in (\mathbb{Z}/2^k\mathbb{Z})^{\times}\} \cup \{f|_{V_2}\}
  • p=3 case: Special construction of E^2∣S3,1,E^2∣S3,2,E^2∣(3V3−S3,0)\hat{E}_2|_{S_{3,1}}, \hat{E}_2|_{S_{3,2}}, \hat{E}_2|(3V_3 - S_{3,0})

Innovation Points:

  • Explicitly identifies limitations of the operator method (k>3 for p=2, k>1 for p=3, k>1 for other odd primes)
  • Provides complete lists of basis elements (Appendices A and B)
  • Gives explicit formulas for cusp values (Proposition 2.7)

2. Theta Series Decomposition Technique

For each θk,M\theta_{k,M}, decompose through the following steps:

Step 1: Determine modularity properties By Theorem 2.4, θk,M∈M2(Γ0(4M2)∩Γ1(M))\theta_{k,M} \in M_2(\Gamma_0(4M^2) \cap \Gamma_1(M))

Step 2: Compute cusp values Use Proposition 2.7 to compute θk,M\theta_{k,M} at all inequivalent cusps

Step 3: Linear combination matching Set θk,M=∑iℓiBi+fk,M\theta_{k,M} = \sum_i \ell_i B_i + f_{k,M}, where BiB_i are Eisenstein basis elements and fk,Mf_{k,M} is the cusp form. Solve for coefficients ℓi\ell_i by matching cusp values.

Step 4: Extract cusp form fk,M=θk,M−∑iℓiBif_{k,M} = \theta_{k,M} - \sum_i \ell_i B_i

Key Case (Proposition 6.3): For θ1,3\theta_{1,3}: θ1,3(τ)=−124(13E^2∣S6,1−2E^2∣S3,1∣V4+E^2∣S3,2∣V2)−13η(6τ)4\theta_{1,3}(\tau) = -\frac{1}{24}\left(\frac{1}{3}\hat{E}_2|_{S_{6,1}} - 2\hat{E}_2|_{S_{3,1}|V_4} + \hat{E}_2|_{S_{3,2}|V_2}\right) - \frac{1}{3}\eta(6\tau)^4

where η(τ)\eta(\tau) is the Dedekind eta function.

3. Elliptic Curve Connection

CM Elliptic Curve: E:y2=x3+1E: y^2 = x^3 + 1 has complex multiplication (CM) by Q(−3)\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-3})

L-function Relationship (Proposition 8.1): L(E,s)=L(η(6τ)4,s)L(E, s) = L(\eta(6\tau)^4, s)

Weil Theorem Application (Theorem 8.2): Let apa_p be the p-th coefficient of the L-function, and α,β\alpha, \beta be roots of x2−apx+p=0x^2 - a_p x + p = 0, then Np(k)=pk+1−αk−βkN_p(k) = p^k + 1 - \alpha^k - \beta^k

Key Lemma 8.4: apk=∑i=0kαiβk−ia_{p^k} = \sum_{i=0}^k \alpha^i \beta^{k-i}

Proved by induction using the three-term recurrence (Theorem 8.3): apk=apapk−1−p⋅apk−2a_{p^k} = a_p a_{p^{k-1}} - p \cdot a_{p^{k-2}}

Experimental Setup

Numerical Verification

This is pure theoretical number theory research without traditional "experiments," but includes extensive numerical verification:

Example 8.7: For p=103p = 103

  • r1,3(103)=28r_{1,3}(103) = 28
  • Fourier coefficient a103=20a_{103} = 20
  • Verification: 3r1,3(103)=103+1−20=84=3×283r_{1,3}(103) = 103 + 1 - 20 = 84 = 3 \times 28 ✓

Computational Tools

  • Maple for Fourier expansion calculations (Reference 18)
  • LMFDB database for elliptic curve data queries (Reference 19)

Case Coverage

The paper systematically analyzes all of the following cases:

  1. θk,2\theta_{k,2}: k = 0, 1 (Section 4)
  2. θk,4\theta_{k,4}: k = 0, 1, 2, 3 (Section 5)
  3. θk,3\theta_{k,3}: k = 0, 1 (Section 6)
  4. θk,6\theta_{k,6}: k = 0, 1, 2, 3 (Section 7)

Experimental Results

Main Results

Theorem 1.7 (Core Result)

For primes p≡1(mod6)p \equiv 1 \pmod{6}: r1,3(p)=13Np(1)r_{1,3}(p) = \frac{1}{3}N_p(1)

General three-term relation:

N_p(k) + 3p \cdot r_{1,3}(p^{k-2}) & k \geq 3 \\ N_p(k) & k = 1, 2 \end{cases}$$ **Expanded Forms**: - Odd powers: $r_{1,3}(p^{2k+1}) = \frac{1}{3}[N_p(2k+1) + pN_p(2k-1) + \cdots + p^k N_p(1)]$ - Even powers: $r_{1,3}(p^{2k+2}) = \frac{1}{3}[N_p(2k+2) + pN_p(2k) + \cdots + p^k N_p(2)]$ #### Theorem 1.9 (Composite Number Case) For $n = \prod_i p_i^{\alpha_i} \equiv 1 \pmod{6}$, where primes satisfy specific congruence conditions: $$r_{1,3}(n) = \sum_{i=1}^k \left[\prod_{j=i+1}^k \sigma_1(p_j^{\alpha_j}) \cdot \prod_{j=1}^{i-1} a_{p_j^{\alpha_j}} \cdot r_{1,3}(p_i^{\alpha_i})\right]$$ ### Specific Proposition Results **Proposition 4.1** ($\theta_{0,2}$): $$r_{0,2}(n) = \begin{cases} 1 & n = 1 \\ 24[\sigma_1(n/4) - 2\sigma_1(n/8)] & n \equiv 0 \pmod{8}, n > 1 \\ 8\sigma_1(n/4) & n \equiv 4 \pmod{8} \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$$ **Proposition 6.3** ($\theta_{1,3}$, most important): $$r_{1,3}(n) = \begin{cases} \sigma_1(n/2) - 2\sigma_1(n/4) & n \equiv 4 \pmod{12} \\ \sigma_1(n/2) & n \equiv 10 \pmod{12} \\ \frac{1}{3}\sigma_1(n) - \frac{1}{3}a(n) & n \equiv 1 \pmod{6} \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$$ where $\eta(6\tau)^4 = \sum_{n \geq 1} a(n)q^n$. ### Corollaries and Observations **Remark 1.10**: 1. For $p \equiv 1 \pmod{6}$, $N_p(1)$ is divisible by 12 2. Congruence relation: $3r_{1,3}(p^m) \equiv N_p(m) \pmod{p}$ **Proposition 1.6**: For odd n, $r_{1,3}(n)$ is divisible by 4 (by symmetry argument) ### Analogous Results (Table 1) The paper also discovers analogous relationships between other quadratic forms and elliptic curves: | Quadratic Form | Congruence Condition | Elliptic Curve | Relationship | |--------|----------|----------|------| | $x_1^2 + x_2^2 + 2x_3^2 + 2x_4^2$ | Specific conditions | $y^2 = x^3 + 4x$ | $r_Q(p) = N_p^E(1)$ | | $x_1^2 + x_1x_2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_3x_4 + x_4^2$ | Specific conditions | $y^2 + y = x^3$ | $r_Q(p) = N_p^E(1)$ | These are all CM elliptic curves, demonstrating the universality of the method. ## Related Work ### Quadratic Form Theory 1. **Lagrange (1770)**: Four-square theorem 2. **Ramanujan [6]**: Complete list of universal quadratic forms 3. **Bhargava & Hanke [1,2]**: Complete proof of universal quaternary quadratic forms 4. **Beli [3]**: Universal quadratic forms over dyadic local fields ### Congruent Theta Series 1. **Sun [8]**: Polygonal numbers with congruence conditions and their sums 2. **Cho [10]**: Divisor sum expressions for coefficients of congruent theta series - This paper extends Cho's work by establishing profound connections with elliptic curves ### Modular Form Techniques 1. **Bringmann & Kane [11]**: Introduction of S and V operators for constructing Eisenstein series - This paper systematizes and extends this technique, providing complete basis construction theorems 2. **Koblitz [14], Diamond & Shurman [15]**: Foundational modular form theory 3. **Cohen & Strömberg [16]**: Classical methods in modular forms ### Elliptic Curves and CM Theory 1. **Cox [4]**: Primes of the form $x^2 + Ny^2$ and class field theory 2. **Li, Long, Tu [17]**: Computing special L-values of CM modular forms - The elliptic curve $y^2 = x^3 + 1$ in this paper has CM by $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-3})$ 3. **Silverman [20]**: Advanced topics in elliptic curve arithmetic ### Unique Contribution of This Paper This is the first systematic establishment of explicit recurrence relationships between **congruent quadratic form representation numbers** and **elliptic curve point counting**, using modular form theory as a bridge—a depth not previously achieved. ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. **Methodological Contribution**: S and V operators provide a systematic method for constructing Eisenstein series bases. While having limitations (failing at high powers), they are highly effective within their applicable range. 2. **Core Mathematical Result**: Establishes precise three-term recurrence relationships between $r_{1,3}(p^k)$ and point counting $N_p(k)$ on the elliptic curve $E: y^2 = x^3 + 1$. 3. **Theoretical Insights**: - The non-multiplicativity of quadratic form representation numbers can be explained through elliptic curve L-function coefficients - Special properties of CM elliptic curves (such as $a_p = 0$ when $p \equiv 5 \pmod{6}$) directly reflect in the congruence properties of representation numbers 4. **Generalizability**: The analogous results shown in Tables 1 and 2 suggest the method may apply to a broader class of quadratic form-elliptic curve pairs. ### Limitations #### 1. Limitations of Operator Methods **Explicitly Acknowledged Restrictions** (Theorem 1.4): - $p = 2$: Valid only for $k \leq 3$ (i.e., $2^6 = 64$) - $p = 3$: Valid only for $k \leq 1$ (i.e., $3^2 = 9$) - Other odd primes: Valid only for $k = 1$ **Reason**: At high powers, the structure of $(\mathbb{Z}/p^k\mathbb{Z})^{\times}$ causes the S operator to produce insufficient elements to span the Eisenstein space dimension. #### 2. Restrictions on Congruence Conditions - Main results focus on moduli 2, 3, 4, 6 - Other moduli (such as 5, 7, etc.) are not systematically studied - Non-uniform congruence vectors $\mathbf{a} \neq s \cdot \mathbf{1}$ are not addressed #### 3. Specificity of Quadratic Forms - Only studies $Q(\mathbf{x}) = x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_4^2$ (sum of four squares) - Other quaternary quadratic forms (such as $x_1^2 + x_2^2 + 2x_3^2 + 2x_4^2$) are mentioned in Table 1 but not analyzed in detail #### 4. Theoretical Completeness - Theorem 1.9's proof uses induction, but for general prime factorizations, the formula becomes quite complex - No computational complexity analysis is provided ### Future Directions #### 1. Extending Operator Methods The author suggests the need to find new operators or methods to handle: - $E_2(\Gamma_0(2^k))$ when $k > 7$ - $E_2(\Gamma_0(3^{\ell}))$ when $\ell > 3$ - $E_2(\Gamma_0(p^k))$ when $p > 3$, $k > 1$ Possible directions: - Combinations of Hecke operators - Atkin-Lehner involutions - Newform theory #### 2. More Quadratic Form-Elliptic Curve Pairs Systematically investigate which quadratic forms correspond to which elliptic curves: - Do all CM elliptic curves admit corresponding quadratic forms? - Does the phenomenon also occur in non-CM cases? #### 3. Higher-Dimensional Generalizations - Cases of six-variable and eight-variable quadratic forms - Relationships with higher-dimensional abelian varieties #### 4. Computational Applications - Develop efficient algorithms utilizing these relationships to compute representation numbers - Applications in cryptography (elliptic curve point counting) #### 5. Grössencharacter Theory Section 8.3.1 begins exploring higher-power Grössencharacters but does not go deep: - Complete theory of modular forms $f_k$ corresponding to $\chi^k$ - Deeper connections with $r_{1,3}(n)$ ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths #### 1. Mathematical Rigor - **Clear Theorem Statements**: All main results have precise mathematical formulations - **Complete Proofs**: Proofs of key theorems (1.7, 1.9, 8.4) are detailed and rigorous - **Boundary Case Handling**: Explicitly identifies the applicable range and failure conditions of methods #### 2. Methodological Innovation - **Systematization of Operator Techniques**: Develops the S and V operators of Bringmann-Kane into a systematic method for constructing Eisenstein bases - **Cross-Domain Connection**: Elegantly connects three seemingly independent fields: - Combinatorial number theory (quadratic form representations) - Algebraic geometry (elliptic curves) - Analytic number theory (modular forms) #### 3. Depth of Results - **Non-trivial Recurrence Relations**: The three-term recurrence in Theorem 1.7 is non-obvious, revealing deep structure - **Generalization Capability**: Theorem 1.9 handles composite numbers, and while the formula is complex, it is completely explicit - **Verifiability**: Numerical verifications like Example 8.7 enhance result credibility #### 4. Paper Organization - **Clear Logic**: Progresses from background → methods → specific cases → main theorems with clear hierarchy - **Detailed Appendices**: Appendices A and B provide complete lists of all Eisenstein basis elements, facilitating subsequent research - **Effective Tables**: Tables 1, 2, C1, D2, etc. effectively summarize complex information #### 5. Academic Value - **Fills Gaps**: First systematic connection between congruent theta series and elliptic curve point counting - **Tool Contribution**: Constructed Eisenstein bases can be used for other problems - **Inspirational**: Tables 1 and 2 suggest broader phenomena, providing direction for future research ### Weaknesses #### 1. Technical Limitations - **Limited Coverage**: Operator methods are effective only for low powers; high-power cases require new approaches - **Excessive Specificity**: Results are highly dependent on $Q = x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2 + x_4^2$ and specific elliptic curves - **Congruence Condition Restrictions**: Only considers $\mathbf{a} = s \cdot \mathbf{1}$ cases #### 2. Proof Techniques - **Induction Dependence**: Many key proofs (such as Lemma 8.4) rely on induction, lacking conceptual explanation - **Computation-Intensive**: Cusp value matching requires extensive calculations, lacking elegance - **Missing Geometric Intuition**: The connection between elliptic curves and quadratic forms is primarily established through L-functions, with unclear geometric meaning #### 3. Practical Utility - **Unanalyzed Computational Complexity**: How efficient is Theorem 1.9's formula in actual computation? - **Missing Algorithm Implementation**: No executable algorithms or code provided - **Limited Numerical Range**: Only small primes verified (e.g., $p = 103$) #### 4. Writing Details - **Heavy Notation**: Abundant subscripts and special symbols (such as $E_{16,5}$, $\theta_{1,3}$) may hinder readability - **Background Assumptions**: Requires reader familiarity with modular forms, elliptic curves, and class field theory—high barrier to entry - **Insufficient Motivation Explanation**: Why study these specific congruence conditions? Where are practical applications? #### 5. Theoretical Completeness - **Inverse Problem Unsolved**: Given an elliptic curve, how to find the corresponding quadratic form? - **Non-CM Cases Missing**: All examples are CM elliptic curves; what about general cases? - **Unexplained Modulus Selection**: Why choose 2, 3, 4, 6? Is there theoretical guidance? ### Impact Assessment #### Contribution to the Field - **Theoretical Contribution**: ★★★★☆ (4/5) - Establishes new cross-domain connections - But limited to special cases - **Methodological Contribution**: ★★★★☆ (4/5) - Systematic application of S and V operators is a valuable tool - But limited applicability range - **Practical Value**: ★★★☆☆ (3/5) - Elegant theoretical results but unclear application scenarios - Computational efficiency unknown #### Reproducibility - **Highly Reproducible**: - All theorem statements are precise - Appendices provide complete basis elements - Uses standard tools (Maple, LMFDB) - Numerical examples are verifiable #### Potential Impact 1. **Short-term**: - Other researchers can directly use constructed Eisenstein bases - Inspires research on similar quadratic form-elliptic curve relationships 2. **Medium-term**: - Possible generalization to broader quadratic forms - Connections with Langlands program worth exploring 3. **Long-term**: - If general theory develops, could be important progress in number theory - Potential applications in cryptography and related fields ### Applicable Scenarios #### 1. Theoretical Research - **Number Theory Researchers**: Experts in quadratic forms, modular forms, or elliptic curves can utilize this paper's methods - **Teaching Use**: Excellent case study demonstrating connections between different number theory branches #### 2. Specific Problems - **Point Counting Problems**: When computing points on elliptic curve $y^2 = x^3 + 1$, can be transformed to quadratic form problems - **Representation Number Computation**: Conversely, computing $r_{1,3}(n)$ can utilize elliptic curve theory #### 3. Generalization Research - **Template Role**: Provides methodological template for studying other quadratic form-elliptic curve pairs - **Toolbox**: S and V operator techniques applicable to other modular form problems #### 4. Non-Applicable Scenarios - **General Quadratic Forms**: Methods highly dependent on specific structure, difficult to directly generalize - **Higher Dimensions**: Six or more variable quadratic forms require different techniques - **Engineering Applications**: Lacks algorithms and efficiency analysis, unsuitable for direct application ## Key References 1. **Bhargava & Hanke [1,2]**: Modern theoretical foundation for universal quadratic forms 2. **Bringmann & Kane [11]**: Original source of S and V operators, methodological foundation of this paper 3. **Cho [10]**: Prior work on congruent theta series, direct predecessor of this paper 4. **Li, Long, Tu [17]**: L-value computation for CM modular forms, provides elliptic curve theory background 5. **Cohen & Strömberg [16]**: Standard reference for modular form theory 6. **Silverman [20]**: Elliptic curve arithmetic, source of CM theory 7. **LMFDB [19]**: Elliptic curve database, tool for verifying numerical results --- ## Overall Evaluation This is a **high-quality pure mathematics research paper** that establishes elegant connections between three core domains of number theory. Main strengths lie in mathematical rigor, methodological systematicity, and result depth. Main limitations are in the specificity of applicable scope and uncertainty of practical utility. **Recommendation Index**: ★★★★☆ (4/5) **Target Readers**: Researchers in algebraic number theory, modular form theory, or elliptic curves; requires graduate-level number theory background. **Core Value**: Provides concrete and profound examples for understanding deep connections between quadratic form representations and elliptic curve point counting. While not achieving completely general theory, it achieves excellence within its feasible range.