2025-11-17T05:13:12.463252

Two-color magneto-optical trapping of ytterbium atoms

Li, Wang, Yu et al.
We report laser cooling and trapping of ytterbium atoms in a two-color magneto-optical trap (MOT). Benefited from both the broad singlet transition ($^1\text{S}_0\rightarrow {}^1\text{P}_1$) and the narrow intercombination transition ($^1\text{S}_0\rightarrow {}^3\text{P}_1$) of ytterbium atoms, the two-color MOT enables rapid loading and efficient cooling. We systematically investigate the shielding effect of the intercombination transition by examining the atom loading and loss rates of single-color and two-color MOTs. Our findings are general and can be extended to other alkaline earth(-like) atoms.
academic

Two-color magneto-optical trapping of ytterbium atoms

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2503.24383
  • Title: Two-color magneto-optical trapping of ytterbium atoms
  • Authors: Xiao Li, Yufei Wang, Ligeng Yu, Bo Song (School of Physics, Peking University)
  • Classification: physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gas
  • Publication Date: March 2025 (arXiv preprint)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.24383

Abstract

This paper reports laser cooling and trapping of ytterbium atoms in a two-color magneto-optical trap (MOT). By utilizing the broad-spectrum singlet transition (1S01P1^1\text{S}_0\rightarrow {}^1\text{P}_1) and narrow-spectrum forbidden transition (1S03P1^1\text{S}_0\rightarrow {}^3\text{P}_1) of ytterbium atoms, the two-color MOT achieves rapid loading and efficient cooling. The study systematically investigates the shielding effects of the forbidden transition by examining atomic loading and loss rates in monochromatic and two-color MOTs. These findings are universal and can be generalized to other alkaline-earth(-like) atoms.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

Alkaline-earth or alkaline-earth-like atoms (such as strontium and ytterbium) possess divalent electronic structures and (ultra)narrow linewidth transitions, with broad application prospects in quantum computing and simulation, atomic interferometry, and precision measurement. Rapid laser cooling and trapping are key technological foundations for realizing these applications.

Core Challenges

  1. Limitations of monochromatic MOT: While the blue MOT (using 1S01P1^1\text{S}_0\rightarrow {}^1\text{P}_1 transition) has fast loading speed, it suffers from atomic loss because the 1P1^1\text{P}_1 state decays to the 3Dj^3\text{D}_j state with a branching ratio of approximately 7×1087×10^{-8}, which subsequently decays to the untrapped 3Pj^3\text{P}_j state.
  2. Limitations of green MOT: The green MOT using the 1S03P1^1\text{S}_0\rightarrow {}^3\text{P}_1 forbidden transition has low loss rates but slow loading speed.
  3. Optimization requirements: A deeper understanding of MOT optimization mechanisms is needed, particularly regarding loss and shielding enhancement effects in the presence of interactions and different transitions.

Research Significance

Rapidly and robustly preparing large samples of cold atoms is crucial for neutral atom quantum computing and simulation; therefore, optimizing MOT performance has important practical value.

Core Contributions

  1. Established a complete two-color MOT system: Including a Zeeman slower and two-color MOT, achieving rapid loading and cooling of 174^{174}Yb atoms with large steady-state atom numbers.
  2. Systematically investigated shielding effects: Through comparing loading and loss rates of blue, green, and two-color MOTs, deeply analyzed the shielding enhancement mechanism of the forbidden transition.
  3. Quantified loss mechanisms: Distinguished and quantified the effects of one-body loss (αN\alpha N) and two-body loss (βN2\beta N^2) on different MOT configurations.
  4. Provided optimization strategies: Achieved efficient transfer from two-color MOT to pure green MOT (loss rate ~10%), obtaining a compressed MOT with 10810^8 atoms, diameter ~300 μm, and temperature 18 μK.

Detailed Methods

Experimental Apparatus Design

Overall Architecture

The experimental apparatus includes: an atomic oven, two six-way crosses, a Zeeman slower, a MOT chamber, and a glass cell. The first cross is used for spectroscopy and transverse cooling, while the differential tube between the Zeeman slower and the second cross, combined with UHV pumping, maintains the MOT chamber vacuum at 101110^{-11} mbar.

Zeeman Slower

  • Design parameters: Total length 32.5 cm, using two types of copper coils wound on a 1-inch diameter 316LN stainless steel tube.
  • Magnetic field configuration: Main coil (diameter 1.6 mm, current ~3.9 A) and enhancement coil (3 mm × 1 mm square hollow copper tube, water-cooled).
  • Optical parameters: Slowing beam power ~20 mW, frequency red-detuned by 756 MHz relative to the 1S01P1^1\text{S}_0\rightarrow {}^1\text{P}_1 transition.
  • Performance: Peak velocity 305 m/s at oven temperature 390°C, X-direction MOT capture velocity designed for ~10 m/s, estimated 174^{174}Yb atomic flux reaching the MOT region of 2×10112×10^{11} s1^{-1}.

Two-color MOT Principle

Shielding Enhancement Mechanism

By strongly coupling the 3P1^3\text{P}_1 and 1S0^1\text{S}_0 states, atoms in the 3P1^3\text{P}_1 state can be effectively trapped by the blue MOT without altering the population balance between the 1S0^1\text{S}_0 and 1P1^1\text{P}_1 states. Thus, the 3P1^3\text{P}_1 state acts as a reservoir, shielding trapped atoms from loss through non-closed channels.

Mathematical Model

Rate equation for atom number in the MOT: dN(t)dt=ηαN(t)βN(t)2\frac{dN(t)}{dt} = \eta - \alpha N(t) - \beta N(t)^2

where N(t)N(t) is the MOT atom number, η\eta is the loading rate, and α\alpha and β\beta are the one-body and two-body loss coefficients, respectively.

Steady-state atom number: N=(α2+4βηα)/2βN = (\sqrt{\alpha^2 + 4\beta\eta} - \alpha)/2\beta

Technical Innovations

  1. Systematic comparison method: By simultaneously measuring loading and holding processes, separating the contributions of one-body and two-body losses.
  2. Quantification of shielding effects: Quantitatively explaining the physical mechanism of shielding effects through population analysis.
  3. Optimization parameter determination: Systematically optimizing various parameters of the two-color MOT, including power, detuning, and magnetic field gradient.

Experimental Setup

Experimental Parameters

  • Blue MOT: Wavelength 399 nm, intensity density (0.33, 0.33, 0.17)IbsatI_b^{sat}, detuning δb=1.2Γb\delta_b = -1.2\Gamma_b
  • Green MOT: Wavelength 556 nm, intensity density (278, 278, 118)IgsatI_g^{sat}, detuning δg=33Γg\delta_g = -33\Gamma_g
  • Magnetic field gradient: Blue MOT 24 G/cm, green MOT 4.2 G/cm, two-color MOT 29.4 G/cm
  • Saturation intensity: Ibsat=59.9I_b^{sat} = 59.9 mW/cm², Igsat=0.14I_g^{sat} = 0.14 mW/cm²

Measurement Methods

  • Atom number detection: Using absorption imaging on the 399 nm singlet transition
  • Loading measurement: Recording atomic number evolution over time for different MOT configurations
  • Holding measurement: Measuring MOT atom number decay after turning off the atomic flux

Experimental Results

Main Results

Shielding Enhancement Effect

  • Optimal detuning: Shielding effect is strongest when green light is red-detuned by δg2π×2\delta_g \approx 2\pi × 2 MHz = 11Γg11\Gamma_g relative to resonance with blue light
  • Power dependence: Shielding effect saturates at power ~20 mW
  • Atom number enhancement: Steady-state atom number in two-color MOT is 3 times higher than in blue MOT

Comparison of Loading and Loss Rates

MOT TypeSteady-state Atoms (×10⁷)Loading Rate (×10⁷ s⁻¹)One-body Loss Rate (s⁻¹)Two-body Loss Coefficient (×10⁻⁹ s⁻¹)
Blue4.19.80.5444
Green8.10.100.012≃0
Two-color11.58.40.211.0

Key Findings

  1. Shielding effect mechanism: The reduction in one-body loss rate in the two-color MOT is primarily due to atomic redistribution to the forbidden state 3P1^3\text{P}_1. The experimentally measured loss rate change Δα=0.33\Delta\alpha = 0.33 s⁻¹ agrees well with the theoretical prediction (1P/P)αhold=0.26(1-P'/P)\alpha_{hold} = 0.26 s⁻¹.
  2. Two-body loss characteristics:
    • Green MOT has almost no two-body loss
    • Blue MOT exhibits significant two-body loss
    • Two-color MOT is intermediate between the two
  3. Temperature performance:
    • Blue MOT: ~7 mK (Doppler limit 698 μK)
    • Green MOT: ~20 μK (Doppler limit 4.4 μK)

MOT Transfer and Compression

Successfully achieved transfer from two-color MOT to pure green MOT:

  • Transfer efficiency: Loss rate ~10%
  • Final parameters: 10810^8 atoms, diameter ~300 μm, temperature 18 μK
  • Compression process: Green light power reduced from 30.5 mW to 35 μW, detuning changed from 33Γg-33\Gamma_g to 8Γg-8\Gamma_g, magnetic field gradient adjusted to 18.2 G/cm

Field Development

Magneto-optical trapping of alkaline-earth(-like) atoms has recently advanced in using both broad-spectrum singlet transitions and narrow-spectrum forbidden transitions; however, systematic understanding of MOT optimization remains lacking, particularly in the presence of interactions and different transitions.

Contribution of This Work

Compared to existing work, this paper provides more systematic investigation of shielding effects, quantitative analysis of one-body and two-body loss mechanisms, and optimized two-color MOT parameters.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Advantages of two-color MOT: Combines rapid loading of singlet transitions with efficient cooling of forbidden transitions.
  2. Shielding mechanism: The forbidden transition effectively reduces one-body loss rate by redistributing atomic populations.
  3. Universality: This method can be generalized to other alkaline-earth(-like) atoms such as strontium, dysprosium, and erbium.

Limitations

  1. System complexity: Requires two laser systems and precise parameter optimization.
  2. Two-body loss: Two-body loss still exists at high densities, limiting the maximum achievable atom number.
  3. Transfer loss: Transfer from two-color MOT to green MOT still incurs ~10% loss.

Future Directions

  1. Further optimization: Exploring methods to reduce transfer loss.
  2. Extended applications: Applying this technique to other isotopes and atomic species.
  3. Quantum applications: Providing better atomic sources for quantum simulation and computing.

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Strong systematicity: Comprehensive comparison of three MOT configurations with complete performance analysis.
  2. Clear mechanism: Clarified the physical mechanism of shielding effects through theoretical analysis and experimental verification.
  3. High practical value: Provides an effective solution for preparing large samples of cold atoms.
  4. Complete technical chain: From Zeeman slowing to final compressed MOT.

Weaknesses

  1. Limited theoretical depth: Theoretical analysis of two-body loss mechanisms is relatively simple.
  2. Parameter optimization: Selection of certain parameters lacks deeper theoretical guidance.
  3. Limited comparison scope: Lacks cross-comparison with other atomic species.

Impact

  1. Technology promotion: Provides important technical reference for alkaline-earth(-like) atom experiments.
  2. Theoretical contribution: Deepens understanding of MOT loss mechanisms.
  3. Application prospects: Lays foundation for quantum technology applications.

Applicable Scenarios

This technique is particularly suitable for:

  1. Quantum simulation experiments requiring large numbers of cold atoms
  2. Precision measurement applications such as atomic clocks
  3. Neutral atom quantum computing platforms

References

The paper cites numerous important references, including pioneering work on alkaline-earth atom MOTs, theoretical studies of shielding effects, and related experimental technique developments, providing a comprehensive literature foundation for the field.