2025-11-10T03:01:44.701257

Query Complexity of Classical and Quantum Channel Discrimination

Nuradha, Wilde
Quantum channel discrimination has been studied from an information-theoretic perspective, wherein one is interested in the optimal decay rate of error probabilities as a function of the number of unknown channel accesses. In this paper, we study the query complexity of quantum channel discrimination, wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of channel uses needed to reach a desired error probability. To this end, we show that the query complexity of binary channel discrimination depends logarithmically on the inverse error probability and inversely on the negative logarithm of the (geometric and Holevo) channel fidelity. As a special case of these findings, we precisely characterize the query complexity of discriminating two classical channels and two classical-quantum channels. Furthermore, by obtaining an optimal characterization of the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing, including prior probabilities, we provide a more precise characterization of query complexity when the error probability does not exceed a fixed threshold. We also provide lower and upper bounds on the query complexity of binary asymmetric channel discrimination and multiple quantum channel discrimination. For the former, the query complexity depends on the geometric Rényi and Petz Rényi channel divergences, while for the latter, it depends on the negative logarithm of the (geometric and Uhlmann) channel fidelity. For multiple channel discrimination, the upper bound scales as the logarithm of the number of channels.
academic

Query Complexity of Classical and Quantum Channel Discrimination

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2504.12989
  • Title: Query Complexity of Classical and Quantum Channel Discrimination
  • Authors: Theshani Nuradha (Cornell University & University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), Mark M. Wilde (Cornell University)
  • Classification: quant-ph cs.IT cs.LG math.IT math.ST stat.TH
  • Publication Date: October 13, 2025 (arXiv v3)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12989

Abstract

This paper investigates the quantum channel discrimination problem from the perspective of query complexity, aiming to determine the minimum number of channel uses required to achieve a desired error probability. The research demonstrates that the query complexity of binary channel discrimination exhibits a logarithmic relationship with the reciprocal of error probability and is inversely proportional to the negative logarithm of geometric and Holevo channel fidelity. As special cases, the paper precisely characterizes the query complexity for two classical channels and two classical-quantum channels. By obtaining optimal characterizations of quantum hypothesis testing sample complexity under fixed error probability thresholds, it provides more precise query complexity characterizations. Additionally, upper and lower bounds for binary asymmetric channel discrimination and multi-channel discrimination query complexity are provided.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

Quantum channel discrimination is a generalization of quantum hypothesis testing, involving the determination of an unknown channel's identity. Traditional research has primarily focused on the optimal decay rate of error probability in the asymptotic regime, whereas this paper addresses query complexity in the non-asymptotic regime.

Research Significance

  1. Theoretical Importance: Fills the gap in non-asymptotic analysis of quantum channel discrimination, providing a new theoretical framework from the perspective of sample complexity
  2. Practical Value: Possesses important application potential in quantum learning theory, quantum computing, and quantum algorithms
  3. Methodological Contribution: Introduces the query complexity concept from theoretical computer science into quantum information theory

Limitations of Existing Approaches

  • Existing research primarily concentrates on the asymptotic regime (n → ∞)
  • Lacks precise characterization of the minimum number of queries under fixed non-zero error probability
  • Absence of a unified theoretical framework for query complexity across different channel types

Core Contributions

  1. Defined three types of query complexity for quantum channel discrimination: symmetric binary, asymmetric binary, and multi-channel discrimination
  2. Improved sample complexity bounds for quantum hypothesis testing: Provided optimal characterization under threshold constraints (Theorem 3)
  3. Obtained tight bounds for symmetric binary channel discrimination: Precise characterization of query complexity regarding error probability and channel fidelity (Theorem 8)
  4. Completely resolved special cases: Tight characterization of query complexity for classical and classical-quantum channels (Corollaries 10, 12, 14, 15)
  5. Extended to general cases: Upper and lower bounds for asymmetric channel discrimination and multi-channel discrimination (Theorems 16, 19)

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Symmetric Binary Channel Discrimination

Given two quantum channels N\mathcal{N} and M\mathcal{M}, selected with prior probabilities pp and q=1pq = 1-p. Query complexity is defined as: n(p,N,q,M,ε):=inf{nN:pe(p,N,q,M,n)ε}n^*(p,\mathcal{N},q,\mathcal{M},\varepsilon) := \inf\{n \in \mathbb{N} : p_e(p,\mathcal{N},q,\mathcal{M},n) \leq \varepsilon\}

where pep_e is the optimal error probability.

Asymmetric Binary Channel Discrimination

Constraining the Type I error probability to not exceed ε\varepsilon, minimizing the Type II error probability: n(N,M,ε,δ):=inf{nN:βε(N(n)M(n))δ}n^*(\mathcal{N},\mathcal{M},\varepsilon,\delta) := \inf\{n \in \mathbb{N} : \beta_\varepsilon(\mathcal{N}^{(n)}\|\mathcal{M}^{(n)}) \leq \delta\}

Multi-Channel Discrimination

Identifying an unknown channel from MM channels: n(S,ε):=inf{nN:pe(S,n)ε}n^*(\mathcal{S},\varepsilon) := \inf\{n \in \mathbb{N} : p_e(\mathcal{S},n) \leq \varepsilon\}

Core Technical Methods

1. Channel Fidelity and Divergence

The paper employs multiple quantum information measures:

  • Geometric Fidelity: F^(ρ,σ)=infϵ>0(Tr[ρ(ϵ)#σ(ϵ)])2\hat{F}(\rho,\sigma) = \inf_{\epsilon>0}(\text{Tr}[\rho^{(\epsilon)}\#\sigma^{(\epsilon)}])^2
  • Holevo Fidelity: FH(ρ,σ)=(Tr[ρσ])2F_H(\rho,\sigma) = (\text{Tr}[\sqrt{\rho}\sqrt{\sigma}])^2
  • Geometric Rényi Divergence: D^α(ρσ)\hat{D}_\alpha(\rho\|\sigma)
  • Petz-Rényi Divergence: Dα(ρσ)D_\alpha(\rho\|\sigma)

2. Chain Rule and Data Processing Inequality

Utilizing the chain rule for geometric Rényi divergence: F^(N(ρ),M(σ))F^(N,M)F^(ρ,σ)\hat{F}(\mathcal{N}(\rho),\mathcal{M}(\sigma)) \geq \hat{F}(\mathcal{N},\mathcal{M})\hat{F}(\rho,\sigma)

3. Adaptive Strategy Analysis

Considering the most general adaptive strategies, including:

  • Arbitrary initial state preparation
  • Adaptive operations following each channel use
  • Final quantum measurement

Technical Innovations

  1. Unified Framework: Incorporates different types of channel discrimination problems into a unified query complexity framework
  2. Tight Bounds: Obtains tight upper and lower bounds through improved quantum Chernoff bounds and geometric methods
  3. Optimal Strategies: Proves that for specific cases (such as classical-quantum channels), product strategies are asymptotically optimal without requiring adaptive strategies
  4. Fine-Grained Analysis: Considers the influence of prior probabilities, providing precise characterizations dependent on all parameters

Main Theoretical Results

Theorem 8: Symmetric Binary Channel Discrimination

max{ln(pqε(1ε))lnF^(N,M),1ε(1ε)pq[dF^(N,M)]2}n(p,N,q,M,ε)\max\left\{\frac{\ln\left(\frac{pq}{\varepsilon(1-\varepsilon)}\right)}{-\ln\hat{F}(\mathcal{N},\mathcal{M})}, \frac{1-\frac{\varepsilon(1-\varepsilon)}{pq}}{[d_{\hat{F}}(\mathcal{N},\mathcal{M})]^2}\right\} \leq n^*(p,\mathcal{N},q,\mathcal{M},\varepsilon)

n(p,N,q,M,ε)infs[0,1]ln(psq1sε)Cs(NM)n^*(p,\mathcal{N},q,\mathcal{M},\varepsilon) \leq \left\lceil\inf_{s\in[0,1]}\frac{\ln\left(\frac{p^s q^{1-s}}{\varepsilon}\right)}{C_s(\mathcal{N}\|\mathcal{M})}\right\rceil

Corollary 10: Tight Characterization for Classical Channels

For classical channels, query complexity satisfies: n(p,N,q,M,ε)=Θ(ln(1/ε)lnF(N,M))n^*(p,\mathcal{N},q,\mathcal{M},\varepsilon) = \Theta\left(\frac{\ln(1/\varepsilon)}{-\ln F(\mathcal{N},\mathcal{M})}\right)

Theorem 13: Improved Characterization

Under conditions p(0,1/2]p \in (0,1/2] and ε(0,p/64)\varepsilon \in (0,p/64): 12λln(p/ε)lnQ^λ(NM)n(p,N,q,M,ε)2λln(p/ε)lnQλ(NM)\left\lceil\frac{1}{2}\frac{\lambda^*\ln(p/\varepsilon)}{-\ln\hat{Q}_{\lambda^*}(\mathcal{N}\|\mathcal{M})}\right\rceil \leq n^*(p,\mathcal{N},q,\mathcal{M},\varepsilon) \leq \left\lceil\frac{2\lambda^*\ln(p/\varepsilon)}{-\ln Q_{\lambda^*}(\mathcal{N}\|\mathcal{M})}\right\rceil

where λ=ln(q/ε)ln(q/ε)+ln(p/ε)\lambda^* = \frac{\ln(q/\varepsilon)}{\ln(q/\varepsilon) + \ln(p/\varepsilon)}.

Experimental Verification and Applications

Complete Resolution of Special Cases

Classical Channels (Corollary 14)

For classical input-output channels, the upper and lower bounds differ only by a constant factor of 4, achieving non-asymptotic optimality.

Classical-Quantum Channels (Corollary 15)

Proves that the product strategy (selecting the optimal input and applying the tensor power strategy) is optimal when the error probability is sufficiently small, without requiring adaptive strategies.

Multi-Channel Discrimination (Theorem 19)

The upper bound scales logarithmically with the number of channels MM: n(S,ε)maxmmˉ2ln(M(M1)pmpmˉ2ε)lnF(Nm,Nmˉ)n^*(\mathcal{S},\varepsilon) \leq \left\lceil\max_{m\neq\bar{m}}\frac{2\ln\left(\frac{M(M-1)\sqrt{p_m}\sqrt{p_{\bar{m}}}}{2\varepsilon}\right)}{-\ln F(\mathcal{N}_m,\mathcal{N}_{\bar{m}})}\right\rceil

Quantum Hypothesis Testing

  • Classical Work: Helstrom-Holevo theorem establishing optimal error probability characterization
  • Asymptotic Analysis: Quantum Chernoff bound and quantum generalizations of Stein's lemma
  • Non-Asymptotic Analysis: Recent work beginning to address sample complexity issues

Quantum Channel Discrimination

  • Comparison of adaptive versus non-adaptive strategies
  • Finite query conditions for perfect discrimination
  • Strong converse theorems and error exponents in the asymptotic regime

Query Complexity

  • Classical concept from theoretical computer science
  • Applications in quantum algorithms (such as unitary discrimination)
  • First systematic application to quantum channel discrimination in this paper

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Theoretical Completeness: Provides a complete query complexity theoretical framework for quantum channel discrimination
  2. Optimality Results: Obtains tight bounds for important special cases, proving optimality of certain strategies
  3. Unified Perspective: Unifies different types of channel discrimination problems under the query complexity framework

Limitations

  1. General Quantum Channels: Gaps remain between upper and lower bounds for general quantum channels
  2. Computational Complexity: Computing certain channel fidelities requires semidefinite programming, potentially presenting computational challenges
  3. Practical Noise: Theoretical results assume ideal quantum operations; practical applications must consider noise and decoherence

Future Directions

  1. Tighter Bounds: Obtaining tighter query complexity bounds for general quantum channels
  2. Algorithm Implementation: Developing efficient algorithms to implement theoretically optimal discrimination strategies
  3. Practical Applications: Applying results to specific problems in quantum learning, quantum algorithms, and quantum communication

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Depth: Provides the first systematic theoretical analysis of query complexity for quantum channel discrimination
  2. Technical Innovation: Skillfully combines multiple tools from quantum information theory, such as geometric fidelity and Rényi divergence
  3. Completeness: Covers various cases of symmetric, asymmetric, and multi-channel discrimination
  4. Precision: Provides tight characterizations for important special cases, with constants precise to a factor of 4

Weaknesses

  1. Generality: Bounds for general quantum channels remain insufficiently tight
  2. Practicality: Practical application value of certain theoretical results awaits verification
  3. Computation: Practical implementation of optimal strategies may face computational complexity challenges

Impact

  1. Academic Value: Provides new research directions and tools for quantum information theory
  2. Application Potential: Possesses important application prospects in quantum machine learning and quantum algorithms
  3. Methodology: Demonstrates how to introduce concepts from theoretical computer science into quantum information theory

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Quantum Learning Theory: Theoretical analysis of quantum classifiers and quantum neural networks
  2. Quantum Algorithm Design: Complexity analysis of quantum algorithms requiring channel discrimination
  3. Quantum Communication: Applications in quantum channel capacity and coding theory

References

The paper cites important literature in quantum information theory, including:

  • Classical quantum hypothesis testing work by Helstrom and Holevo
  • Quantum Chernoff bounds and related non-asymptotic analysis
  • Recent progress in quantum channel discrimination
  • Theoretical development of quantum fidelity and divergence

This paper provides a comprehensive query complexity theoretical framework for quantum channel discrimination, achieving high standards in both theoretical completeness and technical depth, and possesses significant value for quantum information theory and related application domains.