2025-11-22T17:43:16.329386

Tangency counting for well-spaced circles

Maldague, Ortiz
In the late 90's, Tom Wolff introduced the circle tangency counting problem in his expository article on the Kakeya conjecture. For collections of well-spaced circles, we break the $N^{3/2}$-barrier, proving that a set of $N$ well-spaced circles has at most $N^{25/18+\varepsilon}$ sites of internal tangency. The circle tangency problem can be related to a problem about incidences between points in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and light rays. For this problem, we introduce a stopping time argument to extract maximal information about well-spaced points from a refined decoupling theorem for the light cone in $\mathbb{R}^3$, leading to sharp bounds on the number of $μ$-rich tangency rectangles.
academic

Tangency counting for well-spaced circles

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2504.14118
  • Title: Tangency counting for well-spaced circles
  • Authors: Dominique Maldague (University of Cambridge & UCLA), Alexander Ortiz (Rice University)
  • Classification: math.CA (Classical Analysis and ODEs)
  • Publication Date: October 14, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14118

Abstract

In the late 1990s, Tom Wolff introduced the circle tangency counting problem in his expository article on the Kakeya conjecture. For sets of well-spaced circles, this paper breaks through the N3/2N^{3/2} barrier, proving that a set consisting of NN well-spaced circles has at most N25/18+εN^{25/18+\varepsilon} tangency points. The circle tangency problem can be related to incidence problems between points and rays in R3\mathbb{R}^3. To this end, the authors introduce a stopping-time argument to extract maximal information about well-spaced points from a refined decoupling theorem for light cones in R3\mathbb{R}^3, thereby obtaining sharp bounds on the number of μ\mu-rich tangency rectangles.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Circle Tangency Counting Problem: This problem was introduced by Tom Wolff in 1999, asking for an estimate of the number of pairs of internally tangent circles in a set of NN circles in the plane, where no three circles are tangent at the same point.
  2. Connection to the Unit Distance Problem: This problem is a cousin of the famous Erdős unit distance problem in R3\mathbb{R}^3. By mapping circles (z,r)(z,r) to points in R3\mathbb{R}^3, the tangency condition transforms into the quadratic constraint zz2=rr2|z-z'|^2 = |r-r'|^2.
  3. Historical Bounds:
    • Traditional methods (cellular partitioning) yield Oε(N3/2+ε)O_\varepsilon(N^{3/2+\varepsilon}) bounds
    • Ellenberg-Solymosi-Zahl improved this to O(N3/2)O(N^{3/2})
    • For the unit distance problem, Zahl obtained Oε(N295/197+ε)O_\varepsilon(N^{295/197+\varepsilon})

Research Motivation

  1. Breaking the 3/23/2 Barrier: The N3/2N^{3/2} bound has been difficult to improve for a long time; this paper is the first to break this barrier in the case of well-spaced circles.
  2. Theoretical Importance: This problem is closely related to important geometric measure theory problems such as the Kakeya conjecture and the dimension of Besicovitch-Robinson-Kaufman sets.
  3. Methodological Innovation: Introduction of new Fourier analysis techniques, particularly refined decoupling theory and stopping-time algorithms.

Core Contributions

  1. Breakthrough Bound: For well-spaced circles, proves an upper bound of N25/18+εN^{25/18+\varepsilon}, breaking through the N3/2N^{3/2} barrier for the first time.
  2. New Technical Framework:
    • Introduction of stopping-time algorithm to extract frequency information
    • Development of refined decoupling theorem for light cones
    • Establishment of duality between tangency rectangles and lightplanks
  3. Sharpness Results: Construction of random examples proving that the main results are sharp in a certain sense.
  4. Optimal Bounds for Continuous Version: For the μ\mu-rich tangency rectangle problem, obtains the sharp estimate μ4/3Rμ,τAεX4/3+ε\mu^{4/3}|R_{\mu,\tau}| \leq A_\varepsilon|X|^{4/3+\varepsilon}.

Detailed Methodology

Problem Formulation

Problem 1 (Discrete Tangency Counting): Given a set C\mathcal{C} of NN circles in the plane such that no three circles are tangent at the same point, estimate the cardinality of the set of internally tangent circle pairs: Tpair(C)={(C,C)C2:C,C are internally tangent}T_{\text{pair}}(\mathcal{C}) = \{(C,C') \in \mathcal{C}^2 : C,C' \text{ are internally tangent}\}

Problem 2 (Tangency Point Counting): Estimate the cardinality of the set of tangency points: T(C)={zR2:at least two circles are tangent at z}T(\mathcal{C}) = \{z \in \mathbb{R}^2 : \text{at least two circles are tangent at } z\}

Well-spaced Condition

Definition 1.1: If QRnQ \subset \mathbb{R}^n is a unit cube, then a subset XQX \subset Q is well-spaced if and only if XX is ρ\rho-separated (for some ρ(0,1)\rho \in (0,1)) and XX is maximal with respect to this property. In particular, cnρnXCnρnc_n\rho^{-n} \leq |X| \leq C_n\rho^{-n}.

Core Technical Framework

1. Lifting Procedure

Maps circle center-radius pairs (z,r)(z,r) to points in R3\mathbb{R}^3, where the tangency condition zz2=rr2|z-z'|^2 = |r-r'|^2 is equivalent to two points lying on the same ray.

2. Lightplank Duality

  • Tangency Rectangles: δ×δ\delta \times \sqrt{\delta} rectangles Ω\Omega
  • Lightplanks: Corresponding 1×δ×δ\sim 1 \times \sqrt{\delta} \times \delta light cone slabs
  • μ\mu-rich Property: The CδC\delta-neighborhood of a lightplank contains at least μ\mu points

3. Stopping-time Algorithm

For a function f=PPμφPf = \sum_{P \in P_\mu} \varphi_P (where φP\varphi_P is a smooth approximation of the lightplank PP), define multi-scale averages:

Akf:=θfθω~0,θω~1,θω~k,θA_k f := \sum_\theta f_\theta * \tilde{\omega}_{0,\theta} * \tilde{\omega}_{1,\theta} * \cdots * \tilde{\omega}_{k,\theta}

Stopping-time Rule: Define k(x)k(x) as the smallest kk such that Ak1f(x)>RδAkf(x)A_{k-1}f(x) > R^\delta A_k f(x)

4. Refined Decoupling Theorem

Theorem 3.1 (Refined Decoupling for Light Cones): For each ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists CεC_\varepsilon such that for Schwartz functions gθg_\theta with Fourier support in θ\theta:

UβBRθgθ6CεRεβ2θR3gθ2\int_{U_\beta \cap B_R} \left|\sum_\theta g_\theta\right|^6 \leq C_\varepsilon R^\varepsilon \beta^2 \sum_\theta \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |g_\theta|^2

where Uβ:={xR3:βθgθ(x)2wM,θ2β}U_\beta := \{x \in \mathbb{R}^3 : \beta \leq \sum_\theta |g_\theta(x)|^2 * w_{M,\theta} \leq 2\beta\}.

Main Proof Strategy

  1. High-Low Frequency Analysis: Decompose the function ff by frequency, applying different estimation techniques to different frequency ranges.
  2. Stopping-time Analysis: Use the stopping-time algorithm to determine the dominant frequency components near each point xXx \in X.
  3. Local Constancy Property: Utilize the property that HkfH_k f is approximately constant on ρk1\rho_{k-1}-balls.
  4. Refined Decoupling Application: Apply the refined decoupling theorem within the determined frequency ranges.

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

This is primarily a theoretical work, with results verified through rigorous mathematical proofs rather than numerical experiments.

Sharpness Construction

Theorem 4.1: Constructs random well-spaced sets to prove the sharpness of the main results. For RερR1/2R^\varepsilon \leq \rho \leq R^{1/2}, with probability at least 0.9, there exists a random set X[0,R]3X \subset [0,R]^3 satisfying:

  • XR3+ερ3|X| \sim R^{3+\varepsilon}\rho^{-3}
  • Each ρ\rho-cube contains at most RεR^\varepsilon points
  • Each lightplank contains R3/2+ερ3\sim R^{3/2+\varepsilon}\rho^{-3} points

Experimental Results

Main Results

Theorem 1.1: For a well-spaced set X[0,1]2×[1,2]X \subset [0,1]^2 \times [1,2] and corresponding circle set CX\mathcal{C}_X: Tpair(CX)AεX25/18+ε|T_{\text{pair}}(\mathcal{C}_X)| \leq A_\varepsilon |X|^{25/18+\varepsilon}

Theorem 1.2 (Continuous Version): For well-spaced XX and μ1\mu \geq 1, τ[X1/3,1)\tau \in [|X|^{-1/3}, 1): μ4/3Rμ,τAεX4/3+ε\mu^{4/3}|R_{\mu,\tau}| \leq A_\varepsilon |X|^{4/3+\varepsilon}

Comparison with Existing Results

  • Traditional Bound: O(N3/2)O(N^{3/2})
  • This Paper's Bound: O(N25/18+ε)=O(N1.388...+ε)O(N^{25/18+\varepsilon}) = O(N^{1.388...+\varepsilon})
  • Improvement: Exponent reduced from 1.51.5 to approximately 1.3881.388

Sharpness Verification

The main results are shown to be essentially optimal for well-spaced configurations through probabilistic constructions.

Historical Development

  1. Wolff (1999): Introduced the problem, gave Oε(N3/2+ε)O_\varepsilon(N^{3/2+\varepsilon}) bounds
  2. Ellenberg-Solymosi-Zahl (2016): Improved to O(N3/2)O(N^{3/2})
  3. Zahl (2019): Obtained Oε(N295/197+ε)O_\varepsilon(N^{295/197+\varepsilon}) for the unit distance problem
  1. Cellular Partitioning: Traditional combinatorial geometry methods
  2. Polynomial Partitioning: Algebraic geometry methods
  3. Decoupling Theory: Orthogonality measurements in Fourier analysis

Application Areas

  1. Kakeya Conjecture: Related to geometric measure theory of direction sets
  2. Restriction Theory: Fundamental problems in harmonic analysis
  3. Geometric Incidence Theory: Study of incidences among geometric objects

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. First breakthrough of the N3/2N^{3/2} barrier for circle tangency counting in the well-spaced setting
  2. Establishment of a new technical framework combining stopping-time algorithms and refined decoupling theory
  3. Obtainment of sharp bounds for the continuous version of the problem

Limitations

  1. Well-spaced Restriction: Results apply only to well-spaced circle sets
  2. Technical Limitations: Cases with τ(0,X1/3)\tau \in (0, |X|^{-1/3}) require new ideas
  3. General Case: The N3/2N^{3/2} bound remains unbroken for arbitrary circle sets

Future Directions

  1. Extending Scope: Generalize results to more general circle sets
  2. Improving Bounds: Further reduce the exponent, approaching the conjectured N4/3N^{4/3}
  3. Related Problems: Apply techniques to other geometric incidence problems

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Major Breakthrough: First breakthrough of the long-standing N3/2N^{3/2} barrier in the field
  2. Technical Innovation:
    • Introduction of stopping-time algorithm demonstrates application of probabilistic ideas in harmonic analysis
    • Development of refined decoupling theory advances restriction theory
    • Sophisticated application of high-low frequency analysis
  3. Theoretical Depth: Proof techniques are complex and insightful
  4. Sharpness: Construction of examples proves results are essentially optimal

Weaknesses

  1. Limited Applicability: Applies only to well-spaced configurations
  2. Technical Complexity: Extremely complex proofs may limit generalizability of methods
  3. Practical Applications: Primarily theoretical results; practical applications remain to be explored

Impact

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new technical tools for geometric incidence theory
  2. Methodological Value: The combination of stopping-time algorithms and refined decoupling may apply to other problems
  3. Inspirational Significance: Provides insights for breaking other long-standing bounds

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Theoretical Research: Geometric measure theory, harmonic analysis, combinatorial geometry
  2. Related Problems: Unit distance problem, Kakeya conjecture, restriction problems
  3. Technical Generalization: Other problems requiring refined frequency analysis

References

This paper cites important literature in the field, including:

  • Wolff's foundational work 21, 22
  • Improvements by Ellenberg-Solymosi-Zahl 7
  • Zahl's breakthrough on the unit distance problem 23
  • Bourgain-Demeter's decoupling theory 2
  • Related geometric incidence theory literature 4, 10, 11, 14

This paper represents significant progress in geometric incidence theory, breaking through a long-standing barrier through innovative techniques and laying the foundation for further development in the field.