Deep Learning for Sports Video Event Detection: Tasks, Datasets, Methods, and Challenges

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2505.03991
• Title: Deep Learning for Sports Video Event Detection: Tasks, Datasets, Methods, and Challenges
• Authors: Hao Xu, Arbind Agrahari Baniya, Sam Wells, Mohamed Reda Bouadjenek, Richard Dazeley, Sunil Aryal
• Classification: cs.CV
• Publication Date/Venue: October 2025 (ACM Journal)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03991

Abstract

Sports video event detection has become a cornerstone of modern sports analytics, enabling automated performance evaluation, content generation, and tactical decision-making. Recent advances in deep learning have driven the development of related tasks, including Temporal Action Localization (TAL), Action Spotting (AS), and Precise Event Spotting (PES). Although these tasks are closely related, their subtle differences often blur the boundaries between them, creating confusion in research and practical applications. This survey addresses these gaps by clearly delineating TAL, AS, and PES and their respective use cases, introducing a structured taxonomy of recent methodological approaches for AS and PES, and critically evaluating benchmark datasets and evaluation protocols. It provides a comprehensive foundation for developing temporally precise, generalizable, and practical sports event detection systems.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

Sports video event detection faces three core challenges:

1. Blurred Task Boundaries: Subtle differences between TAL, AS, and PES lead to confusion in research and applications
2. Temporal Precision Requirements: Sports events typically require frame-level accuracy, which traditional methods often fail to achieve
3. Practical Application Gap: Existing research predominantly focuses on elite competitions, neglecting the needs of everyday practitioners

Importance Analysis

• Economic Value: The sports market is projected to reach $826 billion by 2030, with a compound annual growth rate of 6.6%
• Technical Demands: Urgent need for automated performance analysis, tactical decision-making, and content generation
• Broad Applications: Coverage spans from professional competitions to amateur matches, serving a diverse user base

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Evaluation Metric Issues: Existing mAP@δ metrics allow multi-label predictions, which do not align with practical application requirements
2. Dataset Limitations: Over-reliance on broadcast-quality videos with insufficient real-world scenario data
3. Poor Generalization: Limited cross-sport generalization capabilities

Core Contributions

1. Task Definition and Differentiation: Systematically defines and distinguishes three tasks—TAL, AS, and PES—clarifying their respective objectives, annotation schemes, and application scenarios
2. Methodological Classification Framework: Proposes a structured taxonomy of deep learning methods, including temporal modeling, multimodal fusion, and data-efficient learning
3. Survey of Datasets and Evaluation Protocols: Comprehensively summarizes benchmark datasets and critically analyzes the limitations of evaluation metrics
4. Practical Guidance: Identifies open challenges and proposes future research directions to bridge the gap between academic research and practical applications

Detailed Methods

Task Definitions

Temporal Action Localization (TAL)

• Output Type: Temporal intervals
• Annotation Format: Start and end timestamps
• Tolerance Window: ~1-5 seconds
• Application Scenarios: Long-duration, continuous actions (e.g., complete tennis serve sequence)

Action Spotting (AS)

• Output Type: Single keyframe
• Annotation Format: Single timestamp
• Tolerance Window: 5-60 frames
• Application Scenarios: Ambiguous, fast-paced actions (e.g., soccer passes and shots)

Precise Event Spotting (PES)

• Output Type: Single keyframe
• Annotation Format: Single timestamp
• Tolerance Window: 0-2 frames
• Application Scenarios: Critical events requiring frame-level precision (e.g., table tennis ball contact moment)

Model Architecture Classification

1. Temporal Modeling Methods

Pooling Methods:

• Employ sliding window strategies to segment videos into fixed-length clips
• Use average pooling, NetVLAD, NetVLAD++, and other aggregation techniques for temporal features
• Advantages: Simple implementation, computationally efficient
• Disadvantages: Loss of sequential information, limited frame-level precision

Encoder Methods:

• Utilize 1D CNN, 3D CNN, RNN, Transformer, and other sequence models
• Preserve temporal dimensions, supporting frame-level predictions
• Representative Methods: SpotFormer, STE, RMS-Net
• Advantages: Richer contextual modeling capabilities

Frame-Aware Methods:

• Directly modify backbone architectures to enhance spatiotemporal representations
• Introduce frame-specific mechanisms to maintain complete temporal dimensions
• Representative Methods: E2E-Spot, UGL, T-DEED, ASTRM
• Innovation: End-to-end training with true frame-level classification

2. Multimodal Fusion Methods

• Integrate visual, audio, textual, and other modalities
• Representative Method: ASTRA (Transformer-based cross-modal attention)
• Challenges: Unstable audio quality and severe noise interference

3. Data-Efficient Learning Methods

• Active Learning: Selective annotation of the most informative samples
• Self-Supervised Learning: COMEDIAN combining SSL and knowledge distillation
• Objective: Reduce dependence on large-scale annotated data

Experimental Setup

Dataset Overview

Soccer Datasets

• SoccerNet-v1: 500 matches, 764 hours, 3 event categories
• SoccerNet-v2: Extended to 17 event categories with single-timestamp annotations
• SoccerNet Ball AS: Focuses on fine-grained ball interactions, 12 ball-related categories

Racquet Sports Datasets

• Tennis: 3,345 video clips, 6 categories
• OpenTTGames: 12 high-definition table tennis matches, 120 FPS
• TTA: 39 semi-professional table tennis matches, 8 event categories
• P2A: 2,721 table tennis videos, 272 hours

Other Sports Datasets

• NCAA: 257 basketball match videos, 14 action categories
• FineGym: 5,374 gymnastics performances, 32 fine-grained action categories
• FineDiving: 300 professional diving videos, 52 key pose transitions

Evaluation Metrics

Traditional Metrics

• mAP@T-IoU: Used for TAL tasks
• mAP@δ: Used for AS and PES tasks

Metric Limitations

Existing mAP@δ metrics have serious problems:

• Allow multiple class predictions per frame
• Inconsistent penalization of contradictory predictions
• Inconsistent handling across evaluation toolkits

Improvement Recommendations

Propose stricter evaluation protocols:

1. Top-1 Filtering: Retain only the highest-scoring class per frame
2. Threshold Scanning: Track PR curves through confidence threshold variation
3. Over-prediction Penalty: Better alignment with actual deployment requirements

Experimental Results

Performance Comparison (SoccerNet Dataset)

Key Findings

1. Frame-Aware Methods demonstrate superior performance, achieving true frame-level classification
2. Data-Efficient Methods show promise in reducing annotation requirements
3. Multimodal Fusion provides significant improvements in specific scenarios
4. Cross-Dataset Generalization remains a major challenge

Related Work

Limitations of Previous Surveys

• Ghosh et al.: Broad coverage of sports AI but not focused on deep learning CV methods
• Thomas et al.: Primarily addresses traditional CV methods and multi-camera systems
• Hu et al.: Detailed coverage of TAL but does not encompass AS and PES

Unique Contributions of This Work

• Specifically targets deep learning methods in monocular video
• Systematically distinguishes three tasks: TAL, AS, and PES
• Emphasizes practical deployment and non-elite competition needs

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Task Differentiation is Critical: TAL, AS, and PES each have applicable scenarios requiring different technical solutions
2. Frame-Aware Methods are the Trend: Provide necessary temporal precision for PES tasks
3. Evaluation Protocols Need Improvement: Existing metrics cannot accurately reflect real-world application performance
4. Generalization Capability Urgently Needed: Cross-sport adaptability is a key challenge

Limitations

1. Dataset Bias: Over-reliance on professional broadcast videos
2. Inconsistent Evaluation Standards: Variations in mAP calculations across different implementations
3. Practical Application Gap: Mismatch between academic benchmarks and real-world deployment requirements

Future Directions

1. Enhanced Generalization: Develop universal methods applicable across sports
2. Unsupervised Learning: Reduce dependence on large-scale annotations
3. Multimodal Fusion: Better integration of audio, textual, and other information
4. Real-World Data: Construct datasets closer to actual application scenarios

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Comprehensive Coverage: First survey specifically focused on deep learning for sports video event detection
2. Practical Orientation: Addresses not only academic research but also practical application needs
3. Critical Thinking: Objectively identifies serious problems with existing evaluation metrics
4. Forward-Looking: Proposes specific and actionable improvement suggestions and research directions

Weaknesses

1. Limited Technical Innovation: Primarily a survey work with relatively limited technical novelty
2. Insufficient Experimental Validation: Lacks experimental verification of proposed evaluation metric improvements
3. Shallow Cross-Domain Analysis: Analysis of differences across sports disciplines could be more in-depth

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides important reference framework for researchers in the field
2. Practical Value: Helps industry understand current technology status and application prospects
3. Standardization Promotion: May drive standardization improvements in evaluation protocols

Applicable Scenarios

• Sports video analysis system development
• Automated sports content generation
• Athlete performance analysis
• Sports broadcasting intelligence

References

This paper cites 98 relevant references covering important works in sports video analysis, deep learning, computer vision, and other related domains, providing readers with a comprehensive literature foundation.

Summary: This is a high-quality survey paper that systematically reviews the current state of development in sports video event detection, particularly regarding the application of deep learning methods. The paper's main contributions lie in clearly distinguishing different task types, proposing a structured methodological taxonomy, and critically analyzing problems with existing evaluation protocols. While relatively limited in technical innovation, its guidance value for field development and attention to practical applications make it an important reference for the field.