Comparison of Integral Equations Used to Study $T_{cc}^+$ for a Stable $D^*$

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2505.05466
• Title: Comparison of Integral Equations Used to Study $T_{cc}^+$ for a Stable $D^*$
• Authors: Sebastian M. Dawid, Fernando Romero-López, Stephen R. Sharpe
• Classification: nucl-th hep-lat hep-ph
• Publication Date: May 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05466

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed comparison of three theoretical approaches for studying the properties of the doubly-charmed tetraquark state $T_{cc}^+(3875)$: the three-particle relativistic field theory (RFT) formalism, the two-body Lippmann-Schwinger (LS) equation combined with chiral effective field theory potentials, and the two-particle relativistic framework (BRH method) proposed by Baião Raposo and Hansen. Within a simplified single-channel framework, the authors derive the conditions under which the infinite-volume integral equations of the RFT and BRH methods reduce to the LS form, and demonstrate through numerical examples that the differences between these methods can be substantially eliminated by adjusting short-range coupling parameters.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem to be Addressed: $T_{cc}^+(3875)$ is a doubly-charmed tetraquark state discovered by the LHCb experiment. Understanding its properties requires an accurate description of $DD^*$ scattering processes. In lattice QCD calculations at unphysical quark masses where the $D^*$ meson is stable, the left-hand cut (LHC) problem arises from single-pion exchange.
2. Significance of the Problem: As an exotic hadronic state, $T_{cc}^+$ is crucial for understanding the structure of multiquark states in QCD. An accurate theoretical framework is essential for extracting physical information from lattice QCD results and understanding experimental observations.
3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
   • The traditional two-particle Lüscher method fails near the LHC
   • The relationships and consistency between different theoretical methods remain unclear
   • Systematic method comparison is lacking
4. Research Motivation: To establish connections between different theoretical frameworks, verify their equivalence under specific conditions, and provide guidance for selecting appropriate theoretical methods.

Core Contributions

1. Proof of Theoretical Equivalence: Demonstrates the equivalence of the three methods in the non-relativistic limit and pole-dominance approximation
2. Systematic Comparison Framework: Establishes a detailed comparison framework for the RFT, LS, and BRH methods
3. Derivation of Matching Conditions: Derives the matching relationships for short-range parameters between different methods
4. Numerical Verification: Validates theoretical predictions through concrete numerical calculations
5. Technical Problem Resolution: Addresses technical issues with cutoff functions in the RFT method

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Study $DD^*$ scattering under stable $D^*$ conditions by comparing three theoretical methods:

• Inputs: Scattering parameters, masses, coupling constants
• Outputs: Scattering amplitudes, phase shifts, pole positions
• Constraints: S-matrix unitarity, Lorentz invariance

Model Architecture

1. Three-Particle RFT Method

The three-particle amplitude is decomposed as: $M_3 = D + M_{\text{df},3}$

where the ladder amplitude $D$ satisfies the integral equation: $D = -M_2 GM_2 - M_2 GD$

and the divergence-free amplitude: $M_{\text{df},3} = L T R$

2. Lippmann-Schwinger Method

The LS equation takes the form: $T(p',p;E) = V(p',p;E) + \int_0^Λ \frac{d^3q}{(2π)^3} V(p',q;E) G(q;E) T(q,p;E)$

The potential includes single-pion exchange and contact terms: $V(p',p;E) = V_π(p',p;E) + V_{\text{CT}}(p',p)$

3. BRH Method

The main equation: $M^{\text{BRH}}_{\text{DD}^*} = M^E + ΔM$

where $M^E$ satisfies a Bethe-Salpeter-like equation and $ΔM$ includes short-range interactions.

Technical Innovations

1. Non-relativistic Reduction: Systematically reduces relativistic equations to non-relativistic form
2. Pole-Dominance Approximation: Separates pole contributions from background terms in the $Dπ$ amplitude
3. Matching Conditions: Establishes precise parameter correspondence between different methods
4. Improved Cutoff Function: Proposes a "bump" cutoff function to resolve technical issues

Experimental Setup

Parameter Selection

Uses non-physical masses close to lattice QCD calculations:

• $m_D = 1927$ MeV
• $m_{D^*} = 2049$ MeV
• $m_π = 280$ MeV
• Cutoff parameter: $Λ = 500$ MeV

Evaluation Metrics

1. Phase Shift Comparison: $p_0 \cot δ/m_D$ as a function of energy
2. Pole Positions: $T_{cc}^+$ poles in the complex energy plane
3. Amplitude Matching: Scattering amplitudes from different methods

Comparison Methods

• RFT fully relativistic calculations
• LS non-relativistic equations
• BRH relativistic two-body method
• Simplified versions under various approximations

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Theoretical Matching: The three methods are in complete agreement under non-relativistic and pole-dominance approximations
2. Numerical Comparison: Using parameters determined by matching conditions, the three methods yield similar results across the entire energy range
3. Pole Positions: The $T_{cc}^+$ pole positions predicted by the three methods are highly consistent (see Table 1)

Matching Relations

Parameter matching from RFT to LS: $c_0 m_D^2 = -\frac{a_1(K_3^E m_D^2)}{1 - a_2(K_3^E m_D^2)}$

where $a_1 = 2.927 × 10^{-4}$ and $a_2 = 8.224 × 10^{-8}$

Technical Findings

1. Cutoff Function Effects: Smooth cutoff functions show significant suppression at the $D^*$ pole
2. Relativistic Corrections: Relativistic effects become important at high energies
3. Background Term Influence: Non-pole contributions can be partially absorbed through redefinition of coupling constants

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Lattice QCD Studies: Direct calculations of $DD^*$ scattering and $T_{cc}^+$ properties
2. Chiral Perturbation Theory: Effective field theory descriptions of hadronic interactions
3. Three-Body Formalism: Theoretical methods for handling $DDπ$ three-body systems
4. Finite-Volume Methods: Extracting scattering information from finite-volume spectra

Advantages of This Work

1. Systematic Comparison: First detailed comparison of three major theoretical methods
2. Precise Matching: Establishes quantitative relationships between methods
3. Technical Improvements: Resolves practical issues in the RFT method

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Under appropriate approximations, the three methods are theoretically equivalent
2. Numerical differences can be essentially eliminated by adjusting short-range parameters
3. Method selection should depend on specific application requirements and computational resources

Limitations

1. Approximation Conditions: Equivalence requires non-relativistic and pole-dominance approximations
2. Single-Channel Restriction: Comparison is limited to simplified single-channel cases
3. Parameter Adjustment: Complete matching requires manual parameter tuning

Future Directions

1. Finite-Volume Comparison: Extension to comparison of finite-volume quantization conditions
2. Multi-Channel Coupling: Complete analysis including additional scattering channels
3. Physical Masses: Extrapolation studies toward physical quark masses

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Detailed mathematical derivations with explicit approximation conditions
2. Practical Value: Provides clear guidance for method selection
3. Technical Contributions: Resolves technical issues in practical calculations
4. Numerical Verification: Theoretical predictions are well-supported by numerical evidence

Weaknesses

1. Approximation Limitations: Equivalence depends on specific approximations that may not hold in practical applications
2. Parameter Sensitivity: Matching quality is sensitive to parameter choices
3. Physical Insight: Lacks in-depth discussion of physical differences between methods

Impact

1. Theoretical Unification: Promotes unified understanding of different theoretical methods
2. Practical Application: Provides method selection guidance for lattice QCD data analysis
3. Technical Advancement: Advances the development of many-body scattering theory

Applicable Scenarios

1. Lattice QCD Analysis: Extracting scattering parameters from finite-volume spectra
2. Hadron Spectroscopy: Understanding properties of exotic hadronic states
3. Method Development: Developing new theoretical calculation methods

References

This paper cites important literature in the field, including:

• LHCb experimental papers on $T_{cc}^+$ discovery
• RFT formalism for three-body scattering
• Applications of chiral effective field theory in hadron physics
• Relevant lattice QCD calculation results

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical physics paper that systematically compares different theoretical methods for studying $T_{cc}^+$, making important contributions to theoretical development in this field. The paper features rigorous theoretical analysis, sufficient numerical verification, and provides important guidance for practical applications.