2025-11-23T01:25:16.631034

Pressure-induced trans-proximate correlation in La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$ and possible routes to enhance its superconductivity

Jiang, Fan, Monserrat et al.
We report an unexpected trans-proximate interlayer correlation (stronger correlation between disjoint layers than the adjacent ones) in the high-pressure phase of the recently discovered La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$ superconductors. Accompanied by an unusual pressure-induced fractionalization of Ni$^{2+}$ ionic spin from the standard spin-1 to spin-$\frac{1}{2}$, this trans-proximate correlation results from the emergence of a cross-layer trimer in our multi-energy-scale derivation of the electron dynamics. The resulting low-energy effective description resembles that of the cuprates and suggests a universal superconducting mechanism in all existing nickelate and cuprate superconductors. The rare trans-proximate correlation not only explains the weaker superconductivity in comparison with the related La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ samples, but it also indicates a viable strategy to improve superconductivity in this trilayer nickelate by lowering layer symmetry. Such pressure-induced trans-proximate correlation is expected in many materials and examplifies the engineering of rich uncharted quantum states of matter through pressure.
academic

Pressure-induced trans-proximate correlation in La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10} and possible routes to enhance its superconductivity

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2505.13442
  • Title: Pressure-induced trans-proximate correlation in La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10} and possible routes to enhance its superconductivity
  • Authors: Ruoshi Jiang, Zhiyu Fan, Bartomeu Monserrat, Wei Ku
  • Affiliations: University of Cambridge; Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Classification: cond-mat.supr-con (superconductivity), cond-mat.str-el (strongly correlated electron systems)
  • Publication Date: May 2025 (arXiv v3: October 27, 2025)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13442

Abstract

This paper reports an unexpected "trans-proximate" inter-layer correlation phenomenon in the high-pressure phase of the recently discovered La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10} superconductor—correlations between non-adjacent layers are stronger than between adjacent layers. Accompanying the pressure-induced fractionalization of Ni2+^{2+} ion spins from the standard spin-1 to spin-1/2, this trans-proximate correlation originates from cross-layer trimers that emerge in the multi-scale electronic dynamics derivation. The resulting low-energy effective description resembles that of cuprate superconductors, suggesting a possible unified superconducting mechanism between nickelate and cuprate superconductors. This rare trans-proximate correlation not only explains the weaker superconductivity compared to La3_3Ni2_2O7_7 samples but also points to feasible strategies for enhancing superconductivity in trilayer nickelates through symmetry reduction.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Problem

The core question addressed in this paper is: What is the microscopic mechanism of the superconducting phenomenon appearing in the trilayer nickelate La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10} under high pressure, and why is its superconducting transition temperature (~30 K) significantly lower than that of bilayer La3_3Ni2_2O7_7 (~80 K)?

Importance of the Problem

  1. Novel High-Temperature Superconductor System: La3_3Ni2_2O7_7 exhibits a superconducting transition temperature of 80 K above 14 GPa pressure, opening a new chapter in nickelate superconductivity research. The subsequently discovered La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10} shows ~30 K superconductivity under 14-20 GPa pressure, providing an important comparative system for understanding pressure-induced superconductivity.
  2. Unconventional Electronic States: Unlike chemically doped single-layer nickelates (containing spin-1/2 Ni+^+), these materials feature nominally spin-1 Ni2+^{2+} ion configurations, developing high-temperature superconductivity only in the high-pressure phase through ion spin fractionalization.
  3. Pressure-Tuned Quantum States: Pressure can qualitatively alter material electronic correlations, providing an ideal pathway for exploring unknown quantum phases.

Limitations of Existing Methods

  • Existing studies primarily focus on band structure and simple orbital analysis
  • Lack of systematic multi-scale analysis of how pressure qualitatively changes low-energy electronic structure
  • Failure to explain the microscopic mechanism underlying the superconductivity difference between trilayer and bilayer nickelates

Research Motivation

Through multi-scale numerical canonical transformation methods, this work systematically investigates pressure effects on electronic correlations in La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10}, particularly:

  1. Identifying qualitative physical changes induced by pressure
  2. Understanding the special nature of inter-layer correlations
  3. Proposing feasible strategies to enhance superconductivity

Core Contributions

  1. Discovery of Rare "Trans-Proximate" Inter-Layer Correlation: In the high-pressure phase, magnetic correlations between non-adjacent outer layers are stronger than between them and the adjacent middle layer, an extremely rare physical phenomenon.
  2. Revelation of Pressure-Induced Spin Fractionalization Mechanism: Through multi-scale analysis, the formation of cross-layer trimers composing spins under high pressure is found to fractionate the effective spin of Ni2+^{2+} ions from 1 to 1/2.
  3. Explanation of Superconductivity Performance Difference: Trans-proximate correlation suppresses spin fluctuations in outer layers, limiting carrier dynamics and thereby explaining the weaker superconductivity of La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10} compared to La3_3Ni2_2O7_7.
  4. Proposal of Superconductivity Enhancement Strategy: Suggests promoting dimerization through reducing trilayer symmetry (e.g., introducing oxygen vacancies or forming superlattice structures) to enhance superconducting phase stiffness. This prediction is consistent with the recently discovered La5_5Ni3_3O11_{11} (Tc_c ~ 64 K) experimental results.
  5. Unified Theoretical Framework: The low-energy effective physics resembles that of cuprate superconductors, suggesting that nickelates and cuprates may share a unified superconducting mechanism.

Detailed Methodology

Multi-Scale Theoretical Framework

This paper employs a systematic multi-scale approach, progressively deriving effective Hamiltonians from high to low energy:

Hartree scale → eV scale → sub-eV scale

This method systematically integrates out high-energy degrees of freedom through numerical canonical transformation to obtain low-energy effective theory.

Hartree Scale Analysis (Charge Distribution)

1. DFT+U Calculations

  • Full-electron density functional theory implementation using WIEN2K code
  • LDA+U formalism with U = 6 eV for Ni-d orbitals
  • Single-particle spectral functions considering Curie paramagnetic phase (disordered magnetic moments)

2. Wannier Function Method

  • Construction of symmetry-preserving Wannier function basis sets
  • Extraction of effective interaction Hamiltonian H(Hartree)^{(\text{Hartree})}

3. Key Findings

From Figure 1 and Table I:

  • Carrier Localization: Only in-plane oxygen O_\parallel-p orbital bands cross the Fermi level; carriers are holes
  • Ni Ion Configuration: Ni-d bands display Ni2+^{2+}-d8^8 configuration (8 occupied states, 2 unoccupied states)
  • Pressure Effect: Low pressure → high pressure, inter-layer hopping parameter tpZ_\perp^{pZ} dramatically increases by 40% from 1.38 eV to 1.94 eV (bold entries in Table I)

Physical Significance: The significant enhancement of tpZ_\perp^{pZ} is the key driver of pressure-induced qualitative changes, but remains far smaller than the charge transfer energy ECT_{CT} ~ 3-4 eV, thus preventing formation of strong Ni-d3z2r2_{3z^2-r^2} inter-layer bonding.

eV Scale Dynamics

Numerical Canonical Transformation

Through numerical methods, doubly-occupied Ni orbital states are integrated out to obtain the effective Hamiltonian in the local |d8^8p6^6d8^8p6^6d8^8⟩ subspace.

eV Scale Effective Hamiltonian H(eV)^{(\text{eV})}

H(eV)=J~H(m)SX(m)SZ(m)J~H(l)(SX(u)SZ(u)+SX(l)SZ(l))+JZZ(SZ(m)SZ(u)+SZ(m)SZ(l))H^{(\text{eV})} = -\tilde{J}_H^{(m)} \mathbf{S}_X^{(m)} \cdot \mathbf{S}_Z^{(m)} - \tilde{J}_H^{(l)} (\mathbf{S}_X^{(u)} \cdot \mathbf{S}_Z^{(u)} + \mathbf{S}_X^{(l)} \cdot \mathbf{S}_Z^{(l)}) + J_{ZZ} (\mathbf{S}_Z^{(m)} \cdot \mathbf{S}_Z^{(u)} + \mathbf{S}_Z^{(m)} \cdot \mathbf{S}_Z^{(l)})

Where:

  • SX\mathbf{S}_X: spin in dx2^2-y2^2 orbital
  • SZ\mathbf{S}_Z: spin in d3z2r2_{3z^2-r^2} orbital
  • J~H\tilde{J}_H: renormalized Hund coupling (~0.6 eV)
  • JZZJ_{ZZ}: inter-layer antiferromagnetic superexchange coupling

Key Phase Transition (Table II)

  • Low Pressure: J~H\tilde{J}_H ~ 0.6 eV > JZZ_{ZZ} ~ 0.4 eV → Hund coupling dominated
  • High Pressure: JZZ_{ZZ} ~ 0.7 eV > J~H\tilde{J}_H ~ 0.6 eV → Superexchange coupling dominated

Physical Significance: The pressure-induced energy scale crossing is the direct signature of qualitative changes in low-energy physics.

Sub-eV Scale Effective Theory

Low-Pressure Phase

Performing numerical canonical transformation again, integrating out singlet states after diagonalizing Hund coupling:

HLP(sub-eV)=J(ml)(Seff(m)Seff(u)+Seff(m)Seff(l))H_{\text{LP}}^{(\text{sub-eV})} = J^{(ml)} (\mathbf{S}_{\text{eff}}^{(m)} \cdot \mathbf{S}_{\text{eff}}^{(u)} + \mathbf{S}_{\text{eff}}^{(m)} \cdot \mathbf{S}_{\text{eff}}^{(l)})

  • Each Ni2+^{2+} ion maintains standard spin-1 effective spin
  • Inter-layer antiferromagnetic coupling J(ml)^{(ml)} ~ 0.11 eV
  • Promotes strong antiferromagnetic order (consistent with experimental observations)

High-Pressure Phase

Superexchange JZZ_{ZZ} dominates, forming 3+1 intrinsic structure separation:

  • Lowest energy doublet: cross-layer trimer composite spin-1/2 S(t)\mathbf{S}^{(t)}
  • Ni2+^{2+} ion effective spin fractionalizes to spin-1/2 Seff\mathbf{S}_{\text{eff}}

HHP(sub-eV)=J(mt)Seff(m)S(t)+J(lt)(Seff(l)S(t)+Seff(u)S(t))+biquadratic termsH_{\text{HP}}^{(\text{sub-eV})} = J^{(mt)} \mathbf{S}_{\text{eff}}^{(m)} \cdot \mathbf{S}^{(t)} + J^{(lt)} (\mathbf{S}_{\text{eff}}^{(l)} \cdot \mathbf{S}^{(t)} + \mathbf{S}_{\text{eff}}^{(u)} \cdot \mathbf{S}^{(t)}) + \text{biquadratic terms}

Key Features:

  • No direct coupling between effective spins Seff\mathbf{S}_{\text{eff}}
  • Coupling only through trimer spin S(t)\mathbf{S}^{(t)} indirectly
  • Coupling of outer layers (u, l) to trimer J(lt)^{(lt)} stronger than middle layer J(mt)^{(mt)}

Physical Origin of Trans-Proximate Correlation

Figures 2 and 3 clearly demonstrate the formation mechanism of this rare phenomenon:

  1. Trimer Quantum Fluctuations: Cross-layer trimers contain intense quantum fluctuations, weakening coupling with the middle layer
  2. Non-Local Correlations: Non-adjacent outer layers establish stronger magnetic correlations through the trimer than adjacent layers
  3. Violation of Convention: Typically correlations are stronger at short range, but here stronger long-range correlations appear

Experimental Setup

Computational Methods

  1. DFT Calculations:
    • Code: WIEN2K (full-electron augmented plane wave method)
    • Functional: LDA+U (U = 6 eV for Ni-d, U = 4 eV for O-p)
    • Hund coupling: JH_H = 0.8 eV
    • Crystal structures: Experimental structures (ambient pressure and 44.3 GPa)
  2. Wannier Functions:
    • Atomic Wannier orbital basis sets
    • Symmetry-preserving construction method
  3. Numerical Canonical Transformation:
    • Completely non-perturbative method
    • Systematically zeroing high-energy-low-energy couplings
    • Verification: low-energy eigensolutions consistent with original Hamiltonian

Parameter Settings

  • Coulomb interactions: Ud_d = 6 eV, Up_p = 4 eV
  • Hund coupling: JH_H = 0.8 eV
  • Charge transfer energy: ECT_{CT} ~ 3 eV
  • Robustness check of U values: conclusions insensitive to U within several eV range

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. Pressure-Induced Parameter Changes (Table I)

ParameterLow Pressure (eV)High Pressure (eV)Change
tpX_\parallel^{pX} (in-plane)1.431.76+23%
tpZ_\perp^{pZ} (inter-layer)1.381.94+40%

Significant enhancement of inter-layer hopping is the key driver.

2. eV Scale Energy Competition (Table II)

PhaseJ~H\tilde{J}_H (eV)JZZ_{ZZ} (eV)Dominant Interaction
Low Pressure0.63< 0.36Hund coupling
High Pressure0.57< 0.66Superexchange

Energy scale crossing leads to qualitative physical changes.

3. Sub-eV Scale Spin Dynamics (Table III)

PhaseEffective SpinInter-Layer CouplingCharacteristic
Low PressureSeff_{\text{eff}} = 1J(ml)^{(ml)} = 0.11 eVStrong AFM correlation
High PressureSeff_{\text{eff}} = 1/2J(lt)^{(lt)} = -0.28 eVTrans-proximate correlation

In the high-pressure phase, correlations between outer layers (J(lt)^{(lt)}) are far stronger than between adjacent layers.

Physical Picture (Figure 2)

Low-Pressure Phase:

  • Ni2+^{2+} ions: standard spin-1
  • Inter-layer: strong antiferromagnetic coupling
  • Promotes magnetic order

High-Pressure Phase:

  • Cross-layer trimer formation (d3z2r2_{3z^2-r^2} orbitals)
  • Ni2+^{2+} ion effective spin fractionalizes to 1/2
  • Trans-proximate correlation: outer-outer > outer-middle

Superconductivity Performance Explanation (Figure 3)

Consequences of Trans-Proximate Correlation

  1. Outer Layer Superconductivity Suppressed: Strong inter-layer spin correlations limit spin fluctuations, weakening carrier dynamics and superconducting phase stiffness
  2. Only Middle Layer Favorable: Only the middle layer experiences weaker inter-layer correlations, allowing stronger superconductivity
  3. Overall Tc_c Reduced: Compared to nearly decoupled bilayer La3_3Ni2_2O7_7, the trans-proximate correlation in La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10} results in weaker superconductivity (~30 K vs ~80 K)

Strategies for Enhancing Superconductivity

Theoretical Prediction: Reducing Trilayer Symmetry

Scheme 1: Oxygen Vacancies (Table III bottom)

  • Introducing oxygen vacancies breaks Ni(u)-Ni(m) coupling
  • Restores near-decoupled spin-1/2 for Ni(m) and Ni(l)
  • Inter-layer coupling J(ml)^{(ml)} reduces from -0.28 eV to 0.08 eV

Scheme 2: Superlattice Structures

  • Splitting trilayer into bilayer + monolayer
  • Coherently reducing trilayer symmetry

Experimental Verification: La5_5Ni3_3O11_{11}

  • Structure: naturally formed monolayer-trilayer superlattice
  • Observation: Tc_c ~ 64 K (significantly higher than La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10}'s ~30 K)
  • Completely consistent with theoretical prediction!

Implications for La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10} Samples

The paper proposes an interesting conjecture: existing La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10} samples showing superconductivity may already possess locally reduced trilayer symmetry, such as:

  • Reported oxygen vacancies
  • Strong fluctuations in apical O-Ni bond lengths observed in La3_3Ni2_2O7_7

Suggests verification through the following experimental techniques:

  • Debye-Waller factors (B factors) in structure refinement
  • Pair distribution function analysis of diffraction
  • Nuclear quadrupole resonance
  • X-ray absorption fine structure
  • Enhanced normal-state dielectric response

Nickelate Superconductor Systems

  1. Single-Layer Nickelates (RNiO2_2, R = Nd, La, etc.)
    • Chemical doping introduces spin-1/2 Ni+^+ ions
    • Similar structure to cuprates
    • Tc_c ~ 10-20 K
  2. Bilayer Nickelates (La3_3Ni2_2O7_7)
    • Pressure-induced superconductivity, Tc_c ~ 80 K
    • Nominally spin-1 Ni2+^{2+} ions
    • Pressure-induced spin fractionalization
  3. Trilayer Nickelates (La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10})
    • Subject of this study
    • Tc_c ~ 30 K
    • Trans-proximate correlation
  4. Superlattice Structures (La5_5Ni3_3O11_{11})
    • Recently discovered, Tc_c ~ 64 K
    • Validates theoretical predictions of this work

Pressure Effect Studies

This work relates to the following research directions:

  • Pressure tuning of cuprates
  • Pressure effects in iron-based superconductors
  • Pressure-induced quantum phase transitions
  • Pressure control of Mott insulators

Theoretical Methods

  1. Multi-Scale Methods:
    • Numerical canonical transformation
    • Completely non-perturbative generalization of Schrieffer-Wolff transformation
    • Systematic derivation of effective Hamiltonians
  2. Comparison with Other Methods:
    • Captures strong correlation effects compared to simple band theory
    • Handles periodic solid systems compared to quantum chemistry methods
    • Completely non-perturbative and numerically exact compared to perturbation theory

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Discovery of Rare Trans-Proximate Correlation: In high-pressure La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10}, correlations between non-adjacent layers are stronger than between adjacent layers, an extremely rare physical phenomenon.
  2. Pressure-Induced Spin Fractionalization: The 40% enhancement of inter-layer hopping tpZ_\perp^{pZ} causes superexchange JZZ_{ZZ} to exceed Hund coupling, forming cross-layer trimers that fractionate Ni2+^{2+} effective spin from 1 to 1/2.
  3. Explanation of Superconductivity Performance Difference: Trans-proximate correlation suppresses outer-layer spin fluctuations, causing La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10}'s Tc_c (~30 K) to be significantly lower than La3_3Ni2_2O7_7 (~80 K).
  4. Proposed Enhancement Strategy: Significantly enhancing superconductivity through reducing trilayer symmetry (oxygen vacancies, superlattices); discovery of La5_5Ni3_3O11_{11} (Tc_c ~ 64 K) validates this prediction.
  5. Unified Superconducting Mechanism: Low-energy effective physics resembles cuprates, suggesting nickelates and cuprates may share a unified d-wave superconducting mechanism.

Limitations

  1. Theoretical Model:
    • Analysis based on local Ni-O-Ni-O-Ni components
    • Does not fully account for quantum effects of long-range carrier fluctuations
    • Discussion of superconducting pairing symmetry relatively qualitative
  2. Parameter Dependence:
    • Although insensitive to U values, still depends on DFT+U framework
    • Truncation errors in numerical canonical transformation not discussed in detail
  3. Experimental Verification:
    • Direct experimental evidence for trans-proximate correlation still needs supplementation
    • Mechanism of oxygen vacancy enhancement of superconductivity needs more experimental verification
    • Quantitative characterization of local structural disorder remains to be developed
  4. Universality:
    • Universality of trans-proximate correlation in other materials awaits exploration
    • Effects of pressure range and structural details require further investigation

Future Directions

  1. Experimental Verification:
    • Local structure probes (PDF, EXAFS, NQR, etc.)
    • Layer-resolved magnetic and superconducting measurements
    • Controlled introduction of oxygen vacancies or structural engineering
  2. Theoretical Extensions:
    • Complete theory including long-range carrier fluctuations
    • Quantitative calculations of superconducting pairing symmetry
    • Comparison with dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) and other methods
  3. Materials Design:
    • Exploration of other multilayer nickelates (n > 3)
    • Chemical substitution to tune inter-layer coupling
    • Heterostructure engineering
  4. Universality Studies:
    • Trans-proximate correlation in other strongly correlated materials
    • General principles of pressure-induced quantum state engineering

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Methodological Innovation:
    • Systematic multi-scale numerical canonical transformation method
    • Completely non-perturbative and numerically exact
    • Clearly reveals physics at different energy scales
  2. Deep Physical Insights:
    • Discovery of rare trans-proximate correlation phenomenon
    • Revelation of microscopic mechanism of pressure-induced spin fractionalization
    • Establishment of unified picture for trilayer and bilayer nickelates
  3. Strong Predictive Power:
    • Theoretical prediction of symmetry reduction strategy to enhance superconductivity
    • Rapidly verified by experimental discovery of La5_5Ni3_3O11_{11}
    • Predictions about sample local structure are testable
  4. Rigorous Logic:
    • Progressive derivation from high to low energy with clear physical picture
    • Explicit numerical values for key parameters at each energy scale
    • Conclusions highly consistent with experimental observations
  5. Writing Quality:
    • Clear structure with beautiful figures and tables
    • Intuitive and accessible physical explanations
    • Comprehensive technical details (extensive supplementary materials)

Shortcomings

  1. Quantitative Accuracy:
    • Effective Hamiltonian parameters show some dependence on DFT+U U value
    • Systematic errors in numerical canonical transformation not discussed in detail
    • Quantitative calculation of superconducting Tc_c not provided
  2. Experimental Comparison:
    • Limited direct experimental evidence for trans-proximate correlation
    • Requires more layer-resolved experimental measurements
    • Quantitative relationship between oxygen vacancy concentration and superconductivity not established
  3. Theoretical Completeness:
    • Discussion of superconducting pairing mechanism relatively qualitative
    • Does not account for contributions from phonons and other degrees of freedom
    • Finite-temperature properties and phase diagram not studied in detail
  4. Universality:
    • Universality of trans-proximate correlation in other materials not sufficiently explored
    • Generalization to higher-layer systems (n > 3) unclear

Impact

  1. Scientific Contribution:
    • Discovery of novel quantum correlation phenomenon (trans-proximate correlation)
    • Revelation of new mechanism for pressure-tuned electronic correlations
    • Provision of unified theoretical framework for nickelate superconductivity
  2. Practical Value:
    • Clear materials design strategies
    • Guidance for experimental sample optimization
    • Predictions rapidly verified, strong practical utility
  3. Methodological Significance:
    • Multi-scale numerical canonical transformation method generalizable to other strongly correlated systems
    • Demonstrates power of combining theory and computation
  4. Field Impact:
    • Advances nickelate superconductivity research to deeper levels
    • Provides new perspective for high-temperature superconductivity mechanism research
    • Stimulates research interest in pressure-induced quantum state engineering

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Material Systems:
    • Multilayer nickelate superconductors
    • Other layered transition metal oxides
    • Strongly correlated electron systems
  2. Research Directions:
    • Pressure-induced phase transitions and superconductivity
    • Multi-scale electronic structure
    • Spin-orbit-charge coupling
  3. Method Applications:
    • Systems requiring systematic treatment of strong correlation effects
    • Materials with coexisting multi-scale physics
    • Pressure-tuned quantum materials

Key References

  1. La3_3Ni2_2O7_7 Superconductivity Discovery:
    • Sun et al., Nature 621, 493 (2023) - Original discovery
    • Zhang et al., Nature Physics 20, 1269 (2024) - Detailed characterization
  2. La4_4Ni3_3O10_{10} Superconductivity:
    • Zhu et al., Nature 631, 531 (2024) - Main experimental work
    • Li et al., Chinese Physics Letters 41, 017401 (2024)
  3. La5_5Ni3_3O11_{11} Verification:
    • Shi et al., arXiv:2502.01018 (2025) - Validates theoretical predictions
  4. Theoretical Methods:
    • Jiang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 126503 (2024) - Prior work on bilayer nickelates
    • Lang et al., Phys. Rev. B 103, L180502 (2021) - Theory of single-layer nickelates
  5. Cuprate Comparison:
    • Zhang & Rice, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3759 (1988) - Classical Zhang-Rice singlet theory

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical physics paper that discovers the rare trans-proximate correlation phenomenon through systematic multi-scale analysis, providing important insights for understanding nickelate superconductivity. The methodology is rigorous, the physical picture is clear, the predictive power is strong, and predictions have been experimentally verified. It has significant importance for advancing high-temperature superconductivity mechanism research and pressure-induced quantum state engineering.