Quantum algorithms for solving a drift-diffusion equation: A complexity analysis

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2505.21221
• Title: Quantum algorithms for solving a drift-diffusion equation: A complexity analysis
• Authors: Ellen Devereux (University of Warwick & Fujitsu UK Ltd), Animesh Datta (University of Warwick)
• Classification: quant-ph
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21221

Abstract

This paper proposes four quantum algorithms for solving multidimensional drift-diffusion equations (DDEs), based respectively on quantum linear system solvers, quantum Hamiltonian simulation, quantum random walks, and quantum Fourier transforms. Through complexity analysis comparing these methods with classical counterparts, the authors demonstrate that the diagonalization method based on quantum Fourier transforms provides quantum computational advantage for solving linear partial differential equations at fixed final time. The paper employs multidimensional amplitude estimation procedures to extract complete probability distributions from quantum computers.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The drift-diffusion equation (DDE) is an important class of partial differential equations with the specific form:

$\frac{\partial p(x,t)}{\partial t} = \sum_{i=1}^d \left[a\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}[p(x,t)] + D\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_i^2}[p(x,t)]\right]$

where $x = \{x_1, ..., x_d\} \in \mathbb{R}^d$ is a $d$-dimensional vector, and $a$ and $D$ are positive drift and diffusion coefficients, respectively.

Research Significance

1. Theoretical Importance: The DDE, as a Fokker-Planck equation describing particle velocities, is closely related to Black-Scholes and Navier-Stokes equations
2. Practical Applications: Used in financial risk modeling, wind power generation forecasting, and other industrial decision-support applications
3. Computational Challenges: Traditional numerical methods require discretization of large complex problem domains, consuming substantial memory and computational resources

Limitations of Existing Methods

Classical PDE solution methods include:

• Linear equation solvers such as conjugate gradient methods
• Random walk methods
• Diagonalization methods based on fast Fourier transforms

These methods face the challenge of computational complexity growing exponentially with dimensionality when handling high-dimensional problems.

Core Contributions

1. Four Quantum Algorithms: Based respectively on quantum linear system solvers, quantum time evolution, quantum random walks, and quantum Fourier transforms
2. Complexity Theoretical Analysis: Provides detailed time complexity analysis demonstrating the conditions for quantum advantage
3. Multidimensional Amplitude Estimation Method: First application of multidimensional amplitude estimation to PDE solving, enabling extraction of complete probability distributions
4. Practical Validation: Verifies commercial application value through financial modeling examples

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Find an approximate solution $\tilde{\tilde{p}}(x,t)$ to the DDE such that at time $t=T$: $||\tilde{\tilde{p}}(x,t) - p(x,t)||_\infty \leq \epsilon$ where $\epsilon \in (0,1)$ is a specified error tolerance and $x \in [-L,L]^d$.

Discretization Strategy

Employs forward-time, center-space finite difference scheme:

• Spatial step size: $\Delta x = 2L/n_x$
• Temporal step size: $\Delta t = T/n_t$
• Stability condition: $\Delta t \leq \Delta x^2/(2dD)$

Four Quantum Algorithms

1. Quantum Linear System Solver

• Basic Approach: Transforms the discretized PDE into a linear system $A\tilde{p} = b$
• Time Complexity: $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{d^5T^2\zeta(aL+D)^2}{\epsilon_q\epsilon_c}\right)$
• Applicability Conditions: Requires bounded condition number ($\kappa_L = 5$ when $D\Delta t/\Delta x^2 \leq 1/5$ and $a/D < 2\sqrt{10}$)

2. Quantum Time Evolution

• Basic Approach: Implements time evolution using Hamiltonian simulation and linear combinations of unitary operators
• Time Complexity: $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{d^{d/2+3}T^{d/2+2}\zeta^{d/4+1}L^2(aL+D)^{d/2}}{\epsilon_q\epsilon_c^{d/4+2}}\right)$
• Characteristics: Directly simulates quantum time evolution process

3. Quantum Random Walk

• Basic Approach: Exploits the stochastic nature of DDEs through quantum random walk simulation
• Time Complexity: $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{d^{(d+7)/2}T^{d/2+1}\zeta^{d/4+1/2}(aL+D)^{d/2+1}}{\epsilon_q\epsilon_c^{d/4+1/2}}\right)$
• Advantages: Extensible to nonlinear stochastic PDEs

4. Quantum Fourier Transform Diagonalization (Optimal Method)

• Basic Approach: Utilizes QFT to diagonalize circulant matrices, directly computing $L^{n_t}$
• Time Complexity: $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{d^{(d/2+2)}T^{d/2}\zeta^{d/4}(aL+D)^{d/2}}{\epsilon_q\epsilon_c^{d/4}}\right)$
• Key Advantages: Simultaneously applies all eigenvalues in quantum superposition

Multidimensional Amplitude Estimation

Innovatively extends single-dimensional amplitude estimation to multidimensional cases:

1. Identifies coordinates with probability ≥ $\epsilon_q$ through sampling
2. Constructs function $f(x) = \langle x,p \rangle$
3. Extracts probability distribution using phase estimation
4. Complexity: $O\left(\frac{\log(n_x^d/\delta)\log(1/\epsilon_q)}{\epsilon_q}\right)$

Experimental Setup

Parameter Configuration

Based on Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes in financial modeling:

• $T = 5000$ days, $L = 10$ dollars
• $a = 0.2366$, $D = 0.2455$
• $d = 3$ dimensions, $\zeta = 1$ dollar$^{-4}$

Evaluation Metrics

• Time complexity comparison
• Space complexity analysis
• Quantum advantage conditions

Experimental Results

Main Findings

Quantum advantage condition: When $\epsilon_q \geq \tilde{O}\left(\frac{\epsilon_c^{d/4}d^D d^{d/2}}{\zeta^{d/4}L^d(aL+D)^{d/2}}\right)$, the quantum diagonalization method outperforms classical methods.

Complexity Comparison Table

Space Complexity

All quantum methods achieve space complexity of $\tilde{O}(d/\epsilon_q)$, primarily determined by quantum state encoding and measurement protocols.

Related Work

Quantum PDE Solution Methods

1. Hamiltonian Mapping Approach: Maps PDEs to Hamiltonians, solving via Schrödinger equation
2. Linear System Approach: Constructs linear systems after discretization for quantum solving
3. Variational Quantum Algorithms: Variational methods suitable for NISQ devices

Distinction from Existing Work

• First systematic comparison of four quantum methods for solving multidimensional DDEs
• Introduces multidimensional amplitude estimation for extracting complete probability distributions
• Provides rigorous complexity-theoretic analysis

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Quantum Fourier Transform Diagonalization is the most effective quantum method for solving DDEs at fixed time
2. Quantum Advantage Exists but requires satisfaction of specific parameter conditions
3. Multidimensional Amplitude Estimation successfully extends the application scope of quantum PDE solving

Limitations

1. Parameter Dependency: Quantum advantage strongly depends on problem parameters and error requirements
2. Applicable Scope: Some methods only apply within specific parameter ranges (e.g., quantum linear system method)
3. Implementation Complexity: Requires advanced quantum hardware such as quantum random access memory (QRAM)

Future Directions

1. Extension to PDEs with spatially varying parameters
2. Investigation of quantum solution methods for nonlinear PDEs
3. Optimization of practical implementation of quantum algorithms

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Provides complete complexity analysis and mathematical proofs
2. Methodological Comprehensiveness: Systematically compares four different quantum approaches
3. Practical Value: Validates commercial value through financial applications
4. Technical Innovation: First application of multidimensional amplitude estimation to PDE solving

Weaknesses

1. Stringent Quantum Advantage Conditions: Requires $\epsilon_q$ to satisfy specific conditions for quantum advantage
2. High Hardware Requirements: Demands fault-tolerant quantum computers and QRAM
3. Limited Applicability: Primarily applicable to linear PDEs with limited extension to nonlinear cases

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides important theoretical foundation for quantum PDE solving
2. Practical Prospects: Potential applications in financial modeling and scientific computing
3. Technical Advancement: Promotes development of quantum algorithms for PDE solving

Applicable Scenarios

• High-dimensional linear partial differential equation solving
• Financial risk modeling and option pricing
• Simulation of diffusion processes in scientific computing
• Applications requiring complete probability distribution information

References

This paper cites 43 relevant references, primarily covering:

• Quantum algorithm theoretical foundations
• Numerical methods for partial differential equations
• Quantum linear system solvers
• Quantum random walks and Fourier transforms
• Stochastic processes in financial modeling

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical quantum algorithm paper making important contributions to the field of quantum PDE solving. While practical applications still face hardware limitations, it establishes a solid theoretical foundation for future applications of quantum computing in scientific computing.