About how large are algebraic Betti numbers?

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2506.08133
• Title: About how large are algebraic Betti numbers?
• Author: Daniel Erman
• Classification: math.AC (Commutative Algebra), math.AG (Algebraic Geometry)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08133

Abstract

This paper provides magnitude bounds for algebraic Betti numbers using Boij-Söderberg theory. By analyzing the numerical properties of pure diagrams and combining Boij-Söderberg decomposition theory, the author establishes upper and lower bounds for algebraic Betti numbers.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

A fundamental question in algebraic geometry concerns estimating the magnitude of Betti numbers of algebraic varieties under highly positive embeddings. For instance, consider $\mathbb{P}^2 \subseteq \mathbb{P}^{5150}$ given by a degree 100 Veronese embedding; how many digits does the corresponding Betti number $\beta_{2000}(S/I)$ have?

Research Significance

1. Development of asymptotic syzygy theory: Ein and Lazarsfeld introduced the concept of "asymptotic syzygies" in 2012, studying syzygy properties of algebraic varieties under increasingly positive embeddings
2. Need for quantitative analysis: While qualitative asymptotic pictures (which Betti numbers are nonzero) have been largely completed, quantitative questions (how large are Betti numbers) remain open
3. Application of theoretical tools: Demonstrates the power of Boij-Söderberg theory in estimating algebraic invariants

Limitations of Existing Methods

• Results such as Green's $N_p$ theorem can only describe a small portion of the Betti diagram
• For highly positive embeddings, existing theory cannot provide precise estimates of Betti number magnitudes
• Lack of a unified framework for handling general cases

Core Contributions

1. Main theoretical results: Establishes upper and lower bounds for algebraic Betti numbers (Theorem 1.5)
2. Specific bounds for Veronese embeddings: Provides bounds for Betti numbers of $\mathbb{P}^n$ under $d$-fold Veronese embeddings (Theorem 1.1)
3. Results for general algebraic varieties: Extends to arbitrary algebraic varieties and very ample line bundles (Theorem 1.3)
4. Computational methods: Provides concrete techniques and examples for computing these bounds

Detailed Methodology

Problem Formulation

Given a graded $S = k[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$-module $M$, estimate the magnitude of its Betti numbers $\beta_i(M) = \dim_k \text{Tor}_i(M,k)$.

Core Theoretical Framework

Boij-Söderberg Theory

The Betti table of any graded module $M$ admits a unique decomposition as a positive rational linear combination of pure diagrams: $\beta(M) = \sum_{i=0}^s c_i \pi_{d_i}$ where $c_i \in \mathbb{Q}_{>0}$ and $\pi_{d_i}$ are pure diagrams.

Numerical Properties of Pure Diagrams

For a degree sequence $d = (d_0, d_1, \ldots, d_N)$, the Betti numbers of the pure diagram $\pi_d$ are given by: $\beta_{i,d_i}(\pi_d) = \frac{\prod_{j \neq 0} d_j}{\prod_{i' \neq i} |d_i - d_{i'}|}$

Key Lemma (Lemma 3.1)

For degree sequences $d$ satisfying certain conditions: $\binom{N}{i} \cdot N^{-r} \leq \beta_i(\pi_d) \leq \binom{N}{i} \cdot N^r$

Main Theorem

Theorem 1.5: For a graded $S$-module $M$: $\binom{\text{codim}M}{i}(\text{codim}M)^{-\text{reg}M} \leq \frac{\beta_i(M)}{\beta_0(M)} \leq \binom{\text{pdim}M}{i}(\text{pdim}M)^{\text{reg}M}$

Technical Innovations

1. Heuristic observation: When $\text{codim}(M) \gg \text{reg}(M)$, pure diagrams have far more columns than rows and behave approximately like Koszul complexes
2. Optimization techniques: Treat Betti number formulas as rational functions and use calculus techniques to find extrema
3. Logarithmic transformation tricks: Analyze monotonicity of $f(x)$ through monotonicity of $\log f(x)$, simplifying computations

Experimental Setup

Computational Examples

Example 1: High-degree Veronese Embedding

• Setup: 106-fold Veronese embedding of $\mathbb{P}^2$, $N \approx 5 \times 10^{11}$
• Goal: Estimate $\beta_{10^{11}}(\mathbb{P}^2; 106)$

Example 2: High-degree Hypersurface

• Setup: Degree 13 hypersurface $X$ in $\mathbb{P}^3$, line bundle $L = O_{\mathbb{P}^3}(1000)|_X$
• Goal: Estimate $\beta_{10^6}(X;L)$

Computational Techniques

Binomial Coefficient Estimation

Using integral approximation: $\int_b^a \log(x) dx \leq \log(a) + \cdots + \log(b+1) \leq \int_{b+1}^{a+1} \log(x) dx$

Specific Formula

$N \log(N) - (N-i)\log(N-i) - (i+1)\log(i+1) + 1 \leq \log\binom{N}{i}$

Experimental Results

Main Results

Veronese Embedding Example

For the 106-fold Veronese embedding of $\mathbb{P}^2$: $10^{108661150967} \leq \beta_{10^{11}}(\mathbb{P}^2; 106) \leq 10^{108661151026}$

• Precision: Approximately $10^{8661150996}$ digits, error $\pm 30$ digits

Hypersurface Example

For a degree 13 hypersurface in $\mathbb{P}^3$: $10^{1207666} \leq \beta_{10^6}(X;L) \leq 10^{1207714}$

• Precision: Approximately 1,207,690 digits, error $\pm 24$ digits

Effectiveness of Theoretical Bounds

Small Degree Case

For the 5-fold embedding of $\mathbb{P}^2$: $\frac{982}{9} \leq \beta_7(\mathbb{P}^2; 5) \leq 10310976$ Actual value $\beta_7(\mathbb{P}^2; 5) = 417690$; bounds are correct but not tight

High Degree Case

As $d$ increases, the binomial coefficient $\binom{N}{i}$ completely dominates the error term $N^{\pm n}$, making the bounds extremely precise.

Related Work

Asymptotic Syzygy Theory

1. Green's $N_p$ theorem: Smooth curves acquire more steps of linear syzygies under increasingly positive embeddings
2. Ein-Lazarsfeld extension: Generalizes results to higher-dimensional algebraic varieties
3. Qualitative results: Park, Raicu, and others have completed the qualitative asymptotic picture

Boij-Söderberg Theory

1. Original conjecture: Proposed by Boij and Söderberg in 2012
2. Proof: Completed by Eisenbud, Schreyer, and others
3. Applications: This paper demonstrates new applications of the theory to magnitude estimation

Related Bound Results

1. Buchsbaum-Eisenbud-Horrocks conjecture: The lower bounds in this paper are weaker than this conjecture
2. Eisenbud's Hilbert function bounds: Related to but not directly comparable with the results here

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Magnitude estimation: Provides the first precise magnitude bounds for algebraic Betti numbers
2. Computational feasibility: Offers effective methods for computing these bounds in practice
3. Theoretical unification: Combines Boij-Söderberg theory with numerical analysis

Limitations

1. Gap between bounds: The gap between upper and lower bounds can be substantial
2. Total Betti number restriction: Only addresses total Betti numbers, avoiding interactions between different rows
3. Technical requirements: Requires $\text{codim}(M) \gg \text{reg}(M)$ for good estimates

Future Directions

1. Individual Betti numbers: Extend to individual entries of the Betti table
2. Tighter bounds: Improve estimates of error terms
3. Probabilistic models: Combine with probabilistic analysis of random Betti numbers

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical innovation: Cleverly applies Boij-Söderberg theory to magnitude estimation
2. Computational practicality: Provides concrete, implementable computational methods and examples
3. Result precision: Achieves impressive precision estimates in highly positive embedding cases
4. Methodological unity: Provides a unified treatment framework for different types of algebraic varieties

Weaknesses

1. Scope of applicability: Methods are primarily effective when $\text{codim} \gg \text{reg}$
2. Coarse bounds: In some cases, the gap between upper and lower bounds is substantial
3. Technical limitations: Relies on specific numerical analysis techniques; simpler approaches may exist

Impact

1. Theoretical contribution: Demonstrates new applications of Boij-Söderberg theory
2. Computational value: Provides tools for computing large algebraic invariants in practice
3. Methodological significance: Successful example of combining pure mathematics with numerical computation

Applicable Scenarios

1. Highly positive embeddings: Particularly effective for Veronese embeddings and similar highly positive cases
2. Asymptotic analysis: Highly useful in studying asymptotic properties of algebraic varieties
3. Computational algebraic geometry: Provides theoretical guidance for computational algebraic geometry

References

Main references include:

• BS12 Boij-Söderberg foundational work on Betti numbers of graded modules
• ES09 Eisenbud-Schreyer proof of Boij-Söderberg theory
• EL12,EL18 Ein-Lazarsfeld pioneering work on asymptotic syzygies
• Erm10 Author's previous work on the Buchsbaum-Eisenbud-Horrocks conjecture

Summary: This is an important theoretical work at the intersection of algebraic geometry and commutative algebra. It successfully transforms abstract Boij-Söderberg theory into concrete numerical estimation tools, providing new perspectives and methods for understanding the asymptotic behavior of algebraic Betti numbers.