This paper establishes novel discrete functional inequalities on the hypercube through the induction-by-restrictions method. This approach reduces high-dimensional inequalities to explicit low-dimensional analytical verification and has recently proven effective for many discrete functional inequalities. Within this framework, the paper establishes two main results: First, it proves a sharp p-biased edge isoperimetric inequality for real-valued increasing functions, which recovers the classical biased edge isoperimetric inequality for increasing sets and identifies increasing subcubes as extremizers. This result also admits a probabilistic interpretation regarding the maximization of mean first exit times for biased random walks. Second, it provides an inductive proof of the Poincaré inequality on increasing subsets of the cube recently established by Fei and Ferreira Pinto Jr., yielding an O(n²) upper bound on the mixing time of censored random walks, improving previous bounds.
Functional inequalities on the discrete cube (such as Poincaré inequalities, log-Sobolev inequalities, and edge isoperimetric inequalities) constitute the core of modern discrete analysis. These inequalities connect Boolean function analysis, discrete isoperimetric problems, and spectral theory of Markov chains, providing powerful tools for studying measure concentration, threshold phenomena, and mixing times of random walks.
On the classical uniform product setting {0,1}^n, these inequalities are well understood: sharp constants are known, and elegant proofs emerge through tensorization, semigroup methods, or discrete Fourier analysis. However, once departing from the product setting—by restricting to structured subsets or working under biased measures—classical methods often fail or lose sharpness.
Inequalities under biased measures: On the uniform cube, the log-Sobolev inequality is tight for general real-valued functions, but when specialized to indicator functions, it only recovers a suboptimal multiplicative constant for the edge isoperimetric bound (off by a factor of 1/ln 2).
Censored random walks: When censoring simple random walks on {0,1}^n to a subset A, the chain now lives in a non-product space whose geometry is determined by the boundary of A. Standard product-based tools (tensorization, Fourier decomposition) no longer apply cleanly.
The paper aims to establish new discrete functional inequalities adapted to non-product environments through the induction-by-restrictions method, with particular focus on:
Establishing Samorodnitsky-type functional inequalities on the p-biased cube
Providing simpler proof methods for mixing time problems of censored random walks
p-biased edge isoperimetric inequality: Establishes a sharp p-biased edge isoperimetric inequality for real-valued increasing functions, recovers the sharp p-biased isoperimetric inequality for increasing sets, and provides a probabilistic interpretation regarding mean first exit times of biased random walks.
Poincaré inequality on increasing sets: Provides a simpler inductive proof of the Poincaré inequality on increasing sets recently established by Fei and Ferreira Pinto Jr., yielding an O(n²) upper bound on the mixing time of censored random walks.
Methodological contribution: Demonstrates the effectiveness of the induction-by-restrictions method in non-product environments, systematically reducing high-dimensional functional inequalities to finite-dimensional verification.
Theoretical insights: Identifies increasing subcubes as extremizers for multiple optimization problems, establishing new connections between functional inequalities and random walk theory.
Step 1: Function Decomposition
Decompose function g as:
g₀(x') := g(x',0)
g₁(x') := g(x',1)
where x' denotes the first n-1 coordinates.
Step 2: Dirichlet Form Decomposition
Using Lemma 2.3:
Epn(g,g)=pEpn−1(g1,g1)+(1−p)Epn−1(g0,g0)+∥g1−g0∥2,μp2
Step 3: Application of Inductive Hypothesis
Apply the inductive hypothesis on dimension n-1:
pEpn−1(g1,g1)≥a1Ep[g1]2logpa1pEpn−1(g0,g0)≥a0Ep[g0]2logpa0
Step 4: Two-Point Inequality Verification
The key is to verify the following two-point inequality:
pf(a1)+(1−p)f(a0)+(1−p)a1f(a0)f(a1)≥((1−p)a1f(a0)+(1−p)2a1f(a1)+1)f(pa1+(1−p)a0)
Simplified inductive framework: Compared to the complex directed heat flow method of Fei and Ferreira Pinto Jr., this paper provides a concise inductive proof
Five-point inequality: Reduces the high-dimensional problem to a verifiable five-point inequality
Constant optimization: Although the constant changes from 1 to 2, the method is more direct and easier to understand
Theorem 1.4 (p-biased edge isoperimetric inequality):
For increasing function g and 0 < p < 1:
p⋅Ep(g,g)≥μp(A)Ep[∣g∣]2logpμp(A)
Equality holds if and only if g is the indicator function of an increasing subcube.
Theorem 1.8 (Poincaré inequality on increasing sets):
For increasing set A:
VarA[f]≤1−1−μ(A)2⋅EA(f)
Corollary 1.9 (Mixing time bound):
The mixing time of censored random walks satisfies:
tmix≤μ(A)2n⋅log(4⋅2nμ(A))
Corollary 1.5: Increasing subcubes maximize the mean first exit time of p-biased random walks among increasing sets of the same cardinality:
E[Y]≤logp(μp(A))n
This paper simplifies existing proofs through a unified inductive framework and extends results to the p-biased setting, providing new methodological approaches for functional inequalities in non-product spaces.
Methodological innovation: Successfully applies the induction-by-restrictions method to non-product settings, demonstrating the broad applicability of this approach
Technical depth: Verification of two-point and five-point inequalities involves sophisticated analytical techniques, demonstrating strong mathematical foundations
Result completeness: Not only proves inequalities but also characterizes conditions for equality and provides probabilistic interpretations
Clear exposition: The paper is well-structured with sufficient technical details, making it accessible and verifiable
The paper cites 33 relevant references spanning discrete analysis, probability theory, combinatorics, and other fields, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.